{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T22:53:03Z","timestamp":1776120783870,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012659","name":"Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["21317241, 81971672"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["21317241, 81971672"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012659","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to reevaluate the high-risk breast non-mass-like lesions (NMLs) in mammography (MG) by target ultrasound (US) and Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS), and to analyze the correlation between different imaging findings and the factors influencing the classification of lesions.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 161 patients with 166 breast lesions were recruited in this retrospectively study. All cases were diagnosed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 by MG and as NML on ultrasound. While all NMLs underwent mammography, target US and ABUS before breast surgery or biopsy in the consistent position of breast. The imaging and pathological features of all cases were collected. All lesions were classified according to the lexion of ACR BI-RADS\u00ae.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>There were significant differences between benign and malignant breast NML in all the features of target US and ABUS. US, especially ABUS, was superior to MG in determining the malignant breast NML. There was a significant difference in the detection rate of calcification between MG and Target US (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), and there was a significant difference in the detection rate of structural distortion between ABUS and MG (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Target US, especially ABUS, can significantly improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis of high-risk NMLs in MG. The features of Target US and ABUS such as blood supply, hyperechogenicity, ductal changes, peripheral changes and coronal features could be employed to predict benign and malignant lesions. The coronal features of ABUS were more sensitive than those of Target HHUS in showing structural abnormalities. Target US was less effective than MG in local micro-calcification.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T12:02:54Z","timestamp":1635249774000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Jianxing","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Lishang","family":"Cai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ling","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Xiyan","family":"Pang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Miao","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Dan","family":"Yan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jia","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Liangping","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"665_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.20063","volume":"60","author":"RA Smith","year":"2010","unstructured":"Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):99\u2013119.","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"665_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2012.012078","volume":"19","author":"M Broeders","year":"2012","unstructured":"Broeders M, Moss S, Nystr\u00f6m L, et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):14\u201325.","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"issue":"4","key":"665_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-012-0397-3","volume":"22","author":"M Amano","year":"2015","unstructured":"Amano M, Ogura K, Ozaki Y, et al. Two cases of primary small cell carcinoma of the breast showing non-mass-like pattern on diagnostic imaging and histopathology. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2015;22(4):437\u201341.","journal-title":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)"},{"issue":"3","key":"665_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-3882-0","volume":"158","author":"RJ Weber","year":"2016","unstructured":"Weber RJ, van Bommel RM, Louwman MW, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;158(3):471\u201383.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"665_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2523080670","volume":"252","author":"N Abdullah","year":"2009","unstructured":"Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009;252:665\u201372.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"665_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhi LW, Nan L, Min L, et al. Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasound: classification and correlation with histology. Radiol Med DOI https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11547-014-0493-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-014-0493-x"},{"key":"665_CR7","unstructured":"Japanese Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology. Guideline for Breast Ultrasound: Management and Diagnosis. Tokyo: Nankodo Co, 2004"},{"key":"665_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.10.010","volume":"84","author":"KH Ko","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ko KH, Hsu HH, Yu JC, et al. Non-mass-like breast lesions at ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:77\u201385.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"665_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-017-0805-z","volume":"123","author":"M Zanotel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zanotel M, Bednarova I, Londero V, et al. Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications. Radiol Med (Torino). 2018;123(1):1\u201312.","journal-title":"Radiol Med (Torino)"},{"issue":"2","key":"665_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185115574872","volume":"57","author":"SK Jeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeh SK, Kim SH, Choi JJ, et al. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 2016;57(2):162\u20139.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"665_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSIPA.2015.7412240","volume":"2015","author":"M Versaci","year":"2015","unstructured":"Versaci M, Calcagno S, Morabito FC. Fuzzy geometrical approach based on unit hyper-cubes for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Int Conf Signal Image Process Appl (ICSIPA). 2015;2015:488\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSIPA.2015.7412240.","journal-title":"IEEE Int Conf Signal Image Process Appl (ICSIPA)"},{"key":"665_CR12","volume-title":"ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System","author":"CJ D\u2019Orsi","year":"2013","unstructured":"D\u2019Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013."},{"issue":"4","key":"665_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.11152\/mu-871","volume":"18","author":"L Jihyun","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jihyun L, Jin HL, Seonmi B, et al. Non-mass lesions on screening breast ultrasound. Med Ultrason. 2016;18(4):446\u201351.","journal-title":"Med Ultrason"},{"key":"665_CR14","unstructured":"Tan PH, Ellis L, Allison K, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology, 2020, Feb 13 [Online ahead of print]"},{"key":"665_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2618","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f2618","volume":"346","author":"PDP Pharoah","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pharoah PDP, Sewell B, Fitzsimmons D, et al. Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model. BMJ. 2013;346:2618.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"665_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2353","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsr1504363","volume":"372","author":"B Lauby-Secretan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al. Breast-cancer screening-viewpoint of the IARC working group. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2353.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"665_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, et al. The benefifits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012;380: 1778e86.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)61611-0"},{"key":"665_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b2587","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2587","volume":"339","author":"KJ Jorgensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ. 2009;339:b2587.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"665_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta17130","volume":"17","author":"M Bond","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bond M, Pavey T, Welch K, et al. Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1\u2013170.","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"665_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2014.981","volume":"174","author":"ANA Tosteson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tosteson ANA, Fryback DG, Hammond CS, et al. Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:954\u201361.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"},{"key":"665_CR21","unstructured":"Jong Won Park , Kyung Hee Ko, Eun-Kyung Kim, et al.Non-mass breast lesions on ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy.Acta Radiologica 0(0) 1\u20137."},{"key":"665_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Monzawa S, Washio T, Yasuoka R, et al. Incidental detection of clinically unexpected breast lesions by computed tomography[J]. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 2013, 54(4): 374\u20139.","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185113475607"},{"issue":"3","key":"665_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-011-0261-x","volume":"18","author":"Y Kojima","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kojima Y, Tsunoda H, Honda S, et al. Radiographic features for triple negative ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2011;18(3):213\u201320.","journal-title":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)"},{"key":"665_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wenyue Z, Xiaoyun X, Xiaolin X, et al. Non-mass breast lesions on ultrasound: feature exploration and mulyimode ultrasound diagnosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.005"},{"key":"665_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-008-0085-5","volume":"16","author":"J Takei","year":"2009","unstructured":"Takei J, Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Kikuchi M, et al. Clinical implications of architectural distortion visualized by breast ultrasonography. Breast Cancer. 2009;16:132\u20135.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"issue":"11","key":"665_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2018.02.014","volume":"25","author":"R Rella","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rella R, Belli P, Giuliani M, et al. Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) in the screening and diagnostic setting: indications and practical use. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(11):1457\u201370.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"665_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.14366\/usg.19038","volume":"39","author":"S Sabour","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sabour S. Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea). 2020;39(1):102\u20133.","journal-title":"Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)"},{"key":"665_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2097","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.010","volume":"42","author":"Z Yongfeng","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yongfeng Z, Ping Z, Wengang L, et al. Application of a novel microvascular imaging technique in breast lesion evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:2097\u2013105.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T12:06:17Z","timestamp":1635249977000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["665"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12880-021-00665-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2342"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2342","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 September 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 October 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (ZE2020-232).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Written informed consent to publish the clinical details and images of the patient was obtained.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"All authors declare they have no conflict of interests to disclose.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"156"}}