{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,14]],"date-time":"2026-03-14T05:49:20Z","timestamp":1773467360949,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669593600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Gliomas are among the most typical brain tumors tackled by neurosurgeons. During navigation for surgery of glioma brain tumors, preoperatively acquired static images may not be accurate due to shifts. Surgeons use intraoperative imaging technologies (2-Dimensional and navigated 3-Dimensional ultrasound) to assess and guide resections. This paper aims to precisely capture the importance of preoperative parameters to decide which type of ultrasound to be used for a particular surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This paper proposes two bagging algorithms considering base classifier logistic regression and random forest. These algorithms are trained on different subsets of the original data set. The goodness of fit of Logistic regression-based bagging algorithms is established using hypothesis testing. Furthermore, the performance measures for random-forest-based bagging algorithms used are AUC under ROC and AUC under the precision-recall curve. We also present a composite model without compromising the explainability of the models.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      These models were trained on the data of 350 patients who have undergone brain surgery from 2015 to 2020. The hypothesis test shows that a single parameter is sufficient instead of all three dimensions related to the tumor (\n                      <jats:inline-formula>\n                        <jats:alternatives>\n                          <jats:tex-math>$$p &lt; 0.05$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                          <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                            <mml:mrow>\n                              <mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi>\n                              <mml:mo>&lt;<\/mml:mo>\n                              <mml:mn>0.05<\/mml:mn>\n                            <\/mml:mrow>\n                          <\/mml:math>\n                        <\/jats:alternatives>\n                      <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                      ). We observed that the choice of intraoperative ultrasound depends on the surgeon making a choice, and years of experience of the surgeon could be a surrogate for this dependence.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study suggests that neurosurgeons may not need to focus on a large set of preoperative parameters in order to decide on ultrasound. Moreover, it personalizes the use of a particular ultrasound option in surgery. This approach could potentially lead to better resource management and help healthcare institutions improve their decisions to make the surgery more effective.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,27]],"date-time":"2022-11-27T23:30:16Z","timestamp":1669591816000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Choice of intraoperative ultrasound adjuncts for brain tumor surgery"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Manoj","family":"Kumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Santosh","family":"Noronha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Narayan","family":"Rangaraj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Aliasgar","family":"Moiyadi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Prakash","family":"Shetty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Vikas Kumar","family":"Singh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2046_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/862634","author":"L Ganau","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ganau L, Paris M, Ligarotti G, Ganau M. Management of gliomas: overview of the latest technological advancements and related behavioral drawbacks. Behav Neurol. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/862634.","journal-title":"Behav Neurol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2046_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.12.FOCUS15529","volume":"40","author":"AV Moiyadi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moiyadi AV, Shetty P. Direct navigated 3d ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(3):5.","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"2046_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barone DG, Lawrie TA, Hart MG. Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1).","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009685.pub2"},{"issue":"01","key":"2046_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"004","DOI":"10.4103\/0976-3147.80077","volume":"2","author":"A Moiyadi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Moiyadi A, Shetty P. Objective assessment of utility of intraoperative ultrasound in resection of central nervous system tumors: a cost-effective tool for intraoperative navigation in neurosurgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2(01):004\u201311.","journal-title":"J Neurosci Rural Pract"},{"key":"2046_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.05.083","volume":"93","author":"AV Moiyadi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moiyadi AV. Intraoperative ultrasound technology in neuro-oncology practice-current role and future applications. World Neurosurg. 2016;93:81\u201393.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"2046_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2015.02.005","volume":"54","author":"S Franke","year":"2015","unstructured":"Franke S, Meixensberger J, Neumuth T. Multi-perspective workflow modeling for online surgical situation models. