{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]],"date-time":"2025-03-02T06:03:36Z","timestamp":1740895416168,"version":"3.38.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]],"date-time":"2001-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1007164800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Social &amp; Legal Studies"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> The judgment in the English Court of Appeal case of Re A ( Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) highlights forcefully the highly individualistic and abstract assumptions that commonly shape the deployment of rights discourse in liberal legal adjudication. Forced by the all-or-nothing nature of this discourse into a dilemma between perceiving of the twins as separate right-bearers or perceiving of the stronger twin, Jodie, as the singular right-bearer and of Mary, her weaker sibling, as a non-legal entity, the court chose the former option. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/a020306","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,30]],"date-time":"2017-01-30T19:40:45Z","timestamp":1485805245000},"page":"459-482","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Square Pegs in Round Holes: The Dilemma of Conjoined Twins and Individual Rights"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Vanessa E.","family":"Munro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Reading, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]]},"container-title":["Social &amp; Legal Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/a020306","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/a020306","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]],"date-time":"2025-03-02T00:17:02Z","timestamp":1740874622000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/a020306"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/a020306"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/a020306","relation":{},"ISSN":["0964-6639","1461-7390"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0964-6639"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1461-7390"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,1]]}}}