{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,11]],"date-time":"2026-11-11T00:50:11Z","timestamp":1794358211338,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771632000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775606400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":46,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Western University, Canada","id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/02grkyz14","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Res Methodol"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T12:32:32Z","timestamp":1771677152000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Statistical analysis of Likert-based ordinal scales: a guide for clinical trialists"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"26","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0376-2214","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ahmed A.","family":"Al-Jaishi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0171-5855","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Meaghan S.","family":"Cuerden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0608-9793","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bin","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3908-1955","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pavel S.","family":"Roshanov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3398-3114","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amit X.","family":"Garg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"2793_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.04.006","volume":"37","author":"R Masterson Creber","year":"2021","unstructured":"Masterson Creber R, Spadaccio C, Dimagli A, Myers A, Taylor B, Fremes S. Patient-Reported outcomes in cardiovascular trials. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(9):1340\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjca.2021.04.006.","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2793_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.21903","volume":"319","author":"M Calvert","year":"2018","unstructured":"Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, et al. Guidelines for inclusion of Patient-Reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: the SPIRIT-PRO extension. JAMA. 2018;319(5):483\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2017.21903.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2793_CR3","unstructured":"Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Devji T et al. Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 6.5. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane; 2024. https:\/\/training.cochrane.org\/handbook\/current\/chapter-18. Accessed September 25, 2024."},{"key":"2793_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10134","DOI":"10.3389\/ti.2022.10134","volume":"35","author":"A Tong","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tong A, Oberbauer R, Bellini MI, et al. Patient-Reported outcomes as endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation interventions. Transpl Int. 2022;35:10134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/ti.2022.10134.","journal-title":"Transpl Int"},{"issue":"10364","key":"2793_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1693","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01805-0","volume":"400","author":"AX Garg","year":"2022","unstructured":"Garg AX, Al-Jaishi AA, Dixon SN, et al. Personalised cooler dialysate for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis (MyTEMP): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2022;400(10364):1693\u2013703. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01805-0.","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"2793_CR6","unstructured":"NIH Collaboratory. NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory. Rethinking Clinical Trials. 2024. https:\/\/rethinkingclinicaltrials.org\/about-nih-collaboratory\/. Accessed September 27, 2024."},{"key":"2793_CR7","unstructured":"Western University. Pragmatic Trials Training Program. https:\/\/www.schulich.uwo.ca\/pragmatictrialstraining\/index.html. Accessed September 27. 2024."},{"key":"2793_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Winter JCF. Five-Point likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Addendum added October 2012). Pract Assess Res Eval. 2010;15(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7275\/bj1p-ts64.","DOI":"10.7275\/bj1p-ts64"},{"key":"2793_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests | The BMJ. https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/315\/7104\/364.long. Accessed September 30, 2024.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7104.364"},{"key":"2793_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Agresti A. Ordinal Probabilities, Scores, and odds ratios. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 9\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch2.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch2"},{"key":"2793_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Agresti A. Logistic regression models using cumulative logits. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 44\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch3.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch3"},{"key":"2793_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Agresti A. Clustered ordinal responses: marginal models. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 262\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch9.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch9"},{"key":"2793_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Agresti A. Clustered ordinal responses: random effects models. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 281\u2013314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch10.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch10"},{"key":"2793_CR14","unstructured":"International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Addendum on Estimands and Sensitivity Analysis in Clinical Trials to the Guideline on Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E9 (R1). ICH. 2019. https:\/\/www.ich.org\/page\/efficacy-guidelines."},{"key":"2793_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e076316","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-076316","volume":"384","author":"BC Kahan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kahan BC, Hindley J, Edwards M, Cro S, Morris TP. The estimands framework: a primer on the ICH E9(R1) addendum. BMJ. 2024;384:e076316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj-2023-076316.