{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T20:01:48Z","timestamp":1777579308579,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]],"date-time":"2007-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1177977600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the usefulness of intracameral lidocaine in cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and especially if the patient wanted intravenous sedation preoperatively.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prospective study 96 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 cc of balanced salt solution (Group 1) or 1% unpreserved lidocaine (Group 2). Patients who wanted sedation received intravenous midazolam hydrochloride. All surgery was done by one surgeon using a clear corneal technique.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mean pain scores were 0.73 (of a maximum 3) in Group 1 and 0.54 in Group 2; the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Forty patients in Group 1 (83%) and 44 patients in Group 2 (92%) reported no discomfort or only mild discomfort. The two study groups were comparable in need for intravenous midazolam. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between pain scores and intravenous sedation (p=0.02) but not with intracameral lidocaine or other tested variables. However, odds ratio for pain increased to 5.1 (95% CI; 1.29\u201320.41) in participants without intravenous sedation compared to those with sedation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results of the present study suggest that intravenous sedation preoperatively seems to be an important determinant to relieve the sensation of discomfort\/pain during small incision cataract surgery, but intracameral lidocaine was shown not to have a clinically useful role.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210701700309","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,24]],"date-time":"2018-01-24T11:15:09Z","timestamp":1516792509000},"page":"332-335","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Is Intracameral Lidocaine Really Effective in Cataract Surgery?"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"J.O.","family":"V\u00e4lim\u00e4ki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Lahti, Lahti, Finland and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tampere, Tampere - Finland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(97)80211-8"},{"key":"bibr2-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(98)91116-2"},{"key":"bibr3-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(99)90394-9"},{"key":"bibr4-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(99)90501-8"},{"key":"bibr5-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(98)80350-7"},{"key":"bibr6-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00557-1"},{"key":"bibr7-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003226-200005000-00002"},{"key":"bibr8-112067210701700309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(98)80232-0"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/112067210701700309","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/112067210701700309","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T19:37:12Z","timestamp":1777405032000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/112067210701700309"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/112067210701700309"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/112067210701700309","relation":{},"ISSN":["1120-6721","1724-6016"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1120-6721","type":"print"},{"value":"1724-6016","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]}}}