{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T02:12:01Z","timestamp":1787019121907,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]],"date-time":"2025-06-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751241600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the modified Yamane (MY) technique with the modified double-flange (MDF) technique in the management of subluxated single-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective study was conducted on 29 eyes (group MY:17 eyes, group MDF:12 eyes). In both techniques, the subluxated IOLs were moved to the anterior chamber, and anterior vitrectomy was performed. In group MY, the IOL was extracted using an approach similar to the \u201ctwist-and-out\u201d technique without enlarging the main incision.The surgery was performed by creating a scleral tunnel 2.5\u2005mm posterior to the limbus using a 26-gauge injector.In group MDF,a 6.0 polypropylene suture was passed through the widest part of the haptic near the optical portion using a 27-gauge injector guide. Visual, refractive results and complications of the two groups were compared.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Both groups exhibited significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity.No differences were observed between the groups in terms of spherical refraction, spherical equivalent, surgical time, or intraocular pressure values (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&gt;\u20090.05 for all). Cylindrical refraction was \u22121.21\u2009\u00b1\u20090.14 D in group MY and \u22121.76\u2009\u00b1\u20090.25 D in group MDF(\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.03).The pseudophacodonesis score was 0.45\u2009\u00b1\u20090.15 in group MY compared to 1.21\u2009\u00b1\u20090.55 in group MDF (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001).Central macular thickness was similar between the two groups preoperatively, while at 6 months postoperatively, it measured 251\u2009\u00b1\u200915\u2005\u03bcm in group MY and 274\u2009\u00b1\u200918\u2005\u03bcm in group MDF (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.19 and\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.01).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare the MY and MDF techniques for subluxated IOLs. Both techniques showed similar efficacy and safety. However, group MY demonstrated better and more stable IOL centration.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/11206721251353661","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]],"date-time":"2025-06-30T05:32:57Z","timestamp":1751261577000},"page":"2010-2016","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Results of two different techniques for subluxated one-piece intraocular lenses: Modified Yamane technique versus modified double-flange technique"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6939-8585","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mehmet","family":"Icoz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Yozgat City Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ey\u00fcp","family":"Erkan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Yozgat Bozok University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.05.015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfo.2020.01.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.06.053"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.03.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000260"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000046"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.03.036"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001154"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S276226"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-024-00962-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/11206721231167198"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-023-02907-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/23258160-20181002-15"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_620_17"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S101515"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.10.029"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0000000000000287"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0000000000001941"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000161"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000349"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/11206721251353661","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/11206721251353661","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/11206721251353661","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T08:54:53Z","timestamp":1784019293000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/11206721251353661"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/11206721251353661"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/11206721251353661","relation":{},"ISSN":["1120-6721","1724-6016"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1120-6721","type":"print"},{"value":"1724-6016","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,30]]}}}