{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T14:51:28Z","timestamp":1792075888898,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":87,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,30]],"date-time":"2018-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1532908800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Fam Pract"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,30]],"date-time":"2018-07-30T11:56:05Z","timestamp":1532951765000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["Endometrial sampling in low-risk patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-synthesis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0033-6375","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Brenda F.","family":"Narice","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brigitte","family":"Delaney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon M.","family":"Dickson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"817_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Munro M, Critchley H, Broder M, Fraser ID. ftFWGoM. FIGO classification system (FIGO-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3-13.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.11.011"},{"key":"817_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1586\/17474108.4.2.179","volume":"4","author":"I Fraser","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fraser I, Langham SU-HK. Health-related quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;4:179\u201389.","journal-title":"Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR3","first-page":"359","volume":"54","author":"M Shapley","year":"2004","unstructured":"Shapley M, Jordan KCP. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:359\u201363.","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"817_CR4","first-page":"155","volume":"8ii","author":"R Garside","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garside R, Stein K, Wyatt K, Round APA. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microwave and thermal balloon endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2004;8ii:155.","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess (Rockv)"},{"key":"817_CR5","unstructured":"McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J, Royal College of General Practitioners GB S. OoPCa. Morbidity statistics from general practice: fourth national study. 1995."},{"key":"817_CR6","unstructured":"Royal college of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Heavy menstrual bleeding audit second annual report. 2012."},{"key":"817_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kai J, Middleton L, Daniels J, Pattison H, Tryposkiadis K, Gupta J, et al. Usual medical treatments or levonorgestrel-IUS for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: long-term randomised pragmatic trial in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(653):e861-e70. Epub 2016 Oct 10.","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp16X687577"},{"key":"817_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2017-101910","volume":"43","author":"J Dickson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dickson J, Delaney B, Connor M. Primary care endometrial sampling for abnormal uterine bleeding: a pilot study. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2017;43:247\u20138.","journal-title":"J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care"},{"key":"817_CR9","first-page":"CD002126","volume":"19","author":"A Lethaby","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lethaby A, Cooke IRM. Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;19:CD002126.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"817_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13226.x","volume":"107","author":"A Weeks","year":"2000","unstructured":"Weeks A, Duffy SWJ. A double-blind randomised trial of leuprorelin acetate prior to hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:323\u20138.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01282.x","volume":"109","author":"M Maresh","year":"2002","unstructured":"Maresh M, Metcalfe M, McPherson K, Overton C, Hall V, Hargreaves J, et al. The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109:302\u201312.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pitkin J. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. BMJ. 2007;334(7603):1110\u20131.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39203.399502.BE"},{"key":"817_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7303.24","volume":"323","author":"P Warner","year":"2001","unstructured":"Warner P, Critchey H, Lumsden M, Cambell-Brown M, Dougas AMG. Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of symptoms, reasons for referral and management. BMJ. 2001;323:24\u20138.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"817_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02190.x","volume":"36","author":"CM Farquhar","year":"1996","unstructured":"Farquhar CM, Kimble RMN. How do New Zealand Gynaecologists treat menorrhagia? Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:444\u20137. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02190.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lumsden M, Gebbie AHC. Managing unscheduled bleeding in non-pregnant premenopausal women. BMJ. 2013;346. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.f3251\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f3251"},{"key":"817_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bignardi T, Van den Bosch T, Condous G. Abnormal uterine and post-menopausal bleeding in the acute gynaecology unit. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;595-607. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.05.001\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.05.001"},{"key":"817_CR17","unstructured":"Cancer Research UK. Uterine Cancer incidence statistics: uterine cancer incidence trends over time 2014. \n                    http:\/\/www.cancerresearchuk.org\/health-professional\/cancer-statistics\/statistics-by-cancer-type\/uterine-cancer\/incidence#ref-2\n                    \n                  . (accessed 19 Jan 2017)."