<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<crossref_result xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0" version="3.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/qrschema/3.0 http://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref_query_output3.0.xsd">
  <query_result>
    <head>
      <doi_batch_id>none</doi_batch_id>
    </head>
    <body>
      <query status="resolved">
        <doi type="journal_article">10.1177/87552930221082684</doi>
        <crm-item name="publisher-name" type="string">Wiley</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="prefix-name" type="string">Wiley (John Wiley &amp; Sons)</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="member-id" type="number">311</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citation-id" type="number">135485625</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="journal-id" type="number">5867</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="deposit-timestamp" type="number">2026012504011800512</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="owner-prefix" type="string">10.1002</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="last-update" type="date">2026-01-25T13:11:53Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="created" type="date">2022-03-15T00:23:36Z</crm-item>
        <crm-item name="citedby-count" type="number">34</crm-item>
        <doi_record>
          <crossref xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/xschema/1.1 http://doi.crossref.org/schemas/unixref1.1.xsd">
            <journal>
              <journal_metadata language="en">
                <full_title>Earthquake Spectra</full_title>
                <abbrev_title>Earthquake Spectra</abbrev_title>
                <issn media_type="print">8755-2930</issn>
                <issn media_type="electronic">1944-8201</issn>
              </journal_metadata>
              <journal_issue>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>08</month>
                  <year>2022</year>
                </publication_date>
                <journal_volume>
                  <volume>38</volume>
                </journal_volume>
                <issue>3</issue>
              </journal_issue>
              <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
                <titles>
                  <title>The Estimated Carbon Cost of Concrete Building Demolitions following the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence</title>
                </titles>
                <contributors>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
                    <given_name>Rosa E</given_name>
                    <surname>Gonzalez</surname>
                    <affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>Max T</given_name>
                    <surname>Stephens</surname>
                    <affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand</affiliation>
                    <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-3701</ORCID>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>Charlotte</given_name>
                    <surname>Toma</surname>
                    <affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                  <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional">
                    <given_name>David</given_name>
                    <surname>Dowdell</surname>
                    <affiliation>Building Research Association of New Zealand Porirua New Zealand</affiliation>
                  </person_name>
                </contributors>
                <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" abstract-type="main">
                  <jats:p>
                    The 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence caused severe economic impacts and community disruption in Christchurch, New Zealand due to damage from liquefaction and strong shaking. Following the earthquake, approximately 7500 dwellings and 1400 commercial properties were demolished, resulting in 4 million tons of building debris. Using the Canterbury event, and the subsequent building demolitions in Christchurch as a case study, this research quantifies the embodied carbon and energy costs associated with the post‐earthquake demolition of buildings prior to the end of their intended design life. A building data set consisting of 142 reinforced concrete buildings that were demolished following the event was used to estimate the total amount of structural and non‐structural debris resulting from the demolitions. A framework was developed to calculate the global warming potential of the demolished buildings considering embodied CO
                    <jats:sub>2</jats:sub>
                    and energy in the building materials, impacts of the processes used in construction of the building, and CO
                    <jats:sub>2</jats:sub>
                    emissions of the transport and waste management processes. A life cycle assessment tool was used to calculate the environmental costs in the production and transport module, the spatial distribution of the waste based on the building locations was calculated to determine transport distances to disposal facilities, and the waste disposal and recycling benefits were calculated using values from a life cycle inventory database. The results of the research revealed the demolition of concrete buildings had staggering environmental costs in terms of embodied CO
                    <jats:sub>2</jats:sub>
                    and energy, which make the case for both resilient design strategies that reduce waste and pollution following earthquakes, and incorporating environmental impacts into demolition decisions.
