{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,27]],"date-time":"2026-10-27T06:52:19Z","timestamp":1793083939944,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]],"date-time":"2019-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1563148800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]],"date-time":"2019-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1563148800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009128","name":"Research for Patient Benefit Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1215-20013"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1215-20013"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009128","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]],"date-time":"2019-07-15T12:48:10Z","timestamp":1563194890000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Women\u2019s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Annalise","family":"Weckesser","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicola","family":"Farmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rinita","family":"Dam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amie","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9817-4313","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Victoria Hodgetts","family":"Morton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R. Katie","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"2402_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)60806-6","volume":"385","author":"Thomas G Weiser","year":"2015","unstructured":"Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Fu R, Azad T, Chao TE, Berry WR, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S11.","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"2402_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0148343","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","volume":"11","author":"AP Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990\u20132014. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016;11(2):e0148343. Available from: \n                    http:\/\/dx.plos.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"PLoS One [Internet]"},{"key":"2402_CR3","unstructured":"NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2016\u201317 [Internet]. 2017. p. 28. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/catalogue\/PUB30137\n                    \n                  ."},{"issue":"1","key":"2402_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x","volume":"35","author":"E Declercq","year":"2008","unstructured":"Declercq E, Cunningham DK, Johnson C, Sakala C. Mothers\u2019 reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: results of a national survey. Birth. 2008;35(1):16\u201324.","journal-title":"Birth."},{"issue":"1","key":"2402_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s40748-017-0051-3","volume":"3","author":"T Kawakita","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Heal Neonatol Perinatol [Internet]. 2017;3(1):12. Available from: \n                    http:\/\/mhnpjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40748-017-0051-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Matern Heal Neonatol Perinatol [Internet]"},{"issue":"2","key":"2402_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjid.2014.09.009","volume":"19","author":"T\u00falio C\u00edcero Franco Farret","year":"2015","unstructured":"Farret TCF, Dall\u00e9 J, da Silva Monteiro V, Riche CVW, Antonello VS. Risk factors for surgical site infection following cesarean section in a Brazilian Women\u2019s Hospital: A case-control study. Brazilian J Infect Dis [Internet]. Elsevier Editora Ltda; 2015;19(2):113\u2013117. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjid.2014.09.009","journal-title":"The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases"},{"key":"2402_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S98876","volume":"9","author":"S Zuarez-Easton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Women's Health. 2017;9:81\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Women's Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"2402_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03452.x","volume":"119","author":"C Wloch","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wloch C, Wilson J, Lamagni T, Harrington P, Charlett A, Sheridan E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119(11):1324\u201333.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2402_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1086\/587810","volume":"29","author":"MA Olsen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Devkota P, Gross GA, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2008;29(6):477\u201384 Available from: \n                    https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0195941700048165\/type\/journal_article\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]"},{"issue":"9","key":"2402_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701515225","volume":"86","author":"HK Op\u00f8ien","year":"2007","unstructured":"Op\u00f8ien HK, Valb\u00f8 A, Grinde-Andersen A, Walberg M. Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1097\u2013102.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2402_CR11","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. NICE Guidelines. 2016. Retrieved from: \n                    https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng51\n                    \n                  . Accessed 2 Sept 2018."},{"key":"2402_CR12","unstructured":"Public Health England. Surveillance of surgical site infections in NHS hospitals in England, 2017\/18. Public Health England. 2018."},{"key":"2402_CR13","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antimicrobial Stewardship: systems and processes for effective antimicrobial medicine use. NICE Guidelines. 2015. Retrieved from: \n                    https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng15\n                    \n                  . Accessed 2 Sept 2018."},{"key":"2402_CR14","volume-title":"WHO Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2011","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. 2011."},{"key":"2402_CR15","volume-title":"Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2018","unstructured":"World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.","edition":"2"},{"key":"2402_CR16","unstructured":"World Helath Organization. Antibiotic Resistance: Key Facts. WHO International. \n                    https:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/fact-sheets\/detail\/antibiotic-resistance\n                    \n                  . Accessed 18 June 2019."