},{"key":"817_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.006","volume":"215","author":"MR Wise","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wise MR, Gill P, Lensen S, Thompson JMD, Farquhar CM. Body mass index trumps age in decision for endometrial biopsy: cohort study of symptomatic premenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:598.e1\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.006\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cooper N, Barton P, Breijer M, Caffrey O, Opmeer B, Timmermans A, Cooper NA, Barton PM, Breijer M, Caffrey O, Opmeer BC. et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and post-menopausal bleeding): a decision analysis 2014;18. doi:\n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta18240\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.3310\/hta18240"},{"key":"817_CR20","unstructured":"National Insititute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referra. 2015."},{"key":"817_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Julian S, Naftalin N, Clark M, Szczepura A, Rashid A, Baker R, et al. An integrated care pathway for menorrhagia across the primary\u2013secondary interface: patients\u2019 experience, clinical outcomes, and service utilisation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2007;16(2):110\u20135.","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.2005.016782"},{"key":"817_CR22","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Standards for Gynaecology. 2008."},{"key":"817_CR23","first-page":"145","volume":"26","author":"RSA Rauf","year":"2004","unstructured":"Rauf RSA, Sadia S, Waqar F, Zafar S, Sultana SWS. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2004;26:145\u20138.","journal-title":"J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad"},{"key":"817_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.4103\/0256-4947.51721","volume":"28","author":"S Fakhar","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fakhar S, Saeed G, Khan AH, Alam AY. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28:188\u201391.","journal-title":"Ann Saudi Med"},{"key":"817_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(00)80018-2","volume":"27","author":"JM Cooper","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cooper JM, Erickson ML. Endometrial sampling techniques in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000;27:235\u201344. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0889-8545(00)80018-2\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"817_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90744-9","volume":"165","author":"TG Stovall","year":"1991","unstructured":"Stovall TG, Ling FW, Morgan PL. A prospective, randomized comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Novak curette. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1287\u201390. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90351-Q\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR27","first-page":"293","volume":"75","author":"P Koonings","year":"1990","unstructured":"Koonings P, Moyer DL, Grimes DA. A randomised clinical trial comparing Pipelle and tis-u-trap for endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;75:293.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR28","first-page":"427","volume":"33","author":"AM Kaunitz","year":"1988","unstructured":"Kaunitz AM, Masciello A, Ostrowski M, Rovira EZ. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator. J Reprod Med. 1988;33:427\u201331.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"817_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1080\/j.1600-0412.1998.770712.x","volume":"77","author":"B Moberger","year":"1998","unstructured":"Moberger B, Nilsson S, Palmstierna S, Redvall L, Sternby N. Amulticenter study comparing two endometrial sampling devices - Medscand Endorette TM and Pipelle De cornier R. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:764\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1998.770712.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"817_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01773.x","volume":"115","author":"ARW Williams","year":"2008","unstructured":"Williams ARW, Brechin S, Porter AJL, Warner P, Critchley HOD. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao brush endometrial sampling. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:1028\u201336. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01773.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02658-9","volume":"72","author":"J Antoni","year":"1997","unstructured":"Antoni J, Folch E, Costa J, Foradada CM, Cayuela E, Combalia N, et al. Comparison of cytospat and pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;72:57\u201361. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02658-9\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"817_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70234-9","volume":"170","author":"GH Lipscomb","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lipscomb GH, Lopatine SM, Stovall TG, Ling FW. A randomized comparison of the Pipelle, Accurette, and Explora endometrial sampling devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:591\u20134. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70234-9\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain CCG. The question. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: a Practical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 9.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511543500"},{"key":"817_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)80043-5","volume":"148","author":"E Cornier","year":"1984","unstructured":"Cornier E. The Pipelle: a disposable device for endometrial biopsy. Am J Obs Gynecol. 1984;148:109\u201310.","journal-title":"Am J Obs Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR35","unstructured":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions | Cochrane Training n.d. \n                    http:\/\/training.cochrane.org\/handbook\n                    \n                   (accessed 12 July 2017)."},{"key":"817_CR36","unstructured":"West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence: Summary. In: AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 1998-2005. 2002;47. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK11930\/\n                    \n                  ."