{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T02:17:07Z","timestamp":1778725027622,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707782400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707782400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Smart Learn. Environ."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper presents a study on the impact of ChatGPT as a formative feedback tool on the writing skills of undergraduate ESL students. Since artificial intelligence-driven automated writing evaluation tools positively impact students\u2019 writing, ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence-propelled tool, can be expected to have a more substantial positive impact. However, very little empirical evidence regarding the impact of ChatGPT on writing is available. The current mixed methods intervention study tried to address this gap. Data were collected from tertiary level ESL students through three tests and as many focus group discussions. The findings indicate a significant positive impact of ChatGPT on students' academic writing skills, and students\u2019 perceptions of the impact were also overwhelmingly positive. The study strengthens and advances theories of feedback as a dialogic tool and ChatGPT as a reliable writing tool, and has practical implications. With proper student training, ChatGPT can be a good feedback tool in large-size writing classes. Future researchers can investigate the impact of ChatGPT on various specific genres and micro aspects of writing.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T10:02:25Z","timestamp":1707818545000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":232,"title":["Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students\u2019 academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0077-2882","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Santosh","family":"Mahapatra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.56540\/jesaf.v2i1.51","volume":"2","author":"JKM Ali","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students\u2019 voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.56540\/jesaf.v2i1.51","journal-title":"Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix"},{"key":"295_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-37129-5_31","volume-title":"International conference on computational science and its applications","author":"B Allagui","year":"2023","unstructured":"Allagui, B. (2023). Chatbot Feedback on students\u2019 writing: Typology of comments and effectiveness. In O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, A. M. A. C. Rocha, C. Garau, F. Scorza, Y. Karaca, & C. M. Torre (Eds.), International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 377\u2013384). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-37129-5_31"},{"key":"295_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003279433-15","volume-title":"African perspectives on the teaching and learning of English in higher education","author":"JA Anderson","year":"2023","unstructured":"Anderson, J. A., & Ayaawan, A. E. (2023). Formative feedback in a writing programme at the University of Ghana. In A. Esimaje, B. van Rooy, D. Jolayemi, D. Nkemleke, & E. Klu (Eds.), African perspectives on the teaching and learning of English in higher education (pp. 197\u2013213). Routledge."},{"key":"295_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2023.100745","volume":"57","author":"JS Barrot","year":"2023","unstructured":"Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2023.100745","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.56297\/BKAM1691\/WIEO1749","volume":"23","author":"E Bonner","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.56297\/BKAM1691\/WIEO1749","journal-title":"Teaching English with Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.30466\/IJLTR.2021.120976","volume":"9","author":"H Bozorgian","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bozorgian, H., & Yazdani, A. (2021). Direct written corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanation: Investigating language analytic ability. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 65\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.30466\/IJLTR.2021.120976","journal-title":"Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"295_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1177\/07356331211045304","volume":"60","author":"R Butterfuss","year":"2022","unstructured":"Butterfuss, R., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2022). Strategy uptake in writing Pal: Adaptive feedback and instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(3), 696\u2013721. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/07356331211045304","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Computing Research"},{"key":"295_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1186\/s41239-023-00411-8","volume":"20","author":"CKY Chan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students\u2019 voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41239-023-00411-8","journal-title":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education"},{"key":"295_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chang, T. S., Li, Y., Huang, H. W., & Whitfield, B. (2021). Exploring EFL students\u2019 writing performance and their acceptance of AI-based automated writing feedback. In 2021 2nd International conference on education development and studies (pp. 31\u201335). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3459043.3459065","DOI":"10.1145\/3459043.3459065"},{"key":"295_CR10","volume-title":"Designing and conducting mixed methods research","author":"JW Creswell","year":"2017","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.","edition":"3"},{"key":"295_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35542\/osf.io\/hcgzj","DOI":"10.35542\/osf.io\/hcgzj"},{"issue":"3","key":"295_CR12","first-page":"1","volume":"7","author":"J Fathi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fathi, J., & Khodabakhsh, M. R. (2019). The role of self-assessment and peer-assessment in improving writing performance of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 7(3), 1\u201310.","journal-title":"International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.15294\/elt.v12i1.64069","volume":"12","author":"TN Fitria","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15294\/elt.v12i1.64069","journal-title":"ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.33541\/jet.v8i1.3044","volume":"8","author":"K Fitriana","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fitriana, K., & Nurazni, L. (2022). Exploring English department students\u2019 perceptions on using Grammarly to check the grammar in their writing. