{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T14:14:38Z","timestamp":1778076878004,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":76,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777593600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Womens Health (Lond Engl)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Stroke is a significant risk factor for cognitive impairment. Women face a heightened risk due to their longer life expectancy and the greater prevalence of stroke-related disability.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the trajectory of cognitive decline in women with and without a stroke diagnosis and assessed demographic differences.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study employed a longitudinal, observational cohort design.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Study of Women\u2019s Health Across the Nation interviewed women in their 40s and 50s from seven U.S. cities approximately yearly to collect information on their physical, biological, psychological, and social health. Cognitive assessments were conducted between 2000 (Wave 4) and 2008 (Wave 10) that were designed to examine information processing speed, working memory, immediate memory, and delayed memory. Adjusting for baseline age, race\/ethnicity, income, education, marital status, comorbidities, and insurance, generalized linear mixed models were used to compare cognitive decline between women who had experienced a stroke and those who had not.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Among the 3302 women in the sample, age was 49.52 (SD\u2009=\u20092.64) years old at baseline and 53.74 (SD\u2009=\u20093.94) in the final wave. In Wave 4, only 0.67% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200922) reported having been diagnosed with a stroke, but 8.39% (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009277) had been diagnosed by Wave 10. Compared to stroke-free women, the multivariable-adjusted changes in cognitive performance were \u22120.18 information processing, \u22120.09 working memory, \u22120.15 immediate memory, and \u22120.17 delayed memory. Compared to White women, Black women who suffered a stroke saw multivariable-adjusted annual changes in information processing, working memory, immediate memory, and delayed memory of \u22120.08, \u22120.03, \u22120.08, and \u22120.09, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>These findings underscore the persistent impact of stroke on multiple cognitive domains in midlife women, with a more significant decline observed among Black women. Targeted prevention and rehabilitation efforts are needed to address both the cognitive consequences of stroke and the demographic differences in post-stroke outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/17455057261444148","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T05:05:23Z","timestamp":1777871123000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Post-stroke cognitive decline among women in midlife"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Molly","family":"Jacobs","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Evans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Communication Equity and Outcomes Laboratory, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5823-9653","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charles","family":"Ellis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Communication Equity and Outcomes Laboratory, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bettio LEB Rajendran L Gil-Mohapel J. The effects of aging in the hippocampus and cognitive decline. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 79: 66\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2017.04.030","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2017.04.030"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beam CR Turkheimer E Finkel D et al. Midlife study of the Louisville Twins: connecting cognitive development to biological and cognitive aging. Behav Genet 2020; 50(2): 73\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10519-019-09983-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s10519-019-09983-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dupr\u00e9 C Helmer C Bongue B et al. Associations between physical activity types and multi-domain cognitive decline in older adults from the Three-city cohort. PLoS One 2021; 16(6): e0252500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0252500","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0252500"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fotuhi M Do D Jack C. Modifiable factors that alter the size of the hippocampus with ageing. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8(4): 189\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nrneurol.2012.27","DOI":"10.1038\/nrneurol.2012.27"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fjell AM Walhovd KB. Structural brain changes in aging: courses causes and cognitive consequences. Rev Neurosci 2010; 21(3): 187\u2013221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/revneuro.2010.21.3.187","DOI":"10.1515\/REVNEURO.2010.21.3.187"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gholami A. Alzheimer\u2019s disease: the role of proteins in formation mechanisms and new therapeutic approaches. Neurosci Lett 2023; 817: 137532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neulet.2023.137532","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neulet.2023.137532"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zimmerman B Rypma B Gratton G et al. Age-related changes in cerebrovascular health and their effects on neural function and cognition: a comprehensive review. Psychophysiology 2021; 58(7): 13796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/psyp.13796","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.13796"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boyle PA Wilson RS Yu L et al. Much of late life cognitive decline is not due to common neurodegenerative pathologies. Ann Neurol 2013; 74(3): 478\u2013489. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ana.23964","DOI":"10.1002\/ana.23964"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eavani H Habes M Satterthwaite TD et al. Heterogeneity of structural and functional imaging patterns of advanced brain aging revealed via machine learning methods. Neurobiol Aging 2018; 71: 41\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.013"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dexter M Ossmy O. The effects of typical ageing on cognitive control: recent advances and future directions. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15: 1231410. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnagi.2023.1231410","DOI":"10.3389\/fnagi.2023.1231410"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oosterhuis EJ Slade K May PJC et al. Toward an understanding of healthy cognitive aging: the importance of lifestyle in cognitive reserve and the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2023; 78(5): 777\u2013788. