{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T04:22:29Z","timestamp":1780374149741,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]],"date-time":"2024-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718928000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]],"date-time":"2024-06-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718928000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Smart Learn. Environ."],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>While peer-editing is considered an important part of developing students\u2019 academic writing, questions remain about how different types of peer-editing affect subsequent student performance. The present study looked at a group of university students (N\u2009=\u2009149) engaged in peer editing of one another\u2019s essays in an online security studies course. The analysis was conducted from two perspectives: feedback givers and feedback receivers. More specifically, the relationships between the giving of comments and tracking changes in peer\u2019s work and writing score on essays were explored. The results showed that there was a positive correlation between the total number of received comments and the student's writing score, whereas there was no correlation for the number of tracked changes (neither words deleted, nor words added). Surprisingly, students who assume that peers provide high quality tracked changes demonstrate worse writing performance. This research shows the importance of nuance in understanding peer editing types and their influence on students\u2019 performance, as well as highlighting potential complexities of the interplay between students\u2019 collaborative activities, their performance, and their attitudes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]],"date-time":"2024-06-21T11:02:10Z","timestamp":1718967730000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Online peer editing: the influence of comments, tracked changes and perception of participation on students\u2019 writing performance"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9482-9332","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Galina","family":"Shulgina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1685-3863","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jamie","family":"Costley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5949-9617","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Irina","family":"Shcheglova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1022-2777","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Han","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalya","family":"Sedova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR1","first-page":"76","volume":"18","author":"A AbuSeileek","year":"2014","unstructured":"AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha\u2019r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners\u2019 writing. Language Learning and Technology, 18(1), 76\u201395.","journal-title":"Language Learning and Technology"},{"key":"315_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.28945\/4888","volume":"20","author":"AD Ali","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ali, A. D. (2021). Using Google docs to enhance students\u2019 collaborative translation and engagement. Journal of Information Technology Education, 20, 503\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.28945\/4888","journal-title":"Journal of Information Technology Education"},{"key":"315_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.05.016","volume":"124","author":"H Al-Samarraie","year":"2018","unstructured":"Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers and Education, 124, 77\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.05.016","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"key":"315_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2017.04.006","volume":"111","author":"M Biasutti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Biasutti, M. (2017). A comparative analysis of forums and wikis as tools for online collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 111, 158\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2017.04.006","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.5296\/jse.v3i4.4314","volume":"3","author":"M Bijami","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bijami, M., Kashef, S. H., & Nejad, M. S. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: Advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(4), 91\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5296\/jse.v3i4.4314","journal-title":"Journal of Studies in Education"},{"key":"315_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Birnholtz, J., & Ibara, S. (2012). Tracking changes in collaborative writing: Edits, visibility and group maintenance. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 809\u2013818). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2145204.2145325","DOI":"10.1145\/2145204.2145325"},{"key":"315_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Birnholtz, J., Steinhardt, S., & Pavese, A. (2013). Write here, write now! An experimental study of group maintenance in collaborative writing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 961\u2013970). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2470654.2466123","DOI":"10.1145\/2470654.2466123"},{"key":"315_CR11","unstructured":"Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2009). What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learning and outcome quality of collaboration using Google Docs. In Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research (vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 48\u201355). Retrieved from: http:\/\/telem-pub.openu.ac.il\/users\/chais\/2009\/noon\/1_1.pdf"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654318791584","volume":"88","author":"J Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799\u2013843. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0034654318791584","journal-title":"Review of Educational Research"},{"key":"315_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2015.02.001","volume":"25","author":"KH Cheng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students\u2019 writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2015.02.001","journal-title":"The Internet and Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006","volume":"20","author":"K Cho","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328\u2013338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006","journal-title":"Learning and Instruction"},{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1037\/a0021950","volume":"103","author":"K Cho","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0021950","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Psychology"},{"key":"315_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Costley, J., Zhang, H., Courtney, M., Shulgina, G., Baldwin, M., & Fanguy, M. (2023). Peer editing using shared online documents: the effects of comments and track changes on student L2 academic writing quality. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2023.2233573","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2023.2233573"},{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2009.12.008","volume":"38","author":"NM Diab","year":"2010","unstructured":"Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students\u2019 revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38(1), 85\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2009.12.008","journal-title":"System"},{"issue":"8","key":"315_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2017.1363056","volume":"30","author":"S Ebadi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners\u2019 academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787\u2013815. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2017.1363056","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lindif.2003.08.002","volume":"14","author":"A Furnham","year":"2003","unstructured":"Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & McDougall, F. