{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]],"date-time":"2026-04-14T02:06:28Z","timestamp":1776132388448,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":96,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]],"date-time":"2020-07-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596153600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"FCT \u2013 Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","award":["UIDB\/05037\/2020"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UIDB\/05037\/2020"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Small Group Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This study explores the relationship between team cohesion and team learning by adopting a nonlinear approach. A quantitative study with a sample composed of 82 organizational teams was conducted. Radial basis function (RBF) interpolation models were used, and results showed that the best predicting ability was obtained by the Thin Plate RBF model, which revealed that an increase in both dimensions of cohesion leads to an increase in team learning up to a certain threshold. Moreover, our results showed that the maximum value of team learning is obtained at higher values of task cohesion and moderate values of social cohesion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496420944488","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]],"date-time":"2020-07-31T07:53:11Z","timestamp":1596181991000},"page":"162-188","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Maximizing Learning Through Cohesion: Contributions From a Nonlinear Approach"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4481-2644","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Isabel D\u00f3rdio","family":"Dimas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, CeBER, Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1405-3835","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paulo Renato","family":"Louren\u00e7o","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, CeBER, Portugal"}]},{"given":"Teresa","family":"Rebelo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, CeBER, Portugal"}]},{"given":"Humberto","family":"Rocha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Economics, INESC-Coimbra, University of Coimbra, CeBER, Portugal"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","first-page":"369","volume-title":"Groups at work: Advances in theory and research","author":"Argote L.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Argote L., Gruenfeld D. H., Naquin C. (2001). Group learning in organizations. In Turner E. (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 369\u2013411). Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452204666"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumeister R. F. Vohs K. D. Funder D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(4) 396\u2013403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.17456916.2007.00051.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199928286.013.0026"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","volume-title":"Exchange and power in social life","author":"Blau P. M.","year":"1964","unstructured":"Blau P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","first-page":"349","volume-title":"Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations","author":"Bliese P. D.","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bliese P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, nonindependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 349\u2013381). Jossey-Bass."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","first-page":"285","volume-title":"Work group learning. Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations","author":"Brandon D. P.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. (2008). Collaborative knowledge and training in online groups. In Sessa V. I., London M. (Eds.), Work group learning. Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 285\u2013313). Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braun M. T. Kozlowski S. W. Brown T. A. DeShon R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion\u2013performance and coordination\u2013performance relationships of newly formed teams. Small Group Research. Advance online publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496420907157","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496420907157"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","volume-title":"Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientists","author":"Bryman A.","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bryman A., Cramer D. (2005). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientists. Routledge."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511543241"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bunderson J. S. Sutcliffe K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(3) 552\u2013560. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.88.3.552","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.88.3.552"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carless S. A. De Paola C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research 31(1) 71\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/104649640003100104","DOI":"10.1177\/104649640003100104"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carr J. C. Fright W. R. Beatson R. K. (1997). Surface interpolation with radial basis functions for medical imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16(1) 96\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/42.552059","DOI":"10.1109\/42.552059"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carron A. V. Brawley L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research 31(1) 89\u2013106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496412468072","DOI":"10.1177\/104649640003100105"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carron A. V. Widmeyer W. N. Brawley L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology 7(3) 244\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1123\/jsp.7.3.244","DOI":"10.1123\/jsp.7.3.244"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang A. Bordia P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion group performance relationship. Small Group Research 32(4) 379\u2013405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/104649640103200401","DOI":"10.1177\/104649640103200401"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chiocchio F. Essiembre H. (2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams production teams and service teams. Small Group Research 40(4) 382\u2013420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496409335103","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496409335103"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen A. Ben-Tura E. Vashdi D. R. (2012). The relationship between social exchange variables OCB and performance: What happens when you consider group characteristics? Personnel Review 41(6) 705\u2013731. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/00483481211263638","DOI":"10.1108\/00483481211263638"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen S. G. Bailey D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23(3) 239\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0149-2063(97)90034-9","DOI":"10.1016\/S0149-2063(97)90034-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cortina J. M. Aguinis H. DeShon R. P. (2017). Twilight of dawn or of evening? A century of research methods in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology 102(3) 274\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/apl0000163","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0000163"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Curral L. A. Forrester R. H. Dawson J. F. West M. A. (2001). It\u2019s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task team size and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10(2) 187\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13594320143000627","DOI":"10.1080\/13594320143000627"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Decuyper S. Dochy F. Van Den Bossche P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review 5(2) 111\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.edurev.2010.02.