{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T11:23:46Z","timestamp":1787397826150,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]],"date-time":"2026-01-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767312000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000065","name":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01 NS102201"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01 NS102201"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000065","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000055","name":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01 DC020143"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01 DC020143"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000055","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>False predictions during sentence comprehension are a frequent phenomenon. Recent research has shown that in highly constrained sentences, inhibitory mechanisms are engaged to suppress false predictions. However, little is known about what specifically leads to this inhibition. Sixty-eight monolingual English-speaking adults participated in the current study to examine what triggers the inhibition of predicted words. We utilized the cross-modal lexical priming paradigm. Participants performed a visual lexical decision task (LDT) immediately after listening to incomplete sentences and sentences containing violations that did not match their prediction. In Experiment 1, violation sentences ended in pseudowords that contained a phonological mismatch, while in Experiment 2, violation sentences ended in environmental sounds that contained a semantic mismatch. To examine whether the predicted word was inhibited in each case, we compared LDT reaction times (RTs) to predicted words across sentence conditions. Results showed that LDT RTs to the predicted word were significantly slower after pseudowords, but not environment sounds. Taken together with previous work, this suggests that lexico-semantic information may not be required to trigger inhibition. While pseudoword violations\u2014stimuli that resemble real words but lack meaning\u2014inhibit false predictions, semantic mismatch alone may be insufficient to elicit inhibition.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218251398828","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T12:24:46Z","timestamp":1762950286000},"page":"1094-1109","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Phonological Mismatch Initiates Inhibitory Control of Failed Predictions During Sentence Comprehension"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"79","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5560-2138","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jina","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Communication Sciences &amp; Disorders, University of Iowa, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan R.","family":"Wessel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychological &amp; Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, USA"},{"name":"Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8843-6615","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kristi","family":"Hendrickson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Communication Sciences &amp; Disorders, University of Iowa, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ahn P. Lee K. (2016). Development of Environmental Sounds for Auditory Training. Audiology and Speech Research 12(2) 82\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21848\/asr.2016.12.2.82","DOI":"10.21848\/asr.2016.12.2.82"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Altmann G. T. Kamide Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73(3) 247\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0010-0277(99)00059-1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-0277(99)00059-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arbel Y. Spencer K. M. Donchin E. (2011). The N400 and the P300 are not all that independent. Psychophysiology 48(6) 861\u2013875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1469-8986.2010.01151.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-8986.2010.01151.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-596X(03)00027-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ballas J. A. Howard J. H. (1987). Interpreting the language of environmental sounds. Environment and Behavior 19(1) 91\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0013916587191005","DOI":"10.1177\/0013916587191005"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balota D. A. Pollatsek A. Rayner K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 17(3) 364\u2013390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0010-0285(85)90013-1","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0285(85)90013-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bansal A. Garg N. K. (2022). Environmental sound classification: A descriptive review of the literature. Intelligent Systems with Applications 16 200115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iswa.2022.200115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iswa.2022.200115"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Block C. K. Baldwin C. L. (2010). Cloze probability and completion norms for 498 sentences: behavioral and neural validation using event-related potentials. Behavior Research Methods 42(3) 665\u2013670. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BRM.42.3.665","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.42.3.665"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brothers T. Morgan E. Yacovone A. Kuperberg G. (2023). Multiple predictions during language comprehension: Friends foes or indifferent companions? Cognition 241 105602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105602","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105602"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caucheteux C. Gramfort A. King J.-R. (2023). Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech. Nature Human Behaviour 7(3) 430\u2013441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-022-01516-2","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-022-01516-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Connolly J. F. Phillips N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6(3) 256\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn.1994.6.3.256","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn.1994.6.3.256"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2006.10.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brainres.2006.07.050"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLong K. A. Kutas M. (2020). Comprehending surprising sentences: Sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness. Language Cognition and Neuroscience 35(8) 1044\u20131063. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23273798.2019.1708960","DOI":"10.1080\/23273798.2019.1708960"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeLong K. A. Urbach T. P. Kutas M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8(8) 1117\u20131121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nn1504","DOI":"10.1038\/nn1504"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Diaz M. T. Swaab T. Y. (2007). Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts. Brain Research 1146(1) 85\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.brainres.2006.07.034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brainres.2006.07.034"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ehrlich S. F. Rayner K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20(6) 641\u2013655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0022-5371(81)90220-6","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5371(81)90220-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Federmeier K. D. Kutas M. (1999). A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 41(4) 469\u2013495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/jmla.1999.2660","DOI":"10.1006\/jmla.1999.2660"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fischler I. S. Bloom P. A. (1985). Effects of constraint and validity of sentence contexts on lexical decisions. Memory & Cognition 13(2) 128\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03197005","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03197005"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fitz H. Chang F. (2019). Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation. Cognitive Psychology 111 15\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2019.03.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2019.03.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friedman D. Cycowicz Y. M. Dziobek I. (2003). Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: Effects on the novelty P3. Cognitive Brain Research 18(1) 58\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frisson S. Harvey D. R. Staub A. (2017). No prediction error cost in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 95 200\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2017.04.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2017.04.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gernsbacher M. A. Varner K. R. Faust M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 16(3) 430\u2013445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0278-7393.16.3.430","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-7393.16.3.430"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandl.2012.01.