{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,5]],"date-time":"2026-02-05T21:52:25Z","timestamp":1770328345904,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]],"date-time":"2021-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625616000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]],"date-time":"2021-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625616000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["RPTEL"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Digital assessment and feedback have been a growing area of research and practice in the past decade in higher education. Within this theme, research has been published highlighting the importance of learner agency in the assessment and feedback process as a way to develop assessment literacy in contrast with the existing lecturer-led approach. In this research, we aimed to find out whether lecturers are willing to let go of some of the power they currently have in the digital assessment and feedback process and how they see opportunities for agency being developed in the digital assessment and feedback systems. We collected data from 10 sandpits with 58 lecturers in which, using a storytelling technique and one mock-up of a digital assessment and feedback system, we discussed and critiqued an assessment scenario intending to collect perceptions about digital assessment and feedback and the constraints felt by lecturers in their assessment practice. Based on these perceptions, we identify recommendations that may improve digital assessment and feedback systems and practices. We discuss the data and the recommendations based on three clusters of themes: (i) preparation for the assessment, (ii) formative feedback and (iii) feedback post-submission.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]],"date-time":"2021-07-07T11:02:53Z","timestamp":1625655773000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8586-0370","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diogo","family":"Casanova","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Graham","family":"Alsop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Isabel","family":"Huet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"168_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ada, M. B. (2018). Using design-based research to develop a mobile learning framework for assessment feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41039-018-0070-3.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41039-018-0070-3"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1080\/13562511003620019","volume":"15","author":"R Bailey","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers\u2019 reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13562511003620019.","journal-title":"Teaching in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.52.1.1","volume":"52","author":"A Bandura","year":"2001","unstructured":"Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.52.1.1.","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"168_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.12547","volume":"49","author":"A Bausili","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bausili, A. (2018). From piloting e-submission to electronic management of assessment (EMA): Mapping grading journeys. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 463\u2013478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.12547.","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"6","key":"168_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1080\/03075071003731135","volume":"36","author":"C Beaumont","year":"2011","unstructured":"Beaumont, C., O\u2019Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671\u2013687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075071003731135.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"168_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1080\/02602930600679050","volume":"31","author":"D Boud","year":"2006","unstructured":"Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602930600679050.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"6","key":"168_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2012.691462","volume":"38","author":"D Boud","year":"2013","unstructured":"Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698\u2013712. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2012.691462.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"168_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology., 1\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14780887.2020.1769238.","DOI":"10.1080\/14780887.2020.1769238"},{"key":"168_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burrows, S., & Shortis, M. (2011). An evaluation of semi-automated, collaborative marking and feedback systems: Academic staff perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14742\/ajet.909.","DOI":"10.14742\/ajet.909"},{"issue":"8","key":"168_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354","volume":"43","author":"D Carless","year":"2018","unstructured":"Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315\u20131325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"6","key":"168_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2016.1211246","volume":"42","author":"D Carless","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carless, D., & Chan, K. K. H. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 930\u2013941. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2016.1211246.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"168_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Casanova, D., Huet, I., Garcia, F. & Pessoa, T. (2020). Role of technology in the design of learning environments. Learning Environment Research 23, 413\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10984-020-09314-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10984-020-09314-1"},{"key":"168_CR13","unstructured":"Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Limited."},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1080\/14681366.2017.1345975","volume":"26","author":"J Charteris","year":"2018","unstructured":"Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2018). A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: Emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26(1), 51\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14681366.2017.1345975.","journal-title":"Pedagogy, Culture & Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR15","first-page":"120","volume":"26","author":"V Clarke","year":"2013","unstructured":"Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120\u2013123.","journal-title":"The Psychologist"},{"key":"168_CR16","unstructured":"Craft, B. (2013). Sketch-ins: A method for participatory design in technology-enhanced learning. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology, (pp. 92\u2013101). Routledge."},{"key":"168_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1467877.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1467877"},{"key":"168_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and drawbacks of computer-based assessment and feedback systems: Student and educator perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 294\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.12232.","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.12232"},{"key":"168_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dixon, H., Hawe, E., & Hamilton, R. (2019). The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2019.1666084.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2019.1666084"},{"key":"168_CR20","unstructured":"Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Digital, Inc."},{"key":"168_CR21","unstructured":"Earnshaw, Y., Tawfik, A. A., & Schmidt, M. (2017). User experience design. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. Press Books."},{"issue":"3","key":"168_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1348\/014466599162782","volume":"38","author":"R Elliott","year":"1999","unstructured":"Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1348\/014466599162782.","journal-title":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology"},{"key":"168_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"ElShaer, A., Casanova, D., Freestone, N. & Calabrese, G. (2020). Students' perceptions of the value of electronic feedback: does disciplinary background really matter? British Journal Of Educational Technology, 51(2), 590\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.12881.","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.12881"},{"key":"168_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Farrell, T., & Rushby, N. (2016). Assessment and learning technologies: An overview. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 106\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.12348.","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.12348"},{"issue":"3","key":"168_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2005.00481.x","volume":"36","author":"JS Fulda","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fulda, J. S. (2006). The ethical limitations of online grading systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 559\u2013561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2005.00481.x.","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"key":"168_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/003465430298487.","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"168_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of \u2018useful\u2019 digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567\u20131579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2015.1007946.","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2015.1007946"},{"key":"168_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3402\/rlt.v19i2.10347.","DOI":"10.3402\/rlt.v19i2.10347"},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1177\/1469787412467125","volume":"14","author":"A Jonsson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1469787412467125.","journal-title":"Active Learning in Higher Education"},{"key":"168_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Critical participatory action research. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-4560-67-2"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1207\/s15326985ep3902_4","volume":"39","author":"J Martin","year":"2004","unstructured":"Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 135\u2013145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15326985ep3902_4.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"issue":"3","key":"168_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1007\/s12124-015-9336-0","volume":"50","author":"E Matusov","year":"2016","unstructured":"Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420\u2013446. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12124-015-9336-0.","journal-title":"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1493087","volume":"44","author":"M Mimirinis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics\u2019 conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233\u2013248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1493087.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"168_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2019.1667955","volume":"45","author":"E Molloy","year":"2019","unstructured":"Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2019). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education., 45(4), 527\u2013540. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2019.1667955.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education."},{"issue":"4","key":"168_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2006.00657.x","volume":"38","author":"D Nicol","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nicol, D. (2007). Laying a foundation for lifelong learning: case studies of e-assessment in large 1st-year classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 668\u2013678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2006.00657.x.","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"5","key":"168_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1080\/02602931003786559","volume":"35","author":"D Nicol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501\u2013517. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602931003786559.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"168_CR37","unstructured":"Nieminen, J. H., & Hilpp\u00f6, J. A. (2020). Methodological and conceptual suggestions for researching the interplay of assessment and student agency. In Methodological approaches to STEM education research, (vol. 1). Cambridge Scholars Publishing."},{"key":"168_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nieminen, J. H., & Tuohilampi, L. (2020). \u2018Finally studying for myself\u2019\u2013examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1031\u20131045. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2020.1720595.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2020.1720595"},{"key":"168_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Parkin, H. J., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students\u2019 engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963\u2013973. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2011.592934.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2011.592934"},{"key":"168_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(01), 51\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S1793206807000300.","DOI":"10.1142\/S1793206807000300"},{"key":"168_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.55.1.68.","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.55.1.68"},{"key":"168_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). In D. Schuler, & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14434\/ijdl.v4i2.3964.","DOI":"10.14434\/ijdl.v4i2.3964"},{"key":"168_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315886350.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315886350"},{"key":"168_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1\u2013A9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2016.12.002.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2016.12.002"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1080\/14703297.2016.1273790","volume":"54","author":"H van der Sluis","year":"2017","unstructured":"van der Sluis, H., Burden, P., & Huet, I. (2017). Retrospection and reflection: The emerging influence of an institutional professional recognition scheme on professional development and academic practice in a UK university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(2), 126\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14703297.2016.1273790.","journal-title":"Innovations in Education and Teaching International"},{"key":"168_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Winstone, N. (2019). In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), Facilitating students\u2019 use of feedback: Capturing and tracking impact using digital tools BT - The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners, (pp. 225\u2013242). Springer International Publishing.. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-25112-3_13.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-25112-3_13"},{"issue":"2","key":"168_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2018.1532985","volume":"38","author":"N Winstone","year":"2019","unstructured":"Winstone, N., & Boud, D. (2019). Exploring cultures of feedback practice: The adoption of learning-focused feedback practices in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 411\u2013425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2018.1532985.","journal-title":"Higher Education Research & Development"},{"key":"168_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2020). \u201cCheck the grade, log out\u201d: students\u2019 engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2020.1787331.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2020.1787331"},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538","volume":"52","author":"N Winstone","year":"2017","unstructured":"Winstone, N., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners\u2019 agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2020.1748569","volume":"46","author":"N Winstone","year":"2021","unstructured":"Winstone, N., Pitt, E., & Nash, R. (2021). Educators\u2019 perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 118\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2020.1748569.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"8","key":"168_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2015.1075956","volume":"41","author":"NE Winstone","year":"2016","unstructured":"Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Menezes, R. (2016). What do students want most from written feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgeting methodology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1237\u20131253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2015.1075956.","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"168_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2011.648373","volume":"39","author":"T Woodall","year":"2014","unstructured":"Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2011.648373.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"key":"168_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zimbardi, K., Colthorpe, K., Dekker, A., Engstrom, C., Bugarcic, A., Worthy, P., \u2026 Long, P. (2017). Are they using my feedback? The extent of students\u2019 feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 625\u2013644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2016.1174187.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2016.1174187"}],"container-title":["Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]],"date-time":"2021-07-07T11:12:59Z","timestamp":1625656379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/telrp.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["168"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41039-021-00168-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1793-7078"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1793-7078","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 December 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declaration"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"20"}}