},{"key":"817_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macones G. How accurate if Pipelle sampling: a study by Huang et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(3):280-1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.02.003"},{"key":"817_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.2005.029702","volume":"59","author":"WG McCluggage","year":"2006","unstructured":"McCluggage WG. My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:801\u201312. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jcp.2005.029702\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"817_CR39","unstructured":"Seamark CJ. Endometrial sampling in general practice. Br J Gen Pract [Internet]. 1998;48:434. Available from: \n                    http:\/\/bjgp.org\/content\/48\/434\/1597\/tab-pdf\n                    \n                  ."},{"key":"817_CR40","first-page":"786","volume":"34","author":"I Henig","year":"1989","unstructured":"Henig I, Tredway DR, Maw GM, Gullett AJ, Cheatwood M, C P. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:786\u20139.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"817_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1159\/000292495","volume":"38","author":"CG Zorlu","year":"1994","unstructured":"Zorlu CG, Cobanoglu O, I\u015fik AZ, Kutluay L, Ku\u015f\u00e7u E. Accuracy of Pipelle endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1994;38:272\u20135.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"key":"817_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02060.x","volume":"33","author":"J Ferry","year":"1993","unstructured":"Ferry J, Farnsworth A, Webster M, Wren B. The efficacy of the Pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;33:76\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02060.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR43","first-page":"142","volume":"33","author":"O Sany","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sany O, Singh K, Jha S. Correlation between preoperative endometrial sampling and final endometrial cancer histology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33:142\u20134.","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"817_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.09.035","volume":"196","author":"GS Huang","year":"2007","unstructured":"Huang GS, Gebb JS, Einstein MH, Shahabi S, Novetsky AP, Goldberg GL. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:243.e1\u20135. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.09.035\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.06.023","volume":"159","author":"S Daud","year":"2011","unstructured":"Daud S, Jalil SSA, Griffin M, Ewies AAA. Endometrial hyperplasia \u2013 the dilemma of management remains: a retrospective observational study of 280 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:172\u20135. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.06.023\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"817_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2014.970524","volume":"35","author":"H Liu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Liu H, Wang FL, Zhao YM, Yao YQ, Li YL. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35:508\u201311.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.12892\/ejgot24972014","volume":"35","author":"K Gungorduk","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Ertas IE, Ozdemir LA, Ulker MM, Yildirim G, et al. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and pipelle biopsy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35:539\u201343. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12892\/ejgot24972014\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"817_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2012.719944","volume":"32","author":"M Kazandi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, et al. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:790\u20134. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/01443615.2012.719944\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2438-8","volume":"286","author":"F Demirkiran","year":"2012","unstructured":"Demirkiran F, Yavuz E, Erenel H, Bese T, Arvas M, Sanioglu C. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1277\u201382. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2438-8\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"817_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1159\/000292573","volume":"37","author":"G Ben-Baruch","year":"1994","unstructured":"Ben-Baruch G, Seidman DS, Schiff E, Moran O, Menczer J. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1994;37:260\u20132.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"key":"817_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02926.x","volume":"36","author":"Z Kavak","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kavak Z, Ceyhan N, Pekin S. Combination of vaginal ultrasonography and pipelle sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease. Aust NZ Obs Gynaecol. 1996;36:63.","journal-title":"Aust NZ Obs Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/S2305-0500(13)60115-3","volume":"2","author":"IA Abdelazim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Abdelazim IA, Elezz AA, Abdelkarim AF. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation &amp; curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Asian Pacific J Reprod. 2013;2:45\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2305-0500(13)60115-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Asian Pacific J Reprod"},{"key":"817_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1159\/000444711","volume":"81","author":"M Rezk","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rezk M, Sayyed T, Dawood R. The effectiveness and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling versus classical dilatation and curettage: a three-year observational study. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2016;81:537\u201342. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000444711\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Investig"},{"key":"817_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02458.x","volume":"97","author":"HA Eddowes","year":"1990","unstructured":"Eddowes HA, Read MD, Codling BW. Pipelle: a more acceptable technique for outpatient endometrial biopsy. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:961\u20132. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02458.