{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,16]],"date-time":"2025-12-16T11:47:14Z","timestamp":1765885634724},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,11]],"date-time":"2008-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1226361600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Since July 1998 all Dutch women (\u00b1 200,000\/y) are screened for red cell antibodies, other than anti-RhesusD (RhD) in the first trimester of pregnancy, to facilitate timely treatment of pregnancies at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Evidence for benefits, consequences and costs of screening for non-RhD antibodies is still under discussion. The screening program was evaluated in a nation-wide study. As a part of this evaluation study we investigated, according to the sixth criterium of Wilson and J\u00fcngner, the acceptance by pregnant women of the screening program for non-RhD antibodies.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Controlled longitudinal survey, including a prenatal and a postnatal measurement by structured questionnaires. Main outcome measures: information satisfaction, anxiety during the screening process (a.o. STAI state inventory and specific questionnaire modules), overall attitude on the screening program. Univariate analysis was followed by standard multivariate analysis to identify significant predictors of the outcome measures. Participants: 233 pregnant women, distributed over five groups, according to the screening result.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Satisfaction about the provided information was moderate in all groups. All screen- positive groups desired more supportive information. Anxiety increased in screen- positives during the screening process, but decreased to basic levels postnatally. All groups showed a strongly positive balance between perceived utility and burden of the screening program, independent on test results or background characteristics.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Women highly accept the non-RhD antibody screening program. However, satisfaction about provided information is moderate. Oral and written information should be provided by obstetric care workers themselves, especially to screen-positive women.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,11]],"date-time":"2008-11-11T19:17:01Z","timestamp":1226431021000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Women's attitude towards prenatal screening for red blood cell antibodies, other than RhD"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"JM","family":"Koelewijn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"TGM","family":"Vrijkotte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"de Haas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"CE","family":"van der Schoot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"GJ","family":"Bonsel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"49_CR1","first-page":"50","volume-title":"Prevention of pregnancy immunisation","author":"Committee prevention pregnancy immunisation","year":"1992","unstructured":"Committee prevention pregnancy immunisation: Prevention of pregnancy immunisation. 1992, The Hague: Dutch Health Council, [Dutch], 50-"},{"key":"49_CR2","volume-title":"Health Care Insurance Board. Inspection Public Health [Dutch]","author":"Health Care Insurance Board","year":"1998","unstructured":"Health Care Insurance Board: Blood testing in pregnancy. Pregnancy immunisation, hepatitis B and lues. Health Care Insurance Board. Inspection Public Health [Dutch]. 1998"},{"issue":"1","key":"49_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00428-0","volume":"92","author":"KJ Moise Jr","year":"2000","unstructured":"Moise KJ: Non-anti-D antibodies in red-cell alloimmunization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000, 92 (1): 75-81. 10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00428-0.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"49_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1053\/j.seminhematol.2005.04.007","volume":"42","author":"KJ Moise","year":"2005","unstructured":"Moise KJ: Red blood cell alloimmunization in pregnancy. Semin Hematol. 2005, 42 (3): 169-178. 10.1053\/j.seminhematol.2005.04.007.","journal-title":"Semin Hematol"},{"issue":"1","key":"49_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.063","volume":"192","author":"IL van Kamp","year":"2005","unstructured":"van Kamp IL, Klumper FJ, Oepkes D, Meerman RH, Scherjon SA, Vandenbussche FP, et al: Complications of intrauterine intravascular transfusion for fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 192 (1): 171-177. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.063.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"49_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2007.01625.x","volume":"48","author":"JM Koelewijn","year":"2008","unstructured":"Koelewijn JM, Vrijkotte TG, Schoot Van der CE, Bonsel GJ, de Haas M: Effect of screening for red cell antibodies, other than anti-D, to detect hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a population study in the Netherlands. Transfusion. 2008, 48 (5): 941-952. 10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2007.01625.x.","journal-title":"Transfusion"},{"issue":"1","key":"49_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1054\/blre.1999.0123","volume":"14","author":"SJ Urbaniak","year":"2000","unstructured":"Urbaniak SJ, Greiss MA: RhD: haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn. Blood Rev. 2000, 14 (1): 44-61. 10.1054\/blre.1999.0123.","journal-title":"Blood Rev"},{"key":"49_CR8","first-page":"34","volume-title":"Public Health Papers","author":"JMG Wilson","year":"1968","unstructured":"Wilson JMG, J\u00fcngner G: Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Papers. 