{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:46:05Z","timestamp":1777434365329,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]],"date-time":"2025-10-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760400000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]],"date-time":"2025-10-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper introduces an argumentation framework, differential equation based on cost for recursive argumentation graph (DECRAG), for natural language arguments. DECRAG\u2019s argumentation graph is so flexible that attack and support relations, recursive relations, similarity relations between arguments, and default values can be represented. The base score and the necessity relation can be simulated by the framework. DECRAG maps an argumentation graph to a general system, and the solution of the system is used as the values of the nodes and edges of the graph. We illustrate interesting solutions such as multiple fixed points for the dilemma of even-length cycles and limit cycles for the paradox of odd-length cycles. DECRAG also satisfies many important properties. In this paper, focusing on the theoretical aspect of DECRAG, we show examples, properties, and evaluations of the framework.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/19462174251376186","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]],"date-time":"2025-10-14T15:41:02Z","timestamp":1760456462000},"page":"28-78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Differential equation based on cost for recursive argumentation graph (DECRAG): Continuous framework for recursive bipolar argumentation with\u00a0similarity"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0383-7386","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kazunori","family":"Yamaguchi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Tokyo"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0056-0185","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yoshitatsu","family":"Matsuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Seikei University, Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","unstructured":"Rago A Toni F Aurisicchio M et al. Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning KR Cape Town South Africa April 25\u201329. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2016 pp. 63\u201372."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arisaka R Satoh K. Voluntary manslaughter? A case study with meta-argumentation with supports. In: Kurahashi S Ohta Y Arai S et al. (eds) New frontiers in artificial intelligence. Cham Switzerland: Springer 2016 pp. 241\u2013252.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-61572-1_16"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villata S. Artificial argumentation for humans. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI\u201918 Stockholm Sweden July 13\u201319. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2018 pp. 5729\u20135733.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/818"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103607"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00338"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al Manir S Niestroy J Levinson MA et al. Evidence graphs: supporting transparent and fair computation with defeasible reasoning on data methods and results. In: Glavic B Braganholo V and Koop D (eds) Provenance and annotation of data and processes. Cham: Springer 2020 pp. 39\u201350.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-80960-7_3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.06.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","unstructured":"Fandinno J Fari\u00f1as del Cerro L Lagasquie-Schiex MC. Structure-based semantics of argumentation frameworks with higher-order attacks and supports. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on computational models of argument COMMA-2018 frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications Warsaw Poland September 12\u201314. Amsterdam Netherlands: IOS Press 2018 vol. 305 p. 29."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.4308"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon E Delobelle J Konieczny S et al. A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence Arizona USA February 12\u201317. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2016 pp. 914\u2013920.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L Ben-Naim J. Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Liu W Subrahmanian VS and Wijsen J (eds) Scalable uncertainty management. Cham Switzerland: Springer 2013 pp. 134\u2013147.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","unstructured":"Leite Ja Martins Ja. Social abstract argumentation. In: proceedings of the twenty-second international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI Catalonia Spain July 16\u201322. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2011 pp. 2287\u20132292."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.704398"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L Ben-Naim J Doder D et al. Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: proceedings of the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI\u201917 Melbourne Australia August 19\u201325. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2017 pp. 56\u201362.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1001791"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","unstructured":"Amgoud L Ben-Naim J. Evaluation of arguments from support relations: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI New York USA July 9\u201315. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2016 pp. 900\u2013906."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","unstructured":"Thimm M. A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 20th European conference on artificial intelligence ECAI-2012 Montpellier France August 27\u201331. Amsterdam Netherlands: IOS Press 2012 pp. 750\u2013755."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/btp421"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matt PA Toni F. A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation. In: H\u00f6lldobler S Lutz C and Wansing H (eds) Logics in artificial intelligence. Cham Switzerland: Springer 2008 pp. 285\u2013297.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni P Comini G Rago A et al. Abstract games of argumentation strategy and game-theoretical argument strength. In: An B Bazzan A Leite J et al. (eds) Principles and practice of multi-agent systems PRIMA-2017.\u00a0Cham Switzerland: Springer 2017 pp. 403\u2013419.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69131-2_24"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Craandijk D Bex F. Deep learning for abstract argumentation semantics. In: Bessiere C (ed) Proceedings of the twenty-ninth international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI Yokohama Japan January 7\u201315. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2021 pp. 1667\u20131673.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2020\/231"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_2","unstructured":"Potyka N. Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation. In: Sixteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning KR\u201918 Arizona USA October 30 - November 2. