{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T06:12:48Z","timestamp":1793945568816,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1759363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Giuseppe Loggia","award":["This study has been funded by a research grant fro"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["This study has been funded by a research grant fro"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["HSS Journal\u00ae: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has gained widespread recognition as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treating degenerative cervical disc disease. Over the past decade, the rate of CDA procedures has increased by a remarkable 654%. However, CDA complications can lead to a repeat procedure or can be converted to fusion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We sought to evaluate the time of onset (early, intermediate, or late) of complications following CDA as well as the progression leading to revision surgeries.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective review of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database examined complications across 9 CDA devices from January 1, 2005, to September 30, 2023. Complications were categorized by postoperative time to occurrence: early (&lt;6 months), intermediate (6-18 months), and late (&gt;18 months). The revision procedures were categorized as either a repeat CDA or conversion to fusion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 688 CDA revision cases were reviewed, with 265 cases (38.5%) reporting revision onset time (median: 12 months, interquartile range: 3-36). Migration was the most frequent complication in both the early (n = 44, 53.0%) and intermediate (n = 25, 32.1%) periods. Subsidence peaked during the intermediate period (11.5%, n = 9), while neck pain and heterotopic ossification (HO) occurred most in the late postoperative phase, at 22.5% (n = 23) and 7.8% (n = 8), respectively. The specific revision type was recorded in 509 of the revision cases; of these, 8 devices were predominantly associated with fusion (&gt;69%), while Mobi-C showed a lower proportion of fusion revisions (16.2%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective review of the MAUDE database showed the timing of complications leading to CDA revision. Migration predominated in the early and intermediate phases, while subsidence peaked in the intermediate phase. In the late phase, neck pain, osteolysis, and HO become more prominent. Conversion to fusion was common across most devices. These data provide insight for clinicians to monitor patients after CDA while considering the relative frequencies of reported complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level IV: retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained government database.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/15563316251364734","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T11:05:53Z","timestamp":1759403153000},"page":"310-319","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Complication Profiles Leading to Revision Surgery After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"22","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-8395-4817","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Loggia","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Franziska C. S.","family":"Altorfer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fedan","family":"Avrumova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Celeste","family":"Abjornson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiaqi","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Darren R.","family":"Lebl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Altorfer FCS Kelly MJ Avrumova F et al. Reasons for revision surgery after cervical disc arthroplasty based on medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Spine. 2024;49(20):1417-1425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/brs.0000000000005060","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005060"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burkus JK Traynelis VC Haid RW Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(4):516-528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carroll AH Fakhre E Khanna AJ Weiner D. Complications in cervical total disc arthroplasty. Semin Spine Surg. 2023;35(1):101010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.semss.2023.101010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.semss.2023.101010"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis RJ Kim KD Hisey MS et al. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):532-545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.6.SPINE12527"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Derman PB Zigler JE. Cervical disc arthroplasty: rationale and history. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(s2):S5-S13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/7086","DOI":"10.14444\/7086"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galbusera F Bellini CM Brayda-Bruno M Fornari M. Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(9):1095-1104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2008.06.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2008.06.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H\u00e4ckel S Gaff J Pabbruwe M et al. Heterotopic ossification osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-CTM artificial disc. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(3):1292-1299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-024-08129-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-024-08129-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hacker FM Babcock RM Hacker RJ. Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine. 2013;38(26):2223-2226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000060","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000060"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joaquim AF Lee NJ Lehman RA Tumial\u00e1n LM Riew KD. Osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2723-2733. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06578-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06578-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelly JC Groarke PJ Butler JS et al. The natural history and clinical syndromes of degenerative cervical spondylosis. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:393642. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/393642","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/393642"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee CY Tung KK Tsou HK et al. Risk factors for cervical disc arthroplasty subsidence with Bryan disc\u2014a retrospective observational analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13061589","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13061589"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee NJ Joaquim AF Boddapati V et al. Revision anterior cervical disc arthroplasty: a national analysis of the associated indications procedures and postoperative outcomes. Global Spine J. 2022;12(7):1338-1344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568220979140","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568220979140"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leven D Meaike J Radcliff K Qureshi S. Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications technique and technical pearls. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(2):160-169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12178-017-9398-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9398-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacDowall A Canto Moreira N Marques C et al. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):323-331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.9.SPINE18659"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacDowall A Skeppholm M Lindhagen L et al. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30(2):159-167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2018.7.SPINE18657","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.7.SPINE18657"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):S177-S181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mehren C Heider F Sauer D et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of a new total cervical disc replacement design. Spine. 2019;44(4):E202-E210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002799","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002799"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001541"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nunley PD Cavanaugh DA Kerr EJ et al. Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement at 7 years-prevalence progression clinical implications and risk factors. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(3):352-361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/5041","DOI":"10.14444\/5041"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ozbek Z Ozkara E Arslanta\u015f A. Implant migration in cervical disk arthroplasty. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:390-397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.10.023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.10.023"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patwardhan AG Havey RM. Biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty devices. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021;32(4):493-504. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nec.2021.05.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2021.05.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Price RL Coric D Ray WZ. Cervical total disc replacement: complications and complication avoidance. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020;32(4):473-481. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nec.2021.05.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2021.05.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quinto ES Paisner ND Huish EG Senegor M. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Spine. 2024;49(7):463-469. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004887","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004887"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shin JJ Kim KR Son DW et al. Radiological changes in adjacent and index levels after cervical disc arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J. 2022;63(1):72-81. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3349\/YMJ.2022.63.1.72","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2022.63.1.72"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shin JJ Kim KR Son DW Shin DA. Cervical disc arthroplasty: what we know in 2020 and a literature review. J Orthop Surg. 2021;29(1 suppl):23094990211006934. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/23094990211006934","DOI":"10.1177\/23094990211006934"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Singh M Balmaceno-Criss M Anderson G et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: an epidemiological review of 433 660 surgical patients from 2011 to 2021. Spine J. 2024;24(8):1342-1351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.02.016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.02.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steib JP Dufour T Beaurain J et al. Observational multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cervical disk arthroplasty with Mobi-C in the treatment of cervical degenerative disk disease. Results at 10 years follow-up. Spine. 2023;48(7):452-459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004536","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004536"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000025"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Virk S Phillips F Khan S Qureshi S. A cross-sectional analysis of 1347 complications for cervical disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Spine J. 2021;21(2):265-272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.09.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.09.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"von Schulze Pellengahr C Teske W Kapoor S et al. Primary stability of the Activ L\u00ae intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):934. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04544-7","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04544-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagner SC Formby PM Kang DG et al. Persistent axial neck pain after cervical disc arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis. Spine J. 2016;16(7):851-856. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.043","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.043"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagner SC Kang DG Helgeson MD. Implant migration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2513-2514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.05.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.05.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wahood W Yolcu YU Kerezoudis P et al. Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:598-613.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walraevens J Demaerel P Suetens P et al. Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan cervical disc. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3):679-687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang Y Lv N He F et al. Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12883-020-01717-0","DOI":"10.1186\/s12883-020-01717-0"}],"container-title":["HSS Journal\u00ae: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15563316251364734","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/15563316251364734","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/15563316251364734","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]],"date-time":"2026-05-19T04:08:30Z","timestamp":1779163710000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/15563316251364734"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/15563316251364734"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15563316251364734","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-3316","1556-3324"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-3316","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-3324","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]}}}