{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T00:43:52Z","timestamp":1777682632979,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,28]],"date-time":"2024-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"NIH","award":["UL1 TR002384"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UL1 TR002384"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["HSS Journal\u00ae: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although a few recent studies showed good outcomes in back pain-predominant patients following decompression alone, none of the studies had a comparative fusion group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We sought to compare outcomes of minimally invasive decompression alone versus fusion in patients with predominant back pain.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression alone or fusion and had preoperative back pain &gt; leg pain. Outcome measures were (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, (3) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement, and (4) global rating change (GRC). As a subgroup analysis, MCID, PASS, and GRC rates were also compared between the decompression and fusion groups for patients with preoperative back pain &lt; leg pain.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 510 patients included, there were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs in both groups at &lt;6 and &gt;6 months with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement. The fusion group showed significantly higher MCID achievement rates for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back at &lt;6 months (85% vs 70%) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at &gt;6 months (67% vs 51%). Proportion of patients achieving PASS and feeling better after surgery based on response to GRC showed no difference between the groups. The subgroup analysis for decompression versus fusion in patients with preoperative back pain &lt; leg pain showed no differences in MCID, PASS, or GRC rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study found that in patients with predominant back pain, minimally invasive decompression alone had significantly less MCID achievement rates in VAS back at &lt;6 months and ODI at &gt;6 months. However, it did lead to an overall significant improvement in PROMs, similar PASS achievement rates, and similar responses on the GRC scale.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/15563316231223503","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,29]],"date-time":"2024-01-29T00:58:45Z","timestamp":1706489925000},"page":"42-48","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Pratyush","family":"Shahi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tejas","family":"Subramanian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Omri","family":"Maayan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nishtha","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0061-2640","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kasra","family":"Araghi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sumedha","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tomoyuki","family":"Asada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7289-7564","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maximilian","family":"Korsun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Olivia","family":"Tuma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anthony","family":"Pajak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Evan","family":"Sheha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Dowdell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sheeraz A.","family":"Qureshi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sravisht","family":"Iyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"},{"name":"Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrasinova T Kalikova E Kopacik R et al. Evaluation of the neuropathic component of chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2019;35(1):7\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AJP.0000000000000653.","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0000000000000653"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Batti\u00e9 MC Videman T. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(suppl 2):3\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.E.01313.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.01313"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brox JI Reiker\u00e5s O Nygaard \u00d8 et al. Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain. 2006;122(1\u20132):145\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pain.2006.01.027.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2006.01.027"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brox JI S\u00f8rensen R Friis A et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(17):1913\u20131921. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bydon M Macki M Abt NB et al. Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: an analysis of 500 patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(suppl 4):S190\u2013S193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/2152-7806.156578.","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.156578"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chou R Baisden J Carragee EJ Resnick DK Shaffer WO Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(10):1094\u20131109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Copay AG Glassman SD Subach BR Berven S Schuler TC Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36 and pain scales. Spine J. 2008;8(6):968\u2013974. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Crawford CH Glassman SD Mummaneni PV Knightly JJ Asher AL. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(5):596\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2016.3.SPINE151468.","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.3.SPINE151468"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Divi SN Woods BI Goyal DKC et al. Do patients with back pain-dominant symptoms improve after lumbar surgery for radiculopathy or claudication? Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(4):780\u2013787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/8100.","DOI":"10.14444\/8100"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freynhagen R Baron R. The evaluation of neuropathic components in low back pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13(3):185\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11916-009-0032-y.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11916-009-0032-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fritzell P H\u00e4gg O Wessberg P Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(23):2521\u20132532; discussion 2532\u20132534. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200112010-00002.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200112010-00002"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris PA Taylor R Minor BL et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.103208.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.103208"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris PA Taylor R Thielke R Payne J Gonzalez N Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)\u2014a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbi.2008.08.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2008.08.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones ADR Wafai AM Easterbrook AL. Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):135\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-013-2964-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2964-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Louie PK Vaishnav AS Gang CH et al. Development and initial internal validation of a novel classification system for perioperative expectations following minimally invasive degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;34(9):E537\u2013E544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001246.","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001246"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Massel DH Mayo BC Patel DV et al. Improvements in back and leg pain after minimally invasive lumbar decompression. HSS J. 2020;16(1):62\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11420-018-09661-z.