{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,16]],"date-time":"2026-07-16T04:20:32Z","timestamp":1784175632880,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,23]],"date-time":"2013-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1377216000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Implementation Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The Dutch multidisciplinary sciatica guideline recommends that the team of professionals involved in sciatica care and the patient together decide on surgical or prolonged conservative treatment (shared decision making [SDM]). Despite this recommendation, SDM is not yet integrated in sciatica care. Existing literature concerning barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation mainly focuses on one discipline only, whereas multidisciplinary care may involve other barriers and facilitators, or make these more complex for both professionals and patients. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by patients and professionals for SDM implementation in multidisciplinary sciatica care.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>We conducted 40 semi-structured interviews with professionals involved in sciatica care (general practitioners, physical therapists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic surgeons) and three focus groups among patients (six to eight per group). The interviews and focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed in full. Reported barriers and facilitators were classified according to the framework of Grol and Wensing. The software package Atlas.ti 7.0 was used for analysis.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Professionals reported 53 barriers and 5 facilitators, and patients 35 barriers and 18 facilitators for SDM in sciatica care. Professionals perceived most barriers at the level of the organizational context, and facilitators at the level of the individual professional. Patients reported most barriers and facilitators at the level of the individual professional. Several barriers and facilitators correspond with barriers and facilitators found in the literature (<jats:italic>e.g<\/jats:italic>., lack of time, motivation) but also new barriers and facilitators were identified. Many of these new barriers mentioned by both professionals and patients were related to the multidisciplinary setting, such as lack of visibility, lack of trust in expertise of other disciplines, and lack of communication between disciplines.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study identified barriers and facilitators for SDM in the multidisciplinary sciatica setting, by both professionals and patients. It is clear that more barriers than facilitators are perceived for implementation of SDM in sciatica care. Newly identified barriers and facilitators are related to the multidisciplinary care setting. Therefore, an effective implementation strategy of SDM in a multidisciplinary setting such as in sciatica care should focus on these barriers and facilitators.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,23]],"date-time":"2013-08-23T08:14:51Z","timestamp":1377245691000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":51,"title":["Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Stefanie N","family":"Hofstede","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Perla J","family":"Marang-van de Mheen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manon M","family":"Wentink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne M","family":"Stiggelbout","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carmen LA","family":"Vleggeert-Lankamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thea PM","family":"Vliet Vlieland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Leti","family":"van Bodegom-Vos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"for the DISC study group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"673_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2464","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318183a4a2","volume":"33","author":"K Konstantinou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Konstantinou K, Dunn KM: Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine. 2008, 33: 2464-2472. 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318183a4a2.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"673_CR2","first-page":"CD001350","volume":"1","author":"JN Gibson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gibson JN, Waddell G: Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 1: CD001350-","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"673_CR3","first-page":"119","volume":"52","author":"PC Vroomen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Vroomen PC, De Krom MC, Knottnerus JA: Predicting the outcome of sciatica at short-term follow-up. Br J Gen Pract. 2002, 52: 119-123.","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"673_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a143","volume":"336","author":"WC Peul","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW: Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008, 336: 1355-1358. 10.1136\/bmj.a143.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39583.709074.BE","volume":"336","author":"WB van den Hout","year":"2008","unstructured":"van den Hout WB, Peul WC, Koes BW, Brand R, Kievit J, Thomeer RT: Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008, 336: 1351-1354. 10.1136\/bmj.39583.709074.BE.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1603-7","volume":"20","author":"WC Jacobs","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jacobs WC, Van Tulder, Arts M, Rubinstein SM, Van MM, Ostelo R: Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2011, 20: 513-522. 10.1007\/s00586-010-1603-7.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"673_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7417.736","volume":"327","author":"AM O\u2019Connor","year":"2003","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor AM, Legare F, Stacey D: Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003, 327: 736-740. 10.1136\/bmj.327.7417.736.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"c5146","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c5146","volume":"341","author":"G Elwyn","year":"2010","unstructured":"Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R: Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010, 341: c5146-10.1136\/bmj.c5146.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR9","volume-title":"Guideline Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome","author":"Quality Institute for Health Care CBO","year":"2008","unstructured":"Quality Institute for Health Care CBO: Guideline Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome. 2008, (In Dutch) Utrecht: CBO"},{"key":"673_CR10","volume-title":"Reduction of variation in clinical practice: budgetary effects of more precise indications","author":"E Van Beek","year":"2010","unstructured":"Van Beek E, Lemmers K, Van Schooten G, Vlieger E: Reduction of variation in clinical practice: budgetary effects of more precise indications. 2010, (In Dutch): PLEXUS"},{"key":"673_CR11","first-page":"241","volume":"101","author":"T Van der Weijden","year":"2007","unstructured":"Van der Weijden T, van Veenendaal H, Timmermans D: Shared decision-making in the Netherlands - current state and future perspectives. ZaeFQ. 