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:158\u201366.","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"key":"2046_CR7","unstructured":"Liebmann P, Neumuth T. Model driven design of workflow schemata for the operating room of the future. INFORMATIK 2010. Service Science\u2013Neue Perspektiven f\u00fcr die Informatik. Band. 2010;1."},{"issue":"3","key":"2046_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.2006.020743","volume":"16","author":"R Flin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S. How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2007;16(3):235\u20139.","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"key":"2046_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nakamura R, Aizawa T, Muragaki Y. Automatic surgical workflow estimation method for brain tumor resection using surgical navigation information. J Robot Mechatron. 2012;24(5).","DOI":"10.20965\/jrm.2012.p0791"},{"issue":"02","key":"2046_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1394192","volume":"76","author":"A Moiyadi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moiyadi A. Impact of navigable ultrasound: how much credit should we give to the \u201cnavigable\u2019\u2019 component? J Neurol Surg Part A Central Eur Neurosurg. 2015;76(02):177\u20138.","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Part A Central Eur Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2046_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.4103\/0028-3886.166549","volume":"63","author":"AV Moiyadi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moiyadi AV, Kannan S, Shetty P. Navigated intraoperative ultrasound for resection of gliomas: predictive value, influence on resection and survival. Neurol India. 2015;63(5):727.","journal-title":"Neurol India"},{"issue":"06","key":"2046_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580594","volume":"77","author":"TE Lothes","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lothes TE, Siekmann M, K\u00f6nig RW, Wirtz CR, Coburger J. Surgical workflow analysis: ideal application of navigated linear array ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgery. J Neurol Surg Part A Central Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77(06):466\u201373.","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Part A Central Eur Neurosurg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2046_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-017-0817-0","volume":"40","author":"HJ Marcus","year":"2017","unstructured":"Marcus HJ, Williams S, Hughes-Hallett A, Camp SJ, Nandi D, Thorne L. Predicting surgical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging: development and preliminary validation of a grading system. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(4):621\u201331.","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"2046_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-017-0921-1","volume":"41","author":"L Ganau","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ganau L, Ligarotti GK, Ganau M. Predicting complexity of tumor removal and postoperative outcome in patients with high-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41(1):371\u20133.","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"2046_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2217","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-013-1881-z","volume":"155","author":"AV Moiyadi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moiyadi AV, Shetty PM, Mahajan A, Udare A, Sridhar E. Usefulness of three-dimensional navigable intraoperative ultrasound in resection of brain tumors with a special emphasis on malignant gliomas. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155(12):2217\u201325.","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir"},{"issue":"9","key":"2046_CR16","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"IA Adjei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Adjei IA, Karim R. An application of bootstrapping in logistic regression model. Open Access Libr J. 2016;3(9):1\u20139.","journal-title":"Open Access Libr J"},{"issue":"4","key":"2046_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1002\/wics.101","volume":"2","author":"H Abdi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2010;2(4):433\u201359.","journal-title":"Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat"},{"key":"2046_CR18","unstructured":"Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chimometrics and intelligent laboratory systems. In: IEEE conference on emerging technologies and factory automation EFTA volume, 1987. p. 704\u20136."},{"key":"2046_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2020.07.009","volume":"229","author":"CR Olsen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Olsen CR, Mentz RJ, Anstrom KJ, Page D, Patel PA. Clinical applications of machine learning in the diagnosis, classification, and prediction of heart failure. Am Heart J. 2020;229:1\u201317.","journal-title":"Am Heart J"},{"key":"2046_CR20","unstructured":"Khaleel FA, Al-Bakry AM. Diagnosis of diabetes using machine learning algorithms. Mater Today Proc. 2021."},{"key":"2046_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2020.108799","volume":"343","author":"I Bilgen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bilgen I, Guvercin G, Rekik I. Machine learning methods for brain network classification: application to autism diagnosis using cortical morphological networks. J Neurosci Methods. 