{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T01:49:29Z","timestamp":1792028969092,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Vet Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a newly growing technique to replace a more invasive conventional multiple portal laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this study was to compare single (SILS) with three portal (Conventional) laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs. Mongrel dogs (n\u2009=\u200918), weighting 15\u2009\u00b1\u20093\u2009kg, were selected for this study (n\u2009=\u200912 SILS; n\u2009=\u20096 conventional). The area from xiphoid to pubis was prepared under aseptic conditions in dorsal recumbency with the head down and tilted 30 degree in the right lateral position. Pneumoperitoneum was established by CO<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> using an automatic high flow pressure until achieving 12\u2009mm Hg. Instrumentation used consisted of curved flexible-tip 5\u2009mm Maryland forceps and ultracision harmonic scalpel for sealing and cutting of the vessels and splenic attachments.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>All dogs recovered uneventfully. The splenectomy procedure using SILS and conventional methods were significantly different in the respective operative time (29.1\u2009\u00b1\u20091.65 <jats:italic>vs.<\/jats:italic> 42.0\u2009+\u20092.69\u2009min) and the length of the surgical scar (51.6\u2009\u00b1\u20091.34\u2009mm <jats:italic>vs.<\/jats:italic> 72.0\u2009\u00b1\u20091.63\u2009mm; P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). There were no post-operative wound complication including inflammation, infection, hernia formation and dehiscence up to one month after surgery. Meanwhile, the conversion to open surgery or application of additional portals was not required in both approaches.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study demonstrated that SILS is a safe and feasible operation and could be used as an alternative approach to three portal (Conventional) for splenectomy in dog.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-6148-8-161","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,10]],"date-time":"2012-09-10T17:01:43Z","timestamp":1347296503000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Comparison between single and three portal laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Alireza","family":"Khalaj","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jalal","family":"Bakhtiari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amir","family":"Niasari-Naslaji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"589_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1159\/000018608","volume":"15","author":"E Schippers","year":"1998","unstructured":"Schippers E, Tittel A, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion-formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig Surg. 1998, 15: 145-152. 10.1159\/000018608.","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"589_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1007\/s004640000358","volume":"15","author":"EM Gamal","year":"2001","unstructured":"Gamal EM, Metzger P, Szab\u00f3 G, Br\u00e1th E, Pet\u00f5 K, Ol\u00e1h A, Kiss J, Furka I, Mik\u00f3 I: The influence of intraoperative complications on adhesion formation during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in an animal model. Surg Endosc. 2001, 15: 873-880. 10.1007\/s004640000358.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR3","first-page":"14","volume-title":"Veterinary Endosurgery","author":"LJ Freeman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Freeman LJ: Veterinary Endosurgery. 1999, Missouri: Mosby Co, 14-15. 1","edition":"1"},{"key":"589_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"898","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-004-0056-7","volume":"18","author":"CN Gutt","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, B\u00fcchler MW: Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004, 18: 898-906. 10.1007\/s00464-003-9233-3.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/s004649900006","volume":"14","author":"PL Leggett","year":"2000","unstructured":"Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G: Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000, 14: 32-36. 10.1007\/s004649900006.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2009.00601.x","volume":"38","author":"G Dupr\u00e9","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dupr\u00e9 G, Fiorbianco V, Skalicky M, G\u00fcltiken N, Ay SS, Findik M: Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: Comparison between single portal and two portal access. Vet Surg. 2009, 38: 818-824. 10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2009.00601.x.","journal-title":"Vet Surg"},{"key":"589_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2009.02.083","volume":"74","author":"MM Desai","year":"2009","unstructured":"Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, Aron M, Irwin BH, Canes D, Desai MR, Rao PP, Sotelo R, Stein R, Gill IS: Laparoscopic single site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology. 2009, 74: 805-812. 10.1016\/j.urology.2009.02.083.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"589_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6","volume":"20","author":"F Froghi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi AK, Paraskeva P: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in general surgery: A review of current practice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010, 20: 191-204. 10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6.","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"589_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12785289144809","volume":"14","author":"EN Hansen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hansen EN, Munesterer OJ: Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy in a 5-year-old with hereditary spherocytosis. JSLS. 2010, 14: 286-288. 10.4293\/108680810X12785289144809.","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"589_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2236","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-0940-2","volume":"24","author":"EM Targarona","year":"2010","unstructured":"Targarona EM, Pallares JL, Balague C, Luppi CR, Marinello F, Hern\u00e1ndez P, Mart\u00ednez C, Trias M: Single incision approach for splenic diseases: a preliminary report on a series of 8 cases. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 2236-2240. 10.1007\/s00464-010-0940-2.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1590\/S0100-736X2009000800009","volume":"29","author":"R Stedile","year":"2009","unstructured":"Stedile R, Beck CAC, Schichet F, Ferreira MP, Oliveria ST, Martens FB, Tessari JP, Bernades SBL, Oliveira CS, Santos AP, Mello FPS, Alievi MM, Muccillo MS: Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in dogs. Pesquisa Vet Brasil. 2009, 29: 653-660. 