{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T07:39:16Z","timestamp":1771573156165,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740096000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740096000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Traumatol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Anatomic stems for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been developed to achieve a precise geometric fit between the implant and the surrounding femoral bone, aiming at the improvement of primary stability of cementless implants until osteointegration occurs. The aim of the current study is to go over the regional Registry of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) to analyze survivorship of THA implants when anatomic stems are used; moreover, separate analysis for modular and nonmodular stems, and in standard and short implants, is presented.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This retrospective registry study involved the analysis of data collected by the RIPO registry between 2000 and 2019. The study focused on THAs performed for primary hip osteoarthritis (OA) between 2000 and 2019. All patients treated by THA within this time frame and officially registered in the RIPO registry were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were: revision THAs, cemented implants, hemiarthroplasties, resurfacing procedures, megaprostheses for neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions, and THAs performed on patients residing outside the region.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A total of 12,010 cementless primary THAs using curved anatomic stems were performed in Emilia-Romagna between 2000 and 2019 and formally registered in the RIPO registry. The overall survival rate for anatomic standard stems was 96.7% at 10 years (96.1\u201397.3%); at 15 from the surgery, the survival rate dropped to 95.1% (93.9\u201396.1%). A total of 473 out of 12,010 recorded THA with anatomic stems (3.93%) experienced failure requiring revision surgery. The fixed standard stem showed the lowest failure rate (0.6%), while modular short stems had the highest (7.4%) at long-term follow-up. The most common stem-related complication was periprosthetic fracture (PF) in short stems (2.0% of cases) while in standard stems it was implant breakage (0.9% of cases); PFs were significantly more frequent in female patients (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.0082), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.59 compared with male patients. Implant breakage demonstrated the highest rate of incidence among standard-modular stems (1.1% of cases).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This registry-based study highlights that stem length and modularity significantly affect the long-term survival of anatomic femoral stems in THA. Fixed standard stems had the lowest failure rates, while modular short stems showed the highest failure rates and complications.<\/jats:p>\n            <jats:p>\n              <jats:italic>Level of evidence<\/jats:italic>: 3.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T16:05:59Z","timestamp":1740153959000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Do all anatomic stems perform equally at long-term survival? A regional registry-based study on 12,010 total hip arthroplasty implants according to stem length and neck modularity"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"26","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0716-4951","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alberto","family":"Di Martino","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Valentino","family":"Rossomando","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Barbara","family":"Bordini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Brunello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Riccardo","family":"Ferri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cesare","family":"Faldini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"824_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(61)92063-3","author":"J Charnley","year":"1961","unstructured":"Charnley J (1961) Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(61)92063-3","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"824_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198810000-00015","volume":"235","author":"PC Noble","year":"1988","unstructured":"Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ et\u00a0al. (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-198810000-00015","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"824_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1186\/S10195-021-00590-Y","volume":"22","author":"A Di Martino","year":"2021","unstructured":"Di Martino A, Castagnini F, Stefanini N et\u00a0al. (2021) Survival rates and reasons for revision of different stem designs in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia: a regional registry study. J Orthop Traumatol 22:29. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S10195-021-00590-Y","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"824_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1053\/J.SART.2019.02.005","volume":"29","author":"T Gehrke","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gehrke T, Citak M, Ohlmeier M (2018) Evolution of the cementless anatomic stem: risks & rewards. Semin Arthroplasty 29:142\u2013146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/J.SART.2019.02.005","journal-title":"Semin Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"2","key":"824_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3763-y","volume":"473","author":"JB Meding","year":"2014","unstructured":"Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Berend ME (2014) Twenty-year followup of an uncemented stem in primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):543\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-014-3763-y","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"824_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00774","volume":"93","author":"HS Khanuja","year":"2011","unstructured":"Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA (2011) Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:500\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.J.00774","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"824_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1874","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00656","volume":"89","author":"MH Huo","year":"2007","unstructured":"Huo MH, Dumont GD, Knight JRM, M.A. (2007) What\u2019s new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1874\u20131885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.K.00656","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"824_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lord GA, Hardy JR, Kummer FJ (1979) An uncemented total hip replacement: experimental study and review of 300 madreporique arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197906000-00001"},{"key":"824_CR9","unstructured":"Marina T, Stefania C, Alessia B, Eugenio C, Attanasio C, V, Mascia M, eds. Registro Italiano ArtroProtesi. Report Annuale 2021. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 2022."},{"key":"824_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199274060-00005","volume":"74","author":"JJ Callaghan","year":"1992","unstructured":"Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson RR, Stranne SK (1992) The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:839\u2013848","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"824_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/S10195-023-00687-6\/TABLES\/2","volume":"24","author":"F Castagnini","year":"2023","unstructured":"Castagnini F, Bordini B, Cosentino M et\u00a0al. (2023) Comparison of single taper and dual taper versions of the same stem design in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Orthop Traumatol 24:1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S10195-023-00687-6\/TABLES\/2","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"824_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2023.07.009","volume":"39","author":"GS Turnbull","year":"2024","unstructured":"Turnbull GS, Akhtar MA, Dunstan ERR, Ballantyne JA (2024) Experience of an anatomic femoral stem in a United Kingdom Center-excellent survivorship and negligible periprosthetic fracture rates at mean 12 years following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 39:187\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2023.07.009","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1177\/11207000221078920","volume":"33","author":"E Sariali","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sariali E, Pascal Moussellard H (2023) Higher femoral anteversion restoration accuracy after total hip arthroplasty with a proximally fixed anatomic stem than with a generic straight double-tapered stem. Hip Int 33:583\u2013589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/11207000221078920","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"824_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.5301\/HIPINT.5000439","volume":"27","author":"FA De Boer","year":"2017","unstructured":"De Boer FA, Sariali E (2017) Comparison of anatomic vs. straight femoral stem design in total hip replacement\u2014Femoral canal fill in vivo. Hip Int 27:241\u2013244. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5301\/HIPINT.5000439","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"824_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1707","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2020.12.030","volume":"36","author":"YH Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim YH, Jang YS, Kim EJ (2021) A prospective, randomized comparison of the long-term clinical and radiographic results of an ultra-short vs a conventional length cementless anatomic femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 36:1707\u20131713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2020.12.030","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1794","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.005","volume":"33","author":"F Giardina","year":"2018","unstructured":"Giardina F, Castagnini F, Stea S et\u00a0al. (2018) Short stems versus conventional stems in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a long-term registry study. J Arthroplasty 33:1794\u20131799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2018.01.005","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1007\/S11999-013-3354-3","volume":"472","author":"YH Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kang JS (2014) Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:943. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S11999-013-3354-3","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"824_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2225","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2022.06.003","volume":"37","author":"YH Kim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kim YH, Park JW, Jang YS, Kim EJ (2022) Does an ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stem improve long-term (up to 17 years) results in patients younger than 30 years? J Arthroplasty 37:2225\u20132232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2022.06.003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1646","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.19.01397","volume":"102","author":"MM Kheir","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kheir MM, Drayer NJ, Chen AF (2020) An update on cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 102:1646\u20131661. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.19.01397","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg"},{"key":"824_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.05.019","volume":"106","author":"P Mertl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mertl P, Dehl M (2020) Femoral stem modularity. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:S35\u2013S42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2019.05.019","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"824_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3747","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3816-2","volume":"472","author":"WM Mihalko","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mihalko WM, Wimmer MA, Pacione CA et\u00a0al. (2014) How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3747\u20133758. