{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T22:08:54Z","timestamp":1769551734018,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]],"date-time":"2024-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735603200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]],"date-time":"2024-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735603200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100014840","name":"Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["01VSF20032"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["01VSF20032"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100014840","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100014840","name":"Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["01VSF20032"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["01VSF20032"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100014840","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100014840","name":"Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["01VSF20032"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["01VSF20032"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100014840","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008967","name":"Philipps-Universit\u00e4t Marburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008967","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Res Methodol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Health services research often relies on secondary data, necessitating quality checks for completeness, validity, and potential errors before use. Various methods address implausible data, including data elimination, statistical estimation, or value substitution from the same or another dataset. This study presents an internal validation process of a secondary dataset used to investigate hospital compliance with minimum caseload requirements (MCR) in Germany. The secondary data source validated is the German Hospital Quality Reports (GHQR), an official dataset containing structured self-reported data from all hospitals in Germany.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study conducted an internal cross-field validation of MCR-related data in GHQR from 2016 to 2021. The validation process checked the validity of reported MCR caseloads, including data availability and consistency, by comparing the stated MCR caseload with further variables in the GHQR. Subsequently, implausible MCR caseload values were corrected using the most plausible values given in the same GHQR. The study also analysed the error sources and used reimbursement-related Diagnosis Related Groups Statistic data to assess the validation outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The analysis focused on four MCR procedures. 11.8\u201327.7% of the total MCR caseload values in the GHQR appeared ambiguous, and 7.9\u201323.7% were corrected. The correction added 0.7\u20133.7% of cases not previously stated as MCR caseloads and added 1.5\u201326.1% of hospital sites as MCR performing hospitals not previously stated in the GHQR. The main error source was this non-reporting of MCR caseloads, especially by hospitals with low case numbers. The basic plausibility control implemented by the Federal Joint Committee since 2018 has improved the MCR-related data quality over time.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study employed a comprehensive approach to dataset internal validation that encompassed: (1) hospital association level data, (2) hospital site level data and (3) medical department level data, (4) report data spanning six years, and (5) logical plausibility checks. To ensure data completeness, we selected the most plausible values without eliminating incomplete or implausible data. For future practice, we recommend a validation process when using GHQR as a data source for MCR-related research. Additionally, an adapted plausibility control could help to improve the quality of MCR documentation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]],"date-time":"2024-12-31T00:07:51Z","timestamp":1735603671000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Internal validation of self-reported case numbers in hospital quality reports: preparing secondary data for health services research"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Limei","family":"Ji","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Max","family":"Geraedts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Werner","family":"de Crupp\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"S 01","key":"2429_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e145","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-108647","volume":"78","author":"E Swart","year":"2016","unstructured":"Swart E, Bitzer EM, Gothe H, Harling M, Hoffmann F, Horenkamp-Sonntag D, et al. A consensus German reporting standard for secondary data analyses, version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine f\u00fcr Sekund\u00e4rdatenAnalysen). Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany). 2016;78(S 01):e145\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0042-108647.","journal-title":"Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)"},{"issue":"10","key":"2429_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1001885","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001885","volume":"12","author":"EI Benchimol","year":"2015","unstructured":"Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, et al. The Reporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001885.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2429_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1396815","volume":"77","author":"E Swart","year":"2015","unstructured":"Swart E, Gothe H, Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Maier B, Grobe TG, et al. Good practice of secondary data analysis (gps): guidelines and recommendations. Gesundheitswesen. 2015;77:120\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0034-1396815.","journal-title":"Gesundheitswesen"},{"key":"2429_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2013.10.002","volume":"113","author":"U Emanuelson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Emanuelson U, Egenvall A. The data - sources and validation. Prev Vet Med. 2014;113:298\u2013303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2013.10.002.","journal-title":"Prev Vet Med"},{"key":"2429_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1118","DOI":"10.1007\/s00103-008-0646-y","volume":"51","author":"F Hoffmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hoffmann F, Andersohn F, Giersiepen K, Scharnetzky E, Garbe E. Validation of secondary data. Strengths and limitations. