{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T10:14:27Z","timestamp":1783332867793,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]],"date-time":"2025-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765411200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]],"date-time":"2025-12-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765411200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Global Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Study Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Systematic review of clinical studies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To identify neurological, anatomical, and technical predictors of failure in closed cranial traction (CCT) for traumatic cervical facet dislocations (CFD) in adults, and to synthesize evidence to guide early surgical decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic search was conducted across five databases: PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science, for studies published from January 2000 to May 2025. Eligible studies included patients \u226516\u00a0years with traumatic CFD managed initially with CCT, reporting both success\/failure rates and predictive variables. Data extraction focused on demographics, injury patterns, reduction techniques, and outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 631 patients. Overall, the success rate of closed reduction was 73.3% (463\/631), ranging from 56% to 92%. Consistently reported predictors of failure included complete neurological deficit (ASIA A\u2013B; four studies), absence of a contralateral perched facet, involvement of the C7\u2013T1 level, inferior endplate fracture, and attempts without general anesthesia. When open reduction was required after failed CCT, posterior approaches achieved higher success rates than anterior approaches (100% vs 45%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In adults with traumatic cervical facet dislocations, CCT is more likely to fail with complete neurological deficits (ASIA A\u2013B), C7\u2013T1 involvement, absence of a contralateral perched facet, and awake traction protocols; GA-first strategies showed higher success in available cohorts. Unlike prior technique-focused overviews, this review consolidates predictors of CCT failure and proposes a practical algorithm to triage patients for early open reduction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682251407637","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]],"date-time":"2025-12-11T18:53:01Z","timestamp":1765479181000},"page":"1999-2011","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Predictive Factors for Failure of Closed Reduction in Traumatic Cervical Facet Dislocations: A Systematic Review of 631 Patients"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1857-219X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge","family":"Tabilo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital de Puerto Montt"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2645-0483","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrei F.","family":"Joaquim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospital das Cl\u00ednicas, UNICAMP"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199712150-00003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0032037"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2244852.426"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2025.3.SPINE241107"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","first-page":"441","article-title":"Predictive factors of failure in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations: retrospective analysis of 40 cases","volume":"32","author":"Oae S","year":"2023","unstructured":"Oae S, Ichimura H, Ogata T, Inoue H. Predictive factors of failure in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations: retrospective analysis of 40 cases. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(2):441-448.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","first-page":"229","article-title":"Awake closed reduction for traumatic subaxial cervical facet dislocation: success rate and need for conversion to open reduction","volume":"18","author":"Branche B","year":"2018","unstructured":"Branche B, Heller JG, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Anderson DG. Awake closed reduction for traumatic subaxial cervical facet dislocation: success rate and need for conversion to open reduction. Spine J. 2018;18(2):229-235.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"8","key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","first-page":"1551","article-title":"Predictors of success in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocation","volume":"32","author":"Sousa M","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sousa M, Jorge RMN, Cardoso MJ. Predictors of success in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(8):1551-1559.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"13","key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","first-page":"E775","article-title":"Traumatic cervical unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations treated with pre-reduction MRI: a prospective observational study","volume":"42","author":"Anissipour AK","year":"2017","unstructured":"Anissipour AK, Agel J, Baron E, Bellabarba C, Bransford RJ. Traumatic cervical unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations treated with pre-reduction MRI: a prospective observational study. Spine. 2017;42(13):E775-E781.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0842-x"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","first-page":"44","article-title":"Predictive factors for success in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations","volume":"18","author":"Potgieter A","year":"2019","unstructured":"Potgieter A, Vorster W, Vlok AJ. Predictive factors for success in closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations. SA Orthop J. 2019;18(1):44-48.","journal-title":"SA Orthop J"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","first-page":"77S","article-title":"AOSpine classification systems for subaxial cervical spine injuries","volume":"7","author":"Schnake KJ","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schnake KJ, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Oner FC. AOSpine classification systems for subaxial cervical spine injuries. Glob Spine J. 2017;7(1 Suppl):77S-82S.","journal-title":"Glob Spine J"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181557b92"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","volume-title":"How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine","author":"Greenhalgh T","year":"2014","unstructured":"Greenhalgh T. How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine. 5th ed. London: BMJ Books; 2014.","edition":"5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","volume-title":"Levels of Evidence","author":"Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine","year":"2009","unstructured":"Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2009. https:\/\/www.cebm.ox.ac.uk\/resources\/levels-of-evidence"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","volume-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in meta-analyses","author":"Wells G","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wells G, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2013."},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","first-page":"539","article-title":"Systematic review of spinal trauma studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale: common methodological issues and reporting gaps","volume":"15","author":"Zhou X","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhou X, Wu L, Guo J, Liu Y, Li Z, Wang H. Systematic review of spinal trauma studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale: common methodological issues and reporting gaps. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):539.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","volume-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions","author":"Higgins JPT","year":"2021","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2021. Version 6.2."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198200710-00001"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","first-page":"201","article-title":"The thoracolumbar AOSpine injury classification system: a comparison with the subaxial cervical classification","volume":"14","author":"Kepler CK","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Koerner JD, Vialle EN. The thoracolumbar AOSpine injury classification system: a comparison with the subaxial cervical classification. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(3):201-206.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"}],"container-title":["Global Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/21925682251407637","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/21925682251407637","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/21925682251407637","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T09:20:18Z","timestamp":1783329618000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/21925682251407637"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/21925682251407637"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/21925682251407637","relation":{},"ISSN":["2192-5682","2192-5690"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2192-5682","type":"print"},{"value":"2192-5690","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,11]]}}}