{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T23:15:44Z","timestamp":1793834144891,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Bioinformatics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Percentage Identity (PID) is frequently quoted in discussion of sequence alignments since it appears simple and easy to understand. However, although there are several different ways to calculate percentage identity and each may yield a different result for the same alignment, the method of calculation is rarely reported. Accordingly, quantification of the variation in PID caused by the different calculations would help in interpreting PID values in the literature. In this study, the variation in PID was quantified systematically on a reference set of 1028 alignments generated by comparison of the protein three-dimensional structures. Since the alignment algorithm may also affect the range of PID, this study also considered the effect of algorithm, and the combination of algorithm and PID method.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The maximum variation in PID due to the calculation method was 11.5% while the effect of alignment algorithm on PID was up to 14.6% across three popular alignment methods. The combined effect of alignment algorithm and PID calculation gave a variation of up to 22% on the test data, with an average of 5.3% \u00b1 2.8% for sequence pairs with &lt; 30% identity. In order to see which PID method was most highly correlated with structural similarity, four different PID calculations were compared to similarity scores (Sc) from the comparison of the corresponding protein three-dimensional structures. The highest correlation coefficient for a PID calculation was 0.80. In contrast, the more sophisticated Z-score calculated by reference to randomized sequences gave a correlation coefficient of 0.84.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Although it is well known amongst expert sequence analysts that PID is a poor score for discriminating between protein sequences, the apparent simplicity of the percentage identity score encourages its widespread use in establishing cutoffs for structural similarity. This paper illustrates that not only is PID a poor measure of sequence similarity when compared to the Z-score, but that there is also a large uncertainty in reported PID values. Since better alternatives to PID exist to quantify sequence similarity, these should be quoted where possible in preference to PID. The findings presented here should prove helpful to those new to sequence analysis, and in warning those who seek to interpret the value of a PID reported in the literature.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-7-415","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,19]],"date-time":"2006-09-19T18:23:10Z","timestamp":1158690190000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":48,"title":["Quantification of the variation in percentage identity for protein sequence alignments"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"GPS","family":"Raghava","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Geoffrey J","family":"Barton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"1154_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2264","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.87.6.2264","volume":"87","author":"S Karlin","year":"1990","unstructured":"Karlin S, Altschul SF: Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1990, 87: 2264\u20132268. 10.1073\/pnas.87.6.2264","journal-title":"Proc Nat Acad Sci"},{"key":"1154_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1002\/pro.5560040613","volume":"4","author":"W Pearson","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pearson W: Comparison of Methods for Searching Protein Sequence Databases. Prot Sci 1995, 4: 1145\u20131160.","journal-title":"Prot Sci"},{"key":"1154_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1093\/protein\/1.2.89","volume":"1","author":"GJ Barton","year":"1987","unstructured":"Barton GJ, Sternberg MJE: Evaluation and Improvements in the Automatic Alignment of Protein Sequences. Prot Eng 1987, 1: 89\u201394.","journal-title":"Prot Eng"},{"key":"1154_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1006\/jmbi.1995.0340","volume":"249","author":"G Vogt","year":"1995","unstructured":"Vogt G, Etzold T, Argos P: An Assessment of Amino Acid Exchange Matrices in Aligning Protein Sequences: The Twilight Zone Revisited. J Mol Biol 1995, 249: 816\u2013831. 10.1006\/jmbi.1995.0340","journal-title":"J Mol Biol"},{"key":"1154_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1006\/jmbi.1994.1733","volume":"244","author":"RB Russell","year":"1994","unstructured":"Russell RB, Barton GJ: Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds: An analysis of side \u2013 chain to side \u2013 chain contacts, secondary structure and accessibilty. J Mol Biol 1994, 244: 332\u2013350. 10.1006\/jmbi.1994.1733","journal-title":"J Mol Biol"},{"key":"1154_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7280687","volume":"214","author":"RF Doolittle","year":"1981","unstructured":"Doolittle RF: Similar amino acid sequences: chance or common ancestry? Science 1981, 214: 149\u2013159.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"1154_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1002\/prot.340090107","volume":"9","author":"C Sander","year":"1991","unstructured":"Sander C, Schneider R: Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991, 9: 56\u201368. 10.1002\/prot.340090107","journal-title":"Proteins"},{"issue":"5","key":"1154_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.str.2004.04.001","volume":"12","author":"AC May","year":"2004","unstructured":"May AC: Percent sequence identity; the need to be explicit. Structure (Camb) 2004, 12(5):737\u20138. [0969\u20132126 (Print) Letter] [0969\u20132126 (Print) Letter] 10.1016\/j.str.2004.04.001","journal-title":"Structure (Camb)"},{"key":"1154_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2836(87)90316-0","volume":"198","author":"GJ Barton","year":"1987","unstructured":"Barton GJ, Sternberg MJE: A Strategy for the Rapid Multiple Alignment of Protein Sequences: Confidence Levels From Tertiary Structure Comparisons. J Mol Biol 1987, 198: 327\u2013337. 10.1016\/0022-2836(87)90316-0","journal-title":"J Mol Biol"},{"key":"1154_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/0076-6879(90)83027-7","volume":"183","author":"GJ Barton","year":"1990","unstructured":"Barton GJ: Protein Multiple Sequence Alignment and Flexible Pattern Matching. Meth Enz 1990, 183: 403\u2013428.","journal-title":"Meth Enz"},{"key":"1154_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4673","DOI":"10.1093\/nar\/22.22.4673","volume":"22","author":"JD Thompson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sesitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weigh matrix choice. Nuc Ac Res 1994, 22: 4673\u20134680.","journal-title":"Nuc Ac Res"},{"key":"1154_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2836(70)90057-4","volume":"48","author":"SB Needleman","year":"1970","unstructured":"Needleman SB, Wunsch CD: A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48: 443\u2013453. 10.1016\/0022-2836(70)90057-4","journal-title":"J Mol Biol"},{"key":"1154_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1002\/prot.340140216","volume":"14","author":"RB Russell","year":"1992","unstructured":"Russell RB, Barton GJ: Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins 1992, 14: 309\u2013323. 10.1002\/prot.340140216","journal-title":"Proteins"},{"issue":"12","key":"1154_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/17.12.1158","volume":"17","author":"C Webber","year":"2001","unstructured":"Webber C, Barton GJ: Estimation of P-values for global alignments of protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(12):1158\u201367. [1367\u20134803 (Print) Journal Article] [1367\u20134803 (Print) Journal Article] 10.1093\/bioinformatics\/17.12.1158","journal-title":"Bioinformatics"},{"key":"1154_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-4-47","volume":"4","author":"GP Raghava","year":"2003","unstructured":"Raghava GP, Searle SM, Audley PC, Barber JD, Barton GJ: OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4: 47. [1471\u20132105 (Electronic) Evaluation Studies Journal Article] [1471\u20132105 (Electronic) Evaluation Studies Journal Article] 10.1186\/1471-2105-4-47","journal-title":"BMC Bioinformatics"}],"container-title":["BMC Bioinformatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2105-7-415.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T03:26:26Z","timestamp":1630466786000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1471-2105-7-415"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,19]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1154"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2105-7-415","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2105"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2105","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,9,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 December 2005","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 September 2006","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 September 2006","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"415"}}