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 47\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lindif.2003.08.002","journal-title":"Learning and Individual Differences"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.3390\/educsci9040276","volume":"9","author":"S Hartikainen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylv\u00e4s, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/educsci9040276","journal-title":"Education Sciences"},{"key":"315_CR700","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu, G. (2019). Culture and peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp. 45\u201363). Cambridge University Press","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108635547.005"},{"issue":"7","key":"315_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1433","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2017.1325854","volume":"36","author":"B Huisman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students\u2019 writing: Exploring the relation between students\u2019 ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(7), 1433\u20131447. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2017.1325854","journal-title":"Higher Education Research and Development"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1424318","volume":"43","author":"B Huisman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students\u2019 peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955\u2013968. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1424318","journal-title":"Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/modl.12189","volume":"99","author":"E Kang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/modl.12189","journal-title":"The Modern Language Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-010-9133-6","volume":"39","author":"JH Kaufman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students\u2019 perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-010-9133-6","journal-title":"Instructional Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"315_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.5430\/wjel.v12n5p217","volume":"12","author":"S Kuyyogsuy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kuyyogsuy, S. (2022). The pilot study of students\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 English writing improvement through online peer feedback during the Covid-19 pandemic in the southern border province of Thailand, Yala Rajabhat University. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 217\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5430\/wjel.v12n5p217","journal-title":"World Journal of English Language"},{"key":"315_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Larsen-Ledet, I., Korsgaard, H., & B\u00f8dker, S. (2020). Collaborative writing across multiple artifact ecologies. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1\u201314). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3313831.3376422","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376422"},{"key":"315_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2014.07.002","volume":"105","author":"J Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students\u2019 learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2014.07.002","journal-title":"System"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x","volume":"41","author":"L Li","year":"2010","unstructured":"Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525\u2013536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x","volume":"17","author":"SS Lin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420\u2013432. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x","journal-title":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/S1475-1585(03)00025-0","volume":"2","author":"J Liu","year":"2003","unstructured":"Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 193\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1475-1585(03)00025-0","journal-title":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1080\/13562510600680582","volume":"11","author":"NF Liu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13562510600680582","journal-title":"Teaching in Higher Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"315_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i-45","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02341.x","volume":"2013","author":"OL Liu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Liu, O. L., & Roohr, K. C. (2013). Investigating ten-year trends of learning outcomes at community colleges. ETS Research Report Series, 2013(2), i\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02341.x","journal-title":"ETS Research Report Series"},{"key":"315_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mabbott, A., & Bull, S. (2006). Student preferences for editing, persuading, and negotiating the open learner model. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 481\u2013490). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11774303_48","DOI":"10.1007\/11774303_48"},{"key":"315_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2022.100608","volume":"52","author":"KS McCarthy","year":"2022","unstructured":"McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2022). Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision? Assessing Writing, 52, 100608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2022.100608","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"9","key":"315_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2013.868878","volume":"40","author":"T McConlogue","year":"2015","unstructured":"McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495\u20131506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2013.868878","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"315_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518","volume":"39","author":"D Nicol","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518","journal-title":"Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-015-9312-8","volume":"27","author":"TJ Nokes-Malach","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-015-9312-8","journal-title":"Educational Psychology Review"},{"issue":"8","key":"315_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2012.758229","volume":"38","author":"L Nordrum","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nordrum, L., Evans, K., & Gustafsson, M. (2013). Comparing student learning experiences of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback: Strategies for formative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 919\u2013940. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2012.758229","journal-title":"Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"315_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2022.2034887","author":"O Noroozi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babayi, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). Gender differences in students\u2019 argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2022.2034887","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2018.1543200","volume":"28","author":"O Noroozi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., Van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students\u2019 online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698\u2013712. