{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,22]],"date-time":"2026-03-22T05:49:49Z","timestamp":1774158589748,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]],"date-time":"2020-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1587081600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]],"date-time":"2020-04-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1587081600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["GMPSTRC-2012-1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GMPSTRC-2012-1"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Improving medication safety is a major concern in primary care settings worldwide. The Salford Medication safety dASHboard (SMASH) intervention provided general practices in Salford (Greater Manchester, UK) with feedback on their safe prescribing and monitoring of medications through an online dashboard, and input from practice-based trained clinical pharmacists. In this study we explored how staff working in general practices used the SMASH dashboard to improve medication safety, through interactions with the dashboard to identify potential medication safety hazards and their workflow to resolve identified hazards.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We used a mixed-methods study design involving quantitative data from dashboard user interaction logs from 43 general practices during the first year of receiving the SMASH intervention, and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 22 pharmacists and physicians from 18 practices in Salford.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Practices interacted with the dashboard a median of 12.0 (interquartile range, 5.0\u201315.2) times per month during the first quarter of use to identify and resolve potential medication safety hazards, typically starting with the most prevalent hazards or those they perceived to be most serious. Having observed a potential hazard, pharmacists and practice staff worked together to resolve that in a sequence of steps (1) verifying the dashboard information, (2) reviewing the patient\u2019s clinical records, and (3) deciding potential changes to the patient\u2019s medicines. Over time, dashboard use transitioned towards regular but less frequent (median of 5.5 [3.5\u20137.9] times per month) checks to identify and resolve new cases. The frequency of dashboard use was higher in practices with a larger number of at-risk patients. In 24 (56%) practices only pharmacists used the dashboard; in 12 (28%) use by other practice staff increased as pharmacist use declined after the initial intervention period; and in 7 (16%) there was mixed use by both pharmacists and practice staff over time.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>An online medication safety dashboard enabled pharmacists to identify patients at risk of potentially hazardous prescribing. They subsequently worked with GPs to resolve risks on a case-by-case basis, but there were marked variations in processes between some practices. Workload diminished over time as it shifted towards resolving new cases of hazardous prescribing.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]],"date-time":"2020-04-17T04:17:42Z","timestamp":1587097062000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Understanding the utilisation of a novel interactive electronic medication safety dashboard in general practice: a mixed methods study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6882-0350","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mark","family":"Jeffries","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wouter T.","family":"Gude","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Richard N.","family":"Keers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Denham L.","family":"Phipps","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Richard","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Evangelos","family":"Kontopantelis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anthony J.","family":"Avery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Niels","family":"Peek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Darren M.","family":"Ashcroft","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"1084_CR1","volume-title":"Medication without harm: WHO\u2019s Third Global Patient Safety Challenge","author":"World Health Organisation","year":"2017","unstructured":"World Health Organisation. Medication without harm: WHO\u2019s Third Global Patient Safety Challenge. 2017 WHO. Available from http:\/\/www.who.int\/patientsafety\/medication-safety\/en\/ (Accessed Nov 2018)."},{"issue":"613","key":"1084_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e543","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp13X670679","volume":"63","author":"AJ Avery","year":"2013","unstructured":"Avery AJ, Ghaleb M, Barber N, Franklin BD, Armstrong SJ, Serumaga B, et al. The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(613):e543\u201353.","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"1084_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h5501","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h5501","volume":"351","author":"SJ Stocks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stocks SJ, Kontopantelis E, Akbarov A, Rodgers S, Avery AJ, Ashcroft DM. Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using the clinical practice research Datalink. BMJ. 2015;351:h5501.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7","key":"1084_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1007\/s40264-015-0304-x","volume":"38","author":"A Akbarov","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akbarov A, Kontopantelis E, Sperrin M, Stocks SJ, Williams R, Rodgers S, et al. Primary care medication safety surveillance with integrated primary and secondary care electronic health records: a cross-sectional study. Drug Saf. 2015;38(7):671\u201382.","journal-title":"Drug Saf"},{"issue":"6","key":"1084_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2125.2009.03427.x","volume":"67","author":"A Agrawal","year":"2009","unstructured":"Agrawal A. Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(6):681\u20136.","journal-title":"Br J Clin Pharmacol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1084_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzt043","volume":"25","author":"M Lainer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lainer M, Mann E, S\u00f6nnichsen A. Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013;25(5):590\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"1084_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E216","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.090578","volume":"182","author":"KG Shojania","year":"2010","unstructured":"Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay C, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2010;182(5):E216\u201325.","journal-title":"CMAJ."