{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T17:33:52Z","timestamp":1777656832731,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Sage Open Pediatrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the effectiveness of 3 neonatal simulators in training medical students in resuscitation skills.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Sixty-eight\u2009fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u2009.05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/30502225251369426","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T19:13:01Z","timestamp":1758049981000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative Evaluation of 3 Neonatal Simulators for Neonatal Resuscitation and Airway Obstruction Skills in Medical Students"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Irma","family":"Manjavidze","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-4505-1132","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lia","family":"Otiashvili","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dali","family":"Chitaishvili","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pirdara","family":"Nozadze","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/sih.0000000000000551"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/ija.ija_1234_23"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/embc46164.2021.9630456"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/children8100940"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2011.141"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4094\/chnr.2019.25.4.518"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-024-05581-1"}],"container-title":["Sage Open Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/30502225251369426","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/30502225251369426","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/30502225251369426","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T07:07:27Z","timestamp":1777446447000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/30502225251369426"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"references-count":7,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/30502225251369426"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/30502225251369426","relation":{},"ISSN":["3050-2225","3050-2225"],"issn-type":[{"value":"3050-2225","type":"print"},{"value":"3050-2225","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"article-number":"30502225251369426"}}