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2010.02.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","volume-title":"Scale development: Theory and applications","author":"DeVellis R.","year":"2003","unstructured":"DeVellis R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). SAGE.","edition":"2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dietterich T. G. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 10(7) 1895\u20131923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/089976698300017197","DOI":"10.1162\/089976698300017197"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimas I. D. Rocha H. Rebelo T. Louren\u00e7o P. R. (2016). A nonlinear multicriteria model for team effectiveness. In Gervasi O. Murgante B. Misra S. Rocha A. M. A. C. Torre C. M. Taniar D. Apduhan B. O. Stankova E. Wang S. (Eds.) Lecture notes in computer science: Computational science and its applications (Vol. 9789 pp. 595\u2013609). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-42089-9_42","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-42089-9_42"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dion K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From \u201cfield of forces\u201d to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice 4(1) 7\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1089-2699.4.1.7","DOI":"10.1037\/\/1089-2699.4.1.7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dionne S. D. Yammarino F. J. Spangler W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change 17(2) 177\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/09534810410530601","DOI":"10.1108\/09534810410530601"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edmondson A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2) 350\u2013383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2666999","DOI":"10.2307\/2666999"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edmondson A. C. Dillon J. R. Roloff K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning. The Academy of Management Annals 1(1) 269\u2013314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/078559811","DOI":"10.5465\/078559811"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-4541-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Understanding teams: A volume in research in management","author":"Ellis A. P. J.","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ellis A. P. J., Bell B. S. (2005). Capacity, collaboration, and commonality: A framework for understanding team learning. In Neider L. L., Shriesheim C. A. (Eds.), Understanding teams: A volume in research in management (pp. 1\u201325). Information Age."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eys M. Kim J. (2017 June 28). Team building and group cohesion in the context of sport and performance psychology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https:\/\/oxfordre.com\/psychology\/view\/10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190236557.001.0001\/acrefore-9780190236557-e-186","DOI":"10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190236557.013.186"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Festinger L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review 57(5) 271\u2013282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0056932","DOI":"10.1037\/h0056932"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Golbabai A. Ahmadian D. Milev M. (2012). Radial basis functions with application to finance: American put option under jump diffusion. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 55(3) 1354\u20131362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mcm.2011.10.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcm.2011.10.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haleblian J. Finkelstein S. (1993). Top management team size CEO dominance and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal 36(4) 844\u2013863. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/256761","DOI":"10.2307\/256761"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470756669.ch21"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hardy J. Eys M. A. Carron A. V. (2005). Exploring the potential disadvantages of high cohesion in sports teams. Small Group Research 36(2) 166\u2013187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496404266715","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496404266715"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoigaard R. S\u00e4fvenbom R. Tonnessen F. E. (2006). The relationship between group cohesion group norms and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research 37(3) 217\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496406287311","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496406287311"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ilgen D. R. Hollenbeck J. R. Johnson M. Jundt D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology 56 517\u2013543. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"James L. R. Demaree R. G. Wolf G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(2) 306\u2013309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.78.2.306","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.78.2.306"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_1","volume-title":"Victims of groupthink","author":"Janis I. L.","year":"1972","unstructured":"Janis I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Houghton Mifflin."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_1","volume-title":"Principles and practice of structural equation modeling","author":"Kline R. B.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kline R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford.","edition":"4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koeslag-Kreunen M. Van den Bossche P. Hoven M. Van der Klink M. Gijselaers W. (2018). When leadership powers team learning: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 49(4) 475\u2013513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496418764824","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496418764824"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koul A. Becchio C. Cavallo A. (2018). Cross-validation approaches for replicability in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Article 1117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.01117","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.01117"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_1","first-page":"412","volume-title":"Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology","author":"Kozlowski S. W. J.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kozlowski S. W. J., Bell B. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations: Review update. In Schmitt N., Highhouse S. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 412\u2013469). Wiley."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kozlowski S. W. J. Chao G. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics 33 335\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mde.2552","DOI":"10.1002\/mde.2552"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lechner C. Frankenberger K. Floyd S. W. (2010). Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationship between inter-group networks and performance. Academy of Management Journal 53(4) 865\u2013889. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5465\/amj.2010.52814620","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2010.52814620"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lehmann-Willenbrock N. Allen J. A. (2018). Modeling temporal interaction dynamics in organizational settings. Journal of Business and Psychology 33(3) 325\u2013344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10869-017-9506-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s10869-017-9506-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li J. Roe R. A. (2012). Introducing an intrateam longitudinal approach to the study of team process dynamics. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 21(5) 718\u2013748. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1359432X.2012.660749","DOI":"10.1080\/1359432X.2012.660749"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marks M. A. Mathieu J. E. Zaccaro S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 26(3) 356\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/259182","DOI":"10.5465\/amr.2001.4845785"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marques-Quinteiro P. Rico R. Passos A. M. Curral L. (2019). There is light and there is darkness: On the temporal dynamics of cohesion Coordination and performance in business teams. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Article 847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00847","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00847"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mathieu J. E. Maynard M. T. Rapp T. Gilson L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management 34(3) 410\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206308316061","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206308316061"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mathieu J. E. Tannenbaum S. I. Donsbach J. S. Alliger G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management 40(1) 130\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206313503014","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206313503014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/S1534-085620150000017005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_1","volume-title":"Social psychology: A brief introduction","author":"McGrath J. E.","year":"1964","unstructured":"McGrath J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McGrath J. E. Arrow H. Berdahl J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1) 95\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/S15327957PSPR0401_8","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327957PSPR0401_8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morgeson F. P. DeRue D. S. Karam E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management 36(1) 5\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206309347376","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206309347376"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mullen B. Copper C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 115(2) 210\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.115.2.210","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-2909.115.2.210"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251) Article aac4716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aac4716","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ortega A. S\u00e1nchez-Manzanares M. Gil F. Rico R. (2013). Enhancing team learning in nursing teams through beliefs about interpersonal context. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(1) 102\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2012.05996.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2012.05996.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pescosolido A. T. Saavedra R. (2012). Cohesion and sports teams: A review. Small Group Research 43 744\u2013758. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496412465020","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496412465020"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pierce J. R. Aguinis H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management 39(2) 313\u2013338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206311410060","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206311410060"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Podsakoff P. M. MacKenzie S. B. Lee J.-Y. Podsakoff N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5) 879\u2013903. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.88.5.879","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.88.5.879"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_65_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Radial basis function methods for interpolation to functions of many variables","volume":"3","author":"Powell M.","year":"2002","unstructured":"Powell M. (2002). Radial basis function methods for interpolation to functions of many variables. HERMIS: International Journal of Computer Mathematics & Applications, 3, 1\u201323.","journal-title":"HERMIS: International Journal of Computer Mathematics & Applications"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ramos-Villagrasa P. J. Marques-Quinteiro P. Navarro J. Rico R. (2017). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research 49(2) 135\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496417713849","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496417713849"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rebelo T. Dimas I. Louren\u00e7o P. R. Pal\u00e1cio A. (2018). Generating team PsyCap through transformational leadership: A route to team learning and performance. Team Performance Management 24(7\u20138) 363\u2013379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/TPM-09-2017-0056","DOI":"10.1108\/TPM-09-2017-0056"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rebelo T. Louren\u00e7o P. R. Dimas I. D. (2020). The journey of team learning since \u201cthe fifth discipline.\u201d The Learning Organization 27(1) 42\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/TLO-10-2019-0144","DOI":"10.1108\/TLO-10-2019-0144"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rocha H. (2008). Model parameter tuning by cross validation and global optimization: Application to the wing weight fitting problem. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 37(2) 197\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00158-007-0224-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00158-007-0224-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_70_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rocha H. (2009). On the selection of the most adequate radial basis function. Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(3) 1573\u20131583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apm.2008.02.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apm.2008.02.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rocha H. Dias J. M. Ferreira B. C. Lopes M. C. (2013). Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework. Journal of Global Optimization 57(4) 1065\u20131089. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10898-012-0002-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s10898-012-0002-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez-S\u00e1nchez A. M. Devloo T. Rico R. Salanova M. Anseel F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion engagement and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management 42(4) 521\u2013547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1059601116636476","DOI":"10.1177\/1059601116636476"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roe R. A. Gockel C. Meyer B. (2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 21(5) 629\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1359432X.2012.729821","DOI":"10.1080\/1359432X.2012.729821"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosh L. Offermann L. R. Van Diest R. (2012). Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion. Human Resource Management Review 22(2) 116\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hrmr.2011.11.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hrmr.2011.11.