2020;343: 108799.","journal-title":"J Neurosci Methods"},{"key":"2046_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2017.05.012","volume":"101","author":"S Piri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Piri S, Delen D, Liu T, Zolbanin HM. A data analytics approach to building a clinical decision support system for diabetic retinopathy: developing and deploying a model ensemble. Decis Support Syst. 2017;101:12\u201327.","journal-title":"Decis Support Syst"},{"key":"2046_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2015.04.003","volume":"74","author":"HM Zolbanin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zolbanin HM, Delen D, Zadeh AH. Predicting overall survivability in comorbidity of cancers: a data mining approach. Decis Support Syst. 2015;74:150\u201361.","journal-title":"Decis Support Syst"},{"key":"2046_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2017.12.004","volume":"106","author":"K Topuz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Topuz K, Zengul FD, Dag A, Almehmi A, Yildirim MB. Predicting graft survival among kidney transplant recipients: a Bayesian decision support model. Decis Support Syst. 2018;106:97\u2013109.","journal-title":"Decis Support Syst"},{"key":"2046_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Agarwal S, Yadav AS, Dinesh V, Vatsav KSS, Prakash KSS, Jaiswal S. By artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning models to diagnosis cancer. Mater Today Proc. 2021.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.matpr.2021.07.088"},{"key":"2046_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2018.10.019","volume":"107","author":"B Suchorska","year":"2019","unstructured":"Suchorska B, Schueller U, Biczok A, Lenski M, Albert NL, Giese A, Kreth F-W, Ertl-Wagner B, Tonn J-C, Ingrisch M. Contrast enhancement is a prognostic factor in IDH1\/2 mutant, but not in wild-type who grade II\/III glioma as confirmed by machine learning. Eur J Cancer. 2019;107:15\u201327.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"2046_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1177\/8756479308317006","volume":"24","author":"H Khamis","year":"2008","unstructured":"Khamis H. Measures of association: how to choose? J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2008;24(3):155\u201362.","journal-title":"J Diagn Med Sonogr"},{"issue":"2","key":"2046_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00058655","volume":"24","author":"L Breiman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24(2):123\u201340.","journal-title":"Mach Learn"},{"key":"2046_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li G-Z, Liu T-Y, Cheng VS. Classification of brain glioma by using SVMs bagging with feature selection. In: International workshop on data mining for biomedical applications. Springer; 2006. p. 124\u201330.","DOI":"10.1007\/11691730_13"},{"issue":"4","key":"2046_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2004.11.032","volume":"12","author":"D Goldberg-Zimring","year":"2005","unstructured":"Goldberg-Zimring D, Talos I-F, Bhagwat JG, Haker SJ, Black PM, Zou KH. Statistical validation of brain tumor shape approximation via spherical harmonics for image-guided neurosurgery. Acad Radiol. 2005;12(4):459\u201366.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"2046_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.953","volume":"16","author":"NV Chawla","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321\u201357.","journal-title":"J Artif Intell Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"2046_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1097\/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d","volume":"5","author":"JN Mandrekar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315\u20136.","journal-title":"J Thorac Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2046_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.21037\/qims.2019.03.06","volume":"9","author":"M Ganau","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ganau M, Ligarotti GK, Apostolopoulos V. Real-time intraoperative ultrasound in brain surgery: neuronavigation and use of contrast-enhanced image fusion. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(3):350.","journal-title":"Quant Imaging Med Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2046_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.14366\/usg.18032","volume":"38","author":"AV Moiyadi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moiyadi AV, Prakash Shetty RJ. Non-enhancing gliomas: does intraoperative ultrasonography improve resections? Ultrasonography. 2019;38(2):156.","journal-title":"Ultrasonography"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]],"date-time":"2022-11-28T10:12:24Z","timestamp":1669630344000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2046"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-022-02046-7","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1101\/2022.02.02.22270289","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1472-6947"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6947","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 February 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 November 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Ethics committee of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai (IEC 3). As per the institutional ethics committee guidelines, consent of participants was not required as this is a retrospective analysis of anonymized data. The study did not require any experiments to be performed and was performed in accordance with ICH-GCP guidelines.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Consent for publication by participants is not applicable in this case.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"307"}}