                  </jats:p>
                </jats:abstract>
                <publication_date media_type="online">
                  <month>08</month>
                  <year>2022</year>
                </publication_date>
                <publication_date media_type="print">
                  <month>08</month>
                  <year>2022</year>
                </publication_date>
                <pages>
                  <first_page>1615</first_page>
                  <last_page>1635</last_page>
                </pages>
                <publisher_item>
                  <identifier id_type="doi">10.1177/87552930221082684</identifier>
                </publisher_item>
                <fr:program xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" name="fundref">
                  <fr:assertion name="fundgroup">
                    <fr:assertion name="funder_name">
                      Building Research Association of New Zealand
                      <fr:assertion name="funder_identifier">https://doi.org/10.13039/100010483</fr:assertion>
                    </fr:assertion>
                    <fr:assertion name="award_number">BRANZ (LR13673)</fr:assertion>
                  </fr:assertion>
                </fr:program>
                <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
                  <ai:license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2022-08-01">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor</ai:license_ref>
                  <ai:license_ref applies_to="tdm">http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1</ai:license_ref>
                </ai:program>
                <archive_locations>
                  <archive name="Portico" />
                </archive_locations>
                <crossmark>
                  <crossmark_version>2</crossmark_version>
                  <crossmark_policy>10.1177/sage-journals-update-policy</crossmark_policy>
                  <crossmark_domains>
                    <crossmark_domain>
                      <domain>journals.sagepub.com</domain>
                    </crossmark_domain>
                  </crossmark_domains>
                  <crossmark_domain_exclusive>true</crossmark_domain_exclusive>
                  <custom_metadata>
                    <fr:program xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" name="fundref">
                      <fr:assertion name="fundgroup">
                        <fr:assertion name="funder_name">
                          building research association of new zealand
                          <fr:assertion name="funder_identifier">https://doi.org/10.13039/100010483</fr:assertion>
                        </fr:assertion>
                        <fr:assertion name="award_number">BRANZ (LR13673)</fr:assertion>
                      </fr:assertion>
                    </fr:program>
                    <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
                      <ai:license_ref applies_to="tdm">https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license</ai:license_ref>
                    </ai:program>
                  </custom_metadata>
                </crossmark>
                <doi_data>
                  <doi>10.1177/87552930221082684</doi>
                  <resource>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/87552930221082684</resource>
                  <collection property="country-based">
                    <item country="CN">
                      <resource>http://sage.cnpereading.com/paragraph/article/?doi=10.1177/87552930221082684</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="crawler-based">
                    <item crawler="iParadigms">
                      <resource>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930221082684</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="text-mining">
                    <item>
                      <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/87552930221082684</resource>
                    </item>
                    <item>
                      <resource mime_type="application/xml">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/87552930221082684</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                  <collection property="list-based" multi-resolution="unlock">
                    <item label="geoscienceworld" setbyID="silver_mr">
                      <resource>https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/earthquake-spectra/article/38/3/1615/615871/the-estimated-carbon-cost-of-concrete-building</resource>
                    </item>
                  </collection>
                </doi_data>
                <citation_list>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_2_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>AECOM Consulting Services(2015)Continuation of earthquake waste processing and disposal activities at the burwood resource recovery park and burwood landfill.http://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The‐Council/HYS/2016/january/Assessment‐of‐environmental‐effects.pdf</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_3_1">
                    <doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.033</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_4_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>Applied Technology Council (ATC)(1995)Addendum to the ATC‐20 post earthquake building safety evaluation procedures.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_5_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>Architecture 2030(2019)New buildings: Embodied carbon. Available at:https://architecture2030.org/new‐buildings‐embodied/(accessed 2 February 2021)</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_6_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>BergB DowdellD CurtisM(2016)New Zealand whole‐building whole‐of‐life framework: Development of reference office buildings for use in early design. BRANZ study report SR350.www.branz.co.nz/study_reports</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_7_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>BrownC(2012)Case study report: 2010 Canterbury and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes—demolition and disaster waste management April. Available at:https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/7038/AppendixK.CBrown.pdf?sequence=12&amp;isAllowed=y</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_8_1">
                    <doi>10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_359</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_9_1">
                    <doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.021</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_10_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>CAENZ(2008)New Zealand energy information handbook. Available at:http://eis.lbl.gov/energy‐information‐handbook.html</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_11_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>CEN(2010)EN 15643—1:2010 Sustainability of construction works—Sustainability assessment of buildings—Part 1: General framework 1: 1‐25.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_12_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>CEN(2011) EN 15978:2011 Sustainability of construction works—Assessment of environmental performance of buildings—Calculation method.International StandardNovember:1–64.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_13_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>CEN(2012)EN 15643—2:2011 Sustainability of construction works—Assessment of buildings—Part 2: Framework for the assessment of environmental performance.::1–36.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_14_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>CEN(2019)EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 —Standards Publication Sustainability of construction works — Environmental product declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products.1–76.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_15_1">