10.1590\/S0100-736X2009000800009.","journal-title":"Pesquisa Vet Brasil"},{"key":"589_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1089\/10926420260188038","volume":"12","author":"WHH Chapman","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, Kim VB, Young JA, Chitwood WR: Computer-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci Surgical Robot. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2002, 12: 155-159. 10.1089\/10926420260188038.","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"589_CR13","first-page":"192","volume-title":"Introduction to veterinary laparoscopy","author":"LJ Freeman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Freeman LJ: Veterinary Endosurgery. Introduction to veterinary laparoscopy. 1999, Missouri: Mosby Co, 192-193. 1","edition":"1"},{"key":"589_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000193602.74417.14","volume":"243","author":"O Aziz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A: Laparoscopic versus appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2006, 243: 17-27. 10.1097\/01.sla.0000193602.74417.14.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"589_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000216784.05951.0b","volume":"243","author":"MM Hutter","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hutter MM, Randall S, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Abbott WM, Warshaw AL: Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk adjusted analysis for the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2006, 243: 657-666. 10.1097\/01.sla.0000216784.05951.0b.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"589_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12674612014509","volume":"14","author":"SJ Rottman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rottman SJ, Podolsky ER, Kim E, Kem J, Curcillo PG: Single port access (SPA) spelenctomy. JSLS. 2010, 14: 48-52. 10.4293\/108680810X12674612014509.","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"589_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350609353765","volume":"16","author":"EM Targarona","year":"2009","unstructured":"Targarona EM, Balague C, Martinez C, Pallares L, Estalella L, Trias M: Single port access: a feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Innov. 2009, 16: 348-352. 10.1177\/1553350609353765.","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"589_CR18","first-page":"1297","volume-title":"Schwartz's Principles of Surgery","author":"AE Park","year":"2005","unstructured":"Park AE, Mckinlay R: Spleen. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery. Edited by: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Pollock RE. 2005, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1297-1315. 8","edition":"8"},{"key":"589_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2009.00507.x","volume":"38","author":"JT Zhang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhang JT, Wang HB, Liu YF, Sun YG, Shao JT, Shi J: Laparoscopic splenectomy in goats. Vet Surg. 2009, 38: 406-410. 10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2009.00507.x.","journal-title":"Vet Surg"},{"key":"589_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2010.00721.x","volume":"39","author":"F Collard","year":"2010","unstructured":"Collard F, Nadeau ME, Carmel EN: Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenic hemangiosarcoma in a dog. Vet Surg. 2010, 39: 870-872. 10.1111\/j.1532-950X.2010.00721.x.","journal-title":"Vet Surg"},{"key":"589_CR21","first-page":"248","volume":"2","author":"C Thibault","year":"1992","unstructured":"Thibault C, Mamazza J, L\u00e9tourneau R, Poulin E: Laparoscopic splenectomy: Operative technique and preliminary reports. Surg Endosc. 1992, 2: 248-253.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-009-0463-x","volume":"23","author":"JR Romanelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Romanelli JR, Earle DB: Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009, 23: 1419-1427. 10.1007\/s00464-009-0463-x.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6","volume":"20","author":"F Froghi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi AK, Paraskeva P: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in general surgery: A review of current practice. Surg Laparosc. 2010, 20: 191-204. 10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6.","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc"},{"key":"589_CR24","first-page":"185","volume":"11","author":"EM Targarona","year":"2004","unstructured":"Targarona EM, Balagu\u00e9 C, Trias M: Is the laparoscopic approach reasonable in cases of splenomegaly?. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2004, 11: 185-190.","journal-title":"Semin Laparosc Surg"},{"key":"589_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)63693-0","volume":"159","author":"E Higashihara","year":"1998","unstructured":"Higashihara E, Baba S, Nakagawa K, Murai M, Go H, Takeda M, Takahashi K, Suzuki K, Fujita K, Ono Y, Ohshima S, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Yoshida O: Learning curve and conversion to open surgery in cases of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and nephrectomy. J Urol. 1998, 159: 650-653. 10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)63693-0.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"589_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00566-3","volume":"94","author":"P Harkki-Siren","year":"1999","unstructured":"Harkki-Siren P, Sjberg J, Kurki T: Major complications of laparoscopy: A follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 94: 94-98. 10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00566-3.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"589_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1572","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0150-5","volume":"19","author":"SA Fraser","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fraser SA, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Fried GM: Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill. Surg Endosc. 2005, 19: 1572-1578. 10.1007\/s00464-005-0150-5.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"589_CR28","volume-title":"User\u2019s Guide","author":"Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS)","year":"2005","unstructured":"Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS): User\u2019s Guide. 2005, Cary: SAS Institute, Inc, Version 9","edition":"Version 9"}],"container-title":["BMC Veterinary Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1746-6148-8-161.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T22:29:20Z","timestamp":1630535360000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1746-6148-8-161"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,10]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["589"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1746-6148-8-161","relation":{},"ISSN":["1746-6148"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1746-6148","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 September 2011","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 August 2012","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 September 2012","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"161"}}