{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,16]],"date-time":"2026-05-16T15:41:28Z","timestamp":1778946088390,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733356800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733356800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Outstanding young Talents Fund of Shandong Provincial Third Hospital","award":["jqrc007"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["jqrc007"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Imaging"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T18:32:47Z","timestamp":1733423567000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 5.0 T: quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3.0 T"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Liang","family":"Yin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ZhangZhu","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"MingYan","family":"Shang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ZongChang","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"BoWen","family":"Tang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dan","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Gan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"1512_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8399","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-021-07968-w","volume":"31","author":"H Yoen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yoen H, Lee JM, Lee SM, et al. Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8399\u2013407.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2012.11.003","volume":"34","author":"N Griffin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Griffin N, Yu D, Alexander Grant L. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: pearls, pitfalls, and pathology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013;34(1):32\u201343.","journal-title":"Semin Ultrasound CT MR"},{"issue":"9","key":"1512_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cgh.2008.05.017","volume":"6","author":"VA Sahni","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sahni VA, Mortele KJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: current use and future applications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(9):967\u201377.","journal-title":"Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1512_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-2980.2008.00339.x","volume":"9","author":"K Hekimoglu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Dusak A, et al. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature. J Dig Dis. 2008;9(3):162\u20139.","journal-title":"J Dig Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-021-03323-1","volume":"48","author":"M Itani","year":"2023","unstructured":"Itani M, Lalwani N, Anderson MA, Arif-Tiwari H, Paspulati RM, Shetty AS. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: pitfalls in interpretation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(1):91\u2013105.","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol (NY)"},{"key":"1512_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaltenthaler E, Vergel YB, Chilcott J et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technol Assess. 2004. 8(10): iii, 1\u201389.","DOI":"10.3310\/hta8100"},{"issue":"6","key":"1512_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2018.10.001","volume":"89","author":"JL Buxbaum","year":"2019","unstructured":"Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1075\u2013e110515.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"issue":"6","key":"1512_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4333","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-022-09293-2","volume":"33","author":"K Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang K, Li X, Liu J, et al. Predicting the image quality of respiratory-gated and breath-hold 3D MRCP from the breathing curve: a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(6):4333\u201343.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1512_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621936","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2021.621936","volume":"12","author":"JE Park","year":"2021","unstructured":"Park JE, Cheong EN, Jung DE, Shim WH, Lee JS. Utility of 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with Epilepsy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2021;12:621936.","journal-title":"Front Neurol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000508","volume":"54","author":"C Giraudo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Giraudo C, Motyka S, Weber M, Feiweier T, Trattnig S, Bogner W. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Healthy Skeletal Muscles: a comparison between 7 T and 3 T. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(1):48\u201354.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1512_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2022.03.007","volume":"103","author":"A Lecler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lecler A, Duron L, Charlson E, et al. Comparison between 7 Tesla and 3 Tesla MRI for characterizing orbital lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022;103(9):433\u20139.","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"issue":"8","key":"1512_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000161","volume":"50","author":"ML Hahnemann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hahnemann ML, Kraff O, Orzada S, et al. T1-Weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel: comparison between 1.5 and 7 T. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(8):539\u201347.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1512_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.23702","volume":"36","author":"L Umutlu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Umutlu L, Maderwald S, Kraff O, et al. New look at renal vasculature: 7 tesla nonenhanced T1-weighted FLASH imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(3):714\u201321.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"issue":"5","key":"1512_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4656","DOI":"10.1002\/nbm.4656","volume":"35","author":"TM Fiedler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fiedler TM, Orzada S, Fl\u00f6ser M, et al. Performance and safety assessment of an integrated transmit array for body imaging at 7 T under consideration of specific absorption rate, tissue temperature, and thermal dose. NMR Biomed. 2022;35(5):e4656.","journal-title":"NMR Biomed"},{"issue":"11","key":"1512_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0187528","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0187528","volume":"12","author":"A Laader","year":"2017","unstructured":"Laader A, Beiderwellen K, Kraff O, et al. 1.5 versus 3 versus 7 Tesla in abdominal MRI: a comparative study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187528.