},{"issue":"e1","key":"1084_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e76","DOI":"10.1136\/amiajnl-2012-001484","volume":"20","author":"J Hayward","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hayward J, Thomson F, Milne H, Buckingham S, Sheikh A, Fernando B, et al. \u201cToo much, too late\u201d: mixed methods multi-channel video recording study of computerized decision support systems and GP prescribing. J Am Medical Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e76\u201384.","journal-title":"J Am Medical Inform Assoc"},{"key":"1084_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1197\/jamia.M2311","volume":"15","author":"H Van der Sijs","year":"2008","unstructured":"Van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Van Gelder T, Berg M, Vulto A. Turning off frequently overridden drug alerts: limited opportunities for doing it safely. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:439\u201348.","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"1084_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1197\/jamia.M1809","volume":"13","author":"H Van der Sijs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Van Gelder T, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:138\u201347.","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"1084_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61817-5","volume":"379","author":"AJ Avery","year":"2012","unstructured":"Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Cresswell K, Eden M, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:1310\u20139.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"1084_CR12","first-page":"419","volume":"216","author":"B Brown","year":"2015","unstructured":"Brown B, Peek N, Buchan I. The case for conceptual and computable cross-fertilization between audit and feedback and clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:419\u201323.","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"key":"1084_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1111\/ijpp.12032","volume":"22","author":"S Sadler","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sadler S, Rodgers S, Howard R, Morris CJ, Avery AJ. Training pharmacists to deliver a complex information technology intervention (PINCER) using the principles of educational outreach and root cause analysis. Int J Pharm Prac. 2014;22:47\u201358.","journal-title":"Int J Pharm Prac"},{"key":"1084_CR14","volume":"6","author":"N Ivers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"1084_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-2248","volume":"164","author":"JC Brehaut","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brehaut JC, Colquhoun HL, Eva KW, Carroll K, Sales A, Michie S, et al. Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):435\u201341.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"1084_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-13-78","volume":"13","author":"KM Cresswell","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cresswell KM, Sadler S, Rodgers S, Avery A, Cantrill J, Murray SA, et al. An embedded longitudinal multi-faceted qualitative evaluation of a complex cluster randomized controlled trial aiming to reduce clinically important errors in medicines management in general practice. Trials. 2012;13:78.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"1084_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Williams R, Keers RN, Gude WT, Jeffries M, Davies C, Brown B, et al. SMASH! The Salford Medication Safety Dashboard. J Health Inform. 2018;25(3):183\u201393.","DOI":"10.14236\/jhi.v25i3.1015"},{"issue":"10","key":"1084_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0205419","volume":"13","author":"M Jeffries","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jeffries M, Keers RN, Phipps DL, Williams R, Brown B, Avery AJ, et al. Developing a learning health system: insights from a qualitative process evaluation of a pharmacist-led electronic audit and feedback intervention to improve medication safety in primary care. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205419.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"1084_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1177\/0038038509103208","volume":"43","author":"CR May","year":"2009","unstructured":"May CR, Finch T. Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535\u201354.","journal-title":"Sociology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1084_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm004","volume":"19","author":"K Walshe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walshe K. Understanding what works - and why - in quality improvement: the need for theory-driven evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(2):57\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"1084_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"a1655","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1655","volume":"337","author":"P Craig","year":"2008","unstructured":"Craig P, Dieppe PA, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"1084_CR22","volume-title":"Process evaluation of complex interventions. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance","author":"G Moore","year":"2014","unstructured":"Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance. London: MRC Population Health Science Research Network; 2014."},{"key":"1084_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7455.1561","volume":"328","author":"P Hawe","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how \u201cout of control\u201d can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ. 2004;328:1561\u20133.","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"key":"1084_CR24","first-page":"109","volume-title":"Safety in Medication Use","author":"A Aarts","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aarts A. A sociotechnical perspective of electronic prescribing. In: Tully MP, Franklin BD, editors. Safety in Medication Use. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. p. 109\u201322."},{"issue":"1","key":"1084_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.5465\/19416520802211644","volume":"2","author":"WJ Orlikowski","year":"2008","unstructured":"Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV. Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad Manag Ann. 2008;2(1):433\u201374.","journal-title":"Acad Manag Ann"},{"key":"1084_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-010208","volume":"6","author":"T Greenhalgh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, Hughes G, Lynch J, A\u2019Court C, et al. SCALS: a fourth generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010208.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"1084_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1108\/14777271111175369","volume":"16","author":"KM Cresswell","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Implementing and adopting electronic health record systems. How actor network theory can support evaluation. Clin Gov. 2011;16(4):320\u201336.","journal-title":"Clin Gov"},{"key":"1084_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39108.379965.BE","volume":"334","author":"NC Campbell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007;334:455\u20139.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"1084_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-015-0755-5","volume":"16","author":"H McMullen","year":"2015","unstructured":"McMullen H, Giffiths C, Leber W, Greenhalgh T. Explaining high and low performers in complex intervention trials: a new model based on diffusion of innovations theory. Trials. 