{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T13:59:16Z","timestamp":1789048756851,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":85,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769040000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769040000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100024871","name":"Sociale en Geesteswetenschappen, NWO","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["VI.Vidi.231G.017"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["VI.Vidi.231G.017"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100024871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Perspect Psychol Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Open science innovations have focused on rigorous theory testing, yet methods for specifying, sharing, and iteratively improving theories remain underdeveloped. To address this limitation, we introduce\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">FAIR theory<\/jats:italic>\n                    , a standard for specifying theories as findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable digital objects. FAIR theories are findable in well-established archives; accessible in terms of their availability and ability to be understood; interoperable for specific purposes, such as selecting control variables; and reusable in that they can be iteratively and collaboratively improved on. This article adapts the FAIR principles for theory; reflects on current FAIR practices in relation to psychological theory; and discusses FAIR theories\u2019 potential impact in terms of reducing research waste, enabling metaresearch on theories\u2019 structure and development, and incorporating theory into reproducible research workflows\u2014from hypothesis generation to simulation studies. We present a conceptual workflow for FAIRifying theory that builds on existing open science principles and infrastructures. More detailed tutorials, worked examples, and convenience functions to automate this workflow are available in the\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">theorytools<\/jats:italic>\n                    R package. FAIR theory constitutes a structured protocol for archiving, communicating about, and iteratively improving theory, addressing a critical gap in open scholarly practices and potentially increasing the efficiency of cumulative knowledge acquisition in psychology and beyond.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/17456916251401850","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]],"date-time":"2026-01-22T20:16:31Z","timestamp":1769112991000},"page":"173-191","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["To Be FAIR: Theory Specification Needs an Update"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"21","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0808-5024","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Caspar J.","family":"Van Lissa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7813-818X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aaron","family":"Peikert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maximilian S.","family":"Ernst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Noah N. N.","family":"van Dongen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8282-3910","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Felix D.","family":"Sch\u00f6nbrodt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8765-6982","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andreas M.","family":"Brandmaier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aalbersberg I. J. Appleyard T. Brookhart S. Carpenter T. Clarke M. Curry S. Dahl J. DeHaven A. C. Eich E. Franko M. Freedman L. Graf C. Grant S. Hanson B. Joseph H. Kiermer V. Kramer B. Kraut A. Karn R. K. .\u2004.\u2004.\u2004Vazire S. (2018). Making science transparent by default; introducing the TOP statement. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/sm78t","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/sm78t"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baddeley A. (1992). Working memory. Science 255(5044) 556\u2013559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1736359","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1736359"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511761577"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bosco F. A. Uggerslev K. L. Steel P. (2017). MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review 27(1) 237\u2013254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hrmr.2016.09.013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hrmr.2016.09.013"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brewer W. F. Lambert B. L. (2001). The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process. Philosophy of Science 68(Suppl. 3) S176\u2013S186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/392907","DOI":"10.1086\/392907"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bringmann L. F. Elmer T. Eronen M. I. (2022). Back to basics: The importance of conceptual clarification in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science 31(4) 340\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09637214221096485","DOI":"10.1177\/09637214221096485"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cinelli C. Forney A. Pearl J. (2022). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research 53(3) 1071\u20131104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00491241221099552","DOI":"10.1177\/00491241221099552"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_1","unstructured":"Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. \u00a7101 et seq. (2024). https:\/\/www.copyright.gov\/title17"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cramer A. O. J. van Borkulo C. D. Giltay E. J. van der Maas H. L. J. Kendler K. S. Scheffer M. Borsboom D. (2016). Major depression as a complex dynamic system. PLOS ONE 11(12) Article e0167490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0167490","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0167490"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cronbach L. J. Meehl P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52 281\u2013302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0040957","DOI":"10.1037\/h0040957"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_1","unstructured":"DataCite. (2024). Contributing citations and references. https:\/\/support.datacite.org\/docs\/contributing-citations-and-references"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_1","unstructured":"DataCite Metadata Working Group. (2024). DataCite metadata schema documentation for the publication and citation of research data and other research outputs (Version 4.6). DataCite. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14454\/MZV1-5B55"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Groot A. D. Spiekerman J. A. A. (1969). Methodology: Foundations of inference and research in the behavioral sciences. De Gruyter Mouton. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783112313121","DOI":"10.1515\/9783112313121"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deci E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18(1) 105\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0030644","DOI":"10.1037\/h0030644"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deci E. L. Ryan R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In Lange P. A. M. V. Kruglanski A. W. Tory Higgins E. (Eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1 pp. 416\u2013437). Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781446249215","DOI":"10.4135\/9781446249215.n21"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_1","unstructured":"Graphviz. (2024). DOT language. https:\/\/graphviz.org\/doc\/info\/lang.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dumas-Mallet E. Smith A. Boraud T. Gonon F. (2017). Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers. PLOS ONE 12(2) Article e0172650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0172650","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0172650"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_1","unstructured":"European Organization for Nuclear Research & OpenAIRE. (2013). Zenodo. CERN. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25495\/7GXK-RD71"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feld J. Sauermann J. de Grip A. (2017). Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 68 18\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socec.2017.03.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socec.2017.03.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frankenhuis W. E. Panchanathan K. Smaldino P. E. (2023). Strategic ambiguity in the social sciences. Social Psychological Bulletin 18 Article e9923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32872\/spb.9923","DOI":"10.32872\/spb.9923"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fried E. I. (2020). Theories and models: What they are what they are for and what they are about. Psychological Inquiry 31(4) 336\u2013344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1047840X.2020.1854011","DOI":"10.1080\/1047840X.2020.1854011"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412986311.n21"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gray K. (2017). How to map theory: Reliable methods are fruitless without rigorous theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(5) 731\u2013741. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691617691949","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691617691949"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gross J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry 26(1) 1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1047840X.2014.940781","DOI":"10.1080\/1047840X.2014.940781"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guest O. (2024). What makes a good theory and how do we make a theory good? Computational Brain & Behavior 7 508\u2013522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42113-023-00193-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s42113-023-00193-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guest O. Martin A. E. (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4) 789\u2013802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691620970585","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691620970585"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guyon H. Kop J.-L. Juhel J. Falissard B. (2018). Measurement ontology and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism. Theory & Psychology 28(2) 149\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0959354318761606","DOI":"10.1177\/0959354318761606"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haslbeck J. M. B. Ryan O. Robinaugh D. J. Waldorp L. J. Borsboom D. (2022). Modeling psychopathology: From data models to formal theories. Psychological Methods 27(6) 930\u2013957. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/met0000303","DOI":"10.1037\/met0000303"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoijtink H. de Bruin J. Duken S. B. Flores J. Frankenhuis W. Van Lissa C. J. (2023). The open empirical cycle for hypothesis evaluation in psychology. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/wsxbh","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/wsxbh"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katz D. S. Chue Hong N. P. (2024). Special issue on software citation indexing and discoverability. PeerJ Computer Science 10 Article e1951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7717\/peerj-cs.1951","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.1951"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kircz J. G. (1998). Modularity: The next form of scientific information presentation? Journal of Documentation 54(2) 210\u2013235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/EUM0000000007185","DOI":"10.1108\/EUM0000000007185"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kissner J. (2008). On the identification of a logical inconsistency in the general theory of crime. Journal of Crime and Justice 31(2) 1\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0735648X.2008.9721251","DOI":"10.1080\/0735648X.2008.9721251"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00fchberger A. Fritz A. Scherndl T. (2014). Publication bias in psychology: A diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size. PLOS ONE 9(9) Article e105825. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0105825","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0105825"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226458106.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lakatos I. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In Buck R. C. Cohen R. S. (Eds.) PSA 1970: In memory of Rudolf Carnap: Proceedings of the 1970 Biennial Meeting Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 91\u2013136). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-3142-4_7","DOI":"10.1086\/psaprocbienmeetp.1970.495757"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lakens D. DeBruine L. M. (2021). Improving transparency falsifiability and rigor by making hypothesis tests machine-readable. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(2) Article 2515245920970949. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245920970949","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245920970949"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lamprecht A.-L. Garcia L. Kuzak M. Martinez C. Arcila R. Martin Del Pico E. Dominguez Del Angel V. van de Sandt S. Ison J. Martinez P. A. McQuilton P. Valencia A. Harrow J. Psomopoulos F. Gelpi J. Ll. Chue Hong N. Goble C. Capella-Gutierrez S. (2019). Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science 3 37\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/DS-190026","DOI":"10.3233\/DS-190026"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lange J. Freyer N. Musfeld P. Sch\u00f6nbrodt F. Leising D. (2025). A checklist for incentivizing and facilitating good theory building. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/7qvfz","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/7qvfz"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lavelle J. S. (2021). When a crisis becomes an opportunity: The role of replications in making better theories. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73(4) Article 714812. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/714812","DOI":"10.1086\/714812"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_41_1","volume-title":"Computational modeling in cognition: Principles and practice","author":"Lewandowsky S.