{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T11:53:48Z","timestamp":1781610828538,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]],"date-time":"2025-08-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754265600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]],"date-time":"2025-08-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754265600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Augsburg"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Imaging"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n The aim of this retrospective study is to compare photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) derived virtual non-contrast (VNC) images of the liver reconstructed from both arterial and portal venous phase using conventional and liver-specific VNC algorithm to true non-contrast images, in context of the body mass index (BMI).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n \n VNC images reconstructed from multiphase (non-contrast, arterial and portal venous phase) PCD-CT scans performed between April 2021 and February 2023 were analysed retrospectively. For each patient, four VNC series were generated: two series (arterial and portal venous) using a conventional VNC algorithm (VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n ; VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n ) and two using a liver-specific \u201cLiver VNC\u201d algorithm (VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n ; VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n ). Regions of interest were placed in the left and right liver lobes and in the spleen, avoiding large vessels and focal lesions. The VNC CT-values were then compared to those of the corresponding true non-contrast images (TNC). The subsequent analysis involved the calculation of both correlation and mean offsets. The median split was utilised to ascertain distinct cohorts of patients with elevated and reduced body mass indices. These cohorts were then subjected to a comparative analysis of attenuation values to discern potential disparities between them. The results were compared by using parametric and non-parametric tests; Pearson\u2019s correlation coefficient was employed. Bland-Altman plots were utilised to visually assess the agreement between results and Passing-Bablok regression, thereby quantifying the observed agreement.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n The study population comprised 42 patients (mean age 70.0\u2009\u00b1\u200910.2 years, 33 males). Mean offsets between TNC and VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n was 0.62\u2009\u00b1\u20095.23 HU, TNC-VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n 1.24\u2009\u00b1\u20096.67 HU, TNC-VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n -0.94\u2009\u00b1\u20095.59 and TNC-VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n -0.35\u2009\u00b1\u20096.99 with no significant difference. Significant differences were found for VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n , VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n and VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n images regarding spleen attenuation. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement and the absence of any systematic difference in liver attenuation. As for the TNC-VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n , TNC-VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n , TNC-VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n and TNC-VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n variables, strong correlations were obtained (Pearson\u2019s coefficient: 0.79, 0.69, 0.79 and 0.7, all\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009<\u20090.001). The investigation revealed no statistically significant disparities between the BMI groups with respect to the mean offset of liver density (\n p-value<\/jats:italic>\n :TNC-VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n 0.51; VNC\n conv<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n 0.61; VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n art<\/jats:sup>\n 0.68; VNC\n Liver<\/jats:sub>\n pv<\/jats:sup>\n 0.45). Furthermore, no significant offset between TNC and VNC images was detected within each BMI group. A Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed no systematic or proportional difference between the two methods.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n It is evident that PCD-CT-derived VNC images generally constitute a corresponding alternative to TNC images. However, caution is advised in the interpretation of images, as there are outliers with differences exceeding 15 HU are present. In general, the mean values obtained from the analysis of, VNC images reconstructed from arterial and portal venous phases employing both the liver-specific and general VNC reconstruction algorithm did not demonstrate any clincially significant difference when compared with TNC images. Furthermore, no significant discrepancy was observed in the utilisation of the conventional and the liver-specific algorithm. The findings of this study demonstrated that, within the limitations of the study, the patients\u2019 BMI did not have a significant impact on the VNC images.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]],"date-time":"2025-08-04T19:28:31Z","timestamp":1754335711000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Photon counting detector CT-derived virtual non-contrast images of the liver: comparison of conventional and liver-specific algorithms across arterial and portal venous phase scans"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Anna-Katharina","family":"Gerstner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Franka","family":"Risch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Canalini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerlig","family":"Widmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elke R.","family":"Gizewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefanie","family":"Bette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Simon","family":"Hellbrueck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Kroencke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Josua A.","family":"Decker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"1849_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000980","volume":"58","author":"T Flohr","year":"2023","unstructured":"Flohr T, Schmidt B. Technical basics and clinical benefits of Photon-Counting CT. Invest Radiol. 2023;58(7):441\u201350.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1849_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000816","volume":"57","author":"A Euler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Euler A, Higashigaito K, Mergen V, Sartoretti T, Zanini B, Schmidt B, et al. High-Pitch Photon-Counting detector computed tomography angiography of the aorta: intraindividual comparison to Energy-Integrating detector computed tomography at equal radiation dose. Invest Radiol. 2022;57(2):115\u201321.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"key":"1849_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rajendran K, Petersilka M, Henning A, Shanblatt E, Marsh J Jr., Thorne J et al. Full field-of-view, high-resolution, photon-counting detector CT: technical assessment and initial patient experience. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(20).","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/ac155e"},{"issue":"5","key":"1849_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2930","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-021-08441-4","volume":"32","author":"SJ Bette","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bette SJ, Braun FM, Haerting M, Decker JA, Luitjens JH, Scheurig-Muenkler C, et al. Visualization of bone details in a novel photon-counting dual-source CT scanner-comparison with energy-integrating CT. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(5):2930\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1849_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7831","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-024-10888-0","volume":"34","author":"M Remy-Jardin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Remy-Jardin M, Guiffault L, Oufriche I, Duhamel A, Flohr T, Schmidt B, et al. Image quality of lung perfusion with photon-counting-detector CT: comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(12):7831\u201344.