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2793_CR16","unstructured":"Food US, Administration D. Guidance for industry: E9 statistical principles for clinical trials. FDA; 1998. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/71336\/download."},{"key":"2793_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-022-06515-2","volume":"23","author":"H Lynggaard","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lynggaard H, Bell J, L\u00f6sch C, et al. Principles and recommendations for incorporating estimands into clinical study protocol templates. Trials. 2022;23:685. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-022-06515-2.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"20","key":"2793_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1546","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067786","volume":"149","author":"J Butler","year":"2024","unstructured":"Butler J, Stockbridge N, Packer M. Win ratio: A seductive but potentially misleading method for evaluating evidence from clinical trials. Circulation. 2024;149(20):1546\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067786.","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"issue":"5","key":"2793_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1177\/17407745241259356","volume":"21","author":"L Mao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mao L. Defining estimand for the win ratio: separate the true effect from censoring. Clin Trials Lond Engl. 2024;21(5):584\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17407745241259356.","journal-title":"Clin Trials Lond Engl"},{"key":"2793_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Even M, Josse J. Rethinking the Win Ratio: A Causal Framework for Hierarchical Outcome Analysis. arXiv. Preprint posted online January 28, 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2501.16933.","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2501.16933"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-15-139","volume":"15","author":"BC Kahan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kahan BC, Jairath V, Dor\u00e9 CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1):139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1745-6215-15-139.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-024-02375-3","volume":"24","author":"Y Gao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gao Y, Liu Y, Matsouaka R. When does adjusting covariate under randomization help? A comparative study on current practices. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024;24(1):250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-024-02375-3.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2793_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6813","volume":"35","author":"F Li","year":"2016","unstructured":"Li F, Lokhnygina Y, Murray DM, Heagerty PJ, DeLong ER. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Stat Med. 2016;35(10):1565\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.6813.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"24","key":"2793_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3791","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.7410","volume":"36","author":"F Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li F, Turner EL, Heagerty PJ, Murray DM, Vollmer WM, DeLong ER. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med. 2017;36(24):3791\u2013806. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.7410.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-024-08072-2","volume":"25","author":"CJ Selman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Selman CJ, Lee KJ, Ferguson KN, Whitehead CL, Manley BJ, Mahar RK. Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review. Trials. 2024;25(1):241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-024-08072-2.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"21","key":"2793_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006533","volume":"91","author":"J Maguire","year":"2018","unstructured":"Maguire J, Attia J. Which version of the modified Rankin scale should we use for stroke trials? Neurology. 2018;91(21):947\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006533.","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"issue":"21","key":"2793_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1951","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006554","volume":"91","author":"A Ganesh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ganesh A, Luengo-Fernandez R, Wharton RM, Rothwell PM, on behalf of the Oxford Vascular Study. Ordinal vs dichotomous analyses of modified Rankin Scale, 5-year outcome, and cost of stroke. Neurology. 2018;91(21):e1951\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1212\/WNL.0000000000006554.","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989x.7.1.19","volume":"7","author":"RC MacCallum","year":"2002","unstructured":"MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):19\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1082-989x.7.1.19.","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"2793_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Harrell FE. Ordinal Logistic Regression. In: Harrell FE, ed. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer International Publishing; 2015:311\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7_13.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7_13"},{"key":"2793_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Harrell FE. Case study in ordinal Regression, data Reduction, and penalization. In: Harrell E Jr, editor. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear Models, logistic and ordinal Regression, and survival analysis. Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 327\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7_14.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7_14"},{"issue":"3","key":"2793_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/cc10240","volume":"15","author":"B Roozenbeek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Perel P, et al. The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2011;15(3):1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/cc10240.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"2793_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1177\/014662168300700301","volume":"7","author":"J Cohen","year":"1983","unstructured":"Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Meas. 1983;7(3):249\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014662168300700301.","journal-title":"Appl Psychol Meas"},{"issue":"7549","key":"2793_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7549.1080","volume":"332","author":"DG Altman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1080. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.332.7549.1080.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2793_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-12-21","volume":"12","author":"C Bennette","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bennette C, Vickers A. Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-12-21.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2793_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a008944","volume":"144","author":"U Str\u00f6mberg","year":"1996","unstructured":"Str\u00f6mberg U. Collapsing ordered outcome categories: A note of concern. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(4):421\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a008944.","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-015-0028-8","volume":"15","author":"O Sauzet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sauzet O, Ofuya M, Peacock JL. Dichotomisation using a distributional approach when the outcome is skewed. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):40. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-015-0028-8.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"12","key":"2793_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x","volume":"42","author":"J Carifio","year":"2008","unstructured":"Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing likert scales. Med Educ. 2008;42(12):1150\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x.","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"issue":"5","key":"2793_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-010-9222-y","volume":"15","author":"G Norman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the laws of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(5):625\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10459-010-9222-y.","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract"},{"key":"2793_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear Models, logistic and ordinal Regression, and survival analysis. Springer International Publishing; 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19425-7"},{"issue":"6","key":"2793_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.2307\/3001968","volume":"1","author":"F Wilcoxon","year":"1945","unstructured":"Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull. 1945;1(6):80\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/3001968.","journal-title":"Biom Bull"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177730491","volume":"18","author":"HB Mann","year":"1947","unstructured":"Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat. 1947;18(1):50\u201360.","journal-title":"Ann Math Stat"},{"key":"2793_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Other Ordinal Logistic Regression Models. In. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 88\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch4.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch4"},{"key":"2793_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Modeling Ordinal Association Structure. In. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. pp. 145\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470594001.ch6.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470594001.ch6"},{"issue":"2","key":"2793_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.113.003151","volume":"45","author":"VW Rahlfs","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rahlfs VW, Zimmermann H, Lees KR. Effect size measures and their relationships in stroke studies. Stroke. 2014;45(2):627\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.113.003151.","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"3","key":"2793_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1002\/pst.2280","volume":"22","author":"G Zou","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zou G, Zou L, Qiu SF. Parametric and nonparametric methods for confidence intervals and sample size planning for win probability in parallel-group randomized trials with likert item and likert scale data. Pharm Stat. 2023;22(3):418\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pst.2280.","journal-title":"Pharm Stat"},{"issue":"14","key":"2793_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3227","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.8918","volume":"40","author":"G Zou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zou G. Confidence interval Estimation for treatment effects in cluster randomization trials based on ranks. Stat Med. 2021;40(14):3227\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.8918.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2793_CR47","unstructured":"Yu C. Nonparametric Methods for Analysis and Sizing of Cluster Randomization Trials with Baseline Measurements. Western University; 2023. https:\/\/ir.lib.uwo.ca\/etd\/9697. Accessed September 30, 2024."},{"issue":"30","key":"2793_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3245","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3923","volume":"29","author":"M Buyse","year":"2010","unstructured":"Buyse M. Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem. Stat Med. 2010;29(30):3245\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.3923.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"2793_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1080\/10543406.2022.2089156","volume":"33","author":"J Song","year":"2023","unstructured":"Song J, Verbeeck J, Huang B, et al. The win odds: statistical inference and regression. J Biopharm Stat. 2023;33(2):140\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10543406.2022.2089156.","journal-title":"J Biopharm Stat"},{"issue":"3","key":"2793_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1002\/pst.1743","volume":"15","author":"D Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang D, Pocock S. A win ratio approach to comparing continuous non-normal outcomes in clinical trials. Pharm Stat. 2016;15(3):238\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pst.1743.","journal-title":"Pharm Stat"},{"issue":"2","key":"2793_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehr352","volume":"33","author":"SJ Pocock","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, Collier TJ, Wang D. The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(2):176\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehr352.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"2793_CR52","unstructured":"Bob Derr. Ordinal Response Modeling with the LOGISTIC Procedure, SAS Institute Inc. 2013. http:\/\/support.sas.com\/resources\/papers\/proceedings13\/446-2013.