{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T13:57:22Z","timestamp":1793973442164,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]],"date-time":"2023-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1676246400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]],"date-time":"2023-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1676246400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Ophthal Inflamm Infect"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To evaluate clinical results in eyes undergoing phacoemulsification intraocular lens (IOL) implantation due to Fuchs<jats:sup>,<\/jats:sup> uveitis (FU) related complicated cataract.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Post-surgical outcomes of 56 eyes of 55 FU patients were evaluated retrospectively. Three groups were formed according to the IOL model: hydrophilic SAF6125 (Optima fold) acrylic, hydrophobic SN60AT (Alcon), and hydrophobic AAB00 (Abbott). Postoperative posterior capsular opacification (PCO) development and PCO development time, neodymium number: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy rate, giant cell (GC) deposition on the IOL, and the development time of GC deposits were compared among the groups. All patients were followed postoperatively on the 1<jats:sup>st<\/jats:sup> day, 1<jats:sup>st<\/jats:sup> week, 2<jats:sup>nd<\/jats:sup> and 6<jats:sup>th<\/jats:sup> weeks, and then at 3-month intervals.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The hydrophilic SAF6125 IOL was implanted in 10 eyes, hydrophobic SN60AT in 24 eyes and AAB00 IOL in 22 eyes. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 34.1\u2009\u00b1\u200930.1 (6-144) months. PCO developed in 7 eyes (70%) in the hydrophilic SAF6125 group, 17 eyes (70.8%) in the hydrophobic SN60AT and 13 eyes (59.1%) in the AAB00 group. There was no statistically significant difference among the three IOL groups in the PCO development, the PCO development time and YAG laser capsulotomy rates (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.674, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.111, and <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.507, respectively). The PCO development time was significantly longer in the hydrophobic SN60AT than AAB00 group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.027). GC deposits were detected in 3 eyes (30%) in the hydrophilic SAF6125 group, 7 eyes (29.1%) in the hydrophobic SN60AT and 3 eyes (13.6%) in the AAB00 group. GC deposition and the development time of GC deposits were similar among the\u00a0three IOL groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.575, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.804). At the final follow-up, BCVA was \u2265\u200920\/40 in 41 eyes (73.2%).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The GC deposits and PCO development were the most important problems in these eyes with hydrophilic or hydrophobic IOLs despite good visual and postoperative results. New developments are needed in terms of IOL design or content in eyes with\u00a0FU.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]],"date-time":"2023-02-13T12:02:49Z","timestamp":1676289769000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with Fuchs uveitis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Yasemin","family":"\u00d6zdamar Erol","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K\u00fcbra","family":"\u00d6zdemir Yal\u00e7\u0131nsoy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"P\u0131nar","family":"\u00d6zdal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2019.10.003","volume":"65","author":"Y Sun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sun Y, Ji Y (2020) A literature review on Fuchs uveitis syndrome: an update. Surv Ophthalmol 65(2):133\u2013143","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1097\/01.icu.0000187056.29563.8d","volume":"16","author":"Q Mohamed","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mohamed Q, Zamir E (2005) Update on Fuchs\u2019 uveitis syndrome. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16(6):356\u2013363","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"320_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1372","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01298-1","volume":"28","author":"J Ram","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ram J, Kaushik S, Brar GS, Gupta A, Gupta A (2002) Phacoemulsification in patients withn Fuchs\u2019 heterochromic uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1372\u20131378","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Mansour YS, Al-Rajhi AA, Al-Dhibi H, Abu El-Asrar AM (2010) Clinical features and prognostic factors in Fuchs\u2019 uveitis. Int Ophthalmol 30:5:501\u2013509","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-010-9379-7"},{"key":"320_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(00)00056-7","volume":"107","author":"S Rauz","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rauz S, Stavrou P, Murray PI (2000) Evaluation of foldable intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmology 107:909\u2013919","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"320_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2096","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01452-9","volume":"28","author":"JL Alio","year":"2002","unstructured":"Alio JL, Chipont E, BenEzra D, Fakhry MA (2002) Comparative performance of intraocular lenses in eyes with cataract and uveitis; the international ocular inflammation Society Study Group of Uveitic cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:2096\u20132210","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01321-4","volume":"28","author":"C Abela-Formanek","year":"2002","unstructured":"Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, Schauersberger J, Kolodjaschna J, Barisani-Asenbaum T, Kruger A (2002) Inflammation after implantation of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, or silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with cataract and uveitis: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1153\u20131159","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR8","first-page":"49","volume":"26","author":"NP Jones","year":"1995","unstructured":"Jones NP (1995) Cataract surgery using heparin surface-modified intraocular lenses in Fuchs\u2019 heterochromic uveitis. Ophthalmic Surg 26:49\u20135218","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg"},{"key":"320_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02583275","volume":"92","author":"CWTA Lardenoye","year":"1996","unstructured":"Lardenoye CWTA, Van der Lelij A, Berendschot TTJM, Rothova A (1996) A retrospective analysis of heparin-surfacemodified intraocular lenses versus regular polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis. Doc Ophthalmol 92:41\u201350","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1097\/APO.0000000000000191","volume":"5","author":"R Bhargava","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bhargava R, Kumar P, Sharma SK, Arora Y (2016) Phacoemulsification Versus Manual small incision cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs Heterochromic Iridocyclitis. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 5(5):330\u2013334","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)"},{"issue":"4","key":"320_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.06.018","volume":"158","author":"S Mehta","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mehta S, Linton MM, Kempen JH (2014) Outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 158(4):676\u2013692","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1080\/09273948.2020.1795207","volume":"30","author":"YMD \u00d6zdamar Erol","year":"2022","unstructured":"\u00d6zdamar Erol YMD, \u0130nan\u00e7 MMD, \u00d6zdal PMD (2022) Fuchs\u2019 Uveitis: is it different from what we know? Ocul Immunol Inflamm 30(1):62\u201367","journal-title":"Ocul Immunol Inflamm"},{"key":"320_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01019-7","volume":"27","author":"J Schauersberger","year":"2001","unstructured":"Schauersberger J, Amon M, Kruger A, Abela C, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J (2001) Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edges. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1579\u20131585","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"320_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.03.057","volume":"140","author":"DA Jabs","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group (2005) Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3):509\u201316","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"320_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01425-6","volume":"28","author":"C Abela-Formanek","year":"2002","unstructured":"Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Nepp J, Schild G (2002) Results of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1141\u20131152","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.08.050","volume":"31","author":"MA Javadi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Javadi MA, Jafarinasab MR, Araghi AA, Mohammadpour M, Yazdani S (2005) Outcomes of phacoemulsification and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation in Fuchs\u2019 heterochromic iridocyclitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(5):997\u20131001","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"320_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.05.010","volume":"32","author":"S Tejwani","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tejwani S, Murthy S, Sangwan VS (2006) Cataract extraction outcomes in patients with Fuchs\u2019 heterochromic cyclitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(10):1678\u20131682","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.04.007","volume":"1484","author":"I Tugal-Tutkun","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tugal-Tutkun I, G\u00fcney-Tefekli E, Kamaci-Duman F, Corum I (2009) A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of Fuchs uveitis syndrome in turkish patients. Am J Ophthalmol 1484:510\u2013515","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"320_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(02)01360-3","volume":"28","author":"C Abela-Formanek","year":"2002","unstructured":"Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Schild G, Kolodjaschna J, Barisani-Asenbauer T, Kruger A (2002) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of 2 foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis or pseudoexfoliation syndrome: comparison to a control group. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1160\u20131172","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(00)00747-1","volume":"26","author":"RJ Linnola","year":"2000","unstructured":"Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK et al (2000) Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 2: explanted intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1807\u20131818","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.3109\/09273948.2015.1047036","volume":"24","author":"K Al Rubaie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Al Rubaie K, Al Dhahri H, Al Fawaz A et al (2016) Incidence and risk factors for developing Glaucoma among patients with Uveitis in a University-based Tertiary Referral Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24(5):571\u2013578","journal-title":"Ocul Immunol Inflamm"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR22","first-page":"532","volume":"31","author":"A Abbouda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abbouda A, Tortorella P, Restivo L et al (2016) Follow-Up study of Over Three Years of patients with Uveitis after Cataract Phacoemulsification: outcomes and complications. Semin Ophthalmol 31(6):532\u2013541","journal-title":"Semin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1080\/08820538.2017.1353815","volume":"33","author":"SM Llop","year":"2018","unstructured":"Llop SM, Papaliodis GN (2018) Cataract surgery complications in Uveitis Patients: a review article. Semin Ophthalmol 33(1):64\u201369","journal-title":"Semin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02170007","volume":"226","author":"M Wenzel","year":"1988","unstructured":"Wenzel M, Reim M, Heinze M, B\u00f6cking A (1988) Cellular invasion on the surface of intraocular lenses. In vivo cytological observations following lens implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226(5):449\u2013454","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"320_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/S0955-3681(89)80004-8","volume":"1","author":"M Wenzl","year":"1989","unstructured":"Wenzl M, Brab M, Reim M, Boecking A (1989) Inflammatory reactions against intraocular lenses: in vivo cytological differentiation. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1:89\u201394","journal-title":"Eur J Implant Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.038","volume":"37","author":"C Abela-Formanek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Kahraman G, Schauersberger J, Dunavoelgyi R (2011) Biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with uveitis having cataract surgery: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):104\u2013112","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"320_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, Schauersberger J, Heinze G, Kruger A (2002) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(1):50\u201361","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01122-1"},{"key":"320_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnston RL, Spalton DJ, Hussain A, Marshall J (1999) In vitro protein adsorption to 2 intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1109\u20131115","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(99)00137-6"},{"key":"320_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roesel M, Heinz C, Heimes B, Koch JM, Heiligenhaus A (2008) Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of two foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with endogenous uveitis--a prospective randomized study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246(11):1609\u201315","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-008-0886-4"},{"key":"320_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80215-5","volume":"21","author":"J Ram","year":"1995","unstructured":"Ram J, Jain S, Pandav SS, Gupta A, Mangat GS (1995) Postoperative complications of intraocular lens implantation in patients with Fuchs\u2019 heterochromic cyclitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 21:548\u2013551","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,14]],"date-time":"2023-02-14T00:03:44Z","timestamp":1676333024000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/joii-journal.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["320"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12348-022-00320-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1869-5760"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1869-5760","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 March 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 February 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Education and Research Hospital. the study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"4"}}