{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,8]],"date-time":"2025-09-08T06:41:23Z","timestamp":1757313683013,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1694649600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1694649600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Imaging"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiological measurements of radial fracture position made in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) projection images are comparable to those made on traditional radiographs and could potentially substitute them.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Sixteen patients with fractures of the distal radius referred for radiographs were recruited for an additional CBCT scan which was performed immediately afterwards. Projection images and volumetric data were saved from the CBCT scans. Measurements of ulnar variance, radial inclination and volar tilt were made from all three sets of images.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Agreement of projection image based measurements with radiographs was nearly as good as as the agreement of cross sectional image measurements with radiographs. The average difference between the results for projection images and radiographs were -1.2\u00a0mm (SD 1.9\u00a0mm), for radial inclination 0.7\u00b0 (SD 2.9\u00b0) and for volar tilt 1.9\u00b0 (SD 5.6\u00b0).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Differences between radiological measurements between the modalities studied are small and projection images could be used for the assessment of distal radial fractures.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T14:36:16Z","timestamp":1694702176000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and plane radiographs of radial fractures as a basis for radiographical measurements"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1315-8811","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kristian","family":"Bry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mika","family":"Kortesniemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mika","family":"Koivikko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liisa","family":"Kerttula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1093_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25631","volume":"93","author":"CY Ng","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ng CY, McQueen MM. What are the radiological predictors of functional outcome following fractures of the distal radius? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(2):145\u201350.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"7","key":"1093_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.04.011","volume":"101","author":"L Cai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cai L, Zhu S, Du S, et al. The relationship between radiographic parameters and clinical outcome of distal radius fractures in elderly patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(7):827\u201331.","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"1093_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2014.10.018","volume":"45S","author":"D Perugia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Perugia D, Guzzini M, Civitenga C, et al. Is it really necessary to restore radial anatomic parameters after distal radius fractures? Injury. 2014;45S:S21\u20136.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"6","key":"1093_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-018-3097-z","volume":"48","author":"M Brink","year":"2019","unstructured":"Brink M, Steenbakkers A, Holla M, et al. Single-shot CT after wrist trauma: impact on detection accuracy and treatment of fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(6):949\u201357.","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1093_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2699","volume":"190","author":"RD Welling","year":"2008","unstructured":"Welling RD, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, et al. MDCT and radiography of wrist fractures: radiography sensitivity and fracture patterns. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):10\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1093_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.4103\/2249-4863.148101","volume":"3","author":"S Meena","year":"2014","unstructured":"Meena S, Sharma P, Sambharia AK, et al. Fractures of Distal Radius: An Overview. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(4):325\u201332.","journal-title":"J Family Med Prim Care"},{"issue":"15","key":"1093_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2523","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.I.01617","volume":"92","author":"S Arora","year":"2010","unstructured":"Arora S, Grover SB, Batra S, et al. Comparative evaluation of postreduction intra-articular distal radial fractures by radiographs and multidetector computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(15):2523\u201332.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"1093_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-017-0582-1","volume":"9","author":"M Posadzy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Posadzy M, Desimpel J, Vanhoenacker F. Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications. Insights Imaging. 2018;9:35\u201345.","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"issue":"6","key":"1093_CR9","first-page":"333","volume":"96","author":"JW Casselman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Casselman JW, Gieraerts K, Volders D, et al. Cone beam CT: non-dental applications. JBR-BTR. 2013;96(6):333\u201353.","journal-title":"JBR-BTR"},{"key":"1093_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130225","volume":"270","author":"JA Carrino","year":"2014","unstructured":"Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W, et al. Dedicated cone beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology. 2014;270:816\u201324.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1093_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cden.2008.05.005","volume":"52","author":"WC Scarfe","year":"2008","unstructured":"Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52(4):707\u201330.","journal-title":"Dent Clin N Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"1093_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncx210","volume":"179","author":"J Koivisto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Koivisto J, van Eijnatten M, Kiljunen T, Shi XQ, Wolff J. Effective radiation dose in the wrist resulting from a radiographic device, two cbct devices and one MSCT Device: a comparative study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;179(1):58\u201368.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosimetry"},{"issue":"12","key":"1093_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e790","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.13640","volume":"46","author":"Q De Man","year":"2019","unstructured":"De Man Q, Haneda E, Claus B, Fitzgerald P, De Man B, Qian G, Shan H, Min J, Sabuncu M, Wang G. A two-dimensional feasibility study of deep learning-based feature detection and characterization directly from CT sinograms. Med Phys. 2019;46(12):e790\u2013800.","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"1","key":"1093_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14852","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-94362-7","volume":"11","author":"YH Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim YH, Shin JY, Lee A, Park S, Han SS, Hwang HJ. Automated cortical thickness measurement of the mandibular condyle head on CBCT images using a deep learning method. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14852.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,18]],"date-time":"2023-11-18T01:16:07Z","timestamp":1700270167000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1093"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12880-023-01093-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2342"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1471-2342"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 November 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 August 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was submitted to and approved by the Surgical Ethical Review Board of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uudenmaa (approval reference number 118\/13\/03\/02\/2015) and the study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable. There are no images or clinical details that compromise anonymity.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"Authors have had access to a prototype scanner provided by Carestream Health (Rochester, NY). No financial conflicts of interest exist.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interest"}}],"article-number":"125"}}