{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T14:51:32Z","timestamp":1792075892426,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]],"date-time":"2020-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1591142400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009102","name":"Education Department of Jiangxi Province","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["GJJ160036, GJJ180007 and GJJ180031"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GJJ160036, GJJ180007 and GJJ180031"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009102","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Scand J Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in order to determine the optimal tract size for patients with renal stones.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic search of Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases was conducted for articles published through 20 August 2019, reporting on a comparison of the standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 763 studies, 14 were considered for the evidence synthesis. A total of 1980 cases were included. Of these patients, 897 cases underwent standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and 1083 cases underwent mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone-free rates were 87.6% (786 of 897 patients) for standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 87.8% (951 of 1083 patients) for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( p\u2009=\u20090.57). Tract sizes of 30F and 22\u201326F in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group shorten operation time compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( p\u2009=\u20090.02; p\u2009=\u20090.004; respectively). Leakage ( p\u2009=\u20090.04), bleeding ( p\u2009=\u20090.01), blood transfusion ( p\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001), and renal pelvis perforation ( p\u2009=\u20090.02) were more common in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group than in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Subgroup analysis showed only blood transfusion for 30F and 22\u201326F standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy group was more common than mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( p\u2009&lt;\u20090.0001, p\u2009=\u20090.005, respectively).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with higher leakage, bleeding, blood transfusion, and renal pelvis perforation, but had a shorter operation time. Tract size of 30F improved the stone-free rate compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but led to more complications. Tract size of 22\u201326F was no better than 30F or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496920920474","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]],"date-time":"2020-06-03T07:55:42Z","timestamp":1591170942000},"page":"301-311","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"110","author":[{"given":"Jun","family":"Deng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jin","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Longwang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanyan","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liangliang","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5136-2958","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jieping","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Renrui","family":"Kuang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2017.01.046"},{"key":"bibr2-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-015-0808-y"},{"key":"bibr3-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-013-1204-2"},{"key":"bibr4-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-010-0308-z"},{"key":"bibr5-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09936.x"},{"key":"bibr6-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2010.0111"},{"key":"bibr7-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2009.06.006"},{"key":"bibr8-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.0581"},{"key":"bibr9-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2006.07.047"},{"key":"bibr10-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-018-1061-y"},{"key":"bibr11-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-018-1055-9"},{"key":"bibr12-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-017-2128-z"},{"key":"bibr13-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.kjms.2016.10.012"},{"key":"bibr14-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-017-0966-1"},{"key":"bibr15-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-016-0890-9"},{"key":"bibr16-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aju.2017.10.003"},{"key":"bibr17-1457496920920474","unstructured":"Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al: Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine\u2014levels of evidence (March 2009). Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, http:\/\/www.cebm.net\/index.aspx?o=1025 (accessed 26 January 2020)."},{"key":"bibr18-1457496920920474","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, et al: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, http:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford.asp (accessed 26 January 2020)."},{"key":"bibr19-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0197-2456(99)00026-4"},{"key":"bibr20-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/gepi.20048"},{"key":"bibr21-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198702193160806"},{"key":"bibr22-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629"},{"key":"bibr23-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2533446"},{"key":"bibr24-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-017-1029-3"},{"key":"bibr25-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000613"},{"key":"bibr26-1457496920920474","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2379-3"}],"container-title":["Scandinavian Journal of Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1457496920920474","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1457496920920474","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1457496920920474","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T04:58:13Z","timestamp":1777697893000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1457496920920474"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1457496920920474"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1457496920920474","relation":{},"ISSN":["1457-4969","1799-7267"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1457-4969","type":"print"},{"value":"1799-7267","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,3]]}}}