{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:34:56Z","timestamp":1792787696726,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,8]],"date-time":"2022-09-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662595200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Novetech Surgery"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of our study was to describe a biomechanical testing protocol to reproduce ex vivo craniodorsal hip luxation specific to the feline model, and evaluate the biomechanical properties of an intact hip joint compared with the fixation strength of two different techniques of extra-articular hip stabilisation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eighteen hip joints (femur and hemipelvis) were harvested from nine mature feline cadavers. CT was performed for each hip joint so that a biomechanical base specific to each joint morphotype could be created using computer-aided design. The biomechanical bases were then produced using a three-dimensional printer to secure the hip joints during testing. A total of 34 biomechanical compression tests were performed. Eighteen compression tests were performed in the control group, of which two fractured. The remaining 16 hip joints were then randomly assigned either to group A (hip joints stabilised with an extra-articular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) implant secured by an interference screw [n\u2009=\u20098]) or to group B (hip joints stabilised with a UHMWPE iliofemoral suture [n\u2009=\u20098]).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mean\u2009\u00b1\u2009SD yield, failure load and linear stiffness in the control group were 616\u2009\u00b1\u2009168\u2009N, 666\u2009\u00b1\u2009158\u2009N and 231\u2009\u00b1\u200950\u2009N\/mm, respectively. The relative fixation strength (% of intact joint) before hip luxation in groups A and B was 43.8% and 34.7%, respectively. No statistical difference was found between groups A and B for yield and failure load. However, the reoccurrence of craniodorsal hip luxation was higher in group B than in group A, in 5\/8 and 0\/8 tests, respectively. Moreover, in group A, the extra-articular UHMWPE implant induced caudodorsal hip luxation, reported as failure mode in 7\/8 cases.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions and relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This modified biomechanical protocol for testing craniodorsal hip luxation in a feline model was validated as repeatable and with acceptable variance. The extra-articular UHMWPE implant stabilisation technique proved to be more efficient in avoiding reoccurrence of craniodorsal hip luxation than UHMWPE iliofemoral suture.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/1098612x221114851","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,8]],"date-time":"2022-09-08T14:17:15Z","timestamp":1662646635000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Validation of a biomechanical testing protocol of craniodorsal hip luxation in feline cadavers and comparison of two ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene materials used for extra-articular hip stabilisation"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Julien","family":"Letesson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Lameilh\u00e9 Veterinary Clinic, Castres, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4127-0317","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bastien","family":"Goin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Interactions Cellules Environnement (ICE), Marcy l\u2019Etoile, France"},{"name":"Novetech Surgery, Monaco"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Viguier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Interactions Cellules Environnement (ICE), Marcy l\u2019Etoile, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thibaut","family":"Cachon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Lyon, VetAgro Sup, Interactions Cellules Environnement (ICE), Marcy l\u2019Etoile, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.1974.tb05648.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.1986.tb00243.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.13595"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.1993.tb02708.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.2012.01199.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","first-page":"407","article-title":"Coxofemoral luxations in dogs.","volume":"61","author":"Bottarelli A","year":"1938","unstructured":"Bottarelli A. Coxofemoral luxations in dogs. Clin Vet 1938; 61: 407.","journal-title":"Clin Vet"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.1987.tb00965.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1637714"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3415\/VCOT-10-12-0168"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.1983.tb00367.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/javma.1980.177.10.1018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.1992.tb01157.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5326\/0420121"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.1994.tb00490.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/javma.229.6.984"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3415\/VCOT-11-02-0019"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2014.12158.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5326\/JAAHA-MS-6937"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vsu.13498"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-5827.2008.00625.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.1984.tb00807.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/ajvr.2001.62.721"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jvet.2001.25875"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1632925"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_2","article-title":"Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with Hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study.","volume":"28","author":"Patrick S","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patrick S, Birur NP, Gurushanth K, et al. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with Hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2017; 28. DOI: 10.4103\/ijdr.IJDR_415_16.","journal-title":"Indian J Dent Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2017.10.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_2","volume-title":"Handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture treatment","author":"Brinker WO","year":"1983","unstructured":"Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL, et al. Handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture treatment. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1983."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_2","volume-title":"Mechanisms of disease in small animal surgery","author":"Bojrab MJ","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bojrab MJ, Monnet E. Mechanisms of disease in small animal surgery. Jackson, WY: Teton NewMedia, 2010."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v17.i1.20"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2460\/ajvr.1981.42.04.563"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_2","first-page":"569","article-title":"Suture reaction following extra-articular stifle stabilization in the dog \u2013 part I: a retrospective study of 161 stifles.","volume":"4","author":"Dulisch ML","year":"1981","unstructured":"Dulisch ML. Suture reaction following extra-articular stifle stabilization in the dog \u2013 part I: a retrospective study of 161 stifles. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 4: 569\u2013571.","journal-title":"J Am Anim Hosp Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.02.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1655765"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02670836.2018.1469455"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2020.1812157"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2020.1713496"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2020.1713499"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2020.1812846"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_2","first-page":"127","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of two femoral fixation methods for synthetic cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in canine cadavers.","volume":"24","author":"Bastien G","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bastien G, Victor M, Philippe B, et al. Biomechanical comparison of two femoral fixation methods for synthetic cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in canine cadavers. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2021; 24: 127\u2013128.","journal-title":"Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2013.12076.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-013-2711-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.09.010"}],"container-title":["Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1098612X221114851","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1098612X221114851","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1098612X221114851","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T13:19:46Z","timestamp":1792588786000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1098612X221114851"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,8]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1098612X221114851"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1098612x221114851","relation":{},"ISSN":["1098-612X","1532-2750"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1098-612X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-2750","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,8]]}}}