{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T17:26:19Z","timestamp":1787851579693,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784246400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784246400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Preference research has shown that humans have a bias towards items located in the middle of the visual field and a number of theories have been suggested to explain the phenomenon. The conjuring trick known as the\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">placement force<\/jats:italic>\n                    not only exploits this central bias but also shows that the preference is subtly biased to the right of centre. We used the force, together with eye tracking, to test the different theories. In a single experiment, four face-down playing cards were presented on a table in a horizontal row. Participants (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u2009137) were asked to select one by pushing it forward. Results replicated the basic force effect, showing that 52% of participants chose the middle right card. Eye-tracking measures revealed that when participants fixated the cards, more time was spent looking at the two centrally located cards. However, this attentional bias did not predict the card they chose. Furthermore, individuals who were more reflective decision makers (as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test) were no less susceptible to the force, nor were individuals who spent more time deliberating about their decision or those who examined more alternatives. The results do not support the view that central bias effects result from cognitive decision heuristics or attentional biases. Instead, participants chose options that required the least physical effort. This supports the reachability hypothesis.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218261472690","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T11:23:29Z","timestamp":1784287409000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Why Do Location-Based Preference Effects Occur Within Decision Making? Evidence From the\n                    <i>Magician\u2019s Force<\/i>"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2888-914X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gustav","family":"Kuhn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rachael","family":"Bulford-Forbes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liliana","family":"Schirru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meda","family":"Valecke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Geoff G.","family":"Cole","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Armel K. C. Beaumel A. Rangel A. (2008). Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment and Decision Making 3(5) 396\u2013403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1930297500000413","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500000413"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atalay A. S. Bodur H. O. Rasolofoarison D. (2012). Shining in the center: Central gaze cascade effect on product choice. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4) 848\u2013866. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/665984","DOI":"10.1086\/665984"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bargh J. A. Chartrand T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54(7) Article 462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.54.7.462","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.54.7.462"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bar-Hillel M. (2015). Position effects in choice from simultaneous displays: A conundrum solved. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(4) 419\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691615588092","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691615588092"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bindemann M. (2010). Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research 50(23) 2577\u20132587. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.visres.2010.08.016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2010.08.016"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","first-page":"903","article-title":"La psychologie de la prestidigitation","volume":"125","author":"Binet A.","year":"1894","unstructured":"Binet A. (1894a). La psychologie de la prestidigitation. Revue des Deux Mondes (1829\u20131971), 125(4), 903\u2013922.","journal-title":"Revue des Deux Mondes (1829\u20131971)"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","volume-title":"Psychology of prestidigitation","author":"Binet A.","year":"1894","unstructured":"Binet A. (1894b). Psychology of prestidigitation (Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution Issue). G. P. Office."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chandon P. Hutchinson J. W. Bradlow E. T. Young S. H. (2009). Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing 73(6) 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.1406506","DOI":"10.1509\/jmkg.73.6.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christenfeld N. (1995). Choices from identical options. Psychological Science 6(1) 50\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00304.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00304.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","first-page":"77","volume-title":"Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences","author":"Cohen J.","year":"1988","unstructured":"Cohen J. (1988). The effect size. In Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 77\u201383). Routledge."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cole G. G. Kuhn G. (2025). What can conjuring tell us about cognition? The future of the science of magic. Current Directions in Psychological Science 34 64\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09637214241300107","DOI":"10.1177\/09637214241300107"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Correll J. Mellinger C. McClelland G. H. Judd C. M. (2020). Avoid Cohen\u2019s \u2018Small\u2019 \u2018Medium\u2019 and \u2018Large\u2019 for power analysis.\u202fTrends in Cognitive Sciences 24 200\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2019.12.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2019.12.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evans J. S. B. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology 75(4) 451\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/psyp.12169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01915.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evans J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10) 454\u2013459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2003.08.012","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2003.08.012"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evans J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1) 255\u2013278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frederick S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4) 25\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1257\/089533005775196732","DOI":"10.1257\/089533005775196732"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ghaffari M. Fiedler S. (2018). The power of attention: Using eye gaze to predict other-regarding and moral choices. Psychological Science 29 1878\u20131889. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797618799301","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797618799301"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hayhoe M. Ballard D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science 9(4) 188\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2005.02.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2005.02.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","author":"Kahneman D.","year":"1982","unstructured":"Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. Cambridge University Press.","journal-title":"The simulation heuristic"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim J. Hwang E. Park J. Lee J. C. Park J. (2019). Position effects of menu item displays in consumer choices: Comparisons of horizontal versus vertical displays. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 60(2) 116\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1938965518778234","DOI":"10.1177\/1938965518778234"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuhn G. Pailh\u00e8s A. Lan Y. (2020). Forcing you to experience wonder: Unconsciously biasing people\u2019s choice through strategic physical positioning. Consciousness and Cognition 80 102902. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2020.102902","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2020.102902"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Land M. F. Mennie N. Rusted J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28(11) 1311\u20131328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1068\/p2935","DOI":"10.1068\/p2935"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michel C. Velasco C. Fraemohs P. Spence C. (2015). Studying the impact of plating on ratings of the food served in a naturalistic dining context. Appetite 90 45\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.appet.2015.02.030","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appet.2015.02.030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nisbett R. E. Wilson T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know\u2013Verbal resports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3) 231\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295x.84.3.231","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.84.3.231"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann A. Clark C. N. (2023). Pseudoneglect during object search in naturalistic scenes. Experimental Brain Research 241 2345\u20132360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00221-023-06679-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-023-06679-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann A. Matthias E. (2014). Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing. Cortex 52 113\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cortex.2013.11.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2013.11.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oldfield R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1) 97\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0028-3932(71)90067-4","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-3932(71)90067-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olson J. A. Amlani A. A. Raz A. Rensink R. A. (2015). Influencing choice without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 37 225\u2013236. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2015.01.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2015.01.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pailh\u00e8s A. Kuhn G. (2020). Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(30) 17675\u201317679. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2000682117","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2000682117"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pailh\u00e8s A. Kuhn G. (2021a). Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: Using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will. Psychological Research 85 1380\u20131390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00426-020-01350-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-020-01350-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pailh\u00e8s A. Kuhn G. (2021b). Mind control tricks: Magicians\u2019 forcing and free will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25(5) 338\u2013341. https:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2021.02.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2021.02.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pailhes A. Kuhn G. (2023). Don\u2019t read this paper! Reverse psychology contrast and position effects in a magician forcing technique. Journal of Performance Magic 7\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5920\/jpm.1264","DOI":"10.5920\/jpm.1264"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pailh\u00e8s A. Rensink R. A. Kuhn G. (2020). A psychologically based taxonomy of Magicians\u2019 forcing techniques: How magicians influence our choices and how to use this to study psychological mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition 86 Article 103038. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.concog.2020.103038","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2020.103038"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P\u00e4rnamets P. Johansson P. Hall L. Balkenius C. Spivey M. J. Richardson D. C. (2015). Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 4170\u20134175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1415250112","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1415250112"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rensink R. A. Kuhn G. (2015). A framework for using magic to study the mind [Hypothesis & Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology 5 Article 1508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.01508","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.01508"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reutskaja E. Nagel R. Camerer C. F. Rangel A. (2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. American Economic Review 101(2) 900\u2013926. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1257\/aer.101.2.900","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.101.2.900"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rodway P. Schepman A. Lambert J. (2012). Preferring the one in the middle: Further evidence for the centre-stage effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26(2) 215\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.1812","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.1812"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rodway P. Schepman A. Thoma V. (2016). Reachability does not explain the middle preference: A comment on Bar-Hillel (2015). i-Perception 7 2041669516639959. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2041669516639959","DOI":"10.1177\/2041669516639959"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer T. Schwarz M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology 10 813. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00813","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00813"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shaw J. I. Bergen J. E. Brown C. A. Gallagher M. E. (2000). Centrality preferences in choices among similar options. The Journal of General Psychology 127(2) 157\u2013164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00221300009598575","DOI":"10.1080\/00221300009598575"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spotorno S. Tatler B. W. (2025). What\u2019s left of the leftward bias in scene viewing? Lateral asymmetries in information processing during early search guidance. Cognition 254 Article 106009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2024.106009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2024.106009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_1","volume-title":"Rationality and the reflective mind","author":"Stanovich K.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Stanovich K. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sundali J. Croson R. (2006). Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler\u2019sfallacy. Judgment and Decision Making 1(1) 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1930297500000309","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500000309"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tatler B. W. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision 7(14) 4.1\u20134.17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/7.14.4","DOI":"10.1167\/7.14.4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_1","unstructured":"Tonsen M. Baumann C. K. Dierkes K. (2020). A high-level description and performance evaluation of pupil invisible. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00508."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toplak M. E. West R. F. Stanovich K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition 39(7) 1275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-011-0104-1","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-011-0104-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toplak M. E. West R. F. Stanovich K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning 20(2) 147\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13546783.2013.844729","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2013.844729"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valenzuela A. Raghubir P. (2009). Position-based beliefs: The center-stage effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19(2) 185\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcps.2009.02.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcps.2009.02.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wegner D. M. (2003). The mind\u2019s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2) 65\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1364-6613(03)00002-0","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(03)00002-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zajonc R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs 9 1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0025848","DOI":"10.1037\/h0025848"}],"container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218261472690","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17470218261472690","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218261472690","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T16:53:11Z","timestamp":1787849591000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17470218261472690"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]]},"references-count":50,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17470218261472690"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17470218261472690","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/17470218261472690\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/17470218261472690\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/17470218261472690\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/17470218261472690\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1747-0218","1747-0226"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1747-0218","type":"print"},{"value":"1747-0226","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]]},"article-number":"17470218261472690"}}