{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T06:19:32Z","timestamp":1793859572527,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791763200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"The MPS Foundation","award":["TMPSF2024001"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["TMPSF2024001"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of the Intensive Care Society"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The clinical and administrative pressures leading to cancellation of surgery are well established. However, it is not known whether the same factors lead to a change in patients\u2019 planned postoperative destination and level of care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted a secondary analysis of the REPACC dataset; a nationwide, retrospective, observational study examining the provision of enhanced and critical care services in the UK. The reasons for cancellation and changes to the level of care received postoperatively were ascertained from free-text data.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our analysis included 5990 patients from 65 sites across the UK, of which 539 (9.6%) had their surgery cancelled. The most common reason for surgical cancellation was a lack of resources (51.0%), primarily bed shortages (37.1%). Among the 5451 patients who proceeded with surgery, 81.3% received the anticipated level of care postoperatively, 3.9% required escalation and 14.8% were de-escalated to a lower level of care. Changes to the anticipated level of care occurred most often among patients initially triaged to enhanced care. Clinical reasons were the major cause of escalation (53.3%) and de-escalation (61.2%) postoperatively with bed shortages accounting for a minority. Patients were commonly de-escalated following a postoperative assessment (21.8%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cancellation of surgery in the UK is primarily a consequence of resource scarcity, whereas clinical reasons account for the majority of those re-allocated to different levels of care postoperatively. Future work should explore the clinical and health economic impacts of this dynamic bed management with particular focus on the role of enhanced care as an interface between critical care and the ward.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/17511437261495043","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T10:04:15Z","timestamp":1791799455000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Surgical cancellation and changes in postoperative level of care among high and moderate risk surgical patients in the UK"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"given":"Joanna K. L.","family":"Wong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-7592-1558","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rosanna","family":"Sasson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2311-9261","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christopher","family":"Oddy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"Pan-London Perioperative Audit and Research Network Committee, The REPACC Study Investigators","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wong DJN Harris SK Moonesinghe SR. Cancelled operations: a 7-day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National Health Service hospitals. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 730\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2018.07.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2018.07.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","unstructured":"Royal College of Anaesthetists. The first super-sprint national anaesthesia project (SuperSNAP1): cancellations efficiency and productivity in perioperative care: a 2-day national service evaluation. Royal College of Anaesthetists http:\/\/rcoa.ac.uk\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/2024-08\/SuperSNAP%20report%2010.03.2022.pdf (2022 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","unstructured":"NHS England. Cancelled elective operations data https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/statistics\/statistical-work-areas\/cancelled-elective-operations\/cancelled-ops-data\/ (2026 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loftus TJ Ruppert MM Ozrazgat-Baslanti T et al. Postoperative overtriage to an intensive care unit is associated with low value of Care. Ann Surg 2023; 277: 179\u2013185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/sla.0000000000005460","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005460"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loftus TJ Ruppert MM Shickel B et al. Overtriage undertriage and value of care after major surgery: an automated explainable deep learning-enabled classification system. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236: 279\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/XCS.0000000000000471","DOI":"10.1097\/XCS.0000000000000471"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell RAS Thevathasan T Wong DJN et al. Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 1165\u20131179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.16383","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.16383"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Azcarate C Esparza L Mallor F. The problem of the last bed: contextualization and a new simulation framework for analyzing physician decisions. Omega 2020; 96: 102120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2019.102120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2019.102120"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walker HGM Dalton NS Coulson T et al. Factors associated with resource-intensive planned critical care admissions after elective surgery in patients with a planned admission to the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 98\u2013106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2025.08.066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2025.08.066"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taccone P Langer T Grasselli G. Do we really need postoperative ICU management after elective surgery? No not any more! Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 1037\u20131038. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00134-017-4814-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-017-4814-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X0603400403"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore D Durie ML Bampoe S et al. The risk of postoperative deterioration of non-cardiac surgery patients with ICU referral status who are admitted to the regular ward: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 2021; 15: 10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00283-9","DOI":"10.1186\/s13037-021-00283-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillies MA Harrison EM Pearse RM et al. Intensive care utilization and outcomes after high-risk surgery in Scotland: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 123\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aew396","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aew396"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oughton C Richardson I Kusre S et al. Enhanced care units provide a tailored and scalable solution to managing postoperative pathophysiology. Anaesth Intensive Care 2026; 54: 