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_75_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rovio E. Eskola J. Kozub S. A. Duda J. L. Lintunen T. (2009). Can high group cohesion be harmful? A case study of a junior ice-hockey team. Small Group Research 40(4) 421\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496409334359","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496409334359"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_76_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rowe A. (2008). Unfolding the dance of team learning: A metaphorical investigation of collective learning. Management Learning 39(1) 41\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1350507607085171","DOI":"10.1177\/1350507607085171"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salas E. Grossman R. Hughes A. M. Coultas C. W. (2015). Measuring team cohesion: Observations from the science. Human Factors 57(3) 365\u2013374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0018720815578267","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720815578267"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sargent L. D. Sue-Chan C. (2001). Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research 32(4) 426\u2013450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/104649640103200403","DOI":"10.1177\/104649640103200403"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_79_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savelsbergh C. Heijden B. Poell R. (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research 40(5) 578\u2013607. https:\/\/doi.org\/.1177\/1046496409340055","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496409340055"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_80_1","volume-title":"The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization","author":"Senge P. M.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Senge P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_81_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/S1534-085620150000017002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_82_1","first-page":"367","volume-title":"Work group learning. Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations","author":"Stagl K. C.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Stagl K. C., Salas E., Day D. V. (2008). Assessing team learning outcomes: Improving team learning and performance. In Sessa V. I., London M. (Eds.), Work group learning. Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 367\u2013390). Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_83_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stone M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(2) 111\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stone M. (1977). An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and Akaike\u2019s criterion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39(1) 44\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01603.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01603.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turner M. E. Pratkanis A. R. Probasco P. Leve C. (1992). Threat cohesion and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(5) 781\u2013796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.63.5.781","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0022-3514.63.5.781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_86_1","volume-title":"Minds in teams: The influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning","author":"Van den Bossche P.","year":"2006","unstructured":"Van den Bossche P. (2006). Minds in teams: The influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning. Datawyse."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_87_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van den Bossche P. Gijselaers W. H. Segers M. Kirschner P. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research 37(5) 490\u2013521. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496406292938","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496406292938"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_88_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van der Haar S. Koeslag-Kreunen M. Euwe E. Segers M. 1. (2017). Team leader structuring for team effectiveness and team learning in command-and-control teams. Small Group Research 48(2) 215\u2013248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496417689897","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496417689897"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_89_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/S1534-085620150000017004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_90_1","volume-title":"Human resource development: Learning for individuals & organizations","author":"Wilson J. P.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Wilson J. P. (2001). Human resource development: Learning for individuals & organizations. Kogan Page."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_91_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wise S. (2014). Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal 32(5) 703\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.emj.2013.12.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2013.12.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_92_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wong S. (2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organization Science 15(6) 645\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/orsc.1040.0080","DOI":"10.1287\/orsc.1040.0080"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yarkoni T. Westfall J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6) 1100\u20131122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691617693393","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691617693393"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_94_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaccaro S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology 131(3) 387\u2013399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224545.1991.9713865","DOI":"10.1080\/00224545.1991.9713865"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_95_1","first-page":"193","volume-title":"Work group learning, understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations","author":"Zaccaro S. J.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zaccaro S. J., Ely K., Shuffler M. (2008). The leader\u2019s role in group learning. In Sessa V., London M. (Eds.), Work group learning, understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 193\u2013214). Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_96_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaccaro S. J. Gualtieri J. Minionis D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology 7(2) 77\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327876mp0702_3","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327876mp0702_3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_97_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaccaro S. J. Lowe C. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology 128(4) 547\u2013558. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224545.1988.9713774","DOI":"10.1080\/00224545.1988.9713774"}],"container-title":["Small Group Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1046496420944488","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1046496420944488","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1046496420944488","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]],"date-time":"2026-01-05T19:31:11Z","timestamp":1767641471000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1046496420944488"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]},"references-count":96,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1046496420944488"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496420944488","relation":{},"ISSN":["1046-4964","1552-8278"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1046-4964","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-8278","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,31]]}}}