{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T02:14:36Z","timestamp":1787019276504,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,10]],"date-time":"2020-07-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1594339200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Internet-Connected Assistive Devices (iCAD), like accessible smartphones, tablets, computers, and apps, have become an integral part of everyday functioning for people with disabilities (PWD). The objective of this article was to identify self-report assessments having the relevance and clinical applicability for assessing satisfaction with performing Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) for PWD using iCAD. An exploratory review was conducted to identify self-report assessments that were appropriate, practical, clinically fit, and psychometrically acceptable, for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD. Thirty-two IADL assessments were identified, of which six met inclusion criteria. Four of six assessments did not specifically address iCAD usage, while two assessments had limited relevance and clinical applicability, for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD. This review establishes the growing need for a self-report IADL assessment that has been specifically designed and validated for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1539449220940001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,10]],"date-time":"2020-07-10T05:13:57Z","timestamp":1594358037000},"page":"24-31","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Exploratory Review: Self-Report IADL Assessments in the age of Internet-Connected Assistive Devices"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6572-3929","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Abbas H.","family":"Quamar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Arkansas at Little Rock, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark R.","family":"Schmeler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diane M.","family":"Collins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard M.","family":"Schein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (3rd ed.). AOTA Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5014\/ajot.2014.682006","DOI":"10.5014\/ajot.2014.682006"},{"key":"bibr2-1539449220940001","unstructured":"Anderson M., Perrin A. (2017). Disabled Americans less likely to use technology. Pew Research Center. TechTank. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/fact-tank\/2017\/04\/07\/disabled-americans-are-less-likely-to-use-technology\/"},{"key":"bibr3-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andreson E. M., Fried-Oken M., Bettes-Peters M. A., Patrick D. L. (2016). Initial constructs for patient-centered outcome measures to evaluate brain-computer interfaces. Disabil Rehabil Asst Techno, 11(7), 548\u2013557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17483107.2015.1027298.","DOI":"10.3109\/17483107.2015.1027298"},{"key":"bibr4-1539449220940001","unstructured":"Coyne R. (2019). The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale. Try This: Best Practices in Nursing Care to Older Adults, 23. https:\/\/consultgeri.org\/try-this\/general-assessment\/issue-23.pdf"},{"key":"bibr5-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Craig C., Chadborn N., Sands G., Tuomainen H., Gladman J. (2015). Systematic review of EASY-Care needs assessment for community-dwelling older people. Age and Ageing, 44(4), 559\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ageing\/afv050","DOI":"10.1093\/ageing\/afv050"},{"key":"bibr6-1539449220940001","unstructured":"Day H. I., Jutai J. (2003). PIADS: The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale Manual (Version 4.2b ed.). http:\/\/piads.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/PIADS_MANUAL__03b_2.pdf"},{"key":"bibr7-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Demers L., Monette M., Lapierre Y., Arnold D. L., Wolfson C. (2002). Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1\u20133), 21\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638280110066352","DOI":"10.1080\/09638280110066352"},{"key":"bibr8-1539449220940001","volume-title":"Scale development: Theory and applications","author":"DeVellis R. F.","year":"2012","edition":"3"},{"key":"bibr9-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Donnelly C., Carswell A. (2002). Individualized assessment tools: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 84\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/000841740206900204","DOI":"10.1177\/000841740206900204"},{"key":"bibr10-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferris S. H., Aisen P. S., Cummings J., Galasko D., Salmon D. P., Schneider L., Sano M., Whitehouse P. J., Edland S., Thal L. J. (2006). ADCS prevention instrument project: Overview and initial results. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 20(4 Suppl. 3), S109\u2013S123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.wad.0000213870.40300.21","DOI":"10.1097\/01.wad.0000213870.40300.21"},{"key":"bibr11-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fillenbaum G. G. (1985). Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 33(10), 698\u2013706. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1985.tb01779.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1985.tb01779.x"},{"key":"bibr12-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fillenbaum G. G., Smyer M. A. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36(4), 428\u2013434. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/geronj\/36.4.428","DOI":"10.1093\/geronj\/36.4.428"},{"key":"bibr13-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galasko D., Bennett D. A., Sano M., Marson D., Kaye J., Edland S. D. (2006). ADCS prevention instrument project: Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living for community-dwelling elderly individuals in dementia prevention clinical trials. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 20(4 Suppl. 3), S152\u2013S169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.wad.0000213873.25053.2b","DOI":"10.1097\/01.wad.0000213873.25053.2b"},{"key":"bibr14-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jekel K., Damian M., Wattmo C., Hausner L., Bullock R., Connelly P. J., Dubois B., Eriksdotter M., Ewers M., Graessel E., Frolich L. (2015). Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: A systematic review. Alzheimer\u2019s Research & Therapy, 7(1), 17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13195-015-0099-0","DOI":"10.1186\/s13195-015-0099-0"},{"key":"bibr15-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar A., Schmeler M. R., Karmarkar A. M., Collins D. M., Cooper R., Cooper R. A., Shin H., Holm M. B. (2013). Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(3), 213\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17483107.2012.688240","DOI":"10.3109\/17483107.2012.688240"},{"key":"bibr16-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawton M. P., Brody E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3), 179\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/org\/10.1093\/geront\/9.3_Part_1.179","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/9.3_Part_1.179"},{"key":"bibr17-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lenker J. A., Shoemaker L. L., Fuhrer M. J., Jutai J. W., Demers L., Tan C. H., Deruyter F. (2012). Classification of assistive technology services: Implications for outcomes research. Technology and Disability, 24(1), 59\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/TAD-2012-0334","DOI":"10.3233\/TAD-2012-0334"},{"key":"bibr18-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindbergh C. A., Dishman R. K., Miller L. S. (2016). Functional disability in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Review, 26(2), 129\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11065-016-9321-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11065-016-9321-5"},{"key":"bibr19-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin J. K., Martin L. G., Stumbo N. J., Morrill J. H. (2011). The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(3), 225\u2013242. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17483107.2010.522685","DOI":"10.3109\/17483107.2010.522685"},{"key":"bibr20-1539449220940001","unstructured":"National Institute of Health. (2019). Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS\u00ae). https:\/\/commonfund.nih.gov\/promis\/index"},{"key":"bibr21-1539449220940001","unstructured":"Psychological Testing. (2020). What makes a good test? http:\/\/psychologicaltesting.com\/test-issues\/what-makes-a-good-test\/"},{"key":"bibr22-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quamar A., Schmeler M., Collins D., Schein R. (2019). Information communication technology-enabled instrumental activities of daily living: A paradigm shift in functional assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16, 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17483107.2019.1650298","DOI":"10.1080\/17483107.2019.1650298"},{"key":"bibr23-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quatrano L. A., Cruz T. H. (2011). Future of outcomes measurement: Impact on research in medical rehabilitation and neurologic populations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10), S7\u2013S11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2010.08.032","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2010.08.032"},{"key":"bibr24-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reuben D. B., Tinetti M. E. (2012). Goal-oriented patient care\u2014An alternative health outcomes paradigm. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 777\u2013779. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMp1113631","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1113631"},{"key":"bibr25-1539449220940001","unstructured":"Riemer-Reiss M. L., Wacker R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44\u201350. http:\/\/www.csun.edu\/~hfdss003\/atacp\/ supplements\/factors_associated_with_assistiv.htm"},{"key":"bibr26-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenberg L., Nyg\u00e5rd L., Kottorp A. (2009). Everyday technology use questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of competence in technology use. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29(2), 52\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/15394492-20090301-05","DOI":"10.3928\/15394492-20090301-05"},{"key":"bibr27-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Samuelsson K., Wressle E. (2008). User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(7), 551\u2013558. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638280701355777","DOI":"10.1080\/09638280701355777"},{"key":"bibr28-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scherer M., Jutai J., Fuhrer M., Demers L., Deruyter F. (2007). A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 2(1), 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17483100600845414","DOI":"10.1080\/17483100600845414"},{"key":"bibr29-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schmitter-Edgecombe M., Parsey C., Lamb R. (2014). Development and psychometric properties of the instrumental activities of daily living: Compensation scale. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(8), 776\u2013792. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/arclin\/acu053","DOI":"10.1093\/arclin\/acu053"},{"key":"bibr30-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Talarska D., Pacholska R., Strugala M., Wieczorowska-Tobis K. (2016). Functional assessment of the elderly with the use of EASY-Care Standard 2010 and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 30(2), 419\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/scs.12241","DOI":"10.1111\/scs.12241"},{"key":"bibr31-1539449220940001","unstructured":"US Census Bureau. (2019). 2017 disability status report\u2014United States. Cornwell University. https:\/\/www.disabilitystatistics.org\/StatusReports\/2017-PDF\/2017-StatusReport_US.pdf"},{"key":"bibr32-1539449220940001","unstructured":"VanSwearingen J. M., Brach J. S. (2001). Making geriatric assessment work: Selecting useful measures. Physical Therapy, 81(6), 1233\u20131252. http:\/\/web.b.ebscohost.com\/ehost\/detail\/detail?vid=15&sid=3de45a73-2a31-4390-ba94-4eb0c0282fa0%40pdc-v-sessmgr05&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=107047811&db=rzh"},{"key":"bibr33-1539449220940001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wessels R. D., de Witte L. P., van den Heuvel W. J. A. (2004). Measuring effectiveness of and satisfaction with assistive devices from a user perspective: An exploration of the literature. Technology and Disability, 16(2), 83\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/TAD-2004-16202","DOI":"10.3233\/TAD-2004-16202"},{"key":"bibr34-1539449220940001","unstructured":"World Bank. (2020). Disability inclusion. https:\/\/www.worldbank.org\/en\/topic\/disability"}],"container-title":["OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1539449220940001","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1539449220940001","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1539449220940001","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T07:02:32Z","timestamp":1777705352000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1539449220940001"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,10]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1539449220940001"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1539449220940001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1539-4492","1938-2383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1539-4492","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,10]]}}}