{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T02:21:39Z","timestamp":1792549299869,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]],"date-time":"2021-06-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]],"date-time":"2021-06-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624320000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Anesthesiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The number of caesarean deliveries has been increasing. Although intrathecal morphine (ITM) can relieve pain and is widely applied in caesarean deliveries, it is associated with many side effects. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), a new analgesic technology, has also began playing a certain role after caesarean delivery, with fewer adverse effects. This study mainly compares the analgesic and adverse effects of ITM and TAPB in caesarean delivery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before 9 October, 2020 to compare the effects of ITM and TAPB. Primary outcome of the study was the pain score at rest 24\u2009h after caesarean delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were the pain score at movement 24\u2009h after operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), itching, and morphine consumption. For the outcome assessment, we conducted a sensitivity analysis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Result<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Six RCTs involving 563 patients and meeting the study inclusion criteria were included in this study. Results indicated no significant difference in the pain score between ITM and TAPB at 24\u2009h of rest or movement. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that the resting pain score (95% CI\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u20091.27 to \u2212\u20090.28; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.002) and 24-h moving pain score (95% CI\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u20091.8 to \u2212\u20090.07; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.03) of the ITM group were lower than those of the TAPB group. The consumption of morphine in the ITM group was lower than in the TAPB group (95% CI\u2009=\u20091.92 to 4.87; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001); however, in terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of pruritus (95% CI\u2009=\u20091.17 to 8.26; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.02) and PONV (95% CI\u2009=\u20091.92 to 4.87, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001) in the ITM group was higher than in the TAPB group.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Parturients in the ITM and TAPB groups exhibited similar analgesic effects. However, in the sensitivity analysis performed by eliminating the studies causing heterogeneity, the ITM group was found to have superior analgesic effects compared with the TAPB group, with less morphine consumption. Differently, the TAPB group displayed less side effects such as PONV. Therefore, TAPB is still a valuable analgesia option for patients who cannot use ITM for analgesia after caesarean delivery or those having a high risk of PONV.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Registration number: Registered on Prospero with the registration number of <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/prospero\/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020210135\">CRD42020210135<\/jats:ext-link>.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]],"date-time":"2021-06-22T04:53:38Z","timestamp":1624337618000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Intrathecal morphine versus transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Tao-ran","family":"Yang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xue-mei","family":"He","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xue-han","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ru-rong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-10-78","volume":"10","author":"BS Wang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wang BS, Zhou LF, Coulter D, Liang H, Zhong Y, Guo YN, et al. Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai. China BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):78. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-10-78.","journal-title":"China BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2003.02.012","volume":"16","author":"AY Leung","year":"2004","unstructured":"Leung AY. Postoperative pain management in obstetric anesthesia--new challenges and solutions. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16(1):57\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2003.02.012.","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2008.07.011","volume":"140","author":"JC Eisenach","year":"2008","unstructured":"Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008;140(1):87\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pain.2008.07.011.","journal-title":"Pain"},{"issue":"5","key":"1392_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199011000-00012","volume":"73","author":"B Wittels","year":"1990","unstructured":"Wittels B, Scot DT, Sinatra RS. Exogenous opioids in human breast Milk and acute neonatal NeurobehaviorA preliminary study. Anesthesiology. 1990;73(5):864\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000542-199011000-00012.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"1392_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-198803000-00023","volume":"68","author":"JC EISENACH","year":"1988","unstructured":"EISENACH JC, GRICE SC, DEWAN DM. Patient-controlled analgesia following cesarean SectionA comparison with epidural and intramuscular narcotics. Anesthesiology. 1988;68(3):444\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000542-198803000-00023.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200407000-00024","volume":"101","author":"SS Liu","year":"2004","unstructured":"Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL. Effects of perioperative central Neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass SurgeryA meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):153\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000542-200407000-00024.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"1392_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200511000-00023","volume":"103","author":"CL Wu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wu CL, Cohen SR, Richman JM, Rowlingson AJ, Courpas GE, Cheung K, et al. Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with OpioidsA meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(5):1079\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000542-200511000-00023.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"8","key":"1392_CR8","first-page":"392","volume":"46","author":"Y Lim","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lim Y, Jha S, Sia A, Rawal N. Morphine for post-caesarean section analgesia: intrathecal, epidural or intravenous? Singap Med J. 2005;46(8):392\u20136.","journal-title":"Singap Med J"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000001255","volume":"123","author":"P Sultan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sultan P, Halpern SH, Pushpanathan E, Patel S, Carvalho B. The effect of intrathecal morphine dose on outcomes after elective cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(1):154\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/ANE.0000000000001255.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"2","key":"1392_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12579","volume":"20","author":"TR Deer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Deer TR, Pope JE, Hayek SM, Lamer TJ, Veizi IE, Erdek M, et al. The Polyanalgesic consensus conference (PACC): recommendations for intrathecal drug delivery: guidance for improving safety and mitigating risks. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(2):155\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ner.12579.","journal-title":"Neuromodulation."