                    <journal_title>Proceedings of the Summer School Francesco Turco</journal_title>
                    <author>Daria B</author>
                    <first_page>166</first_page>
                    <volume>1113</volume>
                    <cYear>2013</cYear>
                    <article_title>LCA (life cycle assessment) in disaster waste management: Emilia‐Romagna earthquake, an Italian case study</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_16_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>DowdellD BergB ButlerJ et al. (2020) New Zealand whole‐building whole‐of‐life framework: LCAQuick v3.4—a tool to help designers understand how to evaluate building environmental performance.Porirua New Zealand. Available at:https://www.branz.co.nz/pubs/research‐reports/sr418/</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_17_1">
                    <volume_title>New Zealand whole‐building whole‐of‐life framework: Development of datasheets to support building life cycle assessment. BRANZ Study Report SR351</volume_title>
                    <author>Dowdell D</author>
                    <cYear>2016</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_18_1">
                    <doi>10.1065/lca2007.05.327</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_19_1">
                    <doi provider="crossref">10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.011</doi>
                    <unstructured_citation>HasikV ChhabraJPS WarnGP et al (2018) Review of approaches for integrating loss estimation and life cycle assessment to assess impacts of seismic building damage and repair.Engineering Structures175(August):123–137.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_20_1">
                    <journal_title>Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)</journal_title>
                    <author>Huang M</author>
                    <first_page>1</first_page>
                    <volume>146</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <cYear>2020</cYear>
                    <article_title>Comparative environmental analysis of seismic damage in buildings</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_21_1">
                    <volume_title>General performance of buildings in Christchurch CDB after the 22 Feb 2011 earthquake: A contextual report, (prepared for the Department of Building and Housing)</volume_title>
                    <author>Kam WY</author>
                    <cYear>2011</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_22_1">
                    <volume_title>Quantitative Analysis of Factors Influencing Post‐Earthquake Decisions on Concrete Buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand</volume_title>
                    <author>Kim JJ</author>
                    <cYear>2015</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_23_1">
                    <doi>10.1193/072516EQS120M</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_24_1">
                    <doi>10.1007/s10518-015-9772-8</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_25_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>MBIE(2020a)Building for climate change: Transforming the building and improve climate resilience July. Available at:https://www.mbie.govt.nz/dmsdocument/11522‐building‐for‐climate‐change</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_26_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>MBIE(2020b)Transforming operational efficiency August.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_27_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>MBIE(2020c)Whole‐of‐life embodied carbon emissions reduction August.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_28_1">
                    <volume_title>A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills</volume_title>
                    <author>Ministry for the Environment</author>
                    <cYear>2002</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_29_1">
                    <journal_title>The myclimate flight emission calculator</journal_title>
                    <author>Myclimate</author>
                    <volume>7</volume>
                    <cYear>2019</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_30_1">
                    <journal_title>Climate change response (zero carbon) amendment act 2019</journal_title>
                    <author>New Zealand Parliament and New Zealand Government</author>
                    <volume>32</volume>
                    <cYear>2019</cYear>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_31_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE)(2009)Building safety evaluation during a state of emergency: Guidelines for territorial authorities(IssueAugust p.49).</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_32_1">
                    <doi>10.1007/978‐94‐007‐7269‐4_25</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_33_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>QV costbuilder(2021) Available at:www.qvcostbuilder.co.nz.</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_34_1">
                    <doi>10.4324/9781315778730</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_35_1">
                    <doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.065</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_36_1">
                    <doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.020</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_37_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>The Carbon Leadership Forum(2019)Estimates of embodied carbon for mechanical electrical plumbing and tenant improvements April 2019. Available at:https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c73f31eb10f25809eb82de2/t/5d62eb73ad10d80001539428/1566763892553/1SummaryReportofEmbodiedCarbonImpactsofMEPSystemsandTI.pdf</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_38_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>The NZ and energy stats(n.d.) Available at:https://www.stats.govt.nz/(accessed 27 October 2020)</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_39_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>UNEP IEA(2017)UN environment and international energy agency (2017): Towards a zero‐emission efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Available at:www.globalabc.org</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_40_1">
                    <unstructured_citation>WebsterM ArehartJ ChepuriR et al (2020)Achieving net zero embodied carbon in structural materials by 2050 March. Available at:https://seisustainability.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/achieving‐net‐zero.pdf</unstructured_citation>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_41_1">
                    <journal_title>Journal of Structural Engineering (United States)</journal_title>
                    <author>Welsh‐Huggins SJ</author>
                    <first_page>1</first_page>
                    <volume>144</volume>
                    <issue>8</issue>
                    <cYear>2018</cYear>
                    <article_title>Evaluating multiobjective outcomes for hazard resilience and sustainability from enhanced building seismic design decisions</article_title>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_42_1">
                    <doi>10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000803</doi>
                  </citation>
                  <citation key="e_1_2_9_43_1">
                    <journal_title>Carbon</journal_title>
                    <author>Worrell E</author>
                    <first_page>303</first_page>
                    <volume>26</volume>
                    <cYear>2001</cYear>
                    <article_title>Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry</article_title>
                  </citation>
                </citation_list>
              </journal_article>
            </journal>
          </crossref>
        </doi_record>
      </query>
    </body>
  </query_result>
</crossref_result>