2007, 101: 241-246.","journal-title":"ZaeFQ"},{"key":"673_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.018","volume":"73","author":"F Legare","year":"2008","unstructured":"Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals\u2019 perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 73: 526-535. 10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.018.","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"673_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-1-16","volume":"1","author":"K Gravel","year":"2006","unstructured":"Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals\u2019 perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006, 1: 16-10.1186\/1748-5908-1-16.","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"673_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1071\/AH070330","volume":"31","author":"RL Jessup","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jessup RL: Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand the difference?. Aust Health Rev. 2007, 31: 330-331. 10.1071\/AH070330.","journal-title":"Aust Health Rev"},{"key":"673_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x","volume":"17","author":"F Legare","year":"2011","unstructured":"Legare F, Stacey D, Gagnon S, Dunn S, Pluye P, Frosch D: Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011, 17: 554-564. 10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x.","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"673_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1080\/13561820500082529","volume":"19","author":"D D\u2019Amour","year":"2005","unstructured":"D\u2019Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, San Martin RL, Beaulieu MD: The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care. 2005, 19 (Suppl 1): 116-131.","journal-title":"J Interprof Care"},{"key":"673_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/10518-189","volume-title":"Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research","author":"R Krueger","year":"2000","unstructured":"Krueger R, Casey M: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2000, Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage"},{"key":"673_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7000.299","volume":"311","author":"J Kitzinger","year":"1995","unstructured":"Kitzinger J: Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995, 311: 299-302. 10.1136\/bmj.311.7000.299.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7226.50","volume":"320","author":"N Mays","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136\/bmj.320.7226.50.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"673_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x","volume":"40","author":"B Dicicco-Bloom","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dicicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF: The qualitative research interview. Med Educ. 2006, 40: 314-321. 10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"673_CR21","volume-title":"Sciatica surgery rates in hospitals","author":"IG Zichtbare Zorg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zichtbare Zorg IG: Sciatica surgery rates in hospitals. 2010, (In Dutch): On request"},{"key":"673_CR22","first-page":"CD001431","volume":"10","author":"D Stacey","year":"2011","unstructured":"Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, 10: CD001431-","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"673_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1229","DOI":"10.1080\/08870440903194015","volume":"25","author":"JJ Francis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010, 25: 1229-1245. 10.1080\/08870440903194015.","journal-title":"Psychol Health"},{"key":"673_CR24","volume-title":"The Focus Group Kit","author":"D Morgan","year":"1998","unstructured":"Morgan D, Krueger R: The Focus Group Kit. 1998, Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage"},{"key":"673_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687","volume":"15","author":"HF Hsieh","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hsieh HF, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15: 1277-1288. 10.1177\/1049732305276687.","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"673_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S57","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x","volume":"180","author":"R Grol","year":"2004","unstructured":"Grol R, Wensing M: What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004, 180: S57-S60.","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"673_CR27","volume-title":"ATLAS.ti 7 User Manual","author":"S Friese","year":"2012","unstructured":"Friese S: ATLAS.ti 7 User Manual. 2012, Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH"},{"key":"673_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2012.1084","volume":"32","author":"MW Friedberg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Friedberg MW, Van Busum K, Wexler R, Bowen M, Schneider EC: A demonstration of shared decision making in primary care highlights barriers to adoption and potential remedies. Health Aff. 2013, 32: 268-275. 10.1377\/hlthaff.2012.1084.","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"673_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-6-57","volume":"6","author":"S Desroches","year":"2011","unstructured":"Desroches S, Lapointe A, Deschenes SM, Gagnon MP, Legare F: Exploring dietitians\u2019 salient beliefs about shared decision-making behaviors. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 57-10.1186\/1748-5908-6-57.","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"673_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2006.00404.x","volume":"9","author":"A Towle","year":"2006","unstructured":"Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A: Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006, 9: 321-332. 10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2006.00404.x.","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"key":"673_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-7-55","volume":"7","author":"SN Hofstede","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hofstede SN, De Mheen PJ M-v, Assendelft WJ, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Stiggelbout AM, Vroomen PC: Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 55-10.1186\/1748-5908-7-55.","journal-title":"Implement Sci"}],"container-title":["Implementation Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,2]],"date-time":"2021-09-02T01:10:39Z","timestamp":1630545039000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/implementationscience.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,23]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}},"alternative-id":["673"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1748-5908-8-95","relation":{},"ISSN":["1748-5908"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1748-5908","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,8,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 February 2013","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 August 2013","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 August 2013","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"95"}}