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00699.x","volume":"47","author":"NM Naim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Naim NM, Ahmad S, Razi ZR, M ZA. The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient endometrial sampling. Aust N Z J Obs Gynaecol. 2007;47:132\u20136.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obs Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90884-4","volume":"168","author":"GC Rodriguez","year":"1993","unstructured":"Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME. A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: The Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:55\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90884-4\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Critchley HOD, Warner P, Lee AJ, Brechin S, Guise J, Graham B. Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding: comparison of three outpatient procedures within cohorts defined by age and menopausal status. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(34):8.","DOI":"10.3310\/hta8340"},{"key":"817_CR58","first-page":"1005","volume":"47","author":"GC Yang","year":"2003","unstructured":"Yang GC, Del Priore G, W LS. Factors influencing the detection of uterine cancer by suction curettage and endometrial brushing. J Reprod Med. 2003;47:1005\u201310.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"817_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-200109000-00014","volume":"56","author":"G Del Priore","year":"2001","unstructured":"Del Priore G, Willliams R, Harbatkin CB, Wan LS, Mittal K, Yang GCH. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56:548\u20139.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"817_CR60","first-page":"109","volume":"45","author":"GC Yang","year":"2000","unstructured":"Yang GC, Wan LS. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:109\u201314.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"817_CR61","first-page":"828","volume":"78","author":"MM Silver","year":"1991","unstructured":"Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:828\u201330.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad45b","volume":"117","author":"CM Leclair","year":"2011","unstructured":"Leclair CM, Zia JK, Doom CM, Morgan TK, Edelman AB. Pain experienced using two different methods of endometrial biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:636\u201341. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad45b\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701718941","volume":"27","author":"A Bhide","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bhide A, Gangji A, Anyanwu L. Endometrial biopsy: A pilot study of instrument used; Pipelle vs infant feeding tube. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:838\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443610701718941\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR64","unstructured":"Masood H, Ashraf S, Masood MS. Frequency of positive endometrial pipelle biopsies in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding for detection of endometrial carcinoma Pak J Med Health Sci. 2015;9:256\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/c724\/5b497b4f5771a8e4356db03be05fc8a0f760.pdf\n                    \n                  . Accessed Apr 2017."},{"key":"817_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.5603\/GP.2016.0044","volume":"87","author":"S Piatek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Piatek S, Panek G, Wielgo\u015b M. Assessment of the usefulness of pipelle biopsy in gynecological diagnostics. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87:559\u201364. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5603\/GP.2016.0044\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"key":"817_CR66","first-page":"279","volume":"24","author":"F Machado","year":"2003","unstructured":"Machado F, Moreno J, Carazo M, Le\u00f3n J, Fiol G, Serna R. Accuracy of endometrial biopsy with the cornier pipelle for diagnosis of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24:279\u201381.","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"817_CR67","first-page":"553","volume":"40","author":"RS Guido","year":"1995","unstructured":"Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:553\u20135.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"817_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4971","DOI":"10.7314\/APJCP.2015.16.12.4971","volume":"16","author":"M Sanam","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sanam M, Majid M. Comparison the diagnostic value of dilatation and curettage versus endometrial biopsy by Pipelle--a clinical trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:4971\u20135. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7314\/APJCP.2015.16.12.4971\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Asian Pac J Cancer Prev"},{"key":"817_CR69","first-page":"727","volume":"82","author":"R Goldchmit","year":"1993","unstructured":"Goldchmit R, Katz Z, Blickstein I, Caspi B, Dgani R. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:727\u201330.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.027","volume":"203","author":"MTY Seto","year":"2016","unstructured":"Seto MTY, Ip PPC, Ngu S-F, Cheung ANY, Pun T-C. Positive predictive value of endometrial polyps in Pipelle aspiration sampling: a histopathological study of 195 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:12\u20135. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.027\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"817_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.026","volume":"134","author":"V Polena","year":"2007","unstructured":"Polena V, Mergui J-L, Zerat L, Sananes S. The role of Pipelle\u00ae Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134:233\u20137. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.026\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"#cr-split#-817_CR72.1","unstructured":"Shams, G. Comparison of Pipelle de Cornier with conventional dilatation and curettage in terms of patients' acceptability. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute ;Peshawar. 