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 15\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33541\/jet.v8i1.3044","journal-title":"Journal of English Teaching"},{"key":"295_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1101\/2022.12.23.521610","author":"CA Gao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. BioRxiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2022.12.23.521610","journal-title":"BioRxiv"},{"key":"295_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2022.100055","volume":"3","author":"JM Gayed","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant\u2019s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.caeai.2022.100055","journal-title":"Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2107297","DOI":"10.1080\/2331186X.2022.2107297","volume":"9","author":"J Golzar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Golzar, J., Momenzadeh, S. E., & Miri, M. A. (2022). Afghan English teachers\u2019 and students\u2019 perceptions of formative assessment: A comparative analysis. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2107297. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/2331186X.2022.2107297","journal-title":"Cogent Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.3102\/0091732X20903302","volume":"44","author":"M Gopalan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218\u2013243. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0091732X20903302","journal-title":"Review of Research in Education"},{"key":"295_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2022.100666","volume":"54","author":"K Guo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students\u2019 argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2022.100666","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1088\/1742-6596\/1387\/1\/012020","volume":"1387","author":"N Haristiani","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haristiani, N. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot as language learning medium: An inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1742-6596\/1387\/1\/012020","journal-title":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series"},{"issue":"6","key":"295_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1545896","volume":"44","author":"B Huisman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students\u2019 academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863\u2013880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1545896","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"295_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"ep464","DOI":"10.30935\/cedtech\/13605","volume":"15","author":"M Imran","year":"2023","unstructured":"Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.30935\/cedtech\/13605","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Technology"},{"key":"295_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/003368822311628","author":"L Kohnke","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language learning and teaching. RELC Journal. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/003368822311628","journal-title":"RELC Journal"},{"key":"295_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450","volume":"44","author":"S Koltovskaia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"key":"295_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-13-1174-1_5","volume-title":"Portfolio assessment for the teaching and learning of writing","author":"R Lam","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lam, R. (2018). Feedback in writing portfolio assessment. In R. Lam (Ed.), Portfolio assessment for the teaching and learning of writing (pp. 59\u201372). Springer."},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.5334\/pme.1072","volume":"12","author":"L Lingard","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261\u2013270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/pme.1072","journal-title":"Perspectives on Medical Education"},{"key":"295_CR27","volume-title":"An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods","author":"S Loewen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. Bloomsbury Publishing."},{"issue":"6","key":"295_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1007\/s40299-021-00603-8","volume":"30","author":"SK Mahapatra","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mahapatra, S. K. (2021). Online formative assessment and feedback practices of ESL teachers in India, Bangladesh and Nepal: A multiple case study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 519\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40299-021-00603-8","journal-title":"Asia-Pacific Education Researcher"},{"issue":"2","key":"295_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2236469","DOI":"10.1080\/2331186X.2023.2236469","volume":"10","author":"S Marzuki","year":"2023","unstructured":"Marzuki, S., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, R., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students\u2019 writing: EFL teachers\u2019 perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/2331186X.2023.2236469","journal-title":"Cogent Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"295_CR30","first-page":"1","volume":"23","author":"M Mathur","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mathur, M., & Mahapatra, S. (2022). Impact of ePortfolio assessment as an instructional strategy on students\u2019 academic speaking skills: An experimental study. CALL-EJ, 23(3), 1\u201323.","journal-title":"CALL-EJ"},{"key":"295_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rmal.2023.100050","author":"A Mizumoto","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rmal.2023.100050","journal-title":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics"},{"key":"295_CR32","unstructured":"Ohio University. (2023). ChatGPT and teaching and learning. https:\/\/www.ohio.edu\/center-teaching-learning\/resources\/chatgpt"},{"key":"295_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2023.2187744","author":"T Olsen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Olsen, T., & Hunnes, J. (2023). Improving students\u2019 learning\u2014The role of formative feedback: Experiences from a crash course for business students in academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2023.2187744","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"295_CR34","unstructured":"OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. https:\/\/openai.com\/blog\/chatgpt\/"},{"key":"295_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203839027","volume-title":"Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer","author":"FL Perry Jr","year":"2011","unstructured":"Perry, F. L., Jr. (2011). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. Routledge."