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hendrickson K. Love T. Walenski M. Friend M. (2019). The organization of words and environmental sounds in the second year: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Developmental Science 22(1) e12746. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/desc.12746","DOI":"10.1111\/desc.12746"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hendrickson K. Walenski M. Friend M. Love T. (2015). The organization of words and environmental sounds in memory. Neuropsychologia 69 67\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.035"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jack B. N. Le Pelley M. E. Griffiths O. Luque D. Whitford T. J. (2019). Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent: An ERP study. Brain Research 1706 86\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.brainres.2018.10.034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brainres.2018.10.034"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kamide Y. Altmann G. T. M. Haywood S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49(1) 133\u2013156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0749-596x(03)00023-8","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-596X(03)00023-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim J. Wessel J. R. Hendrickson K. (2023). Inhibition of lexical representations after violated semantic predictions. Cognition 240 105585. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2023.105585"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuperberg G. R. Jaeger T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language Cognition and Neuroscience 31(1) 32\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23273798.2015.1102299","DOI":"10.1080\/23273798.2015.1102299"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kutas M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(4) 533\u2013572. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01690969308407587","DOI":"10.1080\/01690969308407587"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195395518.003.0065"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kutas M. Federmeier K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62(1) 621\u2013647. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.131123","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.131123"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laszlo S. Federmeier K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language 61(3) 326\u2013338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2009.06.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2009.06.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laszlo S. Federmeier K. D. (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology 48(2) 176\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Love T. Swinney D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25(1) 5\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01708418","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01708418"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luke S. G. Christianson K. (2016). Limits on lexical prediction during reading. Cognitive Psychology 88 22\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lupyan G. Clark A. (2015). Words and the World: Predictive Coding and the Language-perception-Cognition Interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(4) 279\u2013284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721415570732","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721415570732"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moreno E. M. Federmeier K. D. Kutas M. (2002). Switching languages switching Palabras (words): An electrophysiological study of code switching. Brain and Language 80(2) 188\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/brln.2001.2588","DOI":"10.1006\/brln.2001.2588"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ness T. Meltzer-Asscher A. (2018). Lexical inhibition due to failed prediction: Behavioral evidence and ERP correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 44(8) 1269\u20131285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xlm0000525","DOI":"10.1037\/xlm0000525"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nicol J. L. Fodor J. D. Swinney D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 20(5) 1229\u20131238. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0278-7393.20.5.1229","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-7393.20.5.1229"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peelle J. E. Miller R. L. Rogers C. S. Spehar B. Sommers M. S. Van Engen K. J. (2020). Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts. Behavior Research Methods 52(4) 1795\u20131799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-020-01351-1","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-020-01351-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pickering M. J. Garrod S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(3) 105\u2013110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2006.12.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2006.12.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rabovsky M. Hansen S. S. McClelland J. L. (2018). Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning. Nature Human Behaviour 2(9) 693\u2013705. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-018-0406-4","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-018-0406-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/4580"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schwanenflugel P. J. Shoben E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language 24(2) 232\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0749-596x(85)90026-9","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-596X(85)90026-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shokrkon A. Nicoladis E. (2022). The directionality of the relationship between executive functions and language skills: A literature review [review]. Frontiers in Psychology 13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.848696","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.848696"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stone K. Nicenboim B. Vasishth S. R\u00f6sler F. (2023). Understanding the effects of constraint and predictability in ERP. Neurobiology of Language 4(2) 221\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/nol_a_00094","DOI":"10.1162\/nol_a_00094"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swinney D. Love T. Walenski M. Smith E. E. (2007). Conceptual combination during sentence comprehension: evidence for compositional processes. Psychological Science 18(5) 397\u2013400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2007.01912.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2007.01912.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swinney D. Zurif E. Prather P. Love T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(2) 174\u2013184. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn.1996.8.2.174","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn.1996.8.2.174"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swinney D. A. Onifer W. Prather P. Hirshkowitz M. (1979). Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory & Cognition 7(3) 159\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/bf03197534","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03197534"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thornhill D. E. Van Petten C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 83(3) 382\u2013392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uddin S. Heald S. L. M. Van Hedger S. C. Klos S. Nusbaum H. C. (2018a). Understanding environmental sounds in sentence context. Cognition 172 134\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.12.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.12.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandl.2018.02.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Petten C. Luka B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: benefits costs and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 83(2) 176\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Petten C. Rheinfelder H. (1995). Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: event-related brain potential measures. Neuropsychologia 33(4) 485\u2013508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0028-3932(94)00133-a","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-3932(94)00133-A"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218231223858"}],"container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218251398828","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17470218251398828","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218251398828","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T10:50:11Z","timestamp":1787395811000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17470218251398828"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17470218251398828"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17470218251398828","relation":{},"ISSN":["1747-0218","1747-0226"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1747-0218","type":"print"},{"value":"1747-0226","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]]}}}