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-018-09661-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mehra M Hill K Nicholl D Schadrack J. The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):245\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3111\/13696998.2011.642090.","DOI":"10.3111\/13696998.2011.642090"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mirza SK Deyo RA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(7):816\u2013823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000259225.37454.38.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000259225.37454.38"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mirza SK Deyo RA Heagerty PJ Turner JA Martin BI Comstock BA. One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: a community-based prospective cohort study. Spine J. 2013;13(11):1421\u20131433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.05.047.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.05.047"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Omidi-Kashani F Hasankhani EG Ashjazadeh A. Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? an updated review. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(4):521\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4184\/asj.2014.8.4.521.","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2014.8.4.521"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sarmiento JM Shahi P Melissaridou D Fourman MS Araghi K Qureshi S. Step-by-step guide to robotic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Ann Transl Med. 2023;11:221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm-22-3273.","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-22-3273"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shafi KA Pompeu YA Vaishnav AS et al. Does robot-assisted navigation influence pedicle screw selection and accuracy in minimally invasive spine surgery? Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2021.10.FOCUS21526.","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.10.FOCUS21526"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Dalal S Shinn D et al. Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2022.10.FOCUS22604.","DOI":"10.3171\/2022.10.FOCUS22604"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Maayan O Subramanian T et al. Preoperative disability influences effectiveness of minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state in predicting patient improvement following cervical spine Surgery [published online ahead of print November 20 2023]. Global Spine J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/21925682231215765.","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682231215765"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Shinn D Singh N et al. ODI <25 denotes patient acceptable symptom state after minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;48:196\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004479.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004479"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Song J Dalal S et al. Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37:828\u2013835. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2022.5.SPINE22361.","DOI":"10.3171\/2022.5.SPINE22361"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Subramanian T Araghi K et al. Comparison of robotics and navigation for clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:1342\u20131347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004721.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004721"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Subramanian T Maayan O et al. Preoperative disability influences effectiveness of MCID and PASS in predicting patient improvement following lumbar spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2023;36:E506\u2013E511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001517.","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001517"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Subramanian T Maayan O et al. Surgeon experience influences robotics learning curve for minimally invasive lumbar fusion: a cumulative sum analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:1517\u20131525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004745.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004745"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Subramanian T Singh N et al. NDI <21 denotes patient acceptable symptom state after degenerative cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:766\u2013771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004493.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004493"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Vaishnav A Araghi K et al. Robotics reduces radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar fusion compared to navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47:1279\u20131286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004381.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004381"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Vaishnav AS Mai E et al. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Spine J. 2023;23:54\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.07.087.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.07.087"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shahi P Vaishnav AS Melissaridou D et al. Factors causing delay in discharge in patients eligible for ambulatory lumbar fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(16):1137\u20131144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004380.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004380"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shinn D Mok JK Vaishnav AS et al. Recovery kinetics after commonly performed minimally invasive spine surgery procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(21):1489\u20131496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004399.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004399"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Singh S Shahi P Asada T et al. Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression. Spine J. 2023;23(8):1152\u20131160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2023.04.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2023.04.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Subramanian T Araghi K Sivaganesan A et al. Ambulatory lumbar fusion: a systematic review of perioperative protocols patient selection criteria and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(4):278\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004519.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004519"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Subramanian T Merrill RK Shahi P et al. Predictors of subsidence and its clinical impact following expandable cage insertion in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48:1670\u20131678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004619.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004619"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wetmore DS Dalal S Shinn D et al. Erector spinae plane block reduces immediate postoperative pain and opioid demand after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;49:7\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004581.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004581"}],"container-title":["HSS Journal\u00ae: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15563316231223503","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/15563316231223503","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15563316231223503","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T08:43:11Z","timestamp":1777452191000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/15563316231223503"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,28]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/15563316231223503"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15563316231223503","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-3316","1556-3324"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-3316","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-3324","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,28]]}}}