2012: 26"},{"key":"#cr-split#-817_CR72.2","unstructured":"(4) [cited 2017 Jun 22]. Available from:   http:\/\/www.jpmi.org.pk\/index.php\/jpmi\/article\/view\/1377"},{"key":"817_CR73","first-page":"345","volume":"95","author":"MP Trolice","year":"2000","unstructured":"Trolice MP, Fishburne CJR, McGrady S. Anesthetic efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine for endometrial biopsy: a randomized double-masked trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:345\u20137.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR74","first-page":"315","volume":"76","author":"G Frishman","year":"1990","unstructured":"Frishman G, Jacobs S. A randomized clinical trial comparing Pipelle and tis-U-trap for endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:315\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03460.x","volume":"39","author":"SJ Gordon","year":"1999","unstructured":"Gordon SJ, Westgate J. The incidence and Management of Failed Pipelle Sampling in a general outpatient clinic. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39:115\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03460.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1159\/000060286","volume":"20","author":"P Brandner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Brandner P, Neis KJ. Diagnosis of endometrial Cancer and its precursors. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 2000;20:27\u201340.","journal-title":"Contrib Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"817_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(94)90128-7","volume":"45","author":"MC Dantas","year":"1994","unstructured":"Dantas MC, Hidalgo MM, Bahamondes L, Marchi NM. A comparison of the performance of endometrial biopsy with the Pipelle\u00ae by nurses and physicians. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1994;45:164\u20135. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0020-7292(94)90128-7\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"817_CR78","first-page":"198","volume":"54","author":"SN Youssif","year":"1995","unstructured":"Youssif SN, McMillan DL. Outpatient endometrial biopsy: the pipelle. Br J Hosp Med. 1995;54(5):198\u2013201.","journal-title":"Br J Hosp Med"},{"key":"817_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1967","volume":"26","author":"T Van den Bosch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Ameye L, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D. Ultrasound examination of the endometrium before and after Pipelle endometrial sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:283\u20136. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.1967\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1765","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-F","volume":"89","author":"FPHLJ Dijkhuizen","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dijkhuizen FPHLJ, Mol BWJ, Br\u00f6lmann HAM, Heintz APM. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Cancer. 2000;89:1765\u201372. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1765::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-F\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"817_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2515","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-016-2215-3","volume":"142","author":"J Du","year":"2016","unstructured":"Du J, Li Y, Lv S, Wang Q, Sun C, Dong X, et al. Endometrial sampling devices for early diagnosis of endometrial lesions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2515\u201322. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00432-016-2215-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Cancer Res Clin Oncol"},{"key":"817_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080009784.x","volume":"80","author":"TJ Clark","year":"2001","unstructured":"Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:784\u201393.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"817_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199203000-00007","volume":"35","author":"JT Chambers","year":"1992","unstructured":"Chambers JT, Chambers SK. Endometrial sampling: when? Where? Why? With what? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;35:28\u201339.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"817_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.4103\/0976-7800.109628","volume":"4","author":"P Kotdawala","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kotdawala P, Kotdawala S, Nagar N. Evaluation of endometrium in peri-menopausal abnormal uterine bleeding. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:16\u201321. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0976-7800.109628\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Midlife Health"},{"key":"817_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08179.x","volume":"106","author":"MM Tahir","year":"1999","unstructured":"Tahir MM, Bigrigg MA, Browning JJ, Brookes T, Smith PA. A randomised controlled trial comparing transvaginal ultrasound, outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy with inpatient hysteroscopy and curettage. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:1259\u201364. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08179.x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"817_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.014","volume":"147","author":"SJ Ahonkallio","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ahonkallio SJ, Liakka AK, Martikainen HK, Santala MJ. Feasibility of endometrial assessment after thermal ablation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147:69\u201371. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.014\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["BMC Family Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,29]],"date-time":"2019-07-29T19:05:01Z","timestamp":1564427101000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,30]]},"references-count":87,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["817"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12875-018-0817-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2296"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2296","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 September 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 July 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 July 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Not required.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Publisher\u2019s Note"}}],"article-number":"135"}}