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/geronb\/gbac197","DOI":"10.1093\/geronb\/gbac197"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_2","unstructured":"Andrews SJ. Predicting cognitive decline: genetic environmental and lifestyle risk factors. Doctoral thesis Australian National University 2017. 10.25911\/5d74e1b44df39"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dominguez LJ Veronese N Vernuccio L et al. Nutrition physical activity and other lifestyle factors in the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. Nutrients 2021; 13(11): 4080. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/nu13114080","DOI":"10.3390\/nu13114080"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pan KY Xu W Mangialasche F et al. Psychosocial working conditions trajectories of disability and the mediating role of cognitive decline and chronic diseases: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2019; 16(9): e1002899. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002899","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002899"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marin MF Lord C Andrews J et al. Chronic stress cognitive functioning and mental health. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2011; 96(4): 583\u2013595. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nlm.2011.02.016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nlm.2011.02.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lo JW Crawford JD Lipnicki DM et al. Trajectory of cognitive decline before and after stroke in 14 population cohorts. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7(10): e2437133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.37133","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.37133"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guo X Phan C Batarseh S et al. Risk factors and predictive markers of post-stroke cognitive decline\u2014a mini review. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16: 1359792. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnagi.2024.1359792","DOI":"10.3389\/fnagi.2024.1359792"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delgado J Masoli J Hase Y et al. Trajectories of cognitive change following stroke: stepwise decline towards dementia in the elderly. Brain Commun 2022; 4(3): fcac129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/braincomms\/fcac129","DOI":"10.1093\/braincomms\/fcac129"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng F Yan L Zhong B et al. Progression of cognitive decline before and after incident stroke. Neurology 2019; 93(1): e20\u2013e28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1212\/WNL.0000000000007716","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000007716"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pendlebury ST Rothwell PM. Prevalence incidence and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8(11): 1006\u20131018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70236-4","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70236-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dong L Briceno E Morgenstern LB et al. Poststroke cognitive outcomes: sex differences and contributing factors. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9(14): e016683. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.120.016683","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.120.016683"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bako AT Potter T Tannous J et al. Sex differences in post-stroke cognitive decline: a population-based longitudinal study of nationally representative data. PLoS One 2022; 17(5): e0268249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0268249","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0268249"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Exalto LG Weaver NA Kuijf HJ et al. Sex differences in poststroke cognitive impairment: a multicenter study in 2343 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2023; 54(9): 2296\u20132303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.123.042507","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.123.042507"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gottesman RF Hillis AE. Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9(9): 895\u2013905. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1474-4422(10)70164-2","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(10)70164-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karlamangla AS Lachman ME Han W et al. Evidence for cognitive aging in midlife women: Study of Women\u2019s Health Across the Nation. PLoS One 2017; 12(1): e0169008. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0169008","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0169008"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Howard G Cushman M Kissela BM et al. Traditional risk factors as the underlying cause of racial disparities in stroke. Stroke 2011; 42(12): 3369\u20133375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.625277","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.625277"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_2","first-page":"36","volume-title":"Microeconometrics","author":"Abadie A.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Abadie A. Difference-in-difference estimators. In: Microeconometrics. Springer, 2010, pp.36\u201339."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abadie A. Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev Econ Stud 2005; 72(1): 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0034-6527.00321","DOI":"10.1111\/0034-6527.00321"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.14058"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glymour MM Avendano M. Can self-reported strokes be used to study stroke incidence and risk factors? Stroke 2009; 40(3): 873\u2013879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/strokeaha.108.529479","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.108.529479"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-012453790-3\/50012-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bromberger JT Schott LL Matthews KA et al. Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and depressive symptom burden across 15 years of follow-up during midlife: Study of Women\u2019s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Arch Womens Ment Health 2017; 20(4): 495\u2013504. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00737-017-0747-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s00737-017-0747-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weber MT Maki PM McDermott MP. Cognition and mood in perimenopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014; 142: 90\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsbmb.2013.06.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsbmb.2013.06.