{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T06:24:23Z","timestamp":1791872663193,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]],"date-time":"2022-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]],"date-time":"2022-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Gastroenterol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (EGBS) is considered for patients with contraindications to early surgery for acute calculus cholecystitis. However, evidence regarding the long-term outcomes of EGBS is insufficient to date. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of EGBS as a bridge to or alternative to surgery when there are contraindications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We reviewed the cases of patients who underwent EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent for acute calculus cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2019. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes of EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Forty-nine patients were included. The clinical success rate of EGBS was 97%. After EGBS, 25 patients (surgery group) underwent elective cholecystectomy and 24 patients did not (follow-up group). In the surgery group, the median period from EGBS to surgery was 93\u00a0days. There was a single late adverse event with cholecystitis recurrence. In the follow-up group, the median follow-up period was 236\u00a0days. Late adverse events were observed in eight patients, including recurrence of cholecystitis (four patients), duodenal penetration by the distal stent end (two patients), and distal stent migration (two patient). In the follow-up group, the time to recurrence of biliary obstruction was 527\u00a0days.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>EGBS with a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent is safe and effective for long-term acute calculus cholecystitis. There is a possibility of EGBS to be a bridge to surgery and a surgical alternative for acute calculus cholecystitis in patients with contraindications to early cholecystectomy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]],"date-time":"2022-12-23T07:02:57Z","timestamp":1671778977000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Long-term outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel spiral plastic stent in acute calculus cholecystitis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Junya","family":"Sato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0915-030X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kazunari","family":"Nakahara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yosuke","family":"Michikawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keigo","family":"Suetani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yosuke","family":"Igarashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akihiro","family":"Sekine","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yusuke","family":"Satta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shinjiro","family":"Kobayashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takehito","family":"Otsubo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keisuke","family":"Tateishi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2610_CR1","first-page":"15","volume":"8","author":"M Eskelinen","year":"1993","unstructured":"Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Diagnostic approaches in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg. 1993;8:15\u201320.","journal-title":"Theor Surg"},{"key":"2610_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gouma DJ, Obertop H. Acute calculous cholecystitis. What is new in diagnosis and therapy? HPB Surg 1992;69:69\u201378.","DOI":"10.1155\/1992\/46529"},{"key":"2610_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.4836","volume":"92","author":"M Johansson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:44\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2610_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.504","volume":"25","author":"Y Mori","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mori Y, Itoi T, Baron TH, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:87\u201395.","journal-title":"J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"2610_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2019-319996","volume":"69","author":"AYB Teoh","year":"2020","unstructured":"Teoh AYB, Kitano M, Itoi T, et al. Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomized multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1). Gut. 2020;69:1085\u201391.","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"2610_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1010596","volume":"23","author":"K Tamada","year":"1991","unstructured":"Tamada K, Seki H, Sato K, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholecystoendoprosthesis (ERCCE) for cholecystitis. Endoscopy. 1991;23:2\u20133.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"2610_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(96)70177-3","volume":"44","author":"PJ Gaglil","year":"1996","unstructured":"Gaglil PJ, Buniak B, Leevhy CB. Primary endoscopic retrograde cholecystoendoprosthesis: a nonsurgical modality for symptomatic cholelithiasis in cirrhotic patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:339\u201342.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.2169\/internalmedicine.55.5820","volume":"55","author":"T Hatanaka","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hatanaka T, Itoi T, Ijima M, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis in patients with concomitant unresectable cancer. Intern Med. 2016;55:1411\u20137.","journal-title":"Intern Med"},{"key":"2610_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1007\/s00534-005-1062-4","volume":"13","author":"N Toyota","year":"2006","unstructured":"Toyota N, Takada T, Amano H, et al. Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: alleviates inflammation and fixes operator\u2019s aim during early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:80\u20135.","journal-title":"J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg"},{"key":"2610_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.4253\/wjge.v13.i8.345","volume":"13","author":"DM Jandure","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jandure DM, Puli SR. Efficacy and sagety of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: an updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;13:345\u201355.","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1105","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0747-5668","volume":"7","author":"K Nakahara","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nakahara K, Michikawa Y, Morita R, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting using a newly designed plastic stent for acute cholecystitis. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7:E1105\u201314.","journal-title":"Endosc Int Open"},{"key":"2610_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.515","volume":"25","author":"M Yokoe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:41\u201354.","journal-title":"J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"2610_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1111\/den.13959","volume":"34","author":"K Nakahara","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nakahara K, Sato J, Morita R, et al. Incidence and management of cystic duct perforation during endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Dig Endosc. 2022;34:207\u201314.","journal-title":"Dig Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(91)70740-2","volume":"37","author":"PB Cotton","year":"1991","unstructured":"Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383\u201393.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(04)02445-9","volume":"61","author":"JF Conway","year":"2005","unstructured":"Conway JF, Russo MW, Shrestha R. Endoscopic stent insertion into the gallbladder for symptomatic gallbladder disease in patients with end-stage liver disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:32\u20136.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2006.00403.x","volume":"101","author":"C Schlenker","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schlenker C, Trotter JF, Shah RJ, et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stent placement for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in patients with end-stage liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:278\u201383.","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2610_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1256226","volume":"43","author":"TH Lee","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting for symptomatic gallbladder diseases: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:702\u20138.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"2610_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1214727","volume":"41","author":"M Mutignani","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mutignani M, Lacopini F, Perri V, et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: technical and clinical results. Endoscopy. 2009;41:539\u201346.","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"2610_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2015.08.072","volume":"83","author":"T Inoue","year":"2016","unstructured":"Inoue T, Okumura F, Kachi K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:905\u201313.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-230X-13-65","volume":"13","author":"S Maekawa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Maekawa S, Nomura R, Murase T, et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of 46 elderly patients aged 65 years of older. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:65.","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2610_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0240219","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0240219","volume":"15","author":"TH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim TH, Park DE, Chon HK. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the management of acute calculus cholecystitis patients unfit for urgent cholecystectomy. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240219.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2610_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maruta A, Iwashita T, Iwata K et al. Permanent endoscopic gallbladder stenting versus removal of gallbladder drainage, long-term outcomes after management of acute cholecystitis I high-risk surgical patients for cholecystectomy: multi-center retrospective cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021;00:1\u20139.","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.967"},{"key":"2610_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2019.04.238","volume":"90","author":"JT Higa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Higa JT, Sahar N, Kozarek RA, et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for the treatment of acute cholecystitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:483\u201392.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"2610_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-020-01870-7","volume":"405","author":"D Hayes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hayes D, Lucas G, Discolo A, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary stenting for the management of acute cholecystitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:191\u20138.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"2610_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2015.03.1912","volume":"82","author":"P Kedia","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kedia P, Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage compared with percutaneous drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:1031\u20136.","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"}],"container-title":["BMC Gastroenterology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]],"date-time":"2022-12-23T07:04:00Z","timestamp":1671779040000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2610"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12876-022-02610-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-230X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-230X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 April 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 December 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the St. Marianna University School of Medicine (Approval Number: 4382). This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Data used this study was anonymized before its use.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"539"}}