1968, Geneva, World Health Organization, 34-"},{"key":"49_CR9","first-page":"92","volume-title":"Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2004","author":"Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland: Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2004. 2007, Utrecht: Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland [Dutch], 92-"},{"issue":"2","key":"49_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052855","volume":"355","author":"D Oepkes","year":"2006","unstructured":"Oepkes D, Seaward PG, Vandenbussche FP, Windrim R, Kingdom J, Beyene J, et al: Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355 (2): 156-164. 10.1056\/NEJMoa052855.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"49_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml027","volume":"12","author":"HI Wildschut","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wildschut HI, Peters TJ, Weiner CP: Screening in women's health, with emphasis on fetal Down's syndrome, breast cancer and osteoporosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006, 12 (5): 499-512. 10.1093\/humupd\/dml027.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"3","key":"49_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1177\/096914139700400303","volume":"4","author":"D Kerbel","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kerbel D, Glazier R, Holzapfel S, Yeung M, Lofsky S: Adverse effects of screening for gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Toronto, Canada. J Med Screen. 1997, 4 (3): 128-132.","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"issue":"2","key":"49_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00131.x","volume":"42","author":"AR Rumbold","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rumbold AR, Crowther CA: Women's experiences of being screened for gestational diabetes mellitus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 42 (2): 131-137. 10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00131.x.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"49_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1805","volume":"27","author":"MP Fransen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fransen MP, Essink-Bot ML, Oenema A, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, Wildschut HI: Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework. Prenat Diagn. 2007, 27 (10): 938-950. 10.1002\/pd.1805.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"49_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1177\/109019817800600107","volume":"6","author":"KA Wallston","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R: Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs. 2007, 6: 160-170.","journal-title":"Health Education Monographs"},{"key":"49_CR16","volume-title":"STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory","author":"CD Spielberger","year":"1970","unstructured":"Spielberger CD, Gorusch RL, Lushene LE: STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Edited by: Palo Alto C. 1970, Consulting Psychologists Press"},{"key":"49_CR17","volume-title":"State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Sampler set, manual, test, scoring key","author":"CD Spielberger","year":"1983","unstructured":"Spielberger CD: State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Sampler set, manual, test, scoring key. Edited by: Pao Alto C. 1983, Consulting Psychologists Press"},{"issue":"4","key":"49_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X07302131","volume":"27","author":"PF Krabbe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Krabbe PF, Salomon JA, Murray CJ: Quantification of health states with rank-based nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Med Decis Making. 2007, 27 (4): 395-405. 10.1177\/0272989X07302131.","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"issue":"4","key":"49_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11920-007-0032-8","volume":"9","author":"R Balon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Balon R: Rating scales for anxiety\/anxiety disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007, 9 (4): 271-277. 10.1007\/s11920-007-0032-8.","journal-title":"Curr Psychiatry Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"49_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00131.x","volume":"42","author":"AR Rumbold","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rumbold AR, Crowther CA: Women's experiences of being screened for gestational diabetes mellitus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 42 (2): 131-137. 10.1111\/j.0004-8666.2002.00131.x.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"49_CR21","volume-title":"Thesis","author":"H Wijnen","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wijnen H: The Kempen study: Aspects of maternal well-being and obstetrical outcome in relation to gestational thyroid function. Thesis. 2005, University of Tilburg, the Netherlands"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]],"date-time":"2021-08-31T22:24:10Z","timestamp":1630448650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,11]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,12]]}},"alternative-id":["49"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-8-49","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,11,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 April 2008","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 November 2008","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 November 2008","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"49"}}