{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,18]],"date-time":"2026-03-18T03:32:24Z","timestamp":1773804744381,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659916800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659916800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>While various quantitative studies based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Technology Acceptance Models (TAM) exist in the general medical sectors, just a few have been conducted in the behavioral sector; they have all been qualitative interview-based studies.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The purpose of this study is to assess the adoption dimensions of a behavioral electronic health record (EHR) system for behavioral clinical professionals using a modified clinical adoption (CA) research model that incorporates a variety of micro, meso, and macro level factors.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A questionnaire survey with quantitative analysis approach was used via purposive sampling method. We modified the existing CA framework to be suitable for evaluating the adoption of an EHR system by behavioral clinical professionals. We designed and verified questionnaires that fit into the dimensions of the CA framework. The survey was performed in five US behavioral hospitals, and the adoption factors were analyzed using a structural equation analysis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We derived a total of seven dimensions, omitting those determined to be unsuitable for behavioral clinical specialists to respond to. We polled 409 behavioral clinical experts from five hospitals. As a result, the ease of use and organizational support had a substantial impact on the use of the behavioral EHR system. Although the findings were not statistically significant, information and service quality did appear to have an effect on the system's ease of use. The primary reported benefit of behavioral EHR system adoption was the capacity to swiftly locate information, work efficiently, and access patient information via a mobile app, which resulted in more time for better care. The primary downside, on the other hand, was an unhealthy reliance on the EHR system.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We demonstrated in this study that the CA framework can be a useful tool for evaluating organizational and social elements in addition to the EHR system's system features. Not only the EHR system's simplicity of use, but also organizational support, should be considered for the effective implementation of the behavioral EHR system.<\/jats:p>\n                <jats:p><jats:italic>Trial Registration<\/jats:italic>: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB No.: B-1904-534-301).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T14:03:08Z","timestamp":1659967388000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Examining the adoption and implementation of behavioral electronic health records by healthcare professionals based on the clinical adoption framework"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Sooyoung","family":"Yoo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kahyun","family":"Lim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Se Young","family":"Jung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Keehyuck","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Donghyun","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Seok","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ho-Young","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hee","family":"Hwang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"1959_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocv103","volume":"23","author":"ST Mennemeyer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mennemeyer ST, Menachemi N, Rahurkar S, Ford EW. Impact of the HITECH act on physicians\u2019 adoption of electronic health records. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2016;23:375\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jamia\/ocv103.","journal-title":"J Am Med Informatics Assoc"},{"key":"1959_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1416","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2016.1651","volume":"36","author":"J Adler-Milstein","year":"2017","unstructured":"Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff. 2017;36:1416\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1377\/hlthaff.2016.1651.","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"1959_CR3","unstructured":"Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searcy T, Patel V. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008\u20132015. ONC Data Brief, no. 35. Washington DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2016."},{"key":"1959_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.016","volume":"44","author":"A Hossain","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hossain A, Quaresma R, Rahman H. Investigating factors influencing the physicians\u2019 adoption of electronic health record (EHR) in healthcare system of Bangladesh: an empirical study. Int J Inf Manag. 2019;44:76\u201387.","journal-title":"Int J Inf Manag"},{"key":"1959_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1504\/IJEH.2018.092175","volume":"10","author":"A Alsyouf","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alsyouf A, Ishak AK. Understanding EHRs continuance intention to use from the perspectives of UTAUT: practice environment moderating effect and top management support as predictor variables. Int J Electron Healthc. 2018;10:24\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1504\/IJEH.2018.092175.","journal-title":"Int J Electron Healthc"},{"key":"1959_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S63","DOI":"10.3122\/jabfm.2015.S1.150133","volume":"28","author":"M Cifuentes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cifuentes M, Davis M, Fernald D, Gunn R, Dickinson P, Cohen DJ. Electronic health record challenges, workarounds, and solutions observed in practices integrating behavioral health and primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:S63\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3122\/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.","journal-title":"J Am Board Fam Med."},{"key":"1959_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.2147\/RMHP.S241553","volume":"13","author":"X Hu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hu X, Qu H, Houser SH, Chen H, Zhou J, Yu M. Hospital characteristics associated with certified EHR adoption among US psychiatric hospitals. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:295\u2013301.","journal-title":"Risk Manag Healthc Policy"},{"key":"1959_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2016.0013","volume":"35","author":"PA Ranallo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ranallo PA, Kilbourne AM, Whatley AS, Pincus HA. Behavioral health information technology: from chaos to clarity. Health Aff. 2016;35:1106\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1377\/hlthaff.2016.0013.","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"1959_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e35","DOI":"10.2196\/medinform.7958","volume":"5","author":"CS Kruse","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kruse CS, Mileski M, Vijaykumar AG, Viswanathan SV, Suskandla U, Chidambaram Y. Impact of electronic health records on long-term care facilities: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2017;5:e35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/medinform.7958.","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"key":"1959_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11716","DOI":"10.5812\/ircmj.11716","volume":"15","author":"F Sadoughi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sadoughi F, Kimiafar K, Ahmadi M, Shakeri MT. Determining of factors influencing the success and failure of hospital information system and their evaluation methods: a systematic review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15:e11716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5812\/ircmj.11716.","journal-title":"Iran Red Crescent Med J"},{"key":"1959_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI190111","volume":"263","author":"E Ammenwerth","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ammenwerth E. Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;263:64\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/SHTI190111.","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"key":"1959_CR12","unstructured":"Hansen MB, N\u00f8rup I, Elmholdt KT, Kidholm K, N\u00f8hr C, Schmidt T. Managing Change of EHR Systems. In: SHI 2019. Proceedings of the 17th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics; 2019 Nov 12\u201313; Oslo, Norway. Link\u00f6ping: Link\u00f6ping University Electronic Press; 2019. p. 104\u2013107."},{"key":"1959_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1504\/IJEH.2018.092175","volume":"10","author":"A Lsyouf","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lsyouf A, Ku Ishak A. Understanding EHRs continuance intention to use from the perspectives of UTAUT: practice environment moderating effect and top management support as predictor variables. Int J Electron Healthc. 2018;10:24\u201359.","journal-title":"Int J Electron Healthc."},{"key":"1959_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-018-0703-x","volume":"18","author":"A O'Donnell","year":"2018","unstructured":"O\u2019Donnell A, Kaner E, Shaw C, Haighton C. Primary care physicians\u2019 attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18:101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-018-0703-x.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"1959_CR15","first-page":"55","volume-title":"Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach [Internet]","author":"F Lau","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lau F, Price M. Chapter 3: Clinical adoption framework. In: Lau F, Kuziemsky C, editors. Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach [Internet]. Victoria: University of Victoria; 2017. p. 55\u201376."},{"key":"1959_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.12927\/hcq.2011.22157","volume":"14","author":"F Lau","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lau F, Price M, Keshavjee K. From benefits to clinical adoption: making sense of health information system success in Canada. Healthc Q. 2011;14:39\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12927\/hcq.2011.22157.","journal-title":"Healthc Q"},{"key":"1959_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.24.5.1323","volume":"24","author":"D Gans","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B. Medical groups\u2019 adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff. 2005;24:1323\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1377\/hlthaff.24.5.1323.","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"1959_CR18","unstructured":"Harper BD, Norman KL. Improving user satisfaction: The questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction version 5.5. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference; 1993;224\u2013228."},{"key":"1959_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.5121\/ijdms.2012.4204","volume":"4","author":"R Vaziri","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vaziri R, Mohsenzadeh M. A questionnaire-based data quality methodology. Int J Database Manag Syst. 2012;4:55. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5121\/ijdms.2012.4204.","journal-title":"Int J Database Manag Syst"},{"key":"1959_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0190749","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0190749","volume":"13","author":"P Yu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yu P, Qian S. Developing a theoretical model and questionnaire survey instrument to measure the success of electronic health records in residential aged care. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190749. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0190749.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1959_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.28945\/426","volume":"12","author":"H Landrum","year":"2009","unstructured":"Landrum H, Zhang X, Prybutok V, Peak D. Measuring IS system service quality with SERVQUAL: users\u2019 perceptions of relative importance of the five SERVPERF dimensions. Informing Sci. 2009;12:17\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.28945\/426.","journal-title":"Informing Sci"},{"key":"1959_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1089\/tmj.2011.0066","volume":"18","author":"MP Gagnon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gagnon MP, Orru\u00f1o E, Asua J, Abdeljelil AB, Emparanza J. Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals\u2019 adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:54\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/tmj.2011.0066.","journal-title":"Telemed J E Health"},{"key":"1959_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2014.10.008","volume":"53","author":"M Abdekhoda","year":"2015","unstructured":"Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Gohari M, Noruzi A. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians\u2019 attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records. J Biomed Inform. 2015;53:174\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbi.2014.10.008.","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"key":"1959_CR24","unstructured":"Technology Adoption Survey. Survey Monkey. Accessed July 16, 2020. https:\/\/www.surveymonkey.com\/r\/techadoption"},{"key":"1959_CR25","unstructured":"Team 7. Technology in the workplace: survey results. Accessed July 16, 2020. https:\/\/drexel7.wordpress.com\/technology-in-the-workplace-survey-results\/"},{"key":"1959_CR26","unstructured":"SAP Australian User Group. Digital transformation survey. Monash University. Accessed July 16, 2020. https:\/\/www.surveymonkey.com\/r\/SAUGDigitalTransformationSurvey"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T14:03:20Z","timestamp":1659967400000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1959"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01959-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6947"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6947","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 October 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 August 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 August 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of SNUBH Institutional Review Board. It was approved by the Institutional Review Board of SNUBH (IRB No.: B-1904-534-301). All participants voluntarily expressed their consent to participate in the study on an online survey.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"This study does not contain any individual person\u2019s data in any form (including any individual details, images, or videos). No consent is required for publication.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"This research was supported by a research fund from Aurora Behavioral Health Hospitals (Grant # 06-2019-101, #06-2020-139). Hee Hwang and Keehyuck Lee are affiliated with an EHR vendor that provided the EHR system to the hospitals. However, they have no conflict interest in this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"210"}}