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2018.1543200","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"issue":"5","key":"315_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-015-9353-x","volume":"43","author":"MM Patchan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers\u2019 texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43(5), 591\u2013614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-015-9353-x","journal-title":"Instructional Science"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3047","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-016-9571-0","volume":"22","author":"J Petrovi\u0107","year":"2017","unstructured":"Petrovi\u0107, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3047\u20133061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-016-9571-0","journal-title":"Education and Information Technologies"},{"key":"315_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2021.1888753","volume":"35","author":"M Rahimi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students\u2019 writing quality, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35, 1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2021.1888753","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"2","key":"315_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1080\/09571736.2014.958190","volume":"46","author":"R Ruegg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students\u2019 writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87\u2013102.","journal-title":"The Language Learning Journal"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1007\/s11162-020-09591-y","volume":"61","author":"BA Simonsmeier","year":"2020","unstructured":"Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer feedback improves students\u2019 academic self-concept in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 61(6), 706\u2013724. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11162-020-09591-y","journal-title":"Research in Higher Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.21512\/lc.v13i3.5969","volume":"13","author":"WNA Sudrajat","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sudrajat, W. N. A., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). Students\u2019 perceptions on the use of Google Docs as an online collaborative tool in translation class. Lingua Cultura, 13(3), 209\u2013216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21512\/lc.v13i3.5969","journal-title":"Lingua Cultura"},{"key":"315_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2022.104467","volume":"187","author":"JS Tan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tan, J. S., & Chen, W. (2022). Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward? Computers and Education, 187, 104467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2022.104467","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2006.01.007","volume":"49","author":"SC Tseng","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1161\u20131174. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2006.01.007","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"8","key":"315_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2020.1863910","volume":"46","author":"M van Heerden","year":"2021","unstructured":"van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2021). Knowing me, knowing you: The effects of peer familiarity on receiving peer feedback for undergraduate student writers. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1191\u20131201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2020.1863910","journal-title":"Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"315_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2016.10.003","volume":"20","author":"E Van Popta","year":"2017","unstructured":"Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.edurev.2016.10.003","journal-title":"Educational Research Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004","volume":"20","author":"M Van Zundert","year":"2010","unstructured":"Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merri\u00ebnboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270\u2013279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004","journal-title":"Learning and Instruction"},{"issue":"4","key":"315_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1108\/QAE-08-2015-0035","volume":"24","author":"EJ Vella","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vella, E. J., Turesky, E. F., & Hebert, J. (2016). Predictors of academic success in web-based courses: Age, GPA, and instruction mode. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 586\u2013600.","journal-title":"Quality Assurance in Education"},{"key":"315_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang, D., Olson, J. S., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T., & Olson, G. M. (2015). DocuViz: Visualizing collaborative writing. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1865\u20131874). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2702123.2702517","DOI":"10.1145\/2702123.2702517"},{"issue":"6","key":"315_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2014.881386","volume":"28","author":"YC Wang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2014.881386","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"315_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-012-9285-y","volume":"61","author":"MM Woo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 279\u2013309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11423-012-9285-y","journal-title":"Educational Technology Research and Development"},{"key":"315_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.28945\/3870","volume":"16","author":"MP Woodrich","year":"2017","unstructured":"Woodrich, M. P., & Fan, Y. (2017). Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education. Research, 16, 391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.28945\/3870","journal-title":"Journal of Information Technology Education. Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"315_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.3102\/0002831220945266","volume":"58","author":"Y Wu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492\u2013526. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0002831220945266","journal-title":"American Educational Research Journal"},{"issue":"5","key":"315_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2013.839568","volume":"28","author":"YC Yen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yen, Y. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners\u2019 writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: A case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2013.839568","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"315_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.13310","author":"Y Zhan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhan, Y., Yan, Z., Wan, Z. H., Wang, X., Zeng, Y., Yang, M., & Yang, L. (2023). Effects of online peer assessment on higher-order thinking: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.13310","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"key":"315_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang, H., Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2022). Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills. Heliyon, 8(7). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heliyon.2022.e09822","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2022.e09822"},{"issue":"2","key":"315_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s10758-014-9239-z","volume":"20","author":"B Zheng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zheng, B., Lawrence, J., Warschauer, M., & Lin, C. H. (2015). Middle school students\u2019 writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 201\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10758-014-9239-z","journal-title":"Technology, Knowledge and Learning"}],"container-title":["Smart Learning Environments"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]],"date-time":"2024-06-21T11:11:03Z","timestamp":1718968263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/slejournal.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["315"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40561-024-00315-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["2196-7091"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2196-7091","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 June 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"30"}}