},{"key":"295_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2023.2208170","author":"HS Rad","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to foster students\u2019 writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2023.2208170","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"key":"295_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2022.2086575","author":"A Rezai","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S. (2022). Online peer-dynamic assessment: an approach to boosting Iranian high school students\u2019 writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Interactive Learning Environments. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2022.2086575","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"key":"295_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2022.104446","volume":"182","author":"MF Rodr\u00edguez","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez, M. F., Nussbaum, M., Yunis, L., Reyes, T., Alvares, D., Joublan, J., & Navarrete, P. (2022). Using scaffolded feedforward and peer feedback to improve problem-based learning in large classes. Computers & Education, 182, 104446. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2022.104446","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"295_CR39","volume-title":"Data collection research methods in applied linguistics","author":"H Rose","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Baffoe-Djan, J. B. (2020). Data collection research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsbury Academic."},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.37074\/jalt.2023.6.1.9","volume":"6","author":"J Rudolph","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37074\/jalt.2023.6.1.9","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching"},{"key":"295_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-022-04397-7","author":"C Stokel-Walker","year":"2022","unstructured":"Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays\u2014Should professors worry? Nature. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-022-04397-7","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"295_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2023.100752","volume":"57","author":"Y Su","year":"2023","unstructured":"Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2023.100752","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"1","key":"295_CR43","first-page":"T16","volume":"17","author":"AMY Tai","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tai, A. M. Y., Meyer, M., Varidel, M., Prodan, A., Vogel, M., Iorfino, F., & Krausz, R. M. (2023). Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T16\u2013T30.","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Language and Learning"},{"issue":"2","key":"295_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.17718\/tojde.1096260","volume":"23","author":"A Taskiran","year":"2022","unstructured":"Taskiran, A., & Goksel, N. (2022). Automated feedback and teacher feedback: Writing achievement in learning English as a foreign language at a distance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 120\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17718\/tojde.1096260","journal-title":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education"},{"issue":"6","key":"295_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1007\/s40299-021-00625-2","volume":"31","author":"NK Thi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022). How teacher and Grammarly feedback complement one another in Myanmar EFL students\u2019 writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767\u2013779. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40299-021-00625-2","journal-title":"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher"},{"key":"295_CR46","volume-title":"Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.)","author":"SJ Tracy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley."},{"key":"295_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20965311231189826","author":"M Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang, M., & Guo, W. (2023). The potential impact of ChatGPT on education: Using history as a rearview mirror. ECNU Review Education. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20965311231189826","journal-title":"ECNU Review Education"},{"key":"295_CR48","volume-title":"Designing effective feedback processes in higher education","author":"N Winstone","year":"2020","unstructured":"Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2020). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education. Routledge."},{"issue":"2","key":"295_CR49","first-page":"75","volume":"25","author":"T Yamashita","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yamashita, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 75\u201393.","journal-title":"Language Learning & Technology"},{"key":"295_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-023-11742-4","author":"D Yan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Educational Information Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-023-11742-4","journal-title":"Educational Information Technology"},{"key":"295_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeap.2023.101255","volume":"64","author":"F Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023). EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jeap.2023.101255","journal-title":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes"},{"key":"295_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/00336882221094089","author":"X Zhao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhao, X. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC Journal. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00336882221094089","journal-title":"RELC Journal"},{"key":"295_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103668","volume":"143","author":"M Zhu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143, 103668. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103668","journal-title":"Computers & Education"}],"container-title":["Smart Learning Environments"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T10:07:29Z","timestamp":1707818849000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/slejournal.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["295"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00295-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2196-7091"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2196-7091","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 February 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Written consent was obtained from all the participants who participated in the study. Their participation was voluntary, and they had the option to leave the study at any point. The institution where they studied did not require to give any ethical committee permission for the study as the students were adults and had the freedom to choose their participation.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"I do not have any financial or non-financial competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"9"}}