{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T17:24:08Z","timestamp":1788197048699,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,25]],"date-time":"2007-09-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1190678400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Promotion Practice"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The evidence concerning Maryland's anti-drunk driving program, Checkpoint Strikeforce, is reviewed. To date, there is no evidence to indicate that this campaign, which involves a number of sobriety checkpoints and media activities to promote these efforts, has had any impact on public perceptions, driver behaviors, or alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes and injuries. This conclusion is drawn after examining statistics for alcohol-related crashes, police citations for impaired driving, and public perceptions of alcohol-impaired driving risk. Comparisons are also made with other states in the mid-Atlantic region, where similar campaign activities have occurred. Reasons for this failure in Maryland include insufficient levels of enforcement (e.g., too few sobriety checkpoints and vehicle contacts occurred to raise public perceptions of risk pertaining to impaired driving) and inadequate publicity surrounding this campaign. Suggestions for overcoming these problems are offered.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1524839906298520","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,25]],"date-time":"2007-09-25T22:43:49Z","timestamp":1190760229000},"page":"370-377","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Lessons Learned From Evaluating Maryland's Anti-Drunk Driving Campaign: Assessing the Evidence for Cognitive, Behavioral, and Public Health Impact"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Kenneth H.","family":"Beck","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"atypb1","first-page":"101","volume":"5","author":"Beck, K.H.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Traffic Injury Prevention"},{"key":"atypb2","first-page":"268","volume":"30","author":"Beck, K.H.","year":"2006","journal-title":"American Journal of Health Behavior"},{"key":"atypb3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2004.03.002"},{"key":"atypb4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15389580214623"},{"key":"atypb5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0001-4575(02)00097-0"},{"key":"atypb6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15389580490465247"},{"key":"atypb7","volume-title":"Evaluation of Checkpoint Tennessee: Tennessee's statewide sobriety checkpoint program (Report DOT HS 808 841 for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)","author":"Lacey, J.H.","year":"1999"},{"key":"atypb8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/her\/5.2.247"},{"key":"atypb9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.79.3.291"},{"key":"atypb10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0001-4575(85)90042-9"},{"key":"atypb11","volume-title":"Rating the states 2002-Report card","author":"Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).","year":"2006"},{"key":"atypb12","volume-title":"Sobriety checkpoints for DWI enforcement-A review of current research","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.","year":"1987"},{"key":"atypb13","volume-title":"The use of sobriety checkpoints for impaired driving enforcement (Report DOT HS 807 656 for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.","year":"1990"},{"key":"atypb14","volume-title":"Fatality analysis reporting system","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.","year":"2006"},{"key":"atypb15","volume-title":"Checkpoint Strikeforce","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration-Mid Atlantic Region.","year":"2006"},{"key":"atypb16","volume-title":"Saturation patrols and sobriety checkpoints: Sobriety checkpoint state case law summary","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.","year":"2006"},{"key":"atypb17","volume-title":"Traffic safety facts: 2004 data. NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis (DOT HS 809 905)","author":"National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.","year":"2006"},{"key":"atypb18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsr.2006.01.001"}],"container-title":["Health Promotion Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1524839906298520","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1524839906298520","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T08:21:24Z","timestamp":1777450884000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1524839906298520"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,25]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1524839906298520"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1524839906298520","relation":{},"ISSN":["1524-8399","1552-6372"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1524-8399","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-6372","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,25]]}}}