},{"issue":"84","key":"2402_CR17","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"V Hodgetts Morton","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hodgetts Morton V, Wilson A, Hewitt C, Weckesser A, Farmer N, Lissauer D, et al. Chlorhexidine vaginal preparation versus standard treatment at caesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis-a feasibility study protocol (the PREPS trial). Pilot feasibility Stud [Internet]. 2018;4(84):1\u201310 Available from: \n                    https:\/\/pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40814-018-0273-9%0Ahttp:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/29881638%0Ahttp:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov\/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5985577\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Pilot feasibility Stud [Internet]"},{"issue":"1","key":"2402_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0735-5","volume":"16","author":"SL Kenyon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kenyon SL, Johns N, Duggal S, Hewston R, Gale N. Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: An experience-based co-design study. BMC pregnancy childbirth [internet]. 2016;16(1):1\u201313. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-016-1134-2\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BMC pregnancy childbirth [internet]"},{"issue":"1","key":"2402_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1097\/NMC.0b013e31826aa855","volume":"38","author":"Denise Puia","year":"2013","unstructured":"Puia D. A Meta-Synthesis of Women\u2019s Experiences of Cesarean Birth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013;38(1):41-7. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/NMC.0b013e31826aa855\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"MCN, The American Journal of Maternal\/Child Nursing"},{"issue":"6","key":"2402_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E82","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2012.01398.x","volume":"41","author":"Victor Bl\u00fcml","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bl\u00fcml V, Stammler-Safar M, Reitinger AK, Resch I, Naderer A, Leithner K. A qualitative approach to examine women\u2019s experience of planned cesarean. J Obstet Gynecol neonatal Nurs [internet]. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2012;41(6):E82\u2013E90. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2012.01398.x","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing"},{"issue":"11","key":"2402_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2012.09.001","volume":"29","author":"Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kabakian-Khasholian T. \u201cMy pain was stronger than my happiness\u201d: experiences of caesarean births from Lebanon. Midwifery [internet]. Elsevier; 2013;29(11):1251\u20131256. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2012.09.001","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"2402_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2013.02.039","volume":"85","author":"Kristin P. Tully","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tully KP, Ball HL. Misrecognition of need: Women\u2019s experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery. Soc Sci med [internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;85:103\u2013111. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2013.02.039","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"key":"2402_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kealy MA, Small RE, Liamputtong P. Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women\u2019s accounts in Victoria, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-10-47"},{"issue":"2","key":"2402_CR24","first-page":"150","volume":"37","author":"M Redshaw","year":"2010","unstructured":"Redshaw M, Hockley C. Institutional Processes and Individual Responses\u00a0: Women \u2019 s Experiences of Care in Relation to Cesarean Birth. Psycho. 2010;37(2):150\u201360.","journal-title":"Psycho"},{"issue":"6","key":"2402_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2013.10.014","volume":"30","author":"Kristin P. Tully","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tully KP, Ball HL. Maternal accounts of their breast-feeding intent and early challenges after caesarean childbirth. Midwifery [internet]. Elsevier; 2014;30(6):712\u2013719. Available from: \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2013.10.014","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"2402_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7000.299","volume":"311","author":"J Kitzinger","year":"1995","unstructured":"Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:1\u20138.","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"key":"2402_CR27","unstructured":"Opdenakker R. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qual Sozialforsch. 2006;7(4). \n                    http:\/\/www.qualitative-research.net\/index.php\/fqs\/article\/view\/175\/391\n                    \n                  ."},{"key":"2402_CR28","unstructured":"Bryman A. Social research methods: Oxford University Press; 2008."},{"issue":"2","key":"2402_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1136\/eb-2015-102054","volume":"18","author":"H Noble","year":"2015","unstructured":"Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(2):34\u20135.","journal-title":"Evid Based Nurs"},{"issue":"5","key":"2402_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.12968\/bjom.2006.14.5.21054","volume":"14","author":"J Baxter","year":"2006","unstructured":"Baxter J. Women\u2019s experience of infant feeding following birth by caesarean section. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2006;14(5):290\u20135. Available from: \n                    http:\/\/www.magonlinelibrary.com\/doi\/abs\/10.12968\/bjom.2006.14.5.21054#.V161aFYuaDU.mendeley\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Br J Midwifery [Internet]"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,13]],"date-time":"2020-07-13T23:11:11Z","timestamp":1594681871000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2402"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2402-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 September 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 July 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 July 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"A favourable opinion from the London - City & East Research Ethics Committee was obtained in advance of the study (reference 17\/LO\/0874), alongside relevant management approvals from the Health Research Authority and individual NHS sites. Informed written consent was obtained from all interviewees prior to the interviews, including consent to be audio recorded. Potential participants were informed of the voluntary nature of the study and had at least 24\u2009h to consider taking part.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"245"}}