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/t27513-000"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richardson JTE. Measures of short-term memory: a historical review. Cortex 2007; 43(5): 635\u2013650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0010-9452(08)70493-3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-9452(08)70493-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gfeller JD Horn GJ. The East Boston Memory Test: a clinical screening measure for memory impairment in the elderly. J Clin Psychol 1996; 52(2): 191\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4679(199603)52:2<191::AID-JCLP10>3.0.CO;2-F","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4679(199603)52:2<191::AID-JCLP10>3.0.CO;2-F"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/t49755-000"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scherr PA Albert MS Funkenstein HH et al. Correlates of cognitive function in an elderly community population. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128(5): 1084\u20131101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115051","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115051"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng F Yan L Yang Z et al. HbA1c diabetes and cognitive decline: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Diabetologia 2018; 61(4): 839\u2013848. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00125-017-4541-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00125-017-4541-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bruce SS Merkler AE Bassi M et al. Differences in diagnostic evaluation in women and men after acute ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9(5): e015625. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.119.015625","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.119.015625"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charlson M Wells MT Ullman R et al. The Charlson comorbidity index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs. PLoS One 2014; 9(12): e112479. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0112479","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0112479"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charlson ME Carrozzino D Guidi J et al. Charlson comorbidity index: a critical review of clinimetric properties. Psychother Psychosom 2022; 91(1): 8\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000521288","DOI":"10.1159\/000521288"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Groot V Beckerman H Lankhorst G et al. How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57(3): 323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2003.09.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2003.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salami JA Warraich HJ Valero-Elizondo J et al. National trends in nonstatin use and expenditures among the US adult population from 2002 to 2013: insights from medical expenditure panel survey. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7(2): e007132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.117.007132","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.117.007132"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charlson ME Pompei P Ales KL et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373\u2013383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0021-9681(87)90171-8","DOI":"10.1016\/0021-9681(87)90171-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns JW Quartana PJ Bruehl S et al. Chronic pain body mass index and cardiovascular disease risk factors: tests of moderation unique and shared relationships in the Study of Women\u2019s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Behav Med 2015; 38(2): 372\u2013383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10865-014-9608-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10865-014-9608-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Appelros P Mat\u00e9rne M Jarl G et al. Comorbidity in stroke-survivors: prevalence and associations with functional outcomes and health. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30(10): 106000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106000","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106000"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullivan LM Massaro JM D\u2019Agostino RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med 2004; 23(10): 1631\u20131660. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.1742","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1742"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nishida C Barba C Cavalli-Sforza T et al. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363(9403): 157\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ylitalo KR Karvonen-Gutierrez C McClure C et al. Is self-reported physical functioning associated with incident cardiometabolic abnormalities or the metabolic syndrome? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32(4): 413\u2013420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/dmrr.2765","DOI":"10.1002\/dmrr.2765"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McClure CK El Khoudary SR Karvonen-Gutierrez CA et al. Prospective associations between inflammatory and hemostatic markers and physical functioning limitations in mid-life women: longitudinal results of the Study of Women\u2019s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Exp Gerontol 2014; 49: 19\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.exger.2013.10.016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.exger.2013.10.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wong JYY Chang PY Gold EB et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and risk of late-diagnosis incident fibroids in the Study of Women\u2019s Health across the Nation (SWAN). Fertil Steril 2016; 106(5): 1157\u20131164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.025"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alwateer M Atlam ES El-Raouf MMA et al. Missing data imputation: a comprehensive review. J Comput Commun 2024; 12(11): 53\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4236\/jcc.2024.1211004","DOI":"10.4236\/jcc.2024.1211004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ice. Stata J 2005; 5(4): 527\u2013536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1536867X0500500404","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X0500500404"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kazijevs M Samad MD. Deep imputation of missing values in time series health data: a review with benchmarking. J Biomed Inform 2023; 144: 104440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbi.2023.104440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2023.104440"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tan FES Jolani S Verbeek H. Guidelines for multiple imputations in repeated measurements with time-dependent covariates: a case study. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 102: 107\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.06.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.06.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huque MH Carlin JB Simpson JA et al. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18(1): 168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-018-0615-6","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0615-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_59_2","volume-title":"Base SAS 9.4 procedures guide: statistical procedures","author":"SAS Institute","year":"2017","unstructured":"SAS Institute. Base SAS 9.4 procedures guide: statistical procedures. SAS Institute, 2017."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118445112.stat00291"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_61_2","volume-title":"Oops, I DID it again! Advanced difference-in-differences models in SAS\u00ae","author":"Warton EM","year":"2018","unstructured":"Warton EM, Parker MM. Oops, I DID it again! Advanced difference-in-differences models in SAS\u00ae. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2018."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bertrand M Duflo E Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 2004; 119(1): 249\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/003355304772839588","DOI":"10.1162\/003355304772839588"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glymour MM Avenda\u00f1o M Haas S et al. Lifecourse social conditions and racial disparities in incidence of first stroke. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18(12): 904\u2013912. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annepidem.2008.09.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2008.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Silver IA Wooldredge J Sullivan CJ et al. Longitudinal propensity score matching: a demonstration of counterfactual conditions adjusted for longitudinal clustering. J Quant Criminol 2021; 37(1): 267\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10940-020-09455-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s10940-020-09455-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_65_2","volume-title":"Time after time: difference-in-differences and interrupted time series models in SAS","author":"Warton EM.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Warton EM. Time after time: difference-in-differences and interrupted time series models in SAS. SAS Global Forum, 2020."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46(3): 399\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci 2010; 25(1): 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1214\/09-STS313","DOI":"10.1214\/09-STS313"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richey M Maciejewski ML Zepel L et al. A comparison of time-varying propensity score vs sequential stratification approaches to longitudinal matching with a time-varying treatment. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24(1): 280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02391-3","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-024-02391-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marcus SM Siddique J Ten Have TR et al. Balancing treatment comparisons in longitudinal studies. Psychiatr Ann 2008; 38(12): 805\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/00485713-20081201-05","DOI":"10.3928\/00485713-20081201-05"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cramer SC Richards LG Bernhardt J et al. Cognitive deficits after stroke. Stroke 2023; 54(1): 5\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/strokeaha.122.041775","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.122.041775"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson NX Marquine MJ Flores I et al. Racial differences in neurocognitive outcomes post-stroke: the impact of healthcare variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2017; 23(8): 640\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1355617717000480","DOI":"10.1017\/S1355617717000480"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zha A Zhang C Zhu G et al. African American patients have a higher probability of cognitive impairment after incident stroke: an analysis of national electronic health record data. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2024; 33(8): 107787. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107787","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107787"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns SP Mueller M Magwood G et al. Racial and ethnic differences in post-stroke subjective cognitive decline exist. Disabil Health J 2019; 12(1): 87\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dhjo.2018.08.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dhjo.2018.08.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albright KC Huang L Blackburn J et al. Racial differences in recurrent ischemic stroke risk and recurrent stroke case fatality. Neurology 2018; 91(19): e1741\u2013e1750. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006467","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006467"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferrone SR Boltyenkov AT Lodato Z et al. Clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 31(6): 106438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106438","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106438"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woodfield R Sudlow CLM. Accuracy of patient self-report of stroke: a systematic review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group. PLoS One 2015; 10(9): e0137538. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0137538","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0137538"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mistler SA Enders CK. A comparison of joint model and fully conditional specification imputation for multilevel missing data. J Educ Behav Stat 2017; 42(4): 432\u2013466. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/1076998617690869","DOI":"10.3102\/1076998617690869"}],"container-title":["Women's Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17455057261444148","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17455057261444148","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17455057261444148","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T13:17:50Z","timestamp":1778073470000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17455057261444148"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"references-count":76,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17455057261444148"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17455057261444148","relation":{},"ISSN":["1745-5057","1745-5065"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1745-5057","type":"print"},{"value":"1745-5065","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"article-number":"17455057261444148"}}