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1849_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"043503","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JMI.3.4.043503","volume":"3","author":"Z Yu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yu Z, Leng S, Kappler S, Hahn K, Li Z, Halaweish AF, et al. Noise performance of low-dose CT: comparison between an energy integrating detector and a photon counting detector using a whole-body research photon counting CT scanner. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016;3(4):043503.","journal-title":"J Med Imaging (Bellingham)"},{"issue":"5","key":"1849_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.18248","volume":"210","author":"P Durieux","year":"2018","unstructured":"Durieux P, Gevenois PA, Muylem AV, Howarth N, Keyzer C. Abdominal Attenuation values on virtual and true unenhanced images obtained with Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):1042\u201358.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1849_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e222432","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.222432","volume":"309","author":"PC Douek","year":"2023","unstructured":"Douek PC, Boccalini S, Oei EHG, Cormode DP, Pourmorteza A, Boussel L, et al. Clinical applications of Photon-counting CT: A review of pioneer studies and a glimpse into the future. Radiology. 2023;309(1):e222432.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1849_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niehoff JH, Woeltjen MM, Laukamp KR, Borggrefe J, Kroeger JR. Virtual Non-Contrast versus true Non-Contrast computed tomography: initial experiences with a photon counting scanner approved for clinical use. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(12).","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics11122377"},{"issue":"7","key":"1849_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000860","volume":"57","author":"T Sartoretti","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sartoretti T, Mergen V, Higashigaito K, Eberhard M, Alkadhi H, Euler A. Virtual Noncontrast imaging of the liver using Photon-Counting detector computed tomography: A systematic Phantom and patient study. Invest Radiol. 2022;57(7):488\u201393.","journal-title":"Invest Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1849_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.213260","volume":"305","author":"V Mergen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mergen V, Racine D, Jungblut L, Sartoretti T, Bickel S, Monnin P, et al. Virtual Noncontrast abdominal imaging with Photon-counting detector CT. Radiology. 2022;305(1):107\u201315.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1849_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Decker JA, Bette S, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Jehs B, Risch F, Wo\u017anicki P et al. Virtual Non-Contrast reconstructions of Photon-Counting detector CT angiography datasets as substitutes for true Non-Contrast acquisitions in patients after EVAR-Performance of a novel Calcium-Preserving reconstruction algorithm. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(3).","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12030558"},{"key":"1849_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2023.111125","volume":"168","author":"F Risch","year":"2023","unstructured":"Risch F, Bette S, Sinzinger A, Rippel K, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke T, et al. Multiphase photon counting detector CT data sets - Which combination of contrast phase and virtual non-contrast algorithm is best suited to replace true non-contrast series in the assessment of active bleeding? Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111125.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1849_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2023.111031","volume":"167","author":"D Schoenbeck","year":"2023","unstructured":"Schoenbeck D, Pauline Haag N, Elias Michael A, Michael Woeltjen M, Boriesosdick J, Saeed S, et al. Dedicated virtual non-contrast images adapted for liver tissue in clinical photon counting CT improve virtual non-contrast imaging in various organs beyond the liver. Eur J Radiol. 2023;167:111031.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"1849_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2022.110185","volume":"149","author":"JH Niehoff","year":"2022","unstructured":"Niehoff JH, Woeltjen MM, Saeed S, Michael AE, Boriesosdick J, Borggrefe J, et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis based on virtual non-contrast computed tomography: initial experiences with a photon counting scanner approved for clinical use. Eur J Radiol. 2022;149:110185.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"18","key":"1849_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5457","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/59\/18\/5457","volume":"59","author":"S Lee","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lee S, Choi YN, Kim HJ. Quantitative material decomposition using spectral computed tomography with an energy-resolved photon-counting detector. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(18):5457\u201382.","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1849_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2011.010","volume":"21","author":"L Bili\u0107-Zulle","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bili\u0107-Zulle L. Comparison of methods: passing and Bablok regression. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(1):49\u201352.","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"issue":"3","key":"1849_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1515\/labmed-2013-0003","volume":"37","author":"R Haeckel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Klauke R. Comparison of ordinary linear regression, orthogonal regression, standardized principal component analysis, Deming and Passing-Bablok approach for method validation in laboratory medicine: vergleich von ordin\u00e4rer linearer regression, orthogonaler regression, standardisierter hauptkomponentenanalyse, Deming und Passing-Bablok Verfahren Zur methodenvalidierung in der laboratoriumsmedizin. Laboratoriumsmedizin. 2013;37(3):147\u201363.","journal-title":"Laboratoriumsmedizin"},{"key":"1849_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16652","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.16652","volume":"11","author":"S Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu S, Han X, Li J, Xie X, Yang Y, Jiang W, et al. Feasibility of using chest computed tomography (CT) imaging at the first lumbar vertebra (L1) level to assess skeletal muscle mass: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2023;11:e16652.","journal-title":"PeerJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"1849_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2017.08.003","volume":"24","author":"A Qurashi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Qurashi A, Rainford L, Ajlan A, Khashoggi K, Ashkar L, Al-Raddadi M, et al. Optimal abdominal CT protocol for obese patients. Radiography (Lond). 2018;24(1):e1\u201312.","journal-title":"Radiography (Lond)"},{"key":"1849_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meloni A, Maffei E, Clemente A, De Gori C, Occhipinti M, Positano V et al. Spectral Photon-Counting computed tomography: technical principles and applications in the assessment of cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Med. 2024;13(8).","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13082359"},{"key":"1849_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110325","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2022.110325","volume":"151","author":"F Hagen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hagen F, Hofmann J, Wrazidlo R, Gutjahr R, Schmidt B, Faby S, et al. Image quality and dose exposure of contrast-enhanced abdominal CT on a 1st generation clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT in obese patients vs. a 2nd generation dual-source dual energy integrating detector CT. Eur J Radiol. 2022;151:110325.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T11:16:29Z","timestamp":1781608589000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1849"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12880-025-01849-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2342"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2342","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 July 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 August 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All procedures in this study were in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2024). The study was approved by the local institutional review board (ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians Univeristy Munich, project-no 22\u20130456). The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"311"}}