11\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0310057X251366321","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X251366321"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","unstructured":"Health Research Authority. Do I need NHS REC review? https:\/\/www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk\/ethics\/ (2026 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"von Elm E Altman DG Egger M et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 344\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oddy C Lowcock D Davies TW et al. Structural and organisational impacts of peri-operative enhanced care services in the UK: a retrospective evaluation of Postoperative alternatives to critical care (REPACC). Anaesthesia 2026; 81: 500\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.70057","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.70057"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","unstructured":"Intensive Care Society. Levels of care https:\/\/ics.ac.uk\/resource\/levels-of-care.html (2021 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","unstructured":"Fowler A. Defining the high-risk surgical population in the National Health Service. Queen Mary University of London https:\/\/qmro.qmul.ac.uk\/xmlui\/handle\/123456789\/92153 (2023 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bedford J McCone E Hunt A et al. The postponement and cancellations in elective care study: a national evaluation of case postponements and cancellations in elective surgical pathways. Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1925\u20131934. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2026.01.046","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2026.01.046"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koushan M Wood LC Greatbanks R. Evaluating factors associated with the cancellation and delay of elective surgical procedures: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33: mzab092. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzab092","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzab092"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chan J Poon S Lawrence-Jones A et al. Patient experiences of waiting for orthopaedic care and priorities for \u2018waiting well\u2019: a qualitative study in a London NHS trust. Arch Public Health 2025; 83: 95. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13690-025-01578-4","DOI":"10.1186\/s13690-025-01578-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","unstructured":"NHS England. Early screening triaging risk assessment and health optimisation in perioperative pathways: guide for providers and integrated care boards https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/long-read\/earlier-screening-risk-assessment-and-health-optimisation-in-perioperative-pathways\/ (2026 accessed 14 March 2026)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hurndall K-H Clarke J Neves A-L et al. Mapping strategies for reducing inequalities in adult elective surgical care in the United Kingdom: a living scoping review protocol. Syst Rev 2025; 14: 189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02927-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-025-02927-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Town JA Churpek MM Yuen TC et al. Relationship between ICU bed availability ICU readmission and cardiac arrest in the general wards. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 2037\u20132041. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CCM.0000000000000401","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000000401"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Georgiou A Cain D Bruce MS et al. Emergency and postoperative access to critical and enhanced care: a multicentre prospective observational study. Anaesthesia 2025; 80: 522\u2013532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.16536","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.16536"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karamolegkou AP Fergadi MP Magouliotis DE et al. Validation of the surgical outcome risk tool (SORT) and SORT v2 for predicting postoperative mortality in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 2327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12062327","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12062327"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hers TM Van Schaik J Keekstra N et al. Inaccurate risk assessment by the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in aortic surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 5426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm10225426","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10225426"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vosler PS Orsini M Enepekides DJ et al. Predicting complications of major head and neck oncological surgery: an evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 47: 21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40463-018-0269-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s40463-018-0269-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillies MA Wijeysundera DN Harrison EM. Counting the cost of cancelled surgery: a system wide approach is needed. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 691\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2018.08.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2018.08.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arulkumaran N Harrison DA Brett SJ. Association between day and time of admission to critical care and acute hospital outcome for unplanned admissions to adult general critical care units: cohort study exploring the \u2018weekend effect\u2019. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 112\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aew398","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aew398"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prowle JR Forni LG Bell M et al. Postoperative acute kidney injury in adult non-cardiac surgery: joint consensus report of the acute disease quality initiative and perioperative quality initiative. Nat Rev Nephrol 2021; 17: 605\u2013618. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41581-021-00418-2","DOI":"10.1038\/s41581-021-00418-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oddy C. Population characteristics of individual enhanced facilities in the UK compared with critical care. Anaesthesia 2026; 81: 436\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.70113","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.70113"}],"container-title":["Journal of the Intensive Care Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17511437261495043","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/17511437261495043","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/17511437261495043","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T11:52:41Z","timestamp":1792065161000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/17511437261495043"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/17511437261495043"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17511437261495043","relation":{},"ISSN":["1751-1437","1751-1437"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1751-1437","type":"print"},{"value":"1751-1437","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]]},"article-number":"17511437261495043"}}