{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T22:23:11Z","timestamp":1790374991432,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,17]],"date-time":"2023-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1697500800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","award":["19K03384"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["19K03384"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In the spatial Stroop task, an arrow target produces a spatial Stroop effect, whereas a gaze target elicits a reversed congruency effect. The reversed congruency effect has been explained by the unique attentional mechanisms of eye gaze. However, recent studies have shown that not only gaze but arrow targets produced a reversed congruency effect when embedded in a complex background. The present study investigated whether non-gaze targets produce a reversed congruency effect. In Experiments 1 and 2, we used the tongue, which is not commonly used to indicate spatial directions in daily life, as a target in the spatial Stroop task, in addition to the conventional gaze and arrows. In Experiment 3, we used arrow stimuli embedded in a complex background as a target. Participants judged the left\/right direction of the target presented in the left or right visual field. Although arrow and gaze targets replicated previous findings (spatial Stroop and reversed congruency effect, respectively), the tongue target produced a reversed congruency effect (Experiments 1 and 2). The spatial Stroop effect of arrow targets disappeared when they were in a complex background (Experiment 3). These results are inconsistent with previous accounts emphasising the unique status of eye gaze. We propose that temporal decay of the location code and response inhibition are responsible for the reversal of spatial interference.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218231203187","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T11:02:06Z","timestamp":1694689326000},"page":"1485-1497","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Eye gaze is not unique: The reversed congruency effect on gaze and tongue targets"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"77","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3417-5776","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yoshihiko","family":"Tanaka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate School of Humanities, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2648-6681","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kenta","family":"Ishikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takato","family":"Oyama","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate School of Humanities, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matia","family":"Okubo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anisfeld M. (1991). Neonatal imitation. Developmental Review 11(1) 60\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0273-2297(91)90003-7","DOI":"10.1016\/0273-2297(91)90003-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anisfeld M. (1996). Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review 16(2) 149\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/drev.1996.0006","DOI":"10.1006\/drev.1996.0006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aranda-Mart\u00edn B. Ballesteros-Duper\u00f3n M. \u00c1. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2022). What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence. British Journal of Psychology 113(3) 718\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjop.12552","DOI":"10.1111\/bjop.12552"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ariga A. Watanabe K. (2009). What is special about the index finger? The index finger advantage in manipulating reflexive attentional shift. Japanese Psychological Research 51(4) 258\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-5884.2009.00408.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-5884.2009.00408.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","unstructured":"ATR-promotions. (2006). ATR facial expression image database."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","first-page":"89","volume-title":"Imitation in infancy: Progress and prospects of current research","author":"Bard K.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bard K., Russell C. (1999). Evolutionary foundations of imitation: Social, cognitive, and developmental aspects of imitative processes in non-human primates. In Matsuzawa T. (Ed.), Imitation in infancy: Progress and prospects of current research (pp. 89\u2013123). Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","first-page":"513","article-title":"How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading","volume":"13","author":"Baron-Cohen S.","year":"1997","unstructured":"Baron-Cohen S. (1997). How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive\/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13(5), 513\u2013552.","journal-title":"Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive\/Current Psychology of Cognition"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonventre S. Marotta A. (2023). Is the reversed congruency effect unique to the eye-gaze? Investigating the effects of finger pointing eye-gaze and arrows stimuli on spatial interference. Frontiers in Cognition 2 1135435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcogn.2023.1135435","DOI":"10.3389\/fcogn.2023.1135435"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ca\u00f1adas E. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2012). Spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location: A study on the eye contact effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65(8) 1586\u20131598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17470218.2012.659190","DOI":"10.1080\/17470218.2012.659190"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chac\u00f3n-Candia J. A. Rom\u00e1n-Caballero R. Aranda-Mart\u00edn B. Casagrande M. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. Marotta A. (2022). Are there quantitative differences between eye-gaze and arrow cues? A meta-analytic answer to the debate and a call for qualitative differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 144 104993. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2022.104993","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2022.104993"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Z. Thomas R. H. Chen M. S. (2022). Do gaze and non-gaze stimuli trigger different spatial interference effects? It depends on stimulus perceivability. Frontiers in Psychology 13 801151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.801151","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.801151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dalmaso M. Castelli L. Galfano G. (2020). Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27 833\u2013855. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-020-01730-x","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-020-01730-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dalmaso M. Galfano G. Tarqui L. Forti B. Castelli L. (2013). Is social attention impaired in schizophrenia? Gaze but not pointing gestures is associated with spatial attention deficits. Neuropsychology 27(5) 608\u2013613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0033518","DOI":"10.1037\/a0033518"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Leeuw J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods 47(1) 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-014-0458-y","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-014-0458-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Downing P. Dodds C. Bray D. (2004). Why does the gaze of others direct visual attention? Visual Cognition 11(1) 71\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1350628034400022","DOI":"10.1080\/13506280344000220"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Driver J. Davis G. Ricciardelli P. Kidd P. Maxwell E. Baron-Cohen S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition 6(5) 509\u2013540. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/135062899394920","DOI":"10.1080\/135062899394920"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards S. G. Seibert N. Bayliss A. P. (2020). Joint attention facilitates observed gaze direction discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73(1) 80\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1747021819867901","DOI":"10.1177\/1747021819867901"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faul F. Erdfelder E. Lang A.-G. Buchner A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39(2) 175\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03193146","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friesen C. K. Ristic J. Kingstone A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30(2) 319\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-1523.30.2.319","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.30.2.319"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hemmerich K. Narganes-Pineda C. Marotta A. Mart\u00edn-Ar\u00e9valo E. Jim\u00e9nez L. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2022). Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 48(8) 824\u2013841. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0001015","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0001015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hommel B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research 55(4) 280\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00419688","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00419688"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ishikawa K. Oyama T. Okubo M. (2021). The malfunction of domain-specific attentional process in social anxiety: Attentional process of social and non-social stimuli. Cognition and Emotion 35 1163\u20131174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02699931.2021.1935217","DOI":"10.1080\/02699931.2021.1935217"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones S. (2015). The mediating effects of facial expression on spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location. The Journal of General Psychology 142(2) 106\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00221309.2015.1009822","DOI":"10.1080\/00221309.2015.1009822"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Juncos-Rabad\u00e1n O. Pereiro A. X. Facal D. (2008). Cognitive interference and aging: Insights from a spatial stimulus\u2013response consistency task. Acta Psychologica 127(2) 237\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2007.05.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2007.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kingstone A. Friesen C. K. Gazzaniga M. S. (2000). Reflexive joint attention depends on lateralized cortical connections. Psychological Science 11(2) 159\u2013166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-9280.00232","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9280.00232"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Langton S. R. Bruce V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition 6(5) 541\u2013567. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/135062899394939","DOI":"10.1080\/135062899394939"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Legerstee M. (1991). The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 51(3) 423\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-0965(91)90086-8","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0965(91)90086-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lu C.-H. Proctor R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2(2) 174\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03210959","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03210959"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marotta A. Aranda-Mart\u00edn B. De Cono M. Ballesteros-Duper\u00f3n M. \u00c1. Casagrande M. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2022). Integration of facial expression and gaze direction in individuals with a high level of autistic traits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(5) 2798. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph19052798","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19052798"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marotta A. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. Martella D. Casagrande M. (2012). Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: Two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38(2) 326\u2013335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0023959","DOI":"10.1037\/a0023959"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marotta A. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. Rom\u00e1n-Caballero R. Narganes-Pineda C. Mart\u00edn-Ar\u00e9valo E. (2019). Are eyes special? Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for a dissociation between eye-gaze and arrows attentional mechanisms. Neuropsychologia 129 146\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2019.03.017"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marotta A. Rom\u00e1n-Caballero R. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2018). Arrows don\u2019t look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25(6) 2254\u20132259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-018-1457-2","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-018-1457-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meltzoff A. N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders 32(4) 251\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0021-9924(99)00009-X","DOI":"10.1016\/S0021-9924(99)00009-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_1","first-page":"55","article-title":"Imitation and other minds: The \u201clike me\u201d hypothesis","volume":"2","author":"Meltzoff A. N.","year":"2005","unstructured":"Meltzoff A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The \u201clike me\u201d hypothesis. Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, 2, 55\u201377.","journal-title":"Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meltzoff A. N. Moore M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198(4312) 75\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.198.4312.7","DOI":"10.1126\/science.198.4312.75"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myowa-Yamakoshi M. Tomonaga M. Tanaka M. Matsuzawa T. (2004). Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (pan troglodytes). Developmental Science 7(4) 437\u2013442. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-7687.2004.00364.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-7687.2004.00364.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Narganes-Pineda C. Chica A. B. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. Marotta A. (2022). Explicit vs. Implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. Eye-gaze spatial congruency effects. Psychological Research 87(1) 242\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-022-01659-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-022-01659-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oyama T. Okubo M. (2022). Face and eyes: Critical analysis of the cue-target spatial-conflict account for gaze cueing effect. Japanese Journal of Psychology 92(6) 511\u2013521. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4992\/jjpsy.92.20011","DOI":"10.4992\/jjpsy.92.20011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Posner M. I. Rafal R. D. Choate L. S. Vaughan J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2(3) 211\u2013228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02643298508252866","DOI":"10.1080\/02643298508252866"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proctor R. W. Miles J. D. Baroni G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18(2) 242\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-011-0053-5","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-011-0053-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quinn K. A. Macrae C. N. (2011). The face and person perception: Insights from social cognition. British Journal of Psychology 102(4) 849\u2013867. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8295.2011.02030.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8295.2011.02030.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198510697.003.0024"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ridderinkhof K. R. (2002b). Micro-and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research 66(4) 312\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-002-0104-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-002-0104-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_1","first-page":"369","volume-title":"Cognitive neuro-science of attention","author":"Ridderinkhof K. R.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ridderinkhof K. R., van den Wildenberg W. P. M., Wijnen J., Burle B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In Posner M. (Ed.), Cognitive neuro-science of attention (pp. 369\u2013377). Guilford Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rom\u00e1n-Caballero R. Marotta A. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2021a). Spatial interference triggered by gaze and arrows. The role of target background on spatial interference. Psicol\u00f3gica Journal 42(2) 192\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/psicolj-2021-0010","DOI":"10.2478\/psicolj-2021-0010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rom\u00e1n-Caballero R. Marotta A. Lupi\u00e1\u00f1ez J. (2021b). Target\u2013background segregation in a spatial interference paradigm reveals shared and specific attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 47(11) 1561\u20131573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xhp0000953","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000953"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rozin P. Lowery L. Ebert R. (1994). Varieties of disgust faces and the structure of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5) 870\u2013881. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.66.5.870","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.66.5.870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senju A. Hasegawa T. Tojo Y. (2005). Does perceived direct gaze boost detection in adults and children with and without autism? The stare-in-the-crowd effect revisited. Visual Cognition 12(8) 1474\u20131496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13506280444000797","DOI":"10.1080\/13506280444000797"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senju A. Johnson M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(3) 127\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2008.11.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2008.11.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Senju A. Kikuchi Y. Hasegawa T. Tojo Y. Osanai H. (2008). Is anyone looking at me? Direct gaze detection in children with and without autism. Brain and Cognition 67(2) 127\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bandc.2007.12.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandc.2007.12.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanaka Y. Ishikawa K. Oyama T. Okubo M. (2022). Face inversion does not affect the reversed congruency effect of gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 30 974\u2013982. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-022-02208-8","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-022-02208-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tipper S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37(4) 571\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14640748508400920","DOI":"10.1080\/14640748508400920"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tipper S. P. MacQueen G. M. Brehaut J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 43(1) 45\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03208972","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03208972"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tomasello M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Moore C. Dunham P. J. (Ed.) Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 353\u2013383). Erlbaum. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315806617","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315806617"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_1","first-page":"127","volume-title":"Imitation in infancy","author":"Trevarthen C.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Trevarthen C., Kokkinaki T., Fiamenghi G. A.Jr. (1999). What infants\u2019 imitations communicate: With mothers, with fathers and with peers. In Nadel J., Butterworth G. (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 127\u2013185). Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uzgiris I. C. (1981). Two functions of imitation during infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development 4(1) 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/016502548100400101","DOI":"10.1177\/016502548100400101"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_1","first-page":"186","volume-title":"Imitation in infancy","author":"Uzgiris I. C.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Uzgiris I. C. (1999). Imitation as activity: Its developmental aspects. In Nadel J., Butterworth G. (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 186\u2013206). Cambridge University Press."}],"container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218231203187","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17470218231203187","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218231203187","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T10:33:56Z","timestamp":1787394836000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17470218231203187"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,17]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17470218231203187"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17470218231203187","relation":{},"ISSN":["1747-0218","1747-0226"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1747-0218","type":"print"},{"value":"1747-0226","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,17]]}}}