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lewandowsky S., Farrell S. (2010). Computational modeling in cognition: Principles and practice. Sage."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewin K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. The Journal of Social Psychology 17(1) 113\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224545.1943.9712269","DOI":"10.1080\/00224545.1943.9712269"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McPhetres J. Albayrak-Aydemir N. Mendes A. B. Chow E. C. Gonzalez-Marquez P. Loukras E. Maus A. O\u2019Mahony A. Pomareda C. Primbs M. A. Sackman S. L. Smithson C. J. R. Volodko K. (2021). A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009\u20132019). PLOS ONE 16(3) Article e0247986. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0247986","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0247986"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.46.4.806"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meehl P. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry 1(2) 108\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327965pli0102_1","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327965pli0102_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_46_1","unstructured":"Mischel W. (2008 December 1). The toothbrush problem. APS Observer. https:\/\/www.psychologicalscience.org\/observer\/the-toothbrush-problem"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morris A. S. Silk J. S. Steinberg L. Myers S. S. Robinson L. R. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development 16(2) 361\u2013388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nakagawa S. Armitage D. Froese T. Yang Y. Lagisz M. (2024). Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: Learning from a theory crisis in psychology. EcoEvoRxiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32942\/X2S03W","DOI":"10.32942\/X2S03W"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Norouzi R. Kleinberg B. Vermunt J. Van Lissa C. J. (2024). Capturing causal claims: A fine tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers. OSF. https:\/\/osf.io\/preprints\/psyarxiv\/kwtpm_v1","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/kwtpm"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nosek B. A. Alter G. Banks G. C. Borsboom D. Bowman S. D. Breckler S. J. Buck S. Chambers C. D. Chin G. Christensen G. Contestabile M. Dafoe A. Eich E. Freese J. Glennerster R. Goroff D. Green D. P. Hesse B. Humphreys M. .\u2004.\u2004. Yarkoni T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242) 1422\u20131425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aab2374","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aab2374"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nosek B. A. Lakens D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology 45(3) 137\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000192","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000192"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oberauer K. Lewandowsky S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26(5) 1596\u20131618. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-019-01645-2","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-019-01645-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oude Maatman F. (2021). Psychology\u2019s theory crisis and why formal modelling cannot solve it. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/puqvs","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/puqvs"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearl J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82(4) 669\u2013688. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2337329","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/82.4.669"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_55_1","unstructured":"Peikert A. (2023). Towards transparency and open science [Doctoral dissertation Humboldt-Universit\u00e4t zu Berlin]. edoc-Server. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18452\/27056"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peikert A. Ernst M. S. Brandmaier A. M. (2023). Why does preregistration increase the persuasiveness of evidence? A Bayesian rationalization. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/cs8wb","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/cs8wb"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peikert A. Van Lissa C. J. Brandmaier A. M. (2021). Reproducible research in R: A tutorial on how to do the same thing more than once. Psych 3(4) 836\u2013867. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/psych3040053y","DOI":"10.3390\/psych3040053"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_58_1","volume-title":"Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce","author":"Peirce C.","year":"1960","unstructured":"Peirce C. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Belknap Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_59_1","volume-title":"The logic of scientific discovery","author":"Popper K. R.","year":"2002","unstructured":"Popper K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Taylor & Francis."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quine W. V. (1970). On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation. The Journal of Philosophy 67(6) 178\u2013183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2023887","DOI":"10.2307\/2023887"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ram K. (2013). Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 8(1) Article 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1751-0473-8-7","DOI":"10.1186\/1751-0473-8-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robinaugh D. J. Haslbeck J. M. B. Ryan O. Fried E. I. Waldorp L. J. (2021). Invisible hands and fine calipers: A call to use formal theory as a toolkit for theory construction. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4) 725\u2013743. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691620974697","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691620974697"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ryan R. M. Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation social development and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1) 68\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.55.1.68","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0003-066X.55.1.68"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scheel A. M. (2022). Why most psychological research findings are not even wrong. Infant and Child Development 31(1) Article e2295. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/icd.2295","DOI":"10.1002\/icd.2295"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scheel A. M. Schijen M. R. M. J. Lakens D. (2021). An excess of positive results: comparing the standard psychology literature with registered reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/25152459211007467","DOI":"10.1177\/25152459211007467"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scheel A. M. Tiokhin L. Isager P. M. Lakens D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4) 744\u2013755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691620966795","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691620966795"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_67_1","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6nbrodt F. (2025). Nicebread\/FOMO-Psy: Formal modeling in psychology (course material winter term 2024\/2025). Zenodo. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15703575"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smaldino P. E. (2017). Models are stupid and we need more of them. In Vallacher R. R. Read S. J. Nowak A. (Eds.) Computational social psychology (1st ed. pp. 311\u2013331). Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315173726-14","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315173726-14"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_69_1","volume-title":"Literature reviewing: Addressing the jingle and jangle fallacies and jungle conundrum using graph theory and NLP","author":"Song Y.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Song Y., Watson R. T., Zhao X. (2021, December 12\u201315). Literature reviewing: Addressing the jingle and jangle fallacies and jungle conundrum using graph theory and NLP [Paper presentation]. 42nd International Conference on Information Systems, Austin, TX, United States."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_70_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Szollosi A. Donkin C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4) 717\u2013724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691620966796","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691620966796"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tedersoo L. K\u00fcngas R. Oras E. K\u00f6ster K. Eenmaa H. Leijen \u00c4. Pedaste M. Raju M. Astapova A. Lukner H. Kogermann K. Sepp T. (2021). Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Scientific Data 8(1) Article 192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41597-021-00981-0","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-021-00981-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van De Sompel H. Payette S. Erickson J. Lagoze C. Warner S. (2004). Rethinking scholarly communication: Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine 10(9). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1045\/september2004-vandesompel","DOI":"10.1045\/september2004-vandesompel"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Der Maas H. L. J. Dolan C. V. Grasman R. P. P. P. Wicherts J. M. Huizenga H. M. Raijmakers M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review 113(4) 842\u2013861. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.113.4.842","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.113.4.842"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_75_1","unstructured":"van Dongen N. (2025). Course material - Fundamentals. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/ABXUT"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_76_1","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. (2023). Using endpoints to check reproducibility. GitHub. https:\/\/cjvanlissa.github.io\/worcs\/articles\/endpoints.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. Brandmaier A. M. Brinkman L. Lamprecht A.-L. Peikert A. Struiksma M. E. Vreede B. M. I. (2021). WORCS: A workflow for open reproducible code in science. Data Science 4(1) 29\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/DS-210031","DOI":"10.3233\/DS-210031"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. Gu X. Mulder J. Rosseel Y. Zundert C. V. Hoijtink H. (2021). Teacher\u2019s corner: Evaluating informative hypotheses using the Bayes factor in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 28(2) 292\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705511.2020.1745644","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2020.1745644"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_79_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. Keymolen E. Hoek S. van den Klingner A. Schurman L. Hunnik M. van. (2024). Towards a vision for team science at Tilburg University. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/jsbuv","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/jsbuv"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_80_1","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. van Dongen N. Bringmann L. Borsboom D. Scheel A. Haslbeck J. Volz L. Waaijers M. Eronen M. Helmich M. (2025). Proceedings of the Taskforce Theoretical Psychology. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/D3JMW"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_81_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Rooij I. Baggio G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(4) 682\u2013697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691620970604","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691620970604"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_82_1","unstructured":"Vogt L. Str\u00f6mert P. Matentzoglu N. Karam N. Konrad M. Prinz M. Baum R. (2024). FAIR 2.0: Extending the FAIR Guiding Principles to address semantic interoperability. arXiv. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2405.03345"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_83_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagenmakers E.-J. Dutilh G. Sarafoglou A. (2018). The creativity-verification cycle in psychological science: New methods to combat old idols. Perspectives on Psychological Science 13(4) 418\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691618771357","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691618771357"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilkinson M. D. Dumontier M. Aalbersberg I. J. Appleton G. Axton M. Baak A. Blomberg N. Boiten J.-W. da Silva Santos L. B. Bourne P. E. Bouwman J. Brookes A. J. Clark T. Crosas M. Dillo I. Dumon O. Edmunds S. Evelo C. T. Finkers R. .\u2004.\u2004. Mons B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3 Article 160018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilkinson S. R. Aloqalaa M. Belhajjame K. Crusoe M. R. de Paula Kinoshita B. Gadelha L. Garijo D. Gustafsson O. J. R. Juty N. Kanwal S. Khan F. B. K\u00f6ster J. Peters-von Gehlen K. Pouchard L. Rannow R. K. Soiland-Reyes S. Soranzo N. Sufi S. Sun Z. .\u2004.\u2004. Goble C. (2024). Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows. arXiv. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2410.03490","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-025-04451-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_86_1","unstructured":"Winther R. G. (2021). The structure of scientific theories. In Zalta E. N. (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.). Stanford University. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2021\/entries\/structure-scientific-theories"}],"container-title":["Perspectives on Psychological Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17456916251401850","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17456916251401850","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17456916251401850","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T08:45:14Z","timestamp":1777711514000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17456916251401850"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]]},"references-count":85,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17456916251401850"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17456916251401850","relation":{},"ISSN":["1745-6916","1745-6924"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1745-6916","type":"print"},{"value":"1745-6924","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,22]]}}}