{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T16:04:49Z","timestamp":1790697889973,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,14]],"date-time":"2026-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781395200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"Quyen Diep of the Rush Biostatistics Core"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate long-term outcomes of in-office laser barricade for large (\u22652 clock hours) rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) and to report the frequency of additional laser treatment or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated between 2015 and 2023 at a retina-only private practice in Chicago, Illinois. Included cases were eyes with fundus diagram\u2013confirmed RRDs involving \u22652 clock hours of circumference, and \u22653 months of follow-up. Procedure success was defined as RRD management without requiring PPV.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Seventy-six eyes of 72 patients (mean \u00b1 SD age, 52.1 \u00b1 17.7 years) were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 38.6 months. RRD size was a mean \u00b1 SD 2.9 \u00b1 1.1 clock hours (range, 2\u20136). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20\/31 at baseline and 20\/30 at final follow-up. Procedure success rate was 92.1%, with 6 eyes (7.9%) requiring PPV. Thirteen eyes (17.1%) required additional laser barricade. Eyes with phakic lens status, worse baseline BCVA, vitreous hemorrhage, or baseline posterior vitreous detachment were more likely to require PPV, though these associations did not reach statistical significance (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .06\u2013.08). Laser barricade was performed on same day of diagnosis in 47 eyes (61.8%) and delayed by \u22651 day in 29 eyes (38.2%). Same-day treatment trended toward a higher need for PPV (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .08 vs delayed treatment).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In-office laser barricade is an effective treatment for RRDs spanning \u22652 clock hours, with a 92.1% long-term success rate. Patients not requiring same-day intervention may achieve excellent outcomes with laser barricade alone.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/24741264261456583","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T06:41:42Z","timestamp":1781505702000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Long-Term Outcomes of Laser Barricade for Large Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0776-1446","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tarin T.","family":"Tanji","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin F.","family":"Elwood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"},{"name":"Illinois Retina Associates, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Kee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alicia","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qianyi","family":"Pu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emily Anne","family":"Shepherd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"},{"name":"Illinois Retina Associates, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vivek","family":"Chaturvedi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA"},{"name":"Illinois Retina Associates, Chicago, IL, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","article-title":"Retinal detachment","volume":"2014","author":"Steel D.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Steel D. Retinal detachment. BMJ Clin Evid. 2014;2014:0710.","journal-title":"BMJ Clin Evid"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijms26031025"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4557-0737-9.00105-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2019.09.025"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/23258160-20200804-02"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S204366"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.eye.6702318"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000543240"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0b013e318183570d"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2013.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2010.119"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0161-6420(00)00091-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.01.056"}],"container-title":["Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/24741264261456583","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/24741264261456583","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/24741264261456583","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T15:25:50Z","timestamp":1790695550000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/24741264261456583"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,14]]},"references-count":13,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/24741264261456583"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/24741264261456583","relation":{},"ISSN":["2474-1264","2474-1272"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2474-1264","type":"print"},{"value":"2474-1272","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,14]]},"article-number":"24741264261456583"}}