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-014-3816-2","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"824_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.09.014","volume":"38","author":"M Radaelli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Radaelli M, Buchalter DB, Mont MA et\u00a0al. (2023) A new classification system for cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 38:502\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2022.09.014","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.06.007","volume":"37","author":"I Shichman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shichman I, Kurapatti M, Roof M et\u00a0al. (2022) Impact of indication for revision THA on resource utilization. J Arthroplasty 37:2333\u20132339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2022.06.007","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1557.R2","volume":"100","author":"CEH Scott","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scott CEH, Turnbull GS, Powell-Bowns MFR et\u00a0al. (2018) Activity levels and return to work after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients under 65 years of age. Bone Joint J 100:1043\u20131053. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1557.R2","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"824_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/S10195-024-00795-X","volume":"25","author":"M Luger","year":"2024","unstructured":"Luger M, Feldler S, Schopper C et\u00a0al. (2024) Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach? J Orthop Traumatol 25:51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S10195-024-00795-X","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"824_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/S10195-022-00634-X","volume":"23","author":"P Reinbacher","year":"2022","unstructured":"Reinbacher P, Smolle MA, Friesenbichler J et\u00a0al. (2022) Pre-operative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method. J Orthop Traumatol 23:16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S10195-022-00634-X","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"824_CR27","unstructured":"2018 Annual Reports-AOANJRR. https:\/\/aoanjrr.sahmri.com\/annual-reports-2018. Accessed 26 Jul 2024"},{"key":"824_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2012.07.022","volume":"28","author":"C Nourissat","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nourissat C, Essig J, Asencio G (2013) The cementless anatomic Benoist Girard (ABG) II total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 28:707\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2012.07.022","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2012.04.002","volume":"28","author":"YH Kim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2013) Is diaphyseal stem fixation necessary for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic bone (Class C bone)? J Arthroplasty 28:139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2012.04.002","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2046","DOI":"10.1007\/S11999-017-5260-6","volume":"475","author":"S Colas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Colas S, Allalou A, Poichotte A et\u00a0al. (2017) Exchangeable femoral neck (dual-modular) THA prostheses have poorer survivorship than other designs: a nationwide cohort of 324,108 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:2046\u20132059. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S11999-017-5260-6","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"824_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.5301\/HIPINT.5000429","volume":"27","author":"A Toni","year":"2017","unstructured":"Toni A, Giardina F, Guerra G et\u00a0al. (2017) 3rd generation alumina-on-alumina in modular hip prosthesis: 13 to 18 years follow-up results. Hip Int 27:8\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5301\/HIPINT.5000429","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"824_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1016\/J.RCO.2008.03.037","volume":"94","author":"A Mouttet","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mouttet A, Philippot R, Farizon F et\u00a0al. (2008) Five-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite coated stem. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:746\u2013752. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.RCO.2008.03.037","journal-title":"Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot"},{"key":"824_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/J.OTSR.2019.04.019","volume":"105","author":"O Tostain","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tostain O, Debuyzer E, Benad K et\u00a0al. (2019) Ten-year outcomes of cementless anatomical femoral implants after 3D computed tomography planning Follow-up note. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:937\u2013942. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.OTSR.2019.04.019","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"824_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1177\/230949901202000311","volume":"20","author":"DJ Cossetto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cossetto DJ, Goudar A (2012) Mid-term outcome of a modular, cementless, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated, anatomic femoral stem. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20:322\u2013326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/230949901202000311","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)"},{"key":"824_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2087","DOI":"10.1016\/J.ARTH.2021.01.057","volume":"36","author":"DM Ferre\u00f1o M\u00e1rquez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ferre\u00f1o M\u00e1rquez DM, Dauder Gallego C, Bebea Zamorano FNG et\u00a0al. (2021) Long-term outcomes of 496 anatomical cementless modular femoral stems: eleven to twenty years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 36:2087\u20132099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.ARTH.2021.01.057","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"824_CR36","unstructured":"2023-AOANJRR. https:\/\/aoanjrr.sahmri.com\/annual-reports-2023. Accessed 26 Jul 2024"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T16:06:05Z","timestamp":1740153965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jorthoptraumatol.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["824"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s10195-025-00824-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1590-9999"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1590-9999","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 February 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"9"}}