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008;51:1118\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00103-008-0646-y.","journal-title":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz"},{"key":"2429_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.4135\/9780857020994.n4","volume-title":"The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology","author":"PD Allison","year":"2009","unstructured":"Allison PD. Missing data. In: Millsap R, Maydeu-Olivares A, editors. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. pp. 72\u201389."},{"key":"2429_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2117","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa035205","volume":"349","author":"JD Birkmeyer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMsa035205.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2429_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1159\/000456042","volume":"33","author":"C Krautz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Krautz C, Denz A, Weber GF, Gr\u00fctzmann R. Influence of hospital volume effects and minimum caseload requirements on quality of care in pancreatic surgery in Germany. Visc Med. 2017;33:131\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000456042.","journal-title":"Visc Med"},{"key":"2429_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s13561-018-0204-8","volume":"8","author":"C Hentschker","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hentschker C, Mennicken R, Reifferscheid A, Wasem J, W\u00fcbker A. Volume-outcome relationship and minimum volume regulations in the German Hospital sector \u2013 evidence from nationwide administrative hospital data for the years 2005\u20132007. Health Econ Rev. 2018;8:25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13561-018-0204-8.","journal-title":"Health Econ Rev"},{"key":"2429_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2018.10.005","volume":"63","author":"D Avdic","year":"2019","unstructured":"Avdic D, Lundborg P, Vikstr\u00f6m J. Estimating returns to hospital volume: evidence from advanced cancer surgery. J Health Econ. 2019;63:81\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2018.10.005.","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"key":"2429_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs5.50173","volume":"3","author":"J Diers","year":"2019","unstructured":"Diers J, Wagner J, Baum P, Lichthardt S, Kastner C, Matthes N, et al. Nationwide in-hospital mortality following colonic cancer resection according to hospital volume in Germany. BJS Open. 2019;3:672\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs5.50173.","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"2429_CR12","unstructured":"Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA). Regelungen des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 136b Absatz 1 Satz 1 Nummer 2, 108 SGB V zugelassene Krankenh\u00e4user. (Mindestmengenregelungen, Mm-R). SGB V f\u00fcr nach \u00a7. https:\/\/www.g-ba.de\/richtlinien\/5\/. Accessed 28 Mar 2024)."},{"key":"2429_CR13","unstructured":"Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA). Regelungen des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 136b Absatz 1 Satz 1. SGB V \u00fcber Inhalt, Umfang und Datenformat eines strukturierten Qualit\u00e4tsberichts f\u00fcr nach \u00a7-Nummer 3, 108. SGB V zugelassene Krankenh\u00e4user (Regelungen zum Qualit\u00e4tsbericht der Krankenh\u00e4user, Qb-R). https:\/\/www.g-ba.de\/richtlinien\/39\/. Accessed 28 Mar 2024)."},{"key":"2429_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1383371","volume":"141","author":"W de Crupp\u00e9","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Crupp\u00e9 W, Geraedts M. How steady are hospitals in complying with minimum volume standards? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis of the years 2006, 2008, and 2010. Zentralbl Chir. 2016;141:425\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0034-1383371.","journal-title":"Zentralbl Chir"},{"key":"2429_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1555953","volume":"79","author":"RA Kraska","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kraska RA, de Crupp\u00e9 W, Geraedts M. Problems with using hospital quality reports as a secondary data source for health services research in Germany. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;79:542\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0035-1555953.","journal-title":"Gesundheitswesen"},{"key":"2429_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.3238\/arztebl.2014.0549","volume":"111","author":"W de Crupp\u00e9","year":"2014","unstructured":"de Crupp\u00e9 W, Malik M, Geraedts M. Achieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004\u20132010. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:549\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3238\/arztebl.2014.0549.","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"2429_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.3238\/arztebl.2014.0556","volume":"111","author":"D Peschke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Peschke D, Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Achieving minimum caseload requirements-an analysis of hospital discharge data from 2005\u20132011. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:556\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3238\/arztebl.2014.0556.","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"2429_CR18","unstructured":"Federal Statistical Office of Germany. Diagnosis-related groups statistic. https:\/\/www.forschungsdatenzentrum.de\/en\/health\/drg. Accessed 28 Mar 2024."},{"key":"2429_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ji L, Geraedts M, de Crupp\u00e9 W. A theoretical framework for linking hospitals longitudinally: demonstrated using German Hospital Quality Reports 2016\u20132020. BMC Med Res. 2024;212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02317-z.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-024-02317-z"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Research Methodology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]],"date-time":"2024-12-31T01:03:11Z","timestamp":1735606991000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2429"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02429-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2288"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2288","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 August 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The Ethics Committee of the Philipps-Universita\u0308t Marburg evaluated the study and concluded that no formal ethical approval was necessary as the secondary database used for analyses followed all German legal data protection regulations. (AZ: RS21\/85).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"325"}}