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2024."},{"key":"2793_CR53","unstructured":"Harrell F. Equivalence of Wilcoxon Statistic and Proportional Odds Model. Statistical Thinking. April 6, 2022. https:\/\/www.fharrell.com\/post\/powilcoxon\/. Accessed December 12, 2024."},{"issue":"429","key":"2793_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.2307\/2291161","volume":"90","author":"EB Holmgren","year":"1995","unstructured":"Holmgren EB. The P-P plot as a method for comparing treatment effects. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90(429):360\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2291161.","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"2793_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2307\/2334448","volume":"55","author":"MB Wilk","year":"1968","unstructured":"Wilk MB, Gnanadesikan R. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika. 1968;55(1):1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2334448.","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"2793_CR56","unstructured":"SAS Institute Inc. Plotting empirical (observed) logits for binary and ordinal response data. https:\/\/support.sas.com\/kb\/37\/944.html. Accessed September 30. 2024."},{"issue":"4","key":"2793_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.2307\/2532457","volume":"46","author":"R Brant","year":"1990","unstructured":"Brant R. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics. 1990;46(4):1171\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2532457.","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"2793_CR58","unstructured":"Harrell F. Assessing the Proportional Odds Assumption and Its Impact. Statistical Thinking. March 9, 2022. https:\/\/www.fharrell.com\/post\/impactpo\/#examining-the-po-assumption. Accessed October 29, 2024."},{"key":"2793_CR59","unstructured":"22954 - The PROC LOGISTIC proportional odds test and fitting a partial proportional odds model. https:\/\/support.sas.com\/kb\/22\/954.html. Accessed October 24. 2024."},{"issue":"2","key":"2793_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.2307\/2347760","volume":"39","author":"B Peterson","year":"1990","unstructured":"Peterson B, Harrell FE Jr. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 1990;39(2):205\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2347760.","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat"},{"key":"2793_CR61","unstructured":"Harrell F. Borrowing Information Across Outcomes. Statistical Thinking. April 30, 2024. https:\/\/www.fharrell.com\/post\/yborrow\/?utm_source=chatgpt.com. Accessed June 2, 2025."},{"issue":"6","key":"2793_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1747-4949.2011.00614.x","volume":"6","author":"P Bath","year":"2011","unstructured":"Optimising the Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration with the Writing Committee, Bath P, Hogg C, Tracy M, Pocock S. Calculation of numbers-needed-to-treat in parallel group trials assessing ordinal outcomes: case examples from acute stroke and stroke prevention. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2011;6(6):472\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1747-4949.2011.00614.x.","journal-title":"Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc"},{"key":"2793_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2054358119887988","volume":"7","author":"AA Al-Jaishi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Al-Jaishi AA, McIntyre CW, Sontrop JM, et al. Major outcomes with personalized dialysate temperature (MyTEMP): rationale and design of a pragmatic, registry-based, cluster randomized controlled trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020;7:1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2054358119887988.","journal-title":"Can J Kidney Health Dis"},{"key":"2793_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205435812110411","DOI":"10.1177\/20543581211041182","volume":"8","author":"S Dixon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dixon S, Sontrop J, Al-Jaishi A, et al. MyTEMP: statistical analysis plan of a Registry-Based, Cluster-Randomized clinical trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021;8:205435812110411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20543581211041182.","journal-title":"Can J Kidney Health Dis"},{"key":"2793_CR65","unstructured":"R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Published online 2024. https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/."},{"issue":"11","key":"2793_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3189","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/gfl380","volume":"21","author":"SN Davison","year":"2006","unstructured":"Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA. Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2006;21(11):3189\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ndt\/gfl380.","journal-title":"Nephrol Dial Transpl"},{"key":"2793_CR67","unstructured":"Harrell F. Statistical Thinking - Violation of Proportional Odds is Not Fatal. September 20, 2020. https:\/\/www.fharrell.com\/post\/po\/. Accessed September 30, 2024."},{"issue":"11","key":"2793_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2074","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.8086","volume":"38","author":"TP Morris","year":"2019","unstructured":"Morris TP, White IR, Crowther MJ. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Stat Med. 2019;38(11):2074\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.8086.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"24","key":"2793_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2257","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780122404","volume":"12","author":"J Whitehead","year":"1993","unstructured":"Whitehead J. Sample size calculations for ordered categorical data. Stat Med. 1993;12(24):2257\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.4780122404.","journal-title":"Stat Med"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Research Methodology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T11:43:20Z","timestamp":1775648600000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2793"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-026-02793-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2288"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2288","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 April 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and provided their consent for publication.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"78"}}