2015;16:242.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"1084_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-7-85","volume":"7","author":"A O\u2019Cathain","year":"2007","unstructured":"O\u2019Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:85.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"1084_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1177\/1744987110373860","volume":"15","author":"B Blackwood","year":"2010","unstructured":"Blackwood B, O\u2019Halloran P, Porter S. On the problems of mixing RCTs with qualitative research: the case of the MRC framework for the evaluation of complex healthcare interventions. J Res Nurs. 2010;15:511.","journal-title":"J Res Nurs"},{"key":"1084_CR32","first-page":"594","volume":"228","author":"WT Gude","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gude WT, van der Veer SN, de Keizer NF, Coiera E, Peek N. Optimizing digital health informatics interventions through unobtrusive quantitative process evaluations. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:594\u20138.","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"6","key":"1084_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1097\/CIN.0000000000000325","volume":"35","author":"MC Schall","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schall MC, Cullen L, Pennarthur P, Chen H, Burrell K, Matthews G. Usability, evaluation and implementation of a health information technology dashboard of evidence-based quality indicators. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017;35(6):281\u20138.","journal-title":"Comput Inform Nurs"},{"issue":"4","key":"1084_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1177\/1460458212472333","volume":"19","author":"M Meulendijk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Meulendijk M, Spruit M, Drenth van Maanen C, Numans M, Brinkkemper S, Jansen P. General practitioners\u2019 attitudes towards decision-supported prescribing: an analysis of the Dutch primary sector. Health Inform J. 2013;19(4):247\u201363.","journal-title":"Health Inform J"},{"key":"1084_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.001","volume":"84","author":"D Dowding","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dowding D, Randall R, Gardner P, Fitzpatrick G, Dykes P, Favela J, et al. Dashboards for improving patient care: A review of the literature. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:87\u2013100.","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"key":"1084_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c4587"},{"key":"1084_CR37","first-page":"6","volume":"46","author":"MD Fetters","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fetters MD, Curry LA Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;46:6.","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"1084_CR38","volume-title":"Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges","author":"N King","year":"2012","unstructured":"King N. Doing template analysis. In: Symon G, Cassell C, editors. Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges. London: Sage; 2012."},{"issue":"39","key":"1084_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hsdr02390","volume":"2","author":"T Greenhalgh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Greenhalgh T, Swinglehurst D, Stones R. Rethinking resistance to big IT: a sociological study of why and when healthcare staff do not use nationally mandated information and communication technologies. Health Serv Delivery Res. 2014;2(39):1\u201386.","journal-title":"Health Serv Delivery Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1084_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2131-5","volume":"17","author":"M Jeffries","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jeffries M, Phipps DL, Howard RL, Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Ashcroft DM. Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):196.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"1084_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmp102","volume":"27","author":"S Crowe","year":"2010","unstructured":"Crowe S, Tully MP, Cantrill JA. Information in general medical practices: the information processing model. Fam Pract. 2010;27:230\u20136.","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"issue":"2","key":"1084_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1177\/1350508414545907","volume":"23","author":"D Petrakaki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Petrakaki D, Klecun E, Cornford T. Changes in healthcare professional work afforded by technology: the introduction of a national electronic patient record in an English hospital. Organization. 2016;23(2):206\u201326.","journal-title":"Organization"},{"key":"1084_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1057\/ejis.2014.40","volume":"25","author":"E Klecun","year":"2016","unstructured":"Klecun E. Transforming healthcare: policy discourses of IT and patient-centred care. Eur J Inf Syst. 2016;25:64\u201376.","journal-title":"Eur J Inf Syst"},{"key":"1084_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grant A, Dreischulte T, Guthrie B. Process evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: case study evaluation of adoption and maintenance of a complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e015281.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-015281"},{"key":"1084_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2011-000760","volume":"21","author":"M Dixon-Woods","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation\u2019s programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:876\u201384.","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"key":"1084_CR46","unstructured":"Medicine safety: indicators for safer prescribing. Department for Health and Social Care. 2018. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/medicine-safety-indicators-for-safer-prescribing Accessed 18th January 2019."}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,16]],"date-time":"2021-04-16T23:15:24Z","timestamp":1618614924000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1084"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-020-1084-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6947"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6947","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 March 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 April 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Ethical approval for the study was granted by the North West - Greater Manchester East NHS Research Ethics Committee (reference 15\/NW\/0792) and from the local NHS research and development board.Practices consented to take part in the study and began to receive the SMASH intervention thereafter. Additional written informed consent was taken from individual participants prior to each interview, which included consent for the interviews to be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim and for anonymised quotations to be used in reports.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"69"}}