{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,20]],"date-time":"2025-12-20T22:02:54Z","timestamp":1766268174639,"version":"3.38.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,28]],"date-time":"2015-04-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1430179200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Discourse Studies"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> The goal of this study is to examine the argumentative functions of concessive yes, but\u2026 constructions. Based on ( N\u2009=\u200922) interview transcripts, we examine the ways environmental activists negotiate their agreements and disagreements over climate change through yes, but\u2026 constructions. Starting from conversational analyses of such concessive sequences, we develop an account grounded in argumentative discourse analysis, notably pragma-dialectics. The analysis focuses on how in conceding arguments speakers re-present others\u2019 discourse, what types of criticism they exercise through particular sequential patterns and which argumentative techniques they saliently use. We show in particular that, in disputing the standpoints supported by the complex argumentation they encounter, speakers raise different types of criticism (sufficiency, relevance, acceptability). We discuss how examining not only the sequencing of agreements and disagreements, but also the argumentative relations that generate these, may extend our understanding of such concessive constructions. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1461445615578965","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,30]],"date-time":"2015-04-30T00:21:25Z","timestamp":1430353285000},"page":"467-484","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Managing disagreement through <i>yes, but<\/i>\u2026 constructions: An argumentative analysis"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Mehmet Ali","family":"Uzelgun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"ArgLab, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (IFILNOVA), Portugal"}]},{"given":"Dima","family":"Mohammed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ArgLab, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (IFILNOVA), Portugal"}]},{"given":"Marcin","family":"Lewi\u0144ski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"ArgLab, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (IFILNOVA), Portugal"}]},{"given":"Paula","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Instituto Universit\u00e1rio de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, Portugal"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1461445699001001002"},{"key":"bibr2-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110219043.4.411"},{"volume-title":"Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology","year":"1991","author":"Billig M","key":"bibr3-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr4-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9221.2011.00863.x"},{"key":"bibr5-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1354067X08096512"},{"key":"bibr6-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110219043.4.381"},{"key":"bibr7-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.05.002"},{"key":"bibr8-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452225937"},{"key":"bibr9-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0261927X970162006"},{"key":"bibr10-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511841200"},{"key":"bibr11-1461445615578965","first-page":"153","volume-title":"Rethinking Communication","author":"Jacobs S","year":"1989"},{"volume-title":"Logical Self-defense","year":"1994","author":"Johnson RH","key":"bibr12-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr13-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9227-6"},{"key":"bibr14-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v32i4.3620"},{"key":"bibr15-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2013.05.001"},{"key":"bibr16-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/text-2013-0015"},{"key":"bibr17-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/053901894033002002"},{"issue":"1","key":"bibr18-1461445615578965","first-page":"1","volume":"21","author":"Mouro C","year":"2012","journal-title":"Papers on Social Representations"},{"key":"bibr19-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/text.1.1985.5.3.201"},{"key":"bibr20-1461445615578965","first-page":"25","volume":"17","author":"Obeng SG","year":"1997","journal-title":"Text"},{"key":"bibr21-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1075\/hoph.4.14oco"},{"volume-title":"The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation","year":"1969","author":"Perelman C","key":"bibr22-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr23-1461445615578965","first-page":"57","volume-title":"Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis","author":"Pomerantz A","year":"1984"},{"key":"bibr24-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(99)00088-0"},{"key":"bibr25-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.03.009"},{"volume-title":"Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion","year":"1992","author":"Snoeck Henkemans AF","key":"bibr26-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr27-1461445615578965","first-page":"281","volume":"84","author":"Snoeck Henkemans AF","year":"1995","journal-title":"Leuvense Bijdragen"},{"volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","year":"1958","author":"Toulmin S","key":"bibr28-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr29-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15205436.2015.1027407"},{"key":"bibr30-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1075\/aic.2"},{"volume-title":"A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach","year":"2004","author":"Van Eemeren FH","key":"bibr31-1461445615578965"},{"volume-title":"Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse","year":"1993","author":"Van Eemeren FH","key":"bibr32-1461445615578965"},{"key":"bibr33-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9024-4"},{"key":"bibr34-1461445615578965","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-9150-6"}],"container-title":["Discourse Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1461445615578965","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1461445615578965","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1461445615578965","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,1]],"date-time":"2025-03-01T10:32:47Z","timestamp":1740825167000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1461445615578965"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,28]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1461445615578965"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461445615578965","relation":{},"ISSN":["1461-4456","1461-7080"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1461-4456"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1461-7080"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,28]]}}}