{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T23:21:18Z","timestamp":1777677678343,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]],"date-time":"2022-11-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669161600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Health Promotion Practice"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In 2020, California passed a flavored tobacco sales restriction (FTSR), but the tobacco companies filed a referendum, and the ban will not be implemented unless approved by voters in November 2022. This study examined the percentage of the California population covered by a city FTSR and identified groups more likely to be covered. Mean demographics as well as tobacco use and control measures were compared for California cities with ( n = 93) and without ( n = 389) a FTSR, and t tests were used to examine the differences. We calculated adjusted odds ratios using logistic regression models. City FTSR policies covered 20.7% of the California population. Adjusted predictors of having a FTSR included the American Lung Association tobacco control score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.17, 1.38]), voting democratic (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.10]). and having a lower adult smoking prevalence (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: [0.72, 0.99]). A state-level policy would cover all populations in California.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/15248399221136861","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]],"date-time":"2022-11-23T04:10:47Z","timestamp":1669176647000},"page":"455-459","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Demographics, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control Measures of California Cities With Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"25","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3448-5811","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Melanie S.","family":"Dove","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shichen","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sheila","family":"Pakdaman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Chen-Sankey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, USA"},{"name":"Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-15248399221136861","unstructured":"American Lung Association. (2018). Local grading methodology. https:\/\/www.lung.org\/getmedia\/1f5cf8e7-43ee-44a9-9dad-ccf6b565f0c6\/2018-sotc-local-grading.pdf.pdf"},{"key":"bibr2-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.abrep.2019.100227"},{"key":"bibr3-15248399221136861","author":"California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program","year":"2021","journal-title":"California tobacco facts and figures"},{"key":"bibr4-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17265\/2159-5313\/2016.09.003"},{"key":"bibr5-15248399221136861","unstructured":"California Tobacco Health Assessment Tool. (2020). California Tobacco Health Assessment Tool (CTHAT) was developed by the Stanford Prevention Research Center and GreenInfo Network, with funding from the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program grant #22RT-0142, PI: Lisa Henriksen, PhD. https:\/\/cthat.org"},{"key":"bibr6-15248399221136861","unstructured":"Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2021). States and localities that have restricted the sale of flavored tobacco products. https:\/\/www.tobaccofreekids.org\/assets\/factsheets\/0398.pdf"},{"key":"bibr7-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/tobaccocontrol-2021-057042"},{"key":"bibr8-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gentzke A. S., Wang T. W., Cornelius M., Park-Lee E., Ren C., Sawdey M. D., Cullen K. A., Loretan C., Jamal A., Homa D. M. (2022). Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students\u2014National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 71(5), 1\u201329. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/mmwr\/volumes\/71\/ss\/pdfs\/ss7105a1-H.pdf","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.ss7105a1"},{"key":"bibr9-15248399221136861","unstructured":"Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community. (2016). HSHC Retail Survey Results 2020 \u2013 All Counties. https:\/\/healthystoreshealthycommunity.com\/media-center\/"},{"key":"bibr10-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5888\/pcd13.160151"},{"key":"bibr11-15248399221136861","unstructured":"Public Health Law Center. (2020, September). California\u2019s Flavored Tobacco Ban (SB793). https:\/\/www.publichealthlawcenter.org\/sites\/default\/files\/resources\/CA-Flavor-Tobacco-Ban-SB793.pdf"},{"key":"bibr12-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ntr\/ntab188"},{"key":"bibr13-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1524839919879928"},{"key":"bibr14-15248399221136861","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18001\/TRS.1.1.5"},{"key":"bibr15-15248399221136861","unstructured":"Truth Initiative. (2021). Truth Initiative Flavored tobacco policy restrictions as of June 30, 2021. https:\/\/truthinitiative.org\/sites\/default\/files\/media\/files\/2021\/10\/Q2-2021-FINAL.pdf"},{"key":"bibr16-15248399221136861","unstructured":"U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 Census of population and housing, population and housing unit counts, CPH-2-1, United States Summary, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. https:\/\/www2.census.gov\/library\/publications\/decennial\/2010\/cph-2\/cph-2-1.pdf"}],"container-title":["Health Promotion Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15248399221136861","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/15248399221136861","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15248399221136861","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T08:25:03Z","timestamp":1777451103000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/15248399221136861"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/15248399221136861"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248399221136861","relation":{},"ISSN":["1524-8399","1552-6372"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1524-8399","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-6372","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]}}}