{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T21:37:34Z","timestamp":1777930654101,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,30]],"date-time":"2020-08-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598745600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Russell Friedman identifies two \u201crival accounts\u201d in medieval trinitarian theology. The \u201cemanation account,\u201d which Bonaventure represents, prefers to emphasize the constitutive role of \u201cact\u201d or \u201coperation\u201d among the intra-trinitarian persons. The \u201crelation account,\u201d that of Thomas Aquinas, prefers rather to say that relations alone constitute divine persons. A specific question illustrates their difference: Does the Father generate the Son because the Father is Father, or is He Father because He generates the Son? Aquinas thinks the former, Bonaventure the latter. Bonaventure\u2019s position attracts criticism from contemporary Thomists. And even Franciscan sympathizers have conceded ambiguity around this point of his trinitarian theology. To wit: If the Father\u2019s act of begetting the Son makes him Father, doesn\u2019t this presume a \u201cProto-Father,\u201d as Friedman has it, who begets? I argue that this criticism ignores the uniquely Christian-Neoplatonic premises Bonaventure\u2019s view presumes. Perceiving them manifests Bonaventure\u2019s deep coherence on this point and beyond.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1063851220953363","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,31]],"date-time":"2020-08-31T02:14:05Z","timestamp":1598840045000},"page":"3-31","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The Father\u2019s Kenosis: A Defense of Bonaventure on Intra-trinitarian Acts"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Jordan Daniel","family":"Wood","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Incarnate Word Academy, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,30]]},"container-title":["Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1063851220953363","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1063851220953363","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1063851220953363","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T00:19:53Z","timestamp":1777681193000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1063851220953363"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,30]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1063851220953363"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1063851220953363","relation":{},"ISSN":["1063-8512","2631-8334"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1063-8512","type":"print"},{"value":"2631-8334","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,30]]}}}