{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T02:02:10Z","timestamp":1777860130506,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,23]],"date-time":"2017-05-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1495497600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Proposals for research concerning fetal and\/or placental tissue may be refused institutional review board (IRB) review, effectively preventing the research from occurring. We conducted an anonymous electronic survey of IRB chairs to determine their assessment of the likely response to research projects using fetal\/placental tissue obtained from various procedures. We found that proposals concerning tissue obtained from diagnostic procedures or miscarriage were anticipated to be considered at most institutions. Tissue obtained after abortion was likely to be refused consideration by more than 25% of respondents. Additional consultation during review was anticipated for up to 30% of scenarios. Responses for fetal and placental tissue were similar. The most frequently anticipated reason for refusal was institutional policy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264617703893","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,24]],"date-time":"2017-05-24T00:09:44Z","timestamp":1495584584000},"page":"150-160","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Applications for Research Concerning Fetal or Placental Tissue and Expected Institutional Review Board Responses"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Lynn","family":"Borgatta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Boston University, MA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Kaufman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Boston University, MA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Judith Parsells","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Boston University, MA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Babaian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kinetiq, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary","family":"Banks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Boston University, MA, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2011.6.1.3"},{"key":"bibr2-1556264617703893","first-page":"9","volume":"19","author":"Boonstra H. D.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Guttmacher Policy Review"},{"key":"bibr3-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2008.3.4.57"},{"key":"bibr4-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1510279"},{"key":"bibr5-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.079"},{"key":"bibr6-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.05.013"},{"key":"bibr7-1556264617703893","unstructured":"NIH Revitalization Act of 1993, U.S.C. Pub. L. No. 103-43, 107 Stat. 122 (June 10, 1993) (codified at 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 289g-1 and g-2 (2006))."},{"key":"bibr8-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-0004.2006.00640.x"},{"key":"bibr9-1556264617703893","first-page":"277","volume":"31","author":"Seifert C. A.","year":"1997","journal-title":"Marshall Law Review"},{"key":"bibr10-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05683.x"},{"key":"bibr11-1556264617703893","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000132395.32967.d4"}],"container-title":["Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1556264617703893","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1556264617703893","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1556264617703893","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T00:43:02Z","timestamp":1777509782000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1556264617703893"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,23]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1556264617703893"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264617703893","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-2646","1556-2654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-2646","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-2654","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,23]]}}}