{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T09:03:17Z","timestamp":1790326997783,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Working memory and inhibitory control are widely regarded as core components of executive function, yet whether they draw on a shared pool of executive resources remains debated. The present study examined whether concurrently increasing working-memory maintenance and conflict-resolution demands produced additive performance costs or an over-additive interaction in task-performance data. A classic digit preload manipulation of working-memory maintenance (ascending = low load; random = high load) was combined with two inhibitory paradigms that were modified to minimise their own intrinsic memory demands: a flanker task targeting interference control and a spatial conflict task targeting response inhibition. Digit sequences were recalled after each block to ensure sustained working-memory engagement. Ninety-eight participants completed the spatial conflict task and ninety-seven completed the flanker task. Bayesian repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed robust main effects of working-memory load and congruency on inhibitory-trial reaction times in both tasks, but provided evidence against an over-additive interaction of these factors on performance on either task. These findings are consistent with the view that working-memory maintenance and conflict resolution do not compete for shared executive resources.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218261494820","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T05:25:38Z","timestamp":1790227538000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["EXPRESS: Do Working-Memory Maintenance and Inhibitory Control Draw on Shared Executive Resources? Evidence from Two Combined Tasks"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-8497-6373","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yasamin","family":"Rahmati","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher","family":"Jarrold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"container-title":["Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218261494820","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17470218261494820","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T08:16:22Z","timestamp":1790324182000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17470218261494820"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"references-count":0,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17470218261494820"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17470218261494820","relation":{},"ISSN":["1747-0218","1747-0226"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1747-0218","type":"print"},{"value":"1747-0226","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"article-number":"17470218261494820"}}