{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T04:54:12Z","timestamp":1778820852565,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BioMed Eng OnLine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The utility of cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) as a diagnostic tool is being investigated in clinical trials. We sought to assess the reliability of two different sizes of tetrapolar probes used in measuring cervical impedance.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Cervical transfer impedance was measured at 14 frequencies between 76 and 625 000 Hz from 11 pregnant subjects at term. Repeated measurements were taken with two probes (3 mm and 12 mm diameter) applied softly (approximately 0.7 Newton of force), and firmly (approximately 2.2 Newton) to the surface of the cervix by two observers. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and repeatability standard deviations (SD) were derived from these measurements and compared.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Measurements taken by one observer were highly repeatable for both probes as demonstrated by high ICC and low CV values. Probe performance was improved further by firm application. Firm application of the 3 mm probe resulted in ICC values that ranged from 0.936 to 0.986 (p = 0.0001) and CV values between 1.0 and 3.4%. Firm pressure with the 12 mm probe resulted in ICC values that ranged between 0.914 and 0.988 (p = 0.0001) with CV values between 0.7 and 2.1%. In addition, the repeatability SD was low across all frequencies implying that there was low intra-observer variability. Measurements taken by 2 observers with firm application of the 12 mm probe demonstrated moderate reproducibility between 9.8 and 156 kHz, the frequency range in which previous clinical studies have shown predictive association between high cervical resistivity and vaginal delivery: ICC values ranged between 0.528 and 0.638 (p &lt; 0.05), CV values were between 3.3 and 5.2% and reproducibility SD values were also low. In contrast the 3 mm probe demonstrated poor reproducibility at all study frequencies.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Measuring cervical resistivity by a single observer with both the 3 and 12 mm probes is highly repeatable whilst inter-observer reproducibility is poor with the 3 mm probe but moderately good when the 12 mm probe is firmly applied to the cervix in the frequency range 9.8 to 156 kHz, consistent with our observations of probe performance in clinical trials.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1475-925x-8-10","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,17]],"date-time":"2009-06-17T18:15:26Z","timestamp":1245262526000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Reproducibility and repeatability of measuring the electrical impedance of the pregnant human cervix-the effect of probe size and applied pressure"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Roobin P","family":"Jokhi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vidita V","family":"Ghule","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brian H","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dilly OC","family":"Anumba","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"296_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)09095-9","volume":"355","author":"BH Brown","year":"2000","unstructured":"Brown BH, Tidy JA, Boston K, Blackett AD, Smallwood RH, Sharp F: Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia. Lancet 2000, 355: 892\u2013895. 10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)09095-9","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"296_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R1","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/20\/4\/201","volume":"20","author":"TJ Faes","year":"1999","unstructured":"Faes TJ, Meij HA, de Munck JC, Heethaar RM: The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. Physiol Meas 1999, 20: R1\u201310. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/20\/4\/201","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"issue":"Suppl 4A","key":"296_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"A97","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/17\/4A\/014","volume":"17","author":"NJ Avis","year":"1996","unstructured":"Avis NJ, Lindow SW, Kleinermann F: In vitro multifrequency electrical impedance measurements and modelling of the cervix in late pregnancy. Physiol Meas 1996,17(Suppl 4A):A97\u2013103. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/17\/4A\/014","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"key":"296_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/23\/1\/315","volume":"23","author":"DC Walker","year":"2002","unstructured":"Walker DC, Brown BH, Smallwood RH, Hose DR, Jones DM: Modelled current distribution in cervical squamous tissue. Physiol Meas 2002, 23: 159\u2013168. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/23\/1\/315","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"key":"296_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00530.x","volume":"112","author":"BH Brown","year":"2005","unstructured":"Brown BH, Milnes P, Abdul S, Tidy JA: Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using impedance spectroscopy: a prospective study. BJOG 2005, 112: 802\u2013806. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00530.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"296_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.12.029","volume":"129","author":"SV Gandhi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gandhi SV, Walker D, Milnes P, Mukherjee S, Brown BH, Anumba DO: Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the cervix in non-pregnant and pregnant women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006, 129: 145\u2013149. 10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.12.029","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"296_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050412331312230","volume":"14","author":"MP O'Connell","year":"2003","unstructured":"O'Connell MP, Avis NJ, Brown BH, Killick SR, Lindow SW: Electrical impedance measurements: an objective measure of prelabor cervical change. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003, 14: 389\u2013391. 