},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000681","volume":"43","author":"BJ Sanderson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sanderson BJ, Doane MA. Transversus abdominis plane catheters for analgesia following abdominal surgery in adults. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(1):5\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000681.","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3","volume":"106","author":"JG McDonnell","year":"2008","unstructured":"McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):186\u201391 table of contents.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"1392_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3562701","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/3562701","volume":"2018","author":"E Canakci","year":"2018","unstructured":"Canakci E, Gultekin A, Cebeci Z, Hanedan B, Kilinc A. The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane Block versus epidural Block after caesarean delivery: which one is effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block? Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:3562701.","journal-title":"Pain Res Manag"},{"issue":"5","key":"1392_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.15339","volume":"76","author":"E Roofthooft","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M. Anaesthesia PWGotESoR, pain T, et al. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(5):665\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.15339.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"8","key":"1392_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-012-9729-1","volume":"59","author":"BM Mishriky","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59(8):766\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12630-012-9729-1.","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01626-4","volume":"10","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-021-01626-4.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1392_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1016\/S0885-3924(01)00294-9","volume":"22","author":"J Pereira","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pereira J, Lawlor P, Vigano A, Dorgan M, Bruera E. Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids: a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2001;22(2):672\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0885-3924(01)00294-9.","journal-title":"J Pain Symptom Manag"},{"issue":"5","key":"1392_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05169.x","volume":"42","author":"M Silvasti","year":"1998","unstructured":"Silvasti M, Rosenberg P, Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4 T, Svartling N, Pitk\u00e4nen M. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of oxycodone and morphine in postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(5):576\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05169.x.","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"issue":"7414","key":"1392_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557.","journal-title":"Bmj."},{"issue":"oct18 2","key":"1392_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","volume":"343","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.d5928.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"1392_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14467","volume":"74","author":"A Kwikiriza","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kwikiriza A, Kiwanuka JK, Firth PG, Hoeft MA, Modest VE, Ttendo SS. The analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial at a Ugandan regional referral hospital. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(2):167\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.14467.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia."},{"issue":"2","key":"1392_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181e30b9f","volume":"111","author":"GE Kanazi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kanazi GE, Aouad MT, Abdallah FW, Khatib MI, Adham AM, Harfoush DW, et al. The analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(2):475\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181e30b9f.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"5","key":"1392_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aer061","volume":"106","author":"RCN McMorrow","year":"2011","unstructured":"McMorrow RCN, Ni Mhuircheartaigh RJ, Ahmed KA, Aslani A, Ng SC, Conrick-Martin I, et al. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(5):706\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/aer061.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"8","key":"1392_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001013","volume":"36","author":"D Dereu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dereu D, Savoldelli GL, Mercier Y, Combescure C, Mathivon S, Rehberg B. The impact of a transversus abdominis plane block including clonidine vs. intrathecal morphine on nausea and vomiting after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36(8):575\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001013.","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1392_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.02.005","volume":"21","author":"H Loane","year":"2012","unstructured":"Loane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21(2):112\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijoa.2012.02.005.","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"6","key":"1392_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.accpm.2015.10.012","volume":"35","author":"A Jarraya","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jarraya A, Zghal J, Abidi S, Smaoui M, Kolsi K. Subarachnoid morphine versus TAP blocks for enhanced recovery after caesarean section delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain Med. 2016;35(6):391\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.accpm.2015.10.012.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1392_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e318168b443","volume":"107","author":"B Carvalho","year":"2008","unstructured":"Carvalho B. Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(3):956\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/ane.0b013e318168b443.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"Suppl 10","key":"1392_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S151","DOI":"10.1002\/jcph.1113","volume":"58","author":"S Ito","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ito S. Opioids in breast Milk: pharmacokinetic principles and clinical implications. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58(Suppl 10):S151\u2013S63. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jcph.1113.","journal-title":"J Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"1392_CR30","first-page":"8284363","volume":"2017","author":"HC Tsai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, Yang SF, Chang CC, Yao HY, et al. Transversus abdominis plane Block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8284363.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"1392_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1177\/1403494815604765","volume":"44","author":"AS Susuman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Susuman AS, Chialepeh WN, Bado A, Lailulo Y. High infant mortality rate, high total fertility rate and very low female literacy in selected African countries. Scand J Public Health. 2016;44(1):2\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1403494815604765.","journal-title":"Scand J Public Health"}],"container-title":["BMC Anesthesiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]],"date-time":"2021-06-22T04:53:50Z","timestamp":1624337630000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1392"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12871-021-01392-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2253"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2253","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 January 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"174"}}