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"5","key":"1512_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000004","volume":"49","author":"A Fischer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fischer A, Kraff O, Orzada S, et al. Ultrahigh-field imaging of the biliary tract at 7 T: initial results of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(5):346\u201353.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1512_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1962-9","volume":"21","author":"L Umutlu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Umutlu L, Orzada S, Kinner S, et al. Renal imaging at 7 Tesla: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):841\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1512_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.28097","volume":"56","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Yang C, Liang L, et al. Preliminary experience of 5.0 T higher field abdominal diffusion-weighted MRI: agreement of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with 3.0 T imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022;56(4):1009\u201317.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"issue":"5","key":"1512_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3222","DOI":"10.21037\/qims-22-945","volume":"13","author":"Z Wei","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wei Z, Chen Q, Han S, et al. 5T magnetic resonance imaging: radio frequency hardware and initial brain imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(5):3222\u201340.","journal-title":"Quant Imaging Med Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"1512_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1038\/nmeth.2019","volume":"9","author":"J Schindelin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676\u201382.","journal-title":"Nat Methods"},{"issue":"4","key":"1512_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2566","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09744-3","volume":"37","author":"S Afzalpurkar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Afzalpurkar S, Giri S, Kasturi S, Ingawale S, Sundaram S. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(4):2566\u201373.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A6344","volume":"41","author":"JW Rutland","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rutland JW, Delman BN, Gill CM, Zhu C, Shrivastava RK, Balchandani P. Emerging Use of Ultra-high-field 7T MRI in the study of Intracranial Vascularity: state of the field and future directions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(1):2\u20139.","journal-title":"AJNR Am J Neuroradiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1512_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0b013e3181b4c0ae","volume":"44","author":"H Onishi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR Cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(9):559\u201365.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1512_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2303021331","volume":"230","author":"CM de Bazelaire","year":"2004","unstructured":"de Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology. 2004;230(3):652\u20139.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.15970","volume":"50","author":"L Zheng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zheng L, Yang C, Liang L, Rao S, Dai Y, Zeng M. T2-weighted MRI and reduced-FOV diffusion-weighted imaging of the human pancreas at 5 T: a comparison study with 3 T. Med Phys. 2023;50(1):344\u201353.","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"6","key":"1512_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.20708","volume":"54","author":"PF Van de Moortele","year":"2005","unstructured":"Van de Moortele PF, Akgun C, Adriany G, et al. B(1) destructive interferences and spatial phase patterns at 7 T with a head transceiver array coil. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(6):1503\u201318.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Med"},{"key":"1512_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ab.2017.03.022","volume":"529","author":"\u00d6 Ipek","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ipek \u00d6. Radio-frequency coils for ultra-high field magnetic resonance. Anal Biochem. 2017;529:10\u20136.","journal-title":"Anal Biochem"},{"key":"1512_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913707","DOI":"10.3389\/fcvm.2022.913707","volume":"9","author":"L Lin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lin L, Liu P, Sun G, et al. Bi-ventricular assessment with cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 5 Tesla: a pilot study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:913707.","journal-title":"Front Cardiovasc Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1512_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E72","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.229027","volume":"305","author":"Z Shi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shi Z, Zhao X, Zhu S, et al. Time-of-flight intracranial MRA at 3 T versus 5 T versus 7 T: visualization of distal small cerebral arteries. Radiology. 2022;305(3):E72.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1512_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-022-01290-9","volume":"13","author":"L Zheng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zheng L, Yang C, Sheng R, Dai Y, Zeng M. Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):155.","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"issue":"6","key":"1512_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2436","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-5240-y","volume":"28","author":"M Yoshida","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yoshida M, Nakaura T, Inoue T, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2436\u201343.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]],"date-time":"2024-12-05T19:02:21Z","timestamp":1733425341000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1512"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12880-024-01512-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2342"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2342","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This prospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Third Hospital (KYLL-2023064). All participants were informed about the study and provided written informed consent.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"331"}}