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2018 pp. 148\u2013157."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_2","unstructured":"Konat B Budzynska K Saint-Dizier P. Rephrase in argument structure. In: Proceedings of the foundations of the language of argumentation (FLA) workshop Potsdam Germany September 13. Amsterdam Netherlands: IOS Press 2016 pp. 32\u201339."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-013-9139-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_2","unstructured":"Bud\u00e1n PD Martinez MV Bud\u00e1n MC et al. Introducing analogy in abstract argumentation. In: IJCAI-15 Workshop on weighted logics for artificial intelligence WL4AI-2015 Buenos Aires Argentina July 25\u201331. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2015 pp. 25\u201332."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.2014.959332"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boltu\u017ei\u0107 F \u0160najder J. Identifying prominent arguments in online debates using semantic textual similarity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on argumentation mining Colorado USA June 4. Vienna Austria: Association for Computational Linguistics 2015 pp 110\u2013115.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W15-0514"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reimers N Schiller B Beck T et al. Classification and clustering of arguments with contextualized word embeddings. In: Korhonen A Traum D and M\u00e0rquez L (eds) Proceedings of the 57th Annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics Florence Italy July 28\u2013August 2. Association for Computational Linguistics 2019 pp. 567\u2013578.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P19-1054"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-220006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-190479"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_2","unstructured":"Amgoud L Bonzon E Delobelle J et al. Gradual semantics accounting for similarity between arguments. In: Sixteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning KR\u201918 Arizona USA October 27\u2013November 2. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2018 pp. 88\u201397."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud L David V. An adjustment function for dealing with similarities. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on computational models of argument COMMA-2020 frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications.\u00a0Amsterdam Netherlands: IOS Press 2020 pp. 79\u201390.","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200494"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4684-0392-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2022.09.116"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yamaguchi K Matsuda Y. Cost-based framework for natural language argumentation analysis. In: 19th International conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET) Sydney Australia November 4\u20135. New York: IEEE Press 2021 pp. 1\u201310.","DOI":"10.1109\/ITHET50392.2021.9759813"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.319"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3837-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_2","volume-title":"Suurigirongaku","author":"Wakaki T","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wakaki T, Nitta K. Suurigirongaku. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Denki Daigaku, 2017."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2010.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2014.12.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_2","unstructured":"Cohen A Gottifredi S Garc\u00eda AJ et al. On the acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support. In: Proceedings of the Sixth international conference on computational models of argument COMMA-2016 frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications vol. 287. 2016 pp 231\u2013242. IOS Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.11.019"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_2","unstructured":"Amgoud L Ben-Naim J Doder D et al. Ranking arguments with compensation-based semantics. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning KR Cape Town South Africa April 25\u201329. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2016 pp. 12\u201321."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Potyka N. Extending modular semantics for bipolar weighted argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems Montreal Canada May 13\u201317. Liverpool UK: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2019 pp. 1722\u20131730.","DOI":"10.65109\/DEGV1211"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_2","first-page":"1193","article-title":"Decrag: argumentation analysis framework","volume":"64","author":"Yamaguchi K","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yamaguchi K, Matsuda Y, Shibata Y. Decrag: argumentation analysis framework. Inform Process Soc J 2023; 64: 1193\u20131205.","journal-title":"Inform Process Soc J"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_2","volume-title":"Justice: what\u2019s the right thing to do","author":"Sandel MJ","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sandel MJ. Justice: what\u2019s the right thing to do? London, England: Penguin Books, 2009."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nouioua F Risch V. Argumentation frameworks with necessities. In: Benferhat S and Grant J (eds) Scalable uncertainty management. Springer 2011 pp 163\u2013176.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23963-2_14"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aurisicchio M Baroni P Pellegrini D et al. Comparing and integrating argumentation-based with matrix-based decision support in arg&dec. In: Black E Modgil S and Oren N (eds) Theory and applications of formal argumentation. Springer 2015 pp 1\u201320.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_2","unstructured":"Amgoud L Ben-Naim J. Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning KR\u201916 Cape Town South Africa April 25\u201329. Washington DC: AAAI Press 2016 pp. 2\u201311."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar S Cheng J Leskovec J et al. An army of me: sockpuppets in online discussion communities. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web WWW \u201917. Republic and Canton of Geneva CHE: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee pp. 857\u2013866.","DOI":"10.1145\/3038912.3052677"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-92204-7"}],"container-title":["Argument &amp; Computation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/19462174251376186","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/19462174251376186","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/19462174251376186","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:53:31Z","timestamp":1777377211000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/19462174251376186"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/19462174251376186"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/19462174251376186","relation":{},"ISSN":["1946-2166","1946-2174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1946-2166","type":"print"},{"value":"1946-2174","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,14]]}}}