10.1080\/14767050412331312230","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"296_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10410.x","volume":"107","author":"MP O'Connell","year":"2000","unstructured":"O'Connell MP, Tidy J, Wisher SJ, Avis NJ, Brown BH, Lindow SW: An in vivo comparative study of the pregnant and nonpregnant cervix using electrical impedance measurements. BJOG 2000, 107: 1040\u20131041. 10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10410.x","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"296_CR9","first-page":"1","volume":"93","author":"R Jokhi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jokhi R, Brown B, Anumba D: The Role of Cervical Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in the Prediction of the Course and Outcome of Induced Labour [Abstract]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008, 93: 1.","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"296_CR10","volume-title":"IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, Electronic Version","author":"IUPAC","year":"2008","unstructured":"IUPAC Edited by: Nic M, Jirrat J, Kosata B. IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, Electronic Version; 2008."},{"key":"296_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S39","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/26\/2\/004","volume":"26","author":"CA Gonzalez-Correa","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gonzalez-Correa CA, Brown BH, Smallwood RH, Walker DC, Bardhan KD: Electrical bioimpedance readings increase with higher pressure applied to the measuring probe. Physiol Meas 2005, 26: S39\u201347. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/26\/2\/004","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"key":"296_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/24\/2\/369","volume":"24","author":"DM Jones","year":"2003","unstructured":"Jones DM, Smallwood RH, Hose DR, Brown BH, Walker DC: Modelling of epithelial tissue impedance measured using three different designs of probe. Physiol Meas 2003, 24: 605\u2013623. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/24\/2\/369","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"key":"296_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.822","volume":"194","author":"WT Gregory","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K, Corcoran A, Clark AL: External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194: 1243\u20131248. 10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.822","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"296_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00544.x","volume":"18","author":"B Hollis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hollis B, Mavrides E, Campbell S, Tekay A, Thilaganathan B: Reproducibility and repeatability of transabdominal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001, 18: 593\u2013597. 10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00544.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"296_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1997.10030198.x","volume":"10","author":"A Tekay","year":"1997","unstructured":"Tekay A, Jarvela I, Jouppila P: Reproducibility of transvaginal Doppler velocimetry measurements in the uterine arteries of postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997, 10: 198\u2013204. 10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1997.10030198.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"296_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","volume":"86","author":"PE Shrout","year":"1979","unstructured":"Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86: 420\u2013428. 10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"296_CR17","volume-title":"The design and analysis of clinical experiments","author":"JL Fleiss","year":"1986","unstructured":"Fleiss JL: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986."},{"key":"296_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7049.106","volume":"313","author":"JM Bland","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG: Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ 1996, 313: 106.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"296_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","volume":"1","author":"JM Bland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1: 307\u2013310.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"296_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00338.x","volume":"17","author":"F Prefumo","year":"2001","unstructured":"Prefumo F, De Biasio P, Venturini PL: Reproducibility of ductus venosus Doppler flow measurements at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001, 17: 301\u2013305. 10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00338.x","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"296_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1049\/el:20011034","volume":"37","author":"DM Jones","year":"2001","unstructured":"Jones DM, Smallwood RH, DR H, Brown BH: Constraints on tetrapolar tissue impedance measurements. Electronics Letters 2001, 37: 2. 10.1049\/el:20011034","journal-title":"Electronics Letters"},{"issue":"Suppl 4A","key":"296_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"A205","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/17\/4A\/025","volume":"17","author":"SS Marven","year":"1996","unstructured":"Marven SS, Hampshire AR, Smallwood RH, Brown BH, Primhak RA: Reproducibility of electrical impedance tomographic spectroscopy (EITS) parametric images of neonatal lungs. Physiol Meas 1996,17(Suppl 4A):A205\u2013212. 10.1088\/0967-3334\/17\/4A\/025","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"}],"container-title":["BioMedical Engineering OnLine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1475-925X-8-10.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T07:00:47Z","timestamp":1630479647000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1475-925X-8-10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,17]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,12]]}},"alternative-id":["296"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1475-925x-8-10","relation":{},"ISSN":["1475-925X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1475-925X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 March 2009","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 June 2009","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 June 2009","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"10"}}