{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,13]],"date-time":"2026-11-13T15:09:16Z","timestamp":1794582556762,"version":"4.9.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,27]],"date-time":"2011-01-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1296086400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Res Methodol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is a growing ethical imperative to feedback research results to participants but there remains a striking lack of empirical research on how people respond to individualised feedback. We sought to explore longitudinal study participants' response to receiving individual written feedback of weight-related and blood results, and to consider the balance of harms against benefits.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A qualitative study with face-to-face and telephone interviews conducted with 50 men and women who had participated in the fifth and most recent wave of the cohort study 'West of Scotland Twenty-07' and received a feedback letter containing body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin A<jats:sub>1c<\/jats:sub>(HbA<jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub><jats:sub>c<\/jats:sub>) results.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Expectations of, and response to, the feedback of their individual results varied. Whilst half of the participants were on the whole 'pleased' with their results or held neutral views, half reported negative responses such as 'shock' or 'concern', particularly in relation to the weight-related results. Participants who were overweight and obese used the most negative language about their results, with some being quite distressed and reporting feelings of powerlessness, low self-image and anxiety over future health. Nevertheless, some people reported having implemented lifestyle changes in direct response to the feedback, resulting in significant weight-loss and\/or dietary improvements. Others reported being motivated to change their behaviour. Age and gender differences were apparent in these narratives of behaviour change.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The potential harm caused to some participants may be balanced against the benefit to others. More evaluation of the impact of the format, content and means of individualised feedback of research findings in non-trial studies is required given the growing ethical imperative to offer participants a choice of receiving their results, and the likelihood that a high percentage will choose to receive them.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,2,8]],"date-time":"2011-02-08T14:49:23Z","timestamp":1297176563000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Karen","family":"Lorimer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cindy M","family":"Gray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kate","family":"Hunt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sally","family":"Wyke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annie","family":"Anderson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michaela","family":"Benzeval","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"655_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1170","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ejhg.5201690","volume":"14","author":"BM Knoppers","year":"2006","unstructured":"Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, Durocher F: The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006, 14 (11): 1170-1178. 10.1038\/sj.ejhg.5201690.","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"9","key":"655_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e17","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2008.025122","volume":"34","author":"DI Shalowitz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shalowitz DI, Miller FG: The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants. J Med Ethics. 2008, 34 (9): e17-10.1136\/jme.2008.025122.","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"655_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2007.024034","volume":"35","author":"P Affleck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Affleck P: Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?. J Med Ethics. 2009, 35 (4): 209-213. 10.1136\/jme.2007.024034.","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"655_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e91","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0050091","volume":"5","author":"DI Shalowitz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shalowitz DI, Miller FG: Communicating the Results of Clinical Research to Participants: Attitudes, Practices, and Future Directions. PLoS Med. 2008, 5 (5): e91-10.1371\/journal.pmed.0050091.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"7535","key":"655_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38675.677963.3A","volume":"332","author":"M Dixon-Woods","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dixon-Woods M, Jackson C, Windridge KC, Kenyon S: Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views. BMJ. 2006, 332 (7535): 206-210. 10.1136\/bmj.38675.677963.3A.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"655_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.29.2.93","volume":"29","author":"MPM Richards","year":"2003","unstructured":"Richards MPM, Ponder M, Pharoah P, Everest S, Mackay J: Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. J Med Ethics. 2003, 29 (2): 93-96. 10.1136\/jme.29.2.93.","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"655_CR7","volume-title":"Human tissue and biological samples for use in research - operational and ethical guidelines","author":"Medical Research Council","year":"2001","unstructured":"Medical Research Council: Human tissue and biological samples for use in research - operational and ethical guidelines. 2001, London: MRC"},{"key":"655_CR8","volume-title":"Pharmacogenetics ethical issues","author":"Nuffield Council on Bioethics","year":"2003","unstructured":"Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Pharmacogenetics ethical issues. 2003, London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics"},{"issue":"7535","key":"655_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7535.188","volume":"332","author":"SD MacNeil","year":"2006","unstructured":"MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV: Offering results to research participants. BMJ. 2006, 332 (7535): 188-189. 10.1136\/bmj.332.7535.188.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7150","key":"655_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.317.7150.21","volume":"317","author":"C Snowdon","year":"1998","unstructured":"Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D: Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study. BMJ. 1998, 317 (7150): 21-26.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"655_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"p486","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.97.4.486","volume":"97","author":"GR Bunin","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bunin GR, Kazak AE, Mitelman O: Informing subjects of epidemiologic study results. (Children's Cancer Group). Pediatrics. 1996, 97 (4): p486-","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"6","key":"655_CR12","first-page":"1752","volume":"38","author":"M Benzeval","year":"2008","unstructured":"Benzeval M, Der G, Ellaway A, Hunt K, Sweeting H, West P, Macintyre S: Cohort Profile: West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: Health in the Community. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 38 (6): 1752-","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"655_CR13","volume-title":"Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers","author":"J Ritchie","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2003, London: Sage"},{"issue":"7227","key":"655_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7227.114","volume":"320","author":"C Pope","year":"2000","unstructured":"Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000, 320 (7227): 114-116. 10.1136\/bmj.320.7227.114.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"655_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.5993\/AJHB.25.3.8","volume":"25","author":"CC DiClemente","year":"2001","unstructured":"DiClemente CC, Marinilli AS, Singh M, Bellino LE: The Role of Feedback in the Process of Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2001, 25 (3): 217-227.","journal-title":"American Journal of Health Behavior"},{"issue":"6","key":"655_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.242","volume":"2","author":"FM Walter","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walter FM, Emery J, Braithwaite D, Marteau TM: Lay Understanding of Familial Risk of Common Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research. Ann Fam Med. 2004, 2 (6): 583-594. 10.1370\/afm.242.","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"655_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-6133.25.3.425","volume":"25","author":"RT Croyle","year":"2006","unstructured":"Croyle RT, Loftus EF, Barger SD, Hart M, Getting J, Sun YC: How well do people recall risk factor test results? Accuracy and bias among cholesterol screening participants. Health Psychology. 2006, 25 (3): 425-432. 10.1037\/0278-6133.25.3.425.","journal-title":"Health Psychology"},{"key":"655_CR18","volume-title":"The West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: health in the community. Wave 5 fieldwork report, 2007\/8","author":"K Lorimer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lorimer K, Green M, Shipton D, Benzeval M: The West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: health in the community. Wave 5 fieldwork report, 2007\/8. 2010, MRC\/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit"},{"issue":"7327","key":"655_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1487","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7327.1487","volume":"323","author":"A McConnachie","year":"2001","unstructured":"McConnachie A, Hunt K, Emslie C, Hart C, Watt G: \"Unwarranted survivals\" and \"anomalous deaths\" from coronary heart disease: prospective survey of general population. BMJ. 2001, 323 (7327): 1487-1491. 10.1136\/bmj.323.7327.1487.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"655_CR20","volume-title":"Biobank: protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resource","author":"UK Anon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Anon UK: Biobank: protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resource. 2006"},{"issue":"3","key":"655_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2004.010140","volume":"31","author":"A Jeffery","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jeffery A, Snaith R, Voss L: Ethical dilemmas: feeding back results to members of a longitudinal cohort study. J Med Ethics. 2005, 31 (3): 153-10.1136\/jme.2004.010140.","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Research Methodology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,5]],"date-time":"2023-06-05T04:30:19Z","timestamp":1685939419000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,27]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,12]]}},"alternative-id":["655"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-11-10","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